On Thursday, March 26, 2009, 21:20:53, Cédric Gémy wrote:
> This is very simple : Illustrator CS4 has just implemented a real
> multipage PDF support.
You mean something that CorelDraw had for years?
Then again, both CorelDraw and Illustrator are vector editing
programs, and having multiple pag
> And finally, I agree with Sven that I don't know why anyone would
> want to have multipage PDF output for GIMP.
This is very simple : Illustrator CS4 has just implemented a real
multipage PDF support.
My opinion, if worth, is that gimp don't have to copy adobe software,
even if there are man
El Martes, 24 de Marzo de 2009 03:03:36 Guillermo Espertino escribió:
>
> > Does that indicate that separate+ is what needs to be enhanced, rather
> > than the core application?
>
> This discussion was about a PDF export plugin at the beginning.
> I was trying to make evident that a PDF export plug
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:51 -0400, Andrew A. Gill wrote:
>
>> I do work in the printing industry, and I can tell you that
>> output is still CMYK, and will remain CMYK for at least the next
>> few years.
>
> Output, yes, of course. But where in this proc
Hi Robert, thanks for your comments.
> This really sounds like you're using black as a spot color rather than
> going generic editing in CMYK space.
That was just an example. Another example could be just putting an image
in front of a gray gradient background.
In my experience, it's not that eas
From: Guillermo Espertino
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:59:53 -0300
CMYK exists because, though is possible theoretically, it isn't possible
to generate black from mixing CMY inks. As the C, M and Y inks aren't
perfect and have some contaminants, mixing them ends up in a dirty brown
On Monday 23 March 2009 04:56:23 pm Robert Krawitz wrote
snip
>
> When people do send CMYK data to Gutenprint, the large majority of the
> time it's either because they don't really understand what CMYK is
> (it's very device and media specific) or because we have a problem
> with the GCR parameter
From: Sven Neumann
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:18:23 +0100
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:51 -0400, Andrew A. Gill wrote:
> I do work in the printing industry, and I can tell you that
> output is still CMYK, and will remain CMYK for at least the next
> few years.
Output, yes, of
CMYK exists because, though is possible theoretically, it isn't possible
to generate black from mixing CMY inks. As the C, M and Y inks aren't
perfect and have some contaminants, mixing them ends up in a dirty brown
instead of pure black.
That's why CMYK exists, and that's why it isn't so simple to
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:51 -0400, Andrew A. Gill wrote:
> I do work in the printing industry, and I can tell you that
> output is still CMYK, and will remain CMYK for at least the next
> few years.
Output, yes, of course. But where in this process do you actually edit
an image in CMYK? I
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>
> I am by no means a photography professional and my point of view comes
> mostly from what other people have said regarding CMYK support; I don't
> have any direct sources to give.
>
> Could you perhaps clarify/give references to your claim that high-
Sven Neumann wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 21:02 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>> Yes, processing shall as long as possible be done in RGB, but at some
>> point you need to convert to the CMYK color space and a high-end photo
>> app should support editing also in this color space.
>>
>
> Why
12 matches
Mail list logo
