Hi John.
John Tapsell via gimp-developer-list (gimp-developer-list@gnome.org) wrote:
> I love the path effects, and there's a particularly useful path effect that
> I use all the time:
>
> Corners (Fillet/Chamfer)
Are you sure you're reaching out to the right mailing list? I am unaware
of
Hi Massimo.
Massimo Fidanza via gimp-developer-list (gimp-developer-list@gnome.org) wrote:
> in the source archive there are 51 .scm scripts and 11 .py Scheme scripts
> has a complex syntax and I do not know how much it is used today. What are
> the advantages of Scheme compared to Python? Would
Hi Estefania.
Hernandez, Estefania [USA] via gimp-developer-list
(gimp-developer-list@gnome.org) wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> I recently scanned GIMP and noticed that GIMP uses TCP 2177.
>
> I was wondering if I could get information on TCP 2177, such as, what is the
> purpose of TCP 2177?
I
Hi all.
Please see my previous mail for more context of this problem.
So here we go about the handling of colors in indexed images:
In the current toolchain for the carpets the images are indexed, i.e.
instead of RGB data per pixel each pixel stores an index into a color
palette.
At the
Hi all.
Please see my previous mail for more context of this problem.
Working with indexed images:
I witnessed one very funky way of working with indexed images and I am
not sure if I have fully wrapped my head around the ways they use some
features of the proprietary tool they're using now.
Hi all.
Please see my previous mail for more context of this problem.
Integration into a Document Management System
It will be necessary to incorporate GIMP into a site specific Document
Management System. I kind of suspect that this will end up being either
a separate plugin to access the
Hi all.
Please see my previous mail for more context of this problem.
In the textile industry working with patterns is hugely important:
One quite important aspect of designing carpets is dealing with
patterns. The kind of projects we're talking about here is of the scale
"print carpet for a
Hi all.
Please see my previous mail for more context of this problem.
We also discussed some changes to the UI:
The company representative I was talking to was also concerned about the
amount of functionality in the GIMPs UI and fears that it might be
overwhelming to the operators, plus that it
James Houx via gimp-developer-list (gimp-developer-list@gnome.org) wrote:
> How difficult would it be to modify the pencil tool to support transparency?
the regular paintbrush and the pencil tool are both using the
gimppaintcore for painting the brushes. The difference between pencil
and
Hi Ahmad.
Ahmad Nouralizadeh via gimp-developer-list (gimp-developer-list@gnome.org)
wrote:
> I wonder why GIMP spawns a separate process for each plugin (e.g., by
> calling g_spawn_async() @app/plug-in/gimpplugin.c:368). For example, I
> opened an image and the contents of the image was loaded
Hi Ivan.
Edgar Iván López via gimp-developer-list (gimp-developer-list@gnome.org) wrote:
> We do not sell ads or things related, the only thing we would use your
> software for is in-company communication of events photos, meetings,
> posters and so on.
You're welcome to use GIMP for all the
Ryan Stark via gimp-developer-list (gimp-developer-list@gnome.org) wrote:
> Ardour is poor and there were lots of DAWs being developed on Linux
> (probably still are but I don't look into it any more). Paul at Ardour is
> arrogant. It doesn't matter if he is funded.
Since on these issues you
Hi Ryan.
Your collection of pet peeves is impressive. Yet I believe that your
generalization that they must affect everybody is blown way out of
proportion.
Ryan Stark via gimp-developer-list (gimp-developer-list@gnome.org) wrote:
> So many of Gimp's features seem unfinished. For example, look
Hi Marco.
Marco Ciampa via gimp-developer-list (gimp-developer-list@gnome.org) wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 11:37:12AM +0200, Simon Budig wrote:
> > Marco Ciampa via gimp-developer-list (gimp-developer-list@gnome.org) wrote:
> > > The menu layer should named laye
Marco Ciampa via gimp-developer-list (gimp-developer-list@gnome.org) wrote:
> The menu layer should named layers for consistency with the other
> menus like colors, tools, filters.
Would you suggest to change "Image" to "Images" as well?
Both feels wrong to me, since the "Layer" menu mostly
Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote:
> On 05/21/2018 11:13 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote:
> > Just to be clear, the toolkit update here is not*just* a necessary evil.
> > It will also be totally awesome, even feature-wise!
