Re: [Gimp-developer] Problem with gimp-cvs and gimp stable configs

2006-03-26 Thread Frédéric
On Samedi 25 Mars 2006 23:34, Sven Neumann wrote: > You ignored the warning in the release notes that ask you to install > the development version in a separate prefix that is not part of the > system library search path. Or perhaps the release notes need to be > improved to make it more clear tha

Re: [Gimp-developer] Bring Back the Keyboard!

2006-03-26 Thread Tuomas Kuosmanen
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 07:48 +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote: > It might be the wrong interface for some or even most users, but it was the > most efficient interface for others. Yep, I agree. The new dialog tab completion could be improved. But in my opinion the new dialog itself is a lot better - the

Re: [Gimp-developer] crash after saving tif

2006-03-26 Thread Kai-Uwe Behrmann
Similiar problems where reported for CinePaint. Look at your libtiff version. If it has 3.8.0 update or downgrad. This libtiff version is buggy. Hopd this helps. kind regards Kai-Uwe Behrmann + development for color management + i

[Gimp-developer] Déjà vu? (Re: Why be c ryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

2006-03-26 Thread GSR - FR
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2006-03-23 at 1032.39 +0200): > Brendan writes: > > Please, oh Lord, someone fork Gimp. > I can imagine the scenario: (This is a parody, not a flame) > Someones forks GIMP, sets up a project on (say) SourceForge. He spends > lots of effort on the project's web page. (He is a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Déjà vu? (Re: Why be c ryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

2006-03-26 Thread Alan Horkan
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, GSR - FR wrote: > Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:48:23 +0200 > From: GSR - FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > Subject: [Gimp-developer] [iso-8859-1] D?j? vu? (Re: Why be c[iso-8859-1] > ryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions') > > Hi, > [EM

Re: [Gimp-developer] Déjà vu? (Re: Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

2006-03-26 Thread Campbell Barton
Hello all This debate about the Xtns etc. has been going on for tooo long.. Can there be a simple solution? How about move (Xtns) to (File-> Extensions) The file menu isnt that full at the moment, and it seems a logical place for it. -- Campbell J Barton 133 Hope Street Geelong West, Victori

Re: [Gimp-developer] Déjà vu? (Re: Why be c ryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

2006-03-26 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/27/06, Campbell Barton wrote: > Hello all > This debate about the Xtns etc. has been going on for tooo long.. > Can there be a simple solution? > > How about move (Xtns) to (File-> Extensions) > > The file menu isnt that full at the moment, and it seems a logical place > for it. Huh? Logical?

[Gimp-developer] Re: Déjà vu? (Re: Why be cryptic? 'X tns' should be name 'Extensions')

2006-03-26 Thread GSR - FR
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2006-03-26 at 2018.22 +0100): > Sorry, I'm not sure exactly what detail in this screenshot you are > pointing out. You removed the part about my wishes for the topics being about stress testing GIMP and make it move. That image is my test, like some people have issues with "

Re: [Gimp-developer] app icon update proposal

2006-03-26 Thread Steve Stavropoulos
On 3/25/06, Jakub Steiner wrote: > I have refreshed the look of GIMP's mascot as an app icon and propose > this to be included upstream. > http://jimmac.musichall.cz/stuff/gimp.png > I know my personal opinion doesn't really matter on this, but I find the foremost eye of the updated Wilber rathe

Re: [Gimp-developer] Déjà vu? (Re: Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

2006-03-26 Thread Campbell Barton
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: On 3/27/06, Campbell Barton wrote: Hello all This debate about the Xtns etc. has been going on for tooo long.. Can there be a simple solution? How about move (Xtns) to (File-> Extensions) The file menu isnt that full at the moment, and it seems a logical place fo

Re: [Gimp-developer] Déjà vu? (Re: Why be c ryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

2006-03-26 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 3/27/06, Campbell Barton wrote: > Hah. your right. its not exactly logical. but its a tradeoff > File->Extensions (uses a word people can understand) > Xtns (Is in a place people see) > > if you want to be picky- "Preferences" is not a file operation either. > But there is no "Edit", "Option

Re: [Gimp-developer] crash after saving tif

2006-03-26 Thread Roberto Winter
On 3/26/06, Kai-Uwe Behrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Similiar problems where reported for CinePaint. Look at your libtiffversion. $ apt-cache policy libtiff4libtiff4:  Installed: 3.8.0-3  Candidate: 3.8.0-3  Version Table: *** 3.8.0-3 0    500 http://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable/main Packages

Re: [Gimp-developer] Déjà vu? (Re: Why be cryptic? 'Xtns' should be name 'Extensions')

2006-03-26 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would doing a Firefox on the GIMP be a good move? If mainline GIMP > was slimmed down further would that be a good thing? (Just in terms > of disk usage GImpressionist, Gfig and Gflare add quite a bit of > extra bulk.) Maybe this would be more hass

Re: [Gimp-developer] app icon update proposal

2006-03-26 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have refreshed the look of GIMP's mascot as an app icon and propose > this to be included upstream. The icon follows the Tango Style > Guidelines [1] (to a great extent) but is mostly based on the original > shape and colors originally crafted by