I'm quite upset.
I've been an Open Source proponent for a long time now, and have been
trying to get people in my company on board with using GIMP and Inkscape,
as they are wonderful free programs that we can have on as many computers
as we like, and share and edit information.
The problem is,
Yes, you can. If you go to Help menu in GIMP (2.8), and click on About,
then Click the Licence it says you can use GIMP however you like under
the terms of the GNU GPL ver 3 or later.
Documentation is here, for your legal staff:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/#GPL
For a logo, however, I recommend
Some off list concern was raised about the GPL being primarily applied to
restrictions for selling and redistributing the GIMP software, however, the
GPL v3 does speak about program output as well:
*2. Basic Permissions.*
All rights granted under this License are granted for the term of
for some years. I do not
claim to be an authority on the matter. Certainly, if anyone wants proper
legal advise, lawyers would be best.
-C
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Michael Henning dra...@darkrefraction.com
wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 11:06 AM, C R caj...@gmail.com wrote:
Some off list
HI. Can you specify which link on the download you downloaded from? I'll
check it out too.
Thanks!
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Jernej Simončič jer...@ena.si wrote:
On Friday, June 27, 2014, 18:30:44, Lars Frank wrote:
When I tried to download GIMP for Windows from the download page,
While we're at it, can we set the default for guides to 0? It's another
thing that persistently gets in the way of viewing the transform, every
time, without fail.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Joseph Bupe joseph.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
Could we have an option to hide the original image
on the screen as you are typing them? This would make it
somewhat easier to record workflows without having to manually overlay each
keystroke in the final video.
Thanks again.
-C
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Elle Stone ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com
wrote:
On 03/30/2015 12:14 PM, C R wrote:
Elle
structured way than popping onto the list with the export dialog
needs to be improved (that was my latest complaint) or adding a new layer
is cumbersome (which it really is unless you know about click-shift and
dragging colors).
On 03/29/2015 04:35 PM, C R wrote:
Hi Elle. I may be one
Hi Elle. I may be one of the people you are looking for, Re: professional
Photoshop user who now does everything in GIMP. I'm at your service. Please
let me know how I can best help.
As an example, I have done luxury branding with GIMP and Inkscape that was
very well received at the CeBit
Removing the dialogue, or moving it to shift-click would be fine, except
for the fact that it will effectively hide the dialogue from new users.
What about just keeping the dialogue the same (when you click the new layer
button), and having the hot-key auto-repeat the last chosen layer settings
Once you have selected what kind of new layer you want, simply hitting the
return (enter) afterward will give you a layer of the kind you choose last.
As someone who uses GIMP for product photography, I often want a new white
layer rather than a transparent one. My 2p.
On 23 Mar 2015 17:18, Joseph
We should call it GNUIMP (pronounced New-Imp).
GIMP is just crushing recursive acronyms together ;)
Seriously though, the fact that it's not commercial software is likely to
be more of an issue than the name.
Google is about the worst name I can think of for anything adults would
use, yet it's
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
It's your lucky day: next LGM is in London.
Alex
30 апр. 2015 г. 16:07 пользователь C R caj...@gmail.com написал:
I'd give just about anything to be able to afford the trip to Toronto at
the moment. I may be able to do so next year. It's a long way for me
.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Liam R. E. Quin l...@holoweb.net wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 23:13 +0100, C R wrote:
To put it into perspective, do a Google Image search for gimp, and
see the ratio of GIMP project images to fetishy Pulp Fiction swag.
The more common meaning of the word
I'm just arguing against adding checkboxes arbitrarily just in case the
user wants to do anything. That's bad UI design.
I'm trying to discuss the costs and benefits of adding that complexity.
Isn't this achievable with different tools and methods? Is it needed so
frequently that is
Offering another perspective on this topic, I don't personally care at all
about switching back and forth for specific operations if the results are
generally pleasing. Most people learn GIMP, PhotoShop, etc. by using the
tools and seeing what they do, then using those operations to fit their
Come to think of it, I'd like to see more GIMP teeshirts. Is there
somewhere where we can submit designs for them, where profits go to the
project?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:03 PM, C R caj...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm an American (US citizen even), and the name GIMP is just fine. For
the record, I
I'm an American (US citizen even), and the name GIMP is just fine. For
the record, I have no issues wearing a GIMP teeshirt.