>
>
>
> > Simply to get there, we have to pass through an
Hi Samuel.
Samuel Rats (samuel.r...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I noticed a TODO in the code of the rectangle selection tool, about
> changing the internal representation of the selection zone from gdouble
> ((x1, y1), (x2, y2)) to gint (x1, y1) + width & height.
> So, that's basically what I did. Since
Dov Grobgeld (dov.grobg...@gmail.com) wrote:
> My guess is that this happens is that the original ellipse is first reduced
> from a contour to a bitmap "selection", and then the edges of this bitmap
> is somehow traced.
>
> On the other hand the result may be improved by instead of stroking the
>
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com (alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Wed like to know opinions of all developers and contributors of GIMP,
> but not everyone is on IRC. Please vote :)
I voted "I don't care".
Bye,
Simon
--
si...@budig.de
Jehan Pagès (jehan.marmott...@gmail.com) wrote:
> What's up with the IRC channel?
We had a mass join/spam event happening. :-(
The restrictions will be lifted hopefully soon. send a private message
to someone of the regulars to get invited into the channel.
> I just come back from shopping,
Hi Miguel.
Entertainment Mobile wrote:
> My understanding is that GIMP trademark and logo is free to use
> according to GPL. However Google Team says that I must have the GIMP
> team permission in order to use the word "GIMP" in the app name. Do
> you know how we could obtain the GIMP team
John Tapsell (johnf...@gmail.com) wrote:
> So to restate this again - I want to know how to change the top layer
> $latex src$ so that I can have the maximum possible alpha without changing
> the final visual image at all. I.e. remove as much of the background as
> possible from our
Riley Tallman (rptall...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I would like to design t-shirts with the Wilber logo and commercially sell
> those shirts online. I have not made the designs yet because I wanted to
> make sure that I have the right permission and legal ability to do so.
>
> The design will have
Thorsten Stettin (thorsten.stet...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Why do you need libpng >= 1.6.25, and lcms2 >= 2.7 in order to build Gimp
> 2.9.5 - commit 36ebe03770fd8b87102e95cd6c45b194a45a8ba3?
Libpng is due to security issues:
commit a5073ad9289f7e05ef38d2ce99dc71e91983b434
Author: Michael Natterer
C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Uh. In what way isn't that the case currently?
>
> Try Alt-C, s for hue/saturation
> Then try it again after you complete the hue saturation action
> On the second run alt-C, s skips to Colourise
Oh, indeed. That feels stupid.
Bye,
Simon
--
C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I should be able to hit a sequence of hotkeys to get to sub menu items, and
> doing it again should get me to the same function each and every time I
> perform them.
Uh. In what way isn't that the case currently?
GTK+ cycles through all the "conflicting"
C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Yes, it saves time if everyone reads the entire thread before commenting.
> I'm guilty of this too sometimes, though, so don't worry about it. :)
You know, I actually reread, and I find the thread highly confusing.
It starts with the hardness-parameter in the
C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Have you actually tried to do what I outlined above?
> >
> >
> Have you? lol
> No - I haven't. It's not currently possible to turn off anti-aliasing on
> the brush tool, so it's not possible to "test" it.
Ah, sorry. I missed that we're discussing hypothetical
C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > C R (caj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > A pixel brush seems like an adequate replacement for that functionality.
> >
> > Again, no.
> >
> > Try working with a pixel brush in a bigger magnification and check how
> > the pixel-grid-snapping of the pencil tool makes a
Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote:
> "Error while parsing '/home/elle/code/gimpdefault/install/config/devicerc'
> in line 7: unexpected character '-', expected number (float) - fatal parse
> error"
Yay, now the implicit assumptions crop up :)
Thanks for spotting this.
> 2.
Hi Gez.
Gez (lis...@ohweb.com.ar) wrote:
> Although I share your shock, I think Michael is right. Almost nobody
> using GIMP understands color management, because there is virtually
> nobody using GIMP seriously, and probably nobody will because of this
> kind of design decisions.
[...]
> Instead
Michael Natterer (mi...@gimp.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 15:43 -0400, Elle Stone wrote:
> > On 04/28/2016 03:40 PM, Elle Stone wrote:
> > >
> > > Delete the following text from pluginrc after you uninstall
> > > darktable,
> > > and you can use a different raw plug-in:
> > Is there an
Hi all.
