Some points:
* These are not forums. This is a mailing list. Accessing it through the
unofficial gimpusers.com 'forum interface' doesn't change that fact.
* The official GIMP site has problems, mainly to do with lacking a
maintainer. It tends to be only updated on releases and other major events
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:18 PM, artao wrote:
I googled, but haven't found anything particularly recent regarding this.
You could have started with reading news at gimp.org, especially the
one from 2011-01-11 (PLANS FOR 2.8 AND BEYOND).
You next stops are:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, David Gowers (kampu) wrote:
Just a minor correction...
Photoshop is still yet to properly support high bit depth (16/32bpc)
images -- instead it provides a small subset of operations.
Only if the last version you tried was CS2 :) They actually adjusted
lots
Aha, I misread the GIMP 2.8 announcements. I guess I thought GEGL was
inherently high bit depth. So, several years then is fairly accurate?
Oh well.
I neglected in my opening post to THANK the devs for their hard work. GIMP is a
great app. Keep up the hard work.
I'm no programmer, not even
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:57 PM, artao wrote:
Aha, I misread the GIMP 2.8 announcements. I guess I thought
GEGL was inherently high bit depth. So, several years then is
fairly accurate?
It's hard to say. To the best of my knowledge, some bits of GIMP
are ready to be replaced with GEGL already,
I am interested in rewriting some of the logo scripts in
Python. I feel that an investment in learning Python will be
more productive than trying to learn Scheme. I have two
questions:
1. Is there a stash somewhere of python scripts for Gimp?
The few that come with the distro help one to
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:54 PM, John Culleton wrote:
I am interested in rewriting some of the logo scripts in Python. I feel that
an investment in learning Python will be more productive than trying to
learn Scheme. I have two questions:
1. Is there a stash somewhere of python scripts for
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
2. Are there any advantages to using 2.7 instead of 2.6.11
with respect to python scripting?
AFAIK, Python-Fu doesn't exactly support some API changes made over
last 12 months.
In 2.7, that is :)
Alexandre Prokoudine
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:57 PM, artao for...@gimpusers.com wrote:
Aha, I misread the GIMP 2.8 announcements. I guess I thought GEGL was
inherently high bit depth. So, several years then is fairly accurate?
GEGL itself is inherently high bitdepth, the current integration of
GEGL in GIMP
Is there any better noise reduction filter for GIMP than the built in
Wavelet Denoise? It does remove the noise, but also make the image a bit
blurry.
Wavelet Denoise in ufraw has the same problem.
I know it is possible to do it better since my new camera, Canon
PowerShot S95, does it better
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Mikael Ståldal mik...@staldal.nu wrote:
Is there any better noise reduction filter for GIMP than the built in
Wavelet Denoise? It does remove the noise, but also make the image a bit
blurry.
Try the GMIC plugin. There are 2 methods in that plugin that do a
Le 21/07/2011 23:51, Mikael Ståldal a écrit :
Is there any better noise reduction filter for GIMP than the built in
Wavelet Denoise? It does remove the noise, but also make the image a bit
blurry.
Wavelet Denoise in ufraw has the same problem.
I know it is possible to do it better since my
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:51:20 +0200, Mikael Ståldal wrote:
Is there any better noise reduction filter for GIMP than the built in
Wavelet Denoise? It does remove the noise, but also make the image a bit
blurry.
Try Selective Gaussian Blur - it often gives very good results (just lower
the
13 matches
Mail list logo