Be thankful that the name was changed in 1995 from The GIMP to just
GIMP, following the realisation that the movie Pulp Fiction would
forever taint the name in the minds of
:07 PM, C R caj...@gmail.com wrote:
Come to think of it, I'd like to see more GIMP teeshirts. Is there
somewhere where we can submit designs for them, where profits go to the
project?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:03 PM, C R caj...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm an American (US citizen even
different, but... lol
Well, I've been an ass, been diplomatic... now I'm thinking of being lazy.
Anyone wants graphics, let me know. I'm glad to help.
-C
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05/07/2015 10:25 AM, C R wrote:
Is the torrent listed
schum...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05/07/2015 09:39 PM, C R wrote:
Yes, and to also force Bittorrent knowledge upon users.
If I were a new user, I'd Google torrent and immediately get links for
Pirate Bay and other dodgy stuff... nothing having to do with GIMP.
Exactly.
The torrent files
Yes, that's what I mean by table layout. Probably something more
minimalistic than that page, with
clear separation between each entry. It's a bit of a mess with no
separation between different links on the same line.
The Firefox graphics people really like to spank your eyeballs with
transparent
First try:
http://opendesignstudio.org/gimp/samples/gimp_windows_download_buttons.png
I think it's a worthy thing to give users the option to torrent the files.
If we are going to properly do that, let's make sure they don't have to go
searching across the web for what they need, and be up-front
If downloading the proper installation file for your system is tiring your
mind, it is probably not the kind of mind that can handle learning GIMP.
Maybe hire a designer instead?
PS- Better get used to geeks, we make everything your sleepy brain loves in
life.
On 5 May 2015 14:12, Farkas Flórián
It's just... the entitlement, man, the entitlement. Lol. My apologies for
the wrong reply. I will attempt more diplomacy in the future.
On Tue, 5 May 2015 17:23 Alexandre Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:19 PM, C R wrote:
If downloading the proper
First try:
http://opendesignstudio.org/gimp/samples/gimp_windows_download_buttons.png
Not really what I had in mind when you mentioned you planes, rather some
small table that takes the place of the current download links, and a
short, one paragraph explanation below each of them.
I
I'd be ok with having two links labeled Download GIMP 2.8.14 via HTTP
and Download GIMP 2.8.14 via Bittorrent right above each other, in any
order. This should also help to reduce the explanation for Bittorrent to
one short paragraph
To make this a bit more obvious, I'm imagining something
-to-peer file sharing system which saves the GIMP
project
hosting fees associated with high download demand for GIMP.
BitTorrent works by downloading GIMP from a distributed network of
BitTorrent users called seeders. Learn more...
On 14 May 2015 07:35, C R caj...@gmail.com wrote:
The rounded
The rounded corners and drop shadows can be done with css. Recommended
changes to the text?
On 14 May 2015 00:10, Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05/08/2015 11:04 PM, C R wrote:
I'd be ok with having two links labeled Download GIMP 2.8.14 via HTTP
and Download GIMP 2.8.14 via
to be more useful
for the average user, I'm willing to change my workflow, however. I can
probably hotkey a fill-white action if I really need to.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Gez lis...@ohweb.com.ar wrote:
El vie, 03-04-2015 a las 20:36 +0100, C R escribió:
Not to be a pain, but if you
it, and accept that every layer has an
alpha channel as well.
Thoughts?
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:46 PM, C R caj...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, every time I want to mask out the current selection (sometimes
I make 3 or 4 in a row for stacked layer mode edits). This is probably
considered far beyond
wrote:
On 04/03/2015 03:36 PM, C R wrote:
Not to be a pain, but if you have a selection already (that you want to
keep), clicking and dragging a colour fills the selection, which is not
the same as making a new layer with foreground/background, or white. If
I'm outvoted on the issue though, I
Branding guidelines are as much about what NOT to do as it is what to do.
