g"<gimp-user-list@gnome.org>
>Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
>
>How much extra time are you seeing with the Python dialog?
>
>Here on a Windows 7 machine, I can't be sure I'm seeing any
difference, so it must be less than 0.5 seconds.
>
>Kevin
>
>__
f
uga...@talktalk.net <uga...@talktalk.net>
Sent: 23 March 2016 10:22
To: ofn...@gmx.com; gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
Intersting idea, but running Python interactively before launching GIMP
does not seem to make a noticeable difference.
Thanks.
&
Intersting idea, but running Python interactively before launching GIMP
does not seem to make a noticeable difference.
Thanks.
>Original Message
>From: ofn...@gmx.com
>Date: 22/03/2016 21:04
>To: <gimp-user-list@gnome.org>
>Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script
I take the point.
Thanks.
>Original Message
>From: ke...@ve3syb.ca
>Date: 22/03/2016 20:34
>To: <gimp-user-list@gnome.org>
>Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
>
>On 16-03-22 03:04 PM, uga...@talktalk.net wrote:
>> I don't see the
Here is the link: http://gimpbook.com/scripting/gimp-script-templates/pyui.py
>Original Message
>From: payn...@hotmail.com
>Date: 22/03/2016 19:51
>To: "gimp-user-list@gnome.org"<gimp-user-list@gnome.org>
>Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu
&g
On 22/03/16 21:34, Kevin Cozens wrote:
On 16-03-22 03:04 PM, uga...@talktalk.net wrote:
I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is noticeable
lag when executing python-fu.
Script-Fu is always loaded in memory when GIMP starts. For Python
scripts the Python interpreter must
On 16-03-22 03:04 PM, uga...@talktalk.net wrote:
I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is noticeable
lag when executing python-fu.
Script-Fu is always loaded in memory when GIMP starts. For Python scripts
the Python interpreter must be loaded before it can run the script.
e UI. I note show_py_ui.py is a smaller
file size, 3kb compared to test-sphere.scm's 6kb (12kb inc comments).
Is it just me on pre-build OSX?
Thanks.
-u
>Original Message
>From: ofn...@gmx.com
>Date: 22/03/2016 16:34
>To: <gimp-user-list@gnome.org>
>Subj: Re: [
show_py_ui.py is a smaller
file size, 3kb compared to test-sphere.scm's 6kb (12kb inc comments).
Is it just me on pre-build OSX?
Thanks.
-u
>Original Message
>From: ofn...@gmx.com
>Date: 22/03/2016 16:34
>To: <gimp-user-list@gnome.org>
>Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs scr
On 22/03/16 12:27, uga...@talktalk.net wrote:
Is there a known performance issue for python-fu compared with script-
fu?
I have a pair of comparable scripts, and I find python-fu to be
noticeably lagged.
I am running 2.8.16 on OSX.
-u
A script is normally just glue around operations
Is there a known performance issue for python-fu compared with script-
fu?
I have a pair of comparable scripts, and I find python-fu to be
noticeