On 07/05/2010 12:23 PM, Claus Cyrny wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after this has first been announced, I think, in 2002 (!),
> I wonder why 16-bit/channel has still not been implemented.
> Two years ago (or something like this) I read that 16-bit
> would be available in 2.6, but now someone stated that it
>
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Claus Cyrny wrote:
> Ubuntu) have much better anti-aliasing. I really enjoy working with
> the Gimp (currently 2.6.8), but especially 16-bit is really long overdue.
It's overdue, but that won't make it happen any sooner. Let's just
wait it out. Meanwhile, Krita an
Claus - they're all waiting for you to offer to help code it.
It's open source. If there's a feature you'd really like to see,
contribute code or hire someone who can help. It's as simple as that.
Donncha
On 05/07/10 11:23, Claus Cyrny wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after this has first been announced, I
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Claus Cyrny wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after this has first been announced, I think, in 2002 (!),
> I wonder why 16-bit/channel has still not been implemented.
Because noone did it. Noone did it, because it's a lot of work. It's a
lot of work, because GIMP is huge and GEG
Hi all,
after this has first been announced, I think, in 2002 (!),
I wonder why 16-bit/channel has still not been implemented.
Two years ago (or something like this) I read that 16-bit
would be available in 2.6, but now someone stated that it
would probably take a few more years (!). IMHO, 16-bit
