On 11/3/06, Philip Rhoades <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you look at the image at a zoom level of 100%?Yes, you are correct - when I zoom to 100%, the fonts are smooth - now Iam confused - why do the fonts look smooth in xpdf and bitty in gimpwhen the characters are about the same size on the scr
Hi Philip,
On 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 06:11:52 +1100
From: Philip Rhoades <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Opening PDF and PS files
I tried using pstoedit to create other vector editing formats but they
DO have problems
Michael,
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 20:18 +0100, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> Philip Rhoades wrote:
>
> > The anti-aliasing seemed to help a bit but 1200 res did not seem to make
> > much difference (except for slowing down gimp dramatically) . . would it
> > have something to do with not converting t
Stephan Hegel wrote:
Tom Williams wrote:
Sure can. :)
START-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Thanks, Tom. The point is the empty LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable.
IIUC, in this case the loader is not forced to search for libs in
certain d
Toby Haynes wrote:
Tom Williams wrote:
---START-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file /usr/bin/gimp
/usr/bin/gimp: symbolic link to `gimp-2.2'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file /usr/bin/gimp-2.2
/usr/bin/gimp-2.2: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.0, dynamica
Tom Williams wrote:
> Sure can. :)
>
> START-
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Thanks, Tom. The point is the empty LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable.
IIUC, in this case the loader is not forced to search for libs in
certain directories. Seems i
Stephen Hegel wrote:
> Saul Goode wrote:
> > They don't necessarily *need* the wrapper (that is but one suggested
> > solution to having multiple GIMPs installed concurrently)
> If you have another suggestion how to run multiple, library-wise
> incompatible instances of Gimp without using a wrapper
> 1. How do you change it so that when you save a file it
> doesn't save as a GIMP file?
use "File/Save As" when right clicking on the image or using the "File" menu at
the top of the image window.
> 2. Is there a way to move a text box after you type it? Because you cant
> always tell where i
I have 3 questions. 1. How do you change it so that when you save a file it doesn't save as a GIMP file?And 2. Is there a way to move a text box after you type it? Because you cant always tell where it's going to go untill your done. 3. Is there a way to open more then one picture on the same scree
Philip Rhoades wrote:
> The anti-aliasing seemed to help a bit but 1200 res did not seem to make
> much difference (except for slowing down gimp dramatically) . . would it
> have something to do with not converting the Frutiger fonts cleanly?
Do you look at the image at a zoom level of 100%?
Mi
Craig,
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 18:56 +, Craig Marshall wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 05:50:37AM +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote:
>
> Hi Philip,
>
> > Thanks for the note.
> >
> > The anti-aliasing seemed to help a bit but 1200 res did not seem to make
> > much difference (except for slowing d
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 05:50:37AM +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote:
Hi Philip,
> Thanks for the note.
>
> The anti-aliasing seemed to help a bit but 1200 res did not seem to make
> much difference (except for slowing down gimp dramatically) . . would it
> have something to do with not converting the
Craig,
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 18:17 +, Craig Marshall wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 04:19:15AM +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote:
>
> > I realise that gimp converts pdf and ps files into bitmaps when it opens
> > the files but how can I improve the resolution of the resulting images?
> > - even
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 04:19:15AM +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> I realise that gimp converts pdf and ps files into bitmaps when it opens
> the files but how can I improve the resolution of the resulting images?
> - even setting the input res to 600 when opening still leaves the image
> "bitty".
People,
I realise that gimp converts pdf and ps files into bitmaps when it opens
the files but how can I improve the resolution of the resulting images?
- even setting the input res to 600 when opening still leaves the image
"bitty".
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades
Pricom Pty Limited (ACN 003
Stephan Hegel wrote:
Tom Williams wrote:
For the record folks, I've got Gimp 2.2.11 installed in /usr (came with
my Linux distro) and Gimp 2.3.12 (used to have 2.3.11) installed in
/usr/local/gimp-2.3 and I'm able to run either version without any
problems, errors, or wrapper scripts (unless
Saul Goode wrote:
> They don't necessarily *need* the wrapper (that is but one suggested
> solution to having multiple GIMPs installed concurrently)
If you have another suggestion how to run multiple, library-wise
incompatible instances of Gimp without using a wrappers, please
let me know.
Kind re
Tom Williams wrote:
> For the record folks, I've got Gimp 2.2.11 installed in /usr (came with
> my Linux distro) and Gimp 2.3.12 (used to have 2.3.11) installed in
> /usr/local/gimp-2.3 and I'm able to run either version without any
> problems, errors, or wrapper scripts (unless gimp-2.3 is a wrap
18 matches
Mail list logo