The Libre Graphics Meeting 2016 is rapidly approaching and we need to
get our act together to rent the usual gimp-appartment.
If you are a london resident and if you happen to know of an appartment
where 8-12 people could reside in the weeks surrounding 15-18 I'd love
to hear from you.
MassimoIT (massimo.bertine...@tiscali.it) wrote:
> I'm a windows user, so I've tried the 2.9 available at darkrefraction.com.
> I'm very enthusiastic about the deep color precision introduced with the 2.9
> release, but I didn't find out the way to display 30 bit color.
> Having introduced openGL,
Joao S. O. Bueno (gwid...@gmail.com) wrote:
> While it is is feasible to have Python3 as the system default install,
> it is not practical to remove Python2 from the system. Even if it is
> not installed by default (which I doubt very much) it will be
> reachable via the default packaging system
Ofnuts (ofn...@gmx.com) wrote:
> On 26/11/15 11:53, Simon Budig wrote:
> >It would make sense to switch to python 3 in sync with the
> >(plugin-breaking) switch to gtk3 with the 3.0 release.
>
> Why would gtk3 break python plug-ins? I don't see that many that come with
&g
Liam R E Quin (l...@holoweb.net) wrote:
> The difficulties of using Debian Testing are likely to outweigh any
> benefits, plus anyone working closely with git gimp is likely to want
> to test fixes to babl and/or gegl as they happen.
gimp from git specifically depends on gegl/babl from git.
Bye,
Hello, Mr. Gong.
Alexandre Prokoudine (alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com) wrote:
If you don't have either time or interest, I do hope that someone will
get involved and make a GEGL port of your filters. I'm sure that will
benefit a lot of users.
Also it would be necessary for someone else to
Hi all.
This year there will be a Chaos Communication Camp again. In August this
epic event will shake the world and you'll look at videos, regretting
that you haven't been there.
OR you could attend and celebrate hacker culture:
Gez (lis...@ohweb.com.ar) wrote:
[...] optional patch
that provides and easy way to remove the name GIMP from the UI,
replacing it for a different one?
Now, seriously. What do devs think about this idea? If somebody provided
a good patch for building GIMP easily with a different name as an
Hi Sam.
Sam Bagot (dsm...@gmail.com) wrote:
Is there any thought on salvaging the marketing effort and renaming this
product so that it can be taken seriously by people and institutions?
Also, a big barrier to entry adopting Linux for people is a solid
graphic manipulator. The bad branding
Kevin Payne (payn...@hotmail.com) wrote:
Isn't it about time there was an interim release? - a line in the
sand if you will.
I think we will discuss this live at the libre graphics meeting at the
end of april/beginning of may.
Bye,
Simon
--
si...@budig.de
Gez (lis...@ohweb.com.ar) wrote:
El vie, 27-03-2015 a las 09:16 -0400, Elle Stone escribió:
On 03/26/2015 08:16 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
It was also not so obvious to some more advanced users :) let's face it,
in a software with the breadth of Gimp, everyone is going to overlook
some feature.
Alexandre Prokoudine (alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Simon Budig wrote:
Does this GEGL op do anything for you at all? Because it does
absolutely nothing for me (duly noted in
http://wiki.gimp.org/wiki/Hacking:Porting_filters_to_GEGL/UI_review
Alexandre Prokoudine (alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com) wrote:
[drop shadow]
Does this GEGL op do anything for you at all? Because it does
absolutely nothing for me (duly noted in
http://wiki.gimp.org/wiki/Hacking:Porting_filters_to_GEGL/UI_review),
seperate layer or no separate layer.
Is the
Hi Elle.
Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote:
Whether to *ever* use unbounded sRGB chromaticities to perform edits on
UserRGB data is NOT AN IMPLEMENTATION DETAIL.
Unbounded sRGB is a mistake, pure and simple, *unless* the data is intended
by the USER to be HDR sRGB data.
It
Since a few questions have popped up on IRC and it really is a weird
concept to grasp I thought I'd expand a bit on the color math that is
being discussed here. Sorry it is so long, I hope it is somewhat
entertaining though :)
Simon Budig (si...@budig.de) wrote:
I think you are missing
As a small aside...
Alexandre Prokoudine (alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com) wrote:
We'd like to keep the interaction professional, thank you.
I'd like to ask everyone involved in this discussion to remove
the gimp-user mailinglist from the CC-list. The level of this discussion
really is hardcore
Hi Elle.
