Perhaps I'm in danger of starting an argument here but some of your points
surprise me a little.
Manish Singh wrote:
Maybe the creator of GimpShop should have respected the GIMP community
instead of rejecting it. He did not consult anyone on any of the GIMP
lists at all as to proper
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:24:36PM +0100, David Marrs wrote:
Perhaps I'm in danger of starting an argument here but some of your points
surprise me a little.
Manish Singh wrote:
Maybe the creator of GimpShop should have respected the GIMP community
instead of rejecting it. He did not
David Southwell wrote:
Anyone...
Finally does anyone have a handle on the timeframe for 2.4??
Not really. I think you'll just have to be patient.
Incidentally, unless you've got a pro camera and lens, a high quality, properly
calibrated monitor and a very good printer, I really don't think
On Thursday 12 July 2007, Manish Singh wrote:
The GPL allows forks, but doesn't require the organization
that was forked from to provide support to the fork.
True. However, I'm wondering if there's anyone here willing to
moderate such a list, what it would coist to run such at
Berkeley?
The
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 05:16:56AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2007, Manish Singh wrote:
The GPL allows forks, but doesn't require the organization
that was forked from to provide support to the fork.
True. However, I'm wondering if there's anyone here willing to
I frequently use the GIMP for patterns/fractals that are to be used as
height fields. For this, it would be nice if 16bit gray scale was
available. I figure GIMP will eventually have 16bit support.
B. Vanderburg II
David Marrs wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
Anyone...
Finally does
