On 2/26/07, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Take a look at http://developer.gimp.org/ to get more information on
how to obtain a recent development build of the GIMP. If you do not
finsd your way straight from there to teh download binarys , read
some of the information th
On Sunday 25 February 2007 15:32, Simon Davis wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I imagine this is a fairly common question so forgive me but can't
> find anything definate on it. Does anyone know when / if there will
> be a new version of GIMP released. Developing a complete course
> (vid tutorials etc) for G
Hi there,
I imagine this is a fairly common question so forgive me but can't
find anything definate on it. Does anyone know when / if there will be
a new version of GIMP released. Developing a complete course (vid
tutorials etc) for GIMP and don't want it to be obsolete straight away.
If it
Hi Richard,
Richard wrote:
> Thanks,
> but neither link answers my question,
> on bit's ( color depth )
Well, they kind of do (in that, if the GIMP were 16 bits per
channel now, it would have been in the release notes). The short
answer is no, we aren't.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
David Neary,
Thanks,
but neither link answers my question,
on bit's ( color depth )
TKS -
Rick
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 14:01 -0500, Richard wrote:
Question, going from version 2.0
to version 2.2 what has changes, or what improvements,
do we have now?
...is this version now 48 bit ? pe
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 14:01 -0500, Richard wrote:
> Question, going from version 2.0
> to version 2.2 what has changes, or what improvements,
> do we have now?
>
> ...is this version now 48 bit ? per say, 16 bit per R/G/B ?
> also, what about black and white? can we do 16 bit? or 32 bit grey scale
Question, going from version 2.0
to version 2.2 what has changes, or what improvements,
do we have now?
...is this version now 48 bit ? per say, 16 bit per R/G/B ?
also, what about black and white? can we do 16 bit? or 32 bit grey scale ?
Thank You.
Richard
_
Hi,
Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adding to this,
> there should be two groups,
> novice and expert. I know there allot of people whom
> would like to harness the full power of Gimp.
> without any flames.
Uh? Sorry if we appeared to be flaming but we weren't. I was only
curious. My apolo
Adding to this,
there should be two groups,
novice and expert. I know there allot of people whom
would like to harness the full power of Gimp.
without any flames.
Regards-
Richard
Andrew wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Owen Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Just a simpletons understanding that 1.2
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Owen Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Just a simpletons understanding that 1.2 used gtk 1.2 and this last one
uses gtk 2.2
Ah. I wasn't aware that the toolkit we use for the user interface is
considered the underlying library. I'd use that term for an image
manipulat
Hi,
Owen Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just a simpletons understanding that 1.2 used gtk 1.2 and this last one
> uses gtk 2.2
Ah. I wasn't aware that the toolkit we use for the user interface is
considered the underlying library. I'd use that term for an image
manipulation library such as G
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The underlying library changed between 1.2 and the 2.0 series
>
> The underlying library? What would that be?
Ah,
Just a simpletons understanding that 1.2 used gtk 1.2 and this last one
uses gtk 2.2
If my
Hi,
Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The underlying library changed between 1.2 and the 2.0 series
The underlying library? What would that be?
Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-us
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:17:45 -0500
Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a silly question,
> I notice that version 1.25
> then version 2.0.x
>
> Just was wonder,
> was there a different is functionality ?
> or is gimp 2.0.x all of that and more?
>
The underlying library changed between 1.2
Just a silly question,
I notice that version 1.25
then version 2.0.x
Just was wonder,
was there a different is functionality ?
or is gimp 2.0.x all of that and more?
TKS -
Rick
:-)
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.ed
Ciao Stefano -
The problem is that Gimp-1.3.x is still heavily in development and is not yet
usable for production work. One of the things that's still missing is the
Script-Fu and text handling.
Use 1.3.x if you want to participate in the development work -- use 1.2.3 if
you want to make ima
Ciao All!
I'm new for this list and I beg your pardon if following is a FAQ.
I've installed all gimp versions 1.3.x and all have the same problem with
Script-Fu -> Buttons and some Logos
Even if I use the default settings all what I get is part of the shape of
the
button and the text is displa
17 matches
Mail list logo