The following is my understanding, when pippin answers his answers have
more authority than mine.
Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote:
Putting aside coding considerations that might affect other software that
uses babl and GEGL, here's my understanding of your current
Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote:
A slight preface here. I don't consider it important to focus on the
*storage* of the pixel data, as in the actual bulk memory for the pixel
data.
If you choose to *store* the user's RGB data using chromaticities not of
user's choosing,
Jehan Pagès (jehan.marmott...@gmail.com) wrote:
Well for the contribute test images part, I'm not a photographer. I
have a good enough Canon camera and I can try to shoot some objects
with RAW on request though, but I won't guarantee the art quality for
these. Though you'll say that's not the
Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote:
//begin quote from http://color.org/DevCon/devcon14.xalter
While this fixed PCS is capable of delivering unambiguous color transforms,
it cannot support the increasing demand for spectrally-based reproduction.
[...]
Tying GIMP to sRGB as
Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote:
On 10/17/2014 06:39 AM, Simon Budig wrote:
Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote:
//begin quote from http://color.org/DevCon/devcon14.xalter
While this fixed PCS is capable of delivering unambiguous color transforms,
it cannot
Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote:
On 10/15/2014 08:30 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Elle Stone
When the user opens a color-managed fooRGB image, for which *specific*
editing operations will the image be converted to unbounded sRGB?
If the user
Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote:
On 10/14/2014 07:52 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Elle Stone
ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com wrote:
To convert images to and from unbounded linear gamma sRGB, you MUST pass
through XYZ. XYZ is the PCS.
I remind
Hi Thorsten.
Thorsten Stettin (thorsten.stet...@gmail.com) wrote:
with all due respect to you, I think you should contribute instead to
babble.
If you perceive Elles texts as babbling it seems that this discussion
is way over your head and you might want to consider staying out of it.
Thanks,
Christopher Curtis (ccurt...@gmail.com) wrote:
I'll admit that this discussion is way over my head, but as it seems to
involve only two people would it be better handled over a phone call? It
appears that there are some basic assumptions that aren't in alignment.
While it certainly could be
Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x004e7b7f in gimp_blend_tool_motion (tool=0x33f3370,
coords=optimized out, time=optimized out, state=GDK_BUTTON1_MASK,
display=0xe58180)
at gimpblendtool.c:450
450 if
stefankull...@web.de via surveymonkey.com (mem...@surveymonkey.com) wrote:
for a university research project at the Technical University Berlin
(Germany) I would like to gather some original input from open source
software developers. I kept the length of the survey to an absolute
minimum!!!
peter sikking (pe...@mmiworks.net) wrote:
Hmm, you might have misunderstood what I meant by shapebursts. The
shapebursts are special gradients that mimic the shape of your
selection (currently labeled Shaped (angular), Shaped (spherical),
and Shaped (dimpled)). Anyway, at this point I'm
Alexandre Prokoudine (alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com) wrote:
Also, I don't understand neither why we are having this conversation,
nor where the word consensus came from. I implied no consensus.
You wrote the core team's opinion currently is, which implies that the
core team (whoever that
Sam Gleske (sam.mxra...@gmail.com) wrote:
I'm curious to hear Simon's opinions since he openly admitted he was one of
the against parties.
Ok, so let me detail some of my concerns. I want to have it clear
however, that this is not some sort of official statement from the
gimp team, this is just
Ofnuts (ofn...@laposte.net) wrote:
Your reasoning seems to imply that Steam will become the sole source for
Gimp downloads, while as I understand it it will only be an additional
source. Making Gimp available on Steam would not be pushing people towards
Steam, it would make Gimp more easily
Michael Bauer (f...@akerbeltz.org) wrote:
I've asked before but maybe it got missed because it was a
double-barrel question.
I've completed the main UI translation into Scottish Gaelic (gd) and
done some of the other ancillary files. What's the process for
making sure this gets released?
I
Simon Budig (si...@budig.de) wrote:
Michael Bauer (f...@akerbeltz.org) wrote:
I've completed the main UI translation into Scottish Gaelic (gd) and
done some of the other ancillary files. What's the process for
making sure this gets released?
