Re: [Gimp-user] gimp-help-2 .. xi:include
Hi, Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Docbook is nearly as difficult as fonts! Creating a working setup for processing Docbook is a lot more difficult than configuring fonts especially since fonts are so simple to handle nowadays. Tried making the latest CVS cd ../html/C /usr//bin/xsltproc --xinclude --nonet ../../stylesheets/plainhtml.xsl ../../src/gimp.xml Writing gimp-xrefs-en.xml for book(GIMP) No template matches xi:include in chapter. and 100s more of No template matches xi:include The URL here book id=GIMP xmlns:xi=http://www.w3.org/2003/XInclude; doesn't seem to point to anything specific but you can find an XML schema for the XI namespace by hunting around that site. An xmlns URL doesn't need to point to any document. It's just an identifier, you aren't supposed to interpret it as a link. Let me quote what I just sent to gimp-developer on pretty much the same subject: The DTDs are absolutely necessary in order to process the files. You cannot expect things to work if the DTDs are missing. Also you shouldn't use the DTDs from the network but have them installed at your computer. You will need an XML catalog file that tells your XSLT processort where the DTDs are found on your disk. Usually this file lives in /etc/xml. AFAIK it is correctly installed on recent RedHat systems; it is known to be broken on Debian and I don't know about other distributions. For Debian there is a script that attempts to fix the catalog file. Use it at your own risk: http://sven.gimp.org/build-xml-catalog-for-debian.sh Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] How to export only one channel in grey levels ?
Hi, I've shooted some infra-red pictures with my digital camera. I would like to isolate the red channel and transform it to a black and white picture, discarding the green and blue channels. How to do that ? If I select only the red and change the mode to grey levels, I get only a transparent picture. -- Regards - Jean-Luc pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Gimp-user] How to export only one channel in grey levels ?
Hi, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: I've shooted some infra-red pictures with my digital camera. I would like to isolate the red channel and transform it to a black and white picture, discarding the green and blue channels. How to do that ? You should decompose the image. This is not the only way to do it, but it's certainly the easiest. The Decompose filter was moved in the 1.3 tree to Image/Filters/Colors/Decompose. Select RGB from the choices offered, and you will get 3 greyscale images, one for each channel. Cheers, Dave. -- David Neary, Lyon, France E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re : [Gimp-user] How to export only one channel in grey levels ?
Le 11.01.2004 19:16, David Neary a écrit : Hi, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: I've shooted some infra-red pictures with my digital camera. I would like to isolate the red channel and transform it to a black and white picture, discarding the green and blue channels. How to do that ? You should decompose the image. This is not the only way to do it, but it's certainly the easiest. The Decompose filter was moved in the 1.3 tree to Image/Filters/Colors/Decompose. Select RGB from the choices offered, and you will get 3 greyscale images, one for each channel. Cheers, Dave. Worked fine, thanks. -- - Jean-luc pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Re: [Gimp-user] How to export only one channel in grey levels ?
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: Worked fine, thanks. Pas de quoi. Dave. -- David Neary, Lyon, France E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp-remote -n not starting new instance
Hi, Sven Burmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am using Suse 9.0 and KDE 3.1.4 with gimp 1.3.2 If that's really version 1.3.2 you are using then an update would long be overdue. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp-remote -n not starting new instance
On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 19:55, Sven Burmeister wrote: In fact un update was overdue as it seems, do not know why Suse still supplies that old version. That's nothing... My RH9 distro came with gimp-1.2x! Of course I updated like very fast. :) .:: misfit-x ::. ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp-remote -n not starting new instance
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:55:11AM +0100, Sven Burmeister wrote: Sven Neumann schrieb: Hi, Sven Burmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am using Suse 9.0 and KDE 3.1.4 with gimp 1.3.2 If that's really version 1.3.2 you are using then an update would long be overdue. Hi, thanks for the quick hint. In fact un update was overdue as it seems, do not know why Suse still supplies that old version. Anyway, using the 2.0pre I still have the problem that when I select two files in Konqueror and open them with gimp-remote -n I get one gimp instance and only one picture. If I select more than two e.g. 4 and open them I get gimp, gimp2,3,5 and only three images opened. And still there is no option in the preferences to never open more than one instance. What's happening is that Konqueror is calling gimp-remote -n once for each file, instead of listing all the files on a single invocation of gimp-remote. Since gimp takes a while to start up, gimp-remote thinks there isn't one there, so it starts new instances of the app. Konqueror should be fixed to do the right thing, instead of doing contortions in gimp-remote to fix this. -Yosh ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Re: Gimp2.0pre
hello, On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:00:03PM -0700, Thomas Spuhler wrote: Has anybody been able to install it on Mandrake 9.2 I'll get into a dependency hell when trying to make an rpm. The main problem is to get freetype 2 that will install w/o dependency problems well, here is the ditz's take on it, but especially with linux, you need to be really careful about the names. mandrake and freetype might always have issues, for the simple matter of why they chose the names they did. the names dont work well together. mandrake would be a completely different idea than freetype; neither one being a bad idea either. redhat is so much like what you might expect from something wearing a red hat. one time stable installation. wait a long time. then reinstall. well chosen aliases so that if you change distributions, you will at least miss them. carefree night on the town in a red hat, or to the rescue. maybe an old lady with a good recipe who is also wearing a purple dress? i think redhat is sort of like america and what is good about it. you might not prefer this however. debian is a bunch of guys contributing. oh, i am sure there are some girl contributors also, but many more guys. ian started it for his girlfriend debbie. one of debians big issues is that debbie has lots of boyfriends now. they talked me into running sid, so i could get netscape3 back (it is the same as making me dress risque so that i can go ballroom dancing) then they broke something so it doesnt work. I call it all dressed up and no where to go. very very much like having one or a million boyfriends. i see no difference. i have no idea what the gentoo people are doing. same with knoppix. the thing i wish i had done was to build my own from scratch. the linux people have been racing with windows for so long now, i should have done this in 1999. it seems like a huge project now. mandrake and gimp have always had a weird relationship; i really think it is the names. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=mandraker=67 the root is poisonous. i am sure that little bits of it might be beneficial. gimp, well. not named after a poison; at least not to itself. carol ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Re: Tool select
hello, On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 10:16:49AM -0500, Gary Montalbine wrote: How do I get rid of the tool icon when done with it? gimp has never worked this way. perhaps you should go back to using the software you were using. i dont think gimp should ever work this way. carol ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
