On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 03:05:14AM -0700, pixel fairy wrote:
> id like to be able to stroke a path with the cloning stamp, or with an
> arbritrary tool. is this possible in the current (cvs) gimp?
Yes. The path stroking code should use whatever tool
is currently active.
Adrian
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 06:59:21PM -0700, Daniel wrote:
> Question. .
> Will Gimp 1.1.24 work with gtk+ 1.3.0? I am working on Gimp for BeOS
> and the port of gtk+ that I have is roughly 1.3.0 and there is no
> port of the 1.2.x branch.
As far as I can tell, no. There is no port of gim
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 09:34:10AM -0400, Zachary Beane wrote:
> This was a legitimate screw-up in one version of Red Hat, IIRC. They
> did not include the gimptool script in either gimp or gimp-devel
> RPMs. This became an issue on IRC for several people, until we finally
> figured it out.
6
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 05:59:56PM +0100, Fernando Herrera wrote:
> Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 04:40:54PM +0100, Michael Natterer escribió:
> >
> > o Think about a new way to handle plug-in distribution
> >
> > As more and more plug-ins go into the main gimp distribution (and a lot
> > of plug-ins a
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 08:26:59PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
> > As for the plugin distribution, I think the nicest way would be to have
> > a plugin manager that would enable you to download plugins from the web
> > on the fly. Something Linux distributions have too, you just connect to
> >
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 02:28:57PM +0100, Jens Lautenbacher wrote:
> Tuomas "\"spectrolite\"" Kuosmanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 09 Feb 2001 11:32:16 +0100, Jens Lautenbacher wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This mail comes from some discussions I had with Sven around the time
On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 01:29:59PM +0200, David Monniaux wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Many people around here complain that Gimp leaves enormous swap files when
> crashing. It is especially a pain since they are in a "hidden"
> subdirectory.
>
> Would it be possible to have Gimp unlink() the files after
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 03:15:55PM -0800, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 10:24:09PM +, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> > On Sunday, 9 Jan 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 05:08:26PM +0100, "Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
okay, as you have probabaly noticed. www.gimp.org is old
and and outdated. That is pretty much completely my fault.
I really dont have the time or the motivation to work
on web site stuff anymore, or at least not to the level that
something like gimp should have as its web site.
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 10:15:36PM -0700, Kevin Turner wrote:
Neat stuff.
Now to bug you for wish list stuff ;->
> Is the photo credit for this image stored anywhere?
>
Hmmm, might be cool to have the ability to at least provide
all the info in http://purl.org/dc/">Dub
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 07:31:11PM +0200, Raphael Quinet wrote:
> Except for the vines and green pepper, the latest version of the Gimp
> ships with basically the same set of brushes as version 1.0. Even the
> gimp-data-extra package does not contain anything that demonstrates
> the power of the
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 09:03:11AM -0400, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> Raphael:
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 02:28:33PM +0200, Raphael Quinet wrote:
> > Well, it looks like I will not be able to attend the GIMP Developers
> > Conference at the end of this week (too bad - I really wanted to be
> > there)
On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 03:34:55PM +0100, Aaron wrote:
> I get that message (in the subject line) when i open a large jeg file, then try to
>resize it. Please help. I'm scared.
>
It indicates pretty much what it says. For whatever reason the file that
gimp is trying to open as a swap fi
13 matches
Mail list logo
