Hi,
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 18:34 -0600, D. Stimits wrote:
So I pose this question...if print via PDF is to be considered, why
remove the existing PS system, which is pretty much the best quality
PostScript among all of the apps (commercial and free)?
We are not removing anything. So far
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:35:17PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
If yes, a solution could be to not distinguish between a Postscript and a
PDF target (i.e. to embed only opaque images into a PDF despite the fact
that PDF can handle images with alpha values).
Would this approach have
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 16:47 +0200, Stefan Roellin wrote:
I think the current implementation of the print plugin is fine, i.e.
generate the PDF with opaque images. If someone needs to have a PDF with
images with alpha values, it would be possible to write a 'save-as-pdf
plugin' similar to
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 07:29:20PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
I think the current implementation of the print plugin is fine, i.e.
generate the PDF with opaque images. If someone needs to have a PDF with
images with alpha values, it would be possible to write a 'save-as-pdf
plugin'
On 7/25/07, Stefan Roellin wrote:
Yes, this would of course also be possible and not too different from a
GtkPrint approach. GtkPrint offers dialogs to choose the PageSize etc, which
Cairo does not.
Export to PDF has often been requested. It would be particularly
interesting if it could
Alexandre Prokoudine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
- Will it be possible since GIMP doesn't use Cairo yet?
It does implicitely, since it already depends on a GTK+ version that
depends on cairo.
Bye,
Simon
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://simon.budig.de/
Hi,
I was referred to this forum for my
request for a change in Gimp's behavior while using the Free Select
tool. Ref Bugzilla Bug 456277.
Performing selections on a complex
shape is one of the most labor intensive and time consuming tasks in
Gimp (probably in any other editor as well).
