Owen wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:58:46 +0200
Like others with Mozilla and Konquerer on a Mdk10/KDE machine, I only got the source,
however when I removed the first line
That is good news. There are now 3 persons reporting the problem :)
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* olivier ripoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-18-04 03:40]:
might be a problem
...
Not here on Firefox 1.0PR with Windows XP.
^^^
I have two reasons to think XP might not be the problem:
1- I have received an email from a person called
* olivier ripoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-20-04 03:40]:
1- I have received an email from a person called John Shawger for whom
the page works with XP + Firefox 1.0PR
2- It works with IE on windows XP
So I think Firefox is right not to interpret the frame content. It is a
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* olivier ripoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-20-04 03:40]:
1- I have received an email from a person called John Shawger for whom
the page works with XP + Firefox 1.0PR
2- It works with IE on windows XP
So I think Firefox is right not to interpret the frame content. It is
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:58:46 +0200
olivier ripoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* olivier ripoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-20-04 03:40]:
1- I have received an email from a person called John Shawger for whom
the page works with XP + Firefox 1.0PR
2- It works with IE on
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Malcolm Tredinnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-17-04 22:35]:
...
Your webserver is serving up this document as text/plain (rather than
text/html), so it is hard to read at the moment (i.e. littered with
HTML tags). You may wish to fix that. :-)
Hum, looks fine in Firefox
* olivier ripoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-18-04 03:40]:
might be a problem
...
Not here on Firefox 1.0PR with Windows XP.
^^^
--
Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535
http://wahoo.no-ip.org@
