Seth Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe best would be to have a magic entry in the gradient editor
"FG-BG" and "BG-FG" which would change accordingly, and remove the
selection from the gradient tool.
jtl
Make that the gradient selector rather than the editor, and I'll
Maybe best would be to have a magic entry in the gradient editor
"FG-BG" and "BG-FG" which would change accordingly, and remove the
selection from the gradient tool.
Even better: have a reverse gradient toggle so that all gradients can
be easily reversed...
Before anyone starts to
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 10:04:05PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
[snip]
Come on guys. This idea is not new and the only reason it's not yet
implemented is the feature freeze. Read the list we created last August
at the Chaos Communication Camp...
Perhaps it's time to make the TODO file a
On Saturday, 19 Feb 2000, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
Pending a general way to scale images separately on X and Y axes, what
would be your (collective) suggestions about how to handle an image
with different X and Y resolutions?
This happens so rarely that I would (for the moment) ignore it.
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 22:36:11 + (GMT)
From: Austin Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday, 19 Feb 2000, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
Pending a general way to scale images separately on X and Y axes, what
would be your (collective) suggestions about how
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 03:31:25PM -0500, Zach Beane - MINT wrote:
It's a little confusing to me sometimes to use the gradient tool, thinking
the gradient at the bottom of the toolbar will be used, and finding out that
it's actually using the FG-BG colors (or vice versa). I do know how to
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 10:19:11AM +0800, Ian McKellar wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 03:31:25PM -0500, Zach Beane - MINT wrote:
It's a little confusing to me sometimes to use the gradient tool,
thinking the gradient at the bottom of the toolbar will be used,
and finding out that it's
I loaded the 1.1.17 release the other day and today I did a print job. All
I get is a solid black output. I'm using an Epson Stylus Color 500 and the
printer worked fine in 1.1.15 (I didn't try 1.1.16).
Rob: if you need more info, let me know.
--
Michael J. Hammel |
The Graphics
From: "Michael J. Hammel" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:56:17 -0700 (MST)
I loaded the 1.1.17 release the other day and today I did a print job. All
I get is a solid black output. I'm using an Epson Stylus Color 500 and the
printer worked fine in 1.1.15 (I didn't
From: "Michael J. Hammel" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:56:17 -0700 (MST)
I loaded the 1.1.17 release the other day and today I did a print job. All
I get is a solid black output. I'm using an Epson Stylus Color 500 and the
printer worked fine in 1.1.15 (I didn't
From: "Michael J. Hammel" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:56:17 -0700 (MST)
I loaded the 1.1.17 release the other day and today I did a print job. All
I get is a solid black output. I'm using an Epson Stylus Color 500 and the
printer worked fine in 1.1.15 (I didn't
11 matches
Mail list logo