I unfortunately don't know the process itself
Michael Bauer (f...@akerbeltz.org) wrote:
Tha a' phongalachd \%2$s\ aig an dealbh \%1$s\ (%1$d) ach tha
dùil ris a' phongalachd \%3$s\
I don't know what the original string is, but you're referring to the
argument no 1 two times: one as a string, one as a decimal. That can't
be right.
Bye,
Michael Bauer (f...@akerbeltz.org) wrote:
Well, the source string says
Image '%s' (%d) has precision '%s', but an image of precision '%s'
is expected
Then try this:
Tha a' phongalachd \%3$s\ aig an dealbh \%1$s\ (%2$d) ach tha
dùil ris a' phongalachd \%4$s\
(where I am unsure if 3 and 4
Chris Mohler (cr33...@gmail.com) wrote:
His concerns seem to be be... unfounded.
So, what *is* Tito? A help system or a command line system? I have not
seen an answer to that yet.
And yes, I agree with Peter that this is a vital question.
I mean: where does the it must be A or B come from?
Alexandre Prokoudine (alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Julien Hardelin wrote:
Some strings are difficult to translate in gegl interface. Could developpers
give some explanations? This would be useful for all translators:
1- FFmpeg video output sink
Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote:
My question is, for Gimp from git, is 32-bit floating point more
precise than 16-bit integer?
Yes, at least for the range from 0.0 to 1.0.
If so, by how much, and does it depend
on the machine and/or things like the math instructions of the
Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote:
So real colors can easily fall outside the range 0.0 to 1.0 if they
are converted to sRGB. What happens to the precision when dealing
with RGB values up around 2.5 or down around -0.9?
Sign is stored in its own bit. Precision is not affected
Jehan Pagès (jehan.marmott...@gmail.com) wrote:
Oh right. I just checked again. In the AUTHORS page, there is actually
a Sven Neumann as maintainer alongside Mitch. I actually realize I
made a mistake, because that's another Sven!
Indeed :)
Sven N. hasn't been very active in Gimp development
Richard Gitschlag (strata_ran...@hotmail.com) wrote:
And similar to you, one thing *I* don't get is why Export and
Overwrite need to be separate commands.
Because without this distinction you'd accidentially overwrite your
precious orignal file after accidentially doing an Export instead
of an
Elle Stone (l.elle.st...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 10/9/13, Simon Budig si...@budig.de wrote:
Another (slightly philosophical) issue for me is, that you never explain
what you mean by color.
I added a one-paragraph summary of color:
http://ninedegreesbelow.com/photography/xyz-rgb.html
What do
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
I have found a file: gimpstock.h that contains this lines:
/* missing icons: */
#define GIMP_STOCK_PALETTE GTK_STOCK_SELECT_COLOR
I suppose this mean that there is no icon defined, so Gimp load a
gtk one and it is impossible to
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
Not for me! :(
What kind of magic is this?! hehehe.
Sorry, my fault. I was looking at the wrong icon.
I see the problem now as well. Not sure what is happening there...
Bye,
Simon
--
si...@budig.de
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
El 05/10/13 01:05, Simon Budig escribió:
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
But solving A does not solve B and the old coloured icon still
appears. ¿?¿?¿? :(
ok, weird.
yes. :(
Dunno, I added the following section to the imagerc and it just
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
Working on gtkrc I have solved F bug and improve the icons visualization.
Thanks for your efforts, that indeed looks really great. I'm all for
including it in the main gimp source.
The bug D is almost done: eye icon has changed, bug when clicked,
there
Dulce Oración (escogidapord...@gmail.com) wrote:
What is Gimpshop? And how I can get it?
If you don't know what it is, why do you want it?
(It basically is a hacked up outdated version of gimp, we strongly
recommend not using it).
Bye,
Simon
--
si...@budig.de
Chris Mohler (cr33...@gmail.com) wrote:
I can't speak for everyone, but for me: the day GIMP switches to a
closed-source model will be a dark one, indeed.
This actually is virtually impossible. There are tons of contributors in
the codebase and relicensing that one would mean getting them all
Oleg (lego12...@yandex.ru) wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:15:58AM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
The only thing that helps is writing a patch :)
Of course :-), but i just think about some donation that can help with
an intrest in the tiff saving. Is this possible?
It is possible to
Graeme Gill (grae...@argyllcms.com) wrote:
Simon Budig wrote:
We cannot just make the assumption that oh, its a JPEG. *clearly* the
user wants us to discard information on saving.