Notice that official project usage and regular public usage are different
sections of the design document for Libre Office. It's beneficial to
separate projects associated with GIMP development from other sub-sections
that
is a fair use (as long as they don't
depict anything objectionable or illegal, I think). Linking back to the
official site gimp.org is a good thing too, you're sending your users
to the place where the actual project lives and where its official docs
can be found.
As C R just said, I'm
Although permission is not needed, I'd love to hear more about the project
and how GIMP will be used in it. I'm always interested in seeing what
companies use GIMP for.
-C
On 21 Jun 2015 9:44 pm, Gez lis...@ohweb.com.ar wrote:
El dom, 21-06-2015 a las 14:08 -0500, Apollo D. Sharpe, Sr.
application screenshots is a fair use (as long as they don't
depict anything objectionable or illegal, I think). Linking back to the
official site gimp.org is a good thing too, you're sending your users
to the place where the actual project lives and where its official docs
can be found.
As C R
-pullins/6a/2b3/366
https://twitter.com/android272 http://android272.deviantart.com/
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:15 PM, C R caj...@gmail.com wrote:
Branding guidelines are as much about what NOT to do as it is what to do.
Notice that official project usage and regular public usage are different
Hey everyone. Interest in using the GIMP logo to advertise the project has
been expressed by several companies, it has been proposed that we make
branding guidelines and/or press kit materials for GIMP. This could include
(but is not limited to):
1. A branding document (ex:
://plus.google.com/u/0/113439282950133616549/posts
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-pullins/6a/2b3/366
https://twitter.com/android272 http://android272.deviantart.com/
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:23 PM, C R caj...@gmail.com wrote:
All the more reason to offer a press kit of materials
Nevermind. Got some really interesting conversation already. There's even
links to GIMP furry porn. Lol.
On 26 Jun 2015 3:15 pm, C R caj...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it useful to talk about GIMP branding in this way? Are there interested
parties on #GIMP? Or would my time be better spent just coming
, 2015 at 2:38 PM, C R wrote:
Okay, so I posted a summary of the gimp brand stuff to the gimp irc
channel
#GIMP. Am I to assume someone will eventually see it? I mean, is it
logged
or something?
Not logged.
Not publicly logged, but logged.
And for real meetings with action items
01:04 +0100, C R escribió:
Thanks for the comments. For reference, the font styling is the same
that is already deployed throughout the site, the rounded corners
mimic the download button on the front page with the added requirement
that our not contain bitmap graphics, and the color scheme
Assuming this question is about if the GIMP software can be used to produce
commercial content:
The answer to that is also yes.
GIMP is made available to everyone, for commercial or private use to
produce graphics for commercial or private use.
To clarify:
1.The graphics you make with GIMP are
schum...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05/31/2015 06:40 PM, C R wrote:
Michael, could you please elaborate on how the layout breaks, what
browser
you are using, etc? It will help me come up with better solutions.
The code validates under HTML5, so I'm unclear as to waht might be
causing
the problems
, May 31, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Alan Pater alan.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Are people going to read the fine print or just pick their favourite
colour? Perhaps the second option might read GIMP Torrent.
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:43 AM, C R caj...@gmail.com wrote:
I have developed the html
most of our installation complaints for the
time being.
-C
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05/31/2015 06:49 PM, C R wrote:
Sure, go for it. Let me know if you want/need anything else from me.
Odd that it breaks. I can't get it to break on any
than orange. ;D
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Alan Pater alan.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Are people going to read the fine print or just pick their favourite
colour? Perhaps the second option might read GIMP Torrent.
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:43 AM, C R caj...@gmail.com wrote:
I have developed
No problem. Glad to help.
-C
On 1 Jun 2015 00:40, Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.de wrote:
On 06/01/2015 01:14 AM, Gez wrote:
El dom, 31-05-2015 a las 17:14 +0100, C R escribió:
It does say via BitTorrent on the teal link.
There's a good case to be made for just listing the torrent
about the code.
