If I were trying to reduce the size of an image while preserving
definition I would look at changing its resolution
ie from 72pix x 72pix to 288pix x 288pix, reducing the images
apparant size (to 1/4 the starting size) while keeping all the
pixel information.
HTH
I agree with this
On 08/17/2009 08:33 AM, Monika Himpelmann wrote:
Dear all,
I have a question and maybe it is easy to answer and has been answered
before although I didn't find it in the FAQ's.
When I try to scale a foto in order to get it passport photo size it
looses quality.
Seems like a confusion about
On Monday 17 August 2009, Monika Himpelmann wrote:
Dear all,
I have a question and maybe it is easy to answer and has been
answered before although I didn't find it in the FAQ's.
When I try to scale a foto in order to get it passport photo size
it looses quality. The fotos I want to scale
Dear all,
I have a question and maybe it is easy to answer and has been answered before
although I didn't find it in the FAQ's.
When I try to scale a foto in order to get it passport photo size it looses
quality. The fotos I want to scale are of good quality but too large and are
showing not
Hi Monika,
I haven't experienced a loss in quality with scaling photos smaller; as
you mentioned, loss of quality will occur with enlargements.
Are you scaling before you crop the photos? How are you scaling (I
scale with Image-Scale Image). What are your original target sizes?
Regards,
On 08/17/2009 11:33 AM, Monika Himpelmann wrote:
Dear all,
I have a question and maybe it is easy to answer and has been answered
before although I didn't find it in the FAQ's.
When I try to scale a foto in order to get it passport photo size it
looses quality. The fotos I want to scale are
Jay Smith wrote:
Monika,
I agree that it does not make sense to loose quality when scaling smaller.
I'm confused I think. Isn't scaling smaller an inherently lossy
process? If there's information in a section that's 20 bits across and
it gets reduced to 5 bits across it isn't possible
On 08/17/2009 06:38 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
Jay Smith wrote:
Monika,
I agree that it does not make sense to loose quality when scaling smaller.
I'm confused I think. Isn't scaling smaller an inherently lossy
process? If there's information in a section that's 20 bits across and
it
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Monika Himpelmannmonika_1...@yahoo.it wrote:
I would understand the loss in quality if I would try to enlarge the fotos
but making them smaller in size should not make them loose quality???
Any hints from you out there?
Thank you in advance for any answer.