You really think they want you to save a lot of invented bits
and blow their file up in size with all
Alberto Mardegan (ma...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
Is it actually possible for a user to lose the layers when saving to
JPEG with gimp 2.6? The JPEG plugin asks to flatten the image, at which
points the users would cancel the process if he really cares about them.
Or do you have reports
Tobias Lunte (tobias.lu...@hfg-gmuend.de) wrote:
Personally, I've never really understood why GIMP doesn't use more
graphical elements in its UI (yes, I know, GIMP already uses quite a
bit, but given that it's a program for photo-manipulation, we can
assume that most of it's users are inclined
Alberto Mardegan (ma...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
On 11/16/2012 12:54 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
I'm not here to reignite the discussion about the new save/export
behaviour, don't worry. :-)
and
So, given the
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote:
I also find the change frustrating for my workflow. I don't mind learning
the export-instead-of-save command, but it's bad UI to always confirm on
exit even after a file is saved -- and, for many actual real world user
workflows, exported *is* saved
Paul Geraskin (paul_geras...@mail.ru) wrote:
If you have read the article.. it happens only if you use gaussian
blur filter which makes some color calculations with alpha.
Please take a deep breath, relax a little and don't jump to conclusions.
This article is exactly about the blending
Jeff Maples (grapn...@gmail.com) wrote:
I agree with Paul on the overlay mode. The patch is excellent, and it
makes importing files from Photo$hop more consistent. I think it should be
the default. Just my two cents.
The problem with the approach Paul took in the bug report is, that it
Elle Stone (l.elle.st...@gmail.com) wrote:
The purpose of the constant background converting back and forth
between two tone curves, sRGB TRC and linear gamma, is not clear at
all.
Well, it is not on purpose. It is basically a side-effect of trying to
port Gimp to the new infrastructure
sam tygier (samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk) wrote:
If you look at the fences under the smaller arches, they have been
interpolated from nothing. does the algorithm somehow spot the similar
regions at other scales, and filled in the small arches with copies of
the big arches?
Apparently so:
Our
Michael Henning (dra...@darkrefraction.com) wrote:
If you can imagine, we certainly don't intend the GIMP to crash.
What? I wasted *hours* over gimp sourcecode to hide crashers in there
while maintaining plausible deniability. I can't have my work being
disregarded in such a blunt manner!!1!
RMMjr (bob.montgomery...@gmail.com) wrote:
I've worked with a lot of software, and delved into usability issues, and
while I'm not a luminary like Nielsen/Norman Co, I can recognize when a
UI is taxing me, or in some cases, when it reduces me to babbling, schitzo
spaz trying to learn again
Calculemus (calculemus1...@gmail.com) wrote:
I am reading this: docs.gimp.org/en/gimp-concepts-layer-modes.html
and I wonder why is the formula for Multiply, E = (M * I) / 255?
Why divide with 255, that is the part that confuses me.
Should it not be just M * I and then clamp the result in
Cristian Secară (li...@secarica.ro) wrote:
If I use OpenOffice/LibreOffice and export a document to something
different than OpenDocument format, if after export I just close the
program, the program simply closes. _This_ is normal.
This is just not true.
* open a .odt file into libreoffice
*
Conley Moorhous (conleymoorh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I would like to start contributing to GIMP. I was going to start with an
old enhancement request on bugzilla, but I don't know my way around the
source code yet.
A good way to get guidance is to drop by in the #gimp IRC channel on
gimpnet
Partha Bagchi (parth...@gmail.com) wrote:
Is there is something one should know about the interaction with gegl
for loading tiff or everything is contained in file-tiff-load.c?
I have not yet pushed any changes to file-tiff-load.c. But if you want
to look at how to use gegl for loading files
Alexandre Prokoudine (alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com) wrote:
16bit PNG can be loaded and saved
EXR opens as 32bit float, but is saved with 16bit precision.
Also .hdr files are handled by file-gegl as well.
Simon already evaluated porting TIFF loader to GEGL, but I couldn't
understand a
Martin Nordholts (ense...@gmail.com) wrote:
I like it more, but I still think the white diagonal line is too distracting
I am not a fan of this kind of nit-picking. While we have certain
requirements for the splash (e.g. to allow for the startup texts etc.)
we should try to avoid pleasing
98 matches
Mail list logo