-C
On 1 Jun 2015 00:16, Gez lis...@ohweb.com.ar wrote:
El dom, 31-05-2015 a las 17:14 +0100, C R escribió:
It does say via BitTorrent on the teal link.
There's a good case to be made for just listing the torrent file as a
smaller text-link after the orange download button
...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05/31/2015 06:25 PM, C R wrote:
Here are a few changes, based on new suggestions:
http://opendesignstudio.org/gimp/samples/index2.html
Windows capitalised (oops), and I've added (.exe) and (.torrent)
to the link titles. This is for those that have a hard time reading fine
I've replaced Windows executable with Windows installer in the
description.
I've opted to keep the .exe extension however since it describes what the
user can expect to be downloading when they click the download button.
http://opendesignstudio.org/gimp/samples/index4.html
On Sun, May 31, 2015
them to
the git repository values, which are replaced with the urls on the backend.
Comments?
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05/14/2015 08:47 AM, C R wrote:
Hi,
To save retyping, here is the current text:
we do not really have to worry
This makes it all the more important to update the Windows download page on
GIMP.org to provide easy download. I will submit patches this week based on
our previous discussions, now that I have all the text (thanks Michael). I
think providing easy access through our GIMP.org site will hasten SF to
of asking people in the chat room is... At this point no one has expressed
any interest.
On 25 Jun 2015 10:26 pm, Tobias Ellinghaus h...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 25. Juni 2015, 15:10:55 schrieb C R:
[...]
to promote the GIMP.
Just saying
an additional important thing: the ability to give back.
This is also priceless, imho.
On 31 Jul 2015 5:34 am, Gez lis...@ohweb.com.ar wrote:
El jue, 30-07-2015 a las 11:52 +0100, C R escribió:
It seems to me, the real problem is not that it doesn't have the same
UI as
Photoshop, but rather
If we are assuming de-throne means to replace as what people think of as
a photo editor, then it's more a matter of marketing than anything related
to feature parity. Most people wouldn't know what features were missing
in GIMP to compare in the first place. Most of the companies I work with
are
There is no license to use the software. The only license for the GIMP
pertains to the code it's self (altering it, etc). You are free to install
and use the GIMP on as many machines as you want, free of charge, for any
purpose you like. Please keep in mind that there is no warranty.
You retain
I'd love to see myPaint brushes come to GIMP. :) good luck!
On 4 Oct 2015 1:55 pm, "Thorsten Stettin"
wrote:
> Am 03.10.2015 um 11:49 schrieb Michael Natterer:
>
>> On Sat, 2015-10-03 at 00:47 +0200, Thorsten Stettin wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm just integrate my
That's awesome Jabier, great work!
On 2 Oct 2015 4:39 pm, "Jabier Arraiza" wrote:
> Hi to all.
>
> I just update the plugin export from Gimp to SVG to allow the export
> text as text. It become in a new class called "pango to SVG" on the
> branch.
>
> Here are the code:
the other advantages of the software in
terms of modifying it, etc. Even this is mentioned in the intro, so it's
not as if it's left out. :)
-C
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Nikola M <minik...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/18/15 08:38 PM, C R wrote:
>
>> what they want
I have also changed the spelling of licence to license since that's how it
is all over the gnu website. lol Guess the Americans win this round. ;)
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:40 PM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I included a reminder about the warranty it because it's included in b
I included a reminder about the warranty it because it's included in big
bold letters in the about information for GIMP. I have no basis for judging
whether that's necessary or not, other than someone thought it was worth
shouting digitally about. :)
-C
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Gez
Does not contradict. It however, does not mention the four freedoms
verbatim however (neither did the previous text that was there).
Maybe it should?
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Michael Schumacher <schum...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 09/18/2015 04:33 PM, C R wrote:
> &
P software users in regards to the questions we keep
getting regarding licensing, and usage of GIMP for professional
purposes/companies.
Changes welcome as always.
-C
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:49 PM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does not contradict. It however, does not mentio
com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, C R wrote:
> > Feel free to use my description on the website.
