What is the purpose of including src/plugin-intl.h in the template?
Does #include "plugin-intl.h" do something
that #include does not?
How are individual user installations supposed to work? (is there a
target that installs to ~/.gimp?)
are config.sub and guess necessary for most plug-ins?
T
Hi,
> What is the purpose of including src/plugin-intl.h in the template?
> Does #include "plugin-intl.h" do something
> that #include does not?
Yes, a lot!
Actually plugin-intl.h as shipped with gimp-plugin-template is the
equivalent to libgimp/std-plugins-intl.h which is included from all
Tom Rathborne wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 02:28:33PM +0200, Raphael Quinet wrote:
> > [...] rotate a brush automatically according to the local
> > tangent of the path that the brush is following. [...]
> [...] What other transformations could be added? How about: blur,
> colour rotation, s
Hello, dudes,
Jens Finke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has sent me an amazing patch to add
support for XCF file loading to gdk-pixbuf. I would really like to
have this sort of functionality so that simple programs like EOG can
view GIMP files.
However, there is the issue of licensing. Gdk-pixbuf is rele
On May 30, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> However, there is the issue of licensing. Gdk-pixbuf is released
> under the LGPL, and the XCF loader uses big chunks of GPLed code from
> the GIMP. I am not sure what is the best way to proceed.
>
> I would appreciate your suggestions.
Do you know wh
Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, there is the issue of licensing. Gdk-pixbuf is released
> under the LGPL, and the XCF loader uses big chunks of GPLed code from
> the GIMP. I am not sure what is the best way to proceed.
>
Well, there are not many options.
a) Yo
On Tue, 30 May 2000 11:27:37 -0400, Phil Schwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Do you know who all of the copyright holders of that code are?
At least myself, Peter, Spencer, and Adam Moss. There are almost
certainly others.
Kelly
On Tuesday, 30 May 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 30 May 2000 11:27:37 -0400, Phil Schwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >Do you know who all of the copyright holders of that code are?
>
> At least myself, Peter, Spencer, and Adam Moss. There are almost
> certainly others.
I can't re
Austin Donnelly wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 30 May 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 30 May 2000 11:27:37 -0400, Phil Schwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > >Do you know who all of the copyright holders of that code are?
> >
> > At least myself, Peter, Spencer, and Adam Moss. There are
On 30 May 2000, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > However, there is the issue of licensing. Gdk-pixbuf is released
> > under the LGPL, and the XCF loader uses big chunks of GPLed code from
> > the GIMP. I am not sure what is the best way to proceed
On Tue, 30 May 2000 20:04:02 +0200 (MEST), Jens Finke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I think c) is the best solution. It's surely quite hard to find _all_
>contributors to the code.
Actually, I think that the version that was initially put into CVS was
pure S&P, so the CVS log should adequately doc
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 12:06:58PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > What is the purpose of including src/plugin-intl.h in the template?
> > Does #include "plugin-intl.h" do something
> > that #include does not?
>
> Yes, a lot!
> [...]
> I'd suggest you take a short look into plugin-intl.h, it sh
>By default photoshop saves a flattened version of the image as well as all of
>the layers for backward compatibility purposes. I would assume that
IrfanView is
>just displaying the flattened version of the image straight from the file.
>
>We may want to add similar functionality to gimp and the
Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > However, there is the issue of licensing. Gdk-pixbuf is released
> > under the LGPL, and the XCF loader uses big chunks of GPLed code from
> > the GIMP. I am not sure what is the best way to p
Hi all.
Currently our local university has massive problems with the net so
I'm currently not normally reachable via EMail. If you need to urgently
reach me try the Adress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, this is especially targeted
to all people who contacted me for the Gimp-Booth at the LinuxTag.
Sorry, cu
Martin Baulig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> d) Keep the XCF loaded GPL
>
> if I understand that correctly, the loaders are shared libraries which
> dnyamically loaded so they can theoretically have different licenses
> or do I miss something ?
>
RMS claims that this is not allowed without G
Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Baulig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > d) Keep the XCF loaded GPL
> >
> > if I understand that correctly, the loaders are shared libraries which
> > dnyamically loaded so they can theoretically have different licenses
> > or do I miss some
Martin Baulig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, then I think you misunderstood me.
>
> What I suggested was added XCF as a nice add-on to gdk-pixbuf for
> the situation where gdk-pixbuf is used under the GPL.
>
> Of cause, this means that you can't use XCF loading in a proprietary
> app wher
Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Baulig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, then I think you misunderstood me.
> >
> > What I suggested was added XCF as a nice add-on to gdk-pixbuf for
> > the situation where gdk-pixbuf is used under the GPL.
> >
> > Of cause, this means
> RMS claims that this is not allowed without GPL'ing all of
> gdk-pixbuf. Otherwise you could just dlopen() any GPL app from your
> proprietary app.
Not really.
It means that the end user application would have to be a GPL
application. There is nothing bad with having a LGPL module and a GPL
This is a development release. Usual caveat about aerodynamic print
heads and fine Oriental rugs apply.
This is a fairly substantial release. The .tgz file is much bigger
than before because of new dithering matrices. Print quality should
be greatly improved.
1) Greatly improved print quality
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 May 2000 11:27:37 -0400, Phil Schwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >Do you know who all of the copyright holders of that code are?
>
> At least myself, Peter, Spencer, and Adam Moss. There are almost
> certainly others.
>
> Kelly
Until very recently th
Hi, dear developers.
I hope copying gdynamic text layer to another image to keep
text/font/colour/layout informations.
As I don't understand parasites, please forgive me if I'm claiming
something funny.
FUJITA Yuji
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
23 matches
Mail list logo