>
> Where would you like it to show up? Just in case, we already have a
> new FAQ on the new website, and it answers this question in la
Feel free to use my description on the website. I can submit a patch for it
also if that's desirable.
On 18 Sep 2015 2:04 pm, "Alexandre Prokoudine" <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Nikolam wrote:
> > Yes, Oracle Solaris and RedHat are examples where
It seems that it's assigned "C" in the combination alt-i-c, which used to
be "crop to selection". Trips me up every time now.
I recommend assigning it a different value than "c", since most people I
think would probably use cropping much more often than the color management
dialogue.
My 2p.
-C
ill gather a list of clashing accelerators and post it here
(or wherever is best).
-C
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:10 PM, C R wrote:
> > Alt-I-C crop to selection in stock doesn't work
That's fine. It's not crippling, just annoying. I'll probably assign a
hotkey to it for my own purposes for now.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:24 PM, C R wrote:
> > Thanks. :) And yes,
Alt-I-C crop to selection in stock doesn't work? Because I've been using it
for years. It would be astounding if I'd been using it wrong all this time.
;)
-C
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:5
In 2.8 it was possible to hide the layer you are transforming (with
perspective tool) to get the original out of the way during transform.
In 2.9 you can still hide the layer after transform has begun, but the
transform will fail unless the layer is unhidden before applying the
transform (it
Thanks Elle. I may try again next weekend. In the mean time I can look
forward to using all the new features and improvements. Thanks for the
response!
On 29 Nov 2015 6:39 pm, "Elle Stone" <ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com> wrote:
> On 11/29/2015 12:41 PM, C R wrote:
>
>&
Sorry, that should be "cage transform" tool. That's the one that freezes
when the you draw the complete cage.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 2:58 PM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Been using 2.9.3 in production all week. Let me first say that I am truly
> astounded at the plet
Been using 2.9.3 in production all week. Let me first say that I am truly
astounded at the plethora of extra features that have been added, many many
of which will become staples in my workflow from now on. Everyone deserves
high praise for this release, it's been rock solid so far.
It seems the
to the original, so I definitely agree with Gez on that.
-C
-C
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Gez <lis...@ohweb.com.ar> wrote:
> El mar, 08-12-2015 a las 17:28 +, C R escribió:
> > In 2.8 it was possible to hide the layer you are transforming (with
> > perspective
Thanks Alex!
-C
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:24 PM, C R wrote:
> > Thanks. :) And yes, please. :) Also, a strange behaviour:
> > GIMP seems to remember which accelerator you used
>
>
>> You can currently kinda get around this by setting the "Image opacity"
>> in the Tool options palate for unified transform tool to less than 100%.
>> Unfortunately, unless you also change the "Opacity" field in the layer
>> palate, the untransformed layer B is still in the way.
>>
>
>
>
> Is this what you mean by "original layer"? If a layer stack has two
> layers, A and B, with B as the upper layer, and if a transform/rotate/etc
> tool is used on B, the "original layer" is layer B *before* the tranform,
> and the transformed layer is what B would look like if the transform
I'm working on some proposals for talks this weekend. These are things I
can talk about as a graphic designer who works with opensource software as
a primary toolset. GIMP will be featured in several of these talks, but I
also desire to help the GIMP Project with any materials and ideas for
talks.
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your offer!
>
> On 6.1.2016 at 8:13 PM C R wrote:
>
> What I need: A list of your favourite new features in GIMP (developed in
>> the last year, or that will be finished and/or working by the date of LGM
>> in April).
>>
>
>
Looks cool.
Although I like the idea of being able to modifier-click on the layers, I
worry that when layers become multi-selectable in GIMP, the ctrl-key may be
better used to toggle-select individual layers (shift being used to select
a sub-section of layers). This is the convention used in most
Okay, so there was not enough interest in doing the interview montage, so
I'm back-burnering that one. :)
So instead, let's show them what's new in GIMP!
I am doing a brief video commercial for the GIMP project with updates from
the last year. So what are you favourite GIMP features/progress.
Thanks to the development team and everyone who has contributed to this
monumental step! I use GIMP every day and have processed over one hundred
thousand images with it already. So thanks so much for this tremendous
gift, I can't wait to test the new features!
One question, can someone put
I could not successfully get gegl to build from source. I spent ages trying.
Luckily someone updated the edge ppa and it now installs fine:
http://www.webupd8.org/2013/10/gimp-29-210-development-builds.html
I then had to run:
sudo apt-get build-dep gegl
then
sudo apt-get install gegl
and now
bounty is desired for the work! (Best coffee in London, anyone?)
-C
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 7:17 AM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After having used this feature for a few weeks now in production work, I
> find it saves a lot of clicks/time, and I'm happy to have it applie
It's definitely faster, and more convenient. I also like the fact that
ctrl+shift+clicking a masked layer removes the mask.
It makes a pain-free toggle, I can see myself using it a lot.
The only thing I would add is that if there is a selection on the canvas,
that the mask be made from that
Who is Mitch?
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Joseph Bupe <joseph.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10 June 2016 at 18:06, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> [image: Boxbe] <https://www.boxbe.com/overview> This message is eligible
>> for Automatic Clean
I have poked. I hope he likes coffee. lol
-C
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:08 PM, C R <caj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, Michael Natterer is aka "mitch". Sure I'll poke him.
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Joseph Bupe <joseph.b...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
Not yet, waiting for reply. :)
-C
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Joseph Bupe wrote:
>
> Some progress then! Cool.
>
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership:
<draekko.softw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 18:36:36 +0100
>> From: C R
>>
>>
>> It's definitely faster, and more convenient. I also like the fact that
>> ctrl+shift+clicking a masked layer removes the mask.
>> It mak
Hi Elle. :) Thanks for your input...
> I think Americo's suggestion (original topic of thread) was that the
> Hardness slider be removed from the list of options for the Pencil, simply
> because this slider doesn't seem to affect the actual paint applied using
> the Pencil.
>
Yes. I think we
. When I talk about things we are discussing related to GIMP, I
use "we" with the qualifier "can" because we can do it, if we decide we
want to. I'm not saying "we will", notice. Is that what you think? That I'm
trying to represent everyone, and make decisions for them? I
> C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > A pixel brush seems like an adequate replacement for that functionality.
>
> Again, no.
>
> Try working with a pixel brush in a bigger magnification and check how
> the pixel-grid-snapping of the pencil tool makes a huge differ
> Have you actually tried to do what I outlined above?
>
>
Have you? lol
No - I haven't. It's not currently possible to turn off anti-aliasing on
the brush tool, so it's not possible to "test" it.
However, knowing how anti-aliasing works, your statement is incorrect...
The paintbrush tool
>
>
> Ah, sorry. I missed that we're discussing hypothetical future
> characteristics of the tools here. I was just looking at the current
> difference between the pencil and the paintbrush tool.
>
Yes, it saves time if everyone reads the entire thread before commenting.
I'm guilty of this too
things to decide. I still recommend adding
the no anti-aliasing option to the brush though, to use to test agains
these other methods.
-C
>
>
> -Petteri
>
>
> On 22.6.2016 13:40, Simon Budig wrote:
>
>> C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Hav
Ah, I think I see.
The presets could be stored as they are now, and the tool simply switched
with the checkmark.
We could also think about storing presets via brush instead of via tool.
That would be much more useful, imho.
-C
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:44 PM, C R <caj...@gmail.com>
>
> > I still recommend adding the no anti-aliasing option to the brush though
>
> That would involve somehow making GIMP to switch presets when swapping
> Wacom pens, for starters. As Liam pointed out before.
>
Why would pen presets be affected?
Also, we could just have the checkbox switch to
I did, I just misunderstood. :) I also replied about it too with a
possibly better solution to brush presets problems.
-C
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, C R wrote:
> >> &
>
> You know, I actually reread, and I find the thread highly confusing.
>
I'll try to help explain, if it's not going to upset you...
> It starts with the hardness-parameter in the pencil tool, then goes on
> to how paintbrush is so similiar to the pencil tool, how the pencil tool
> can get
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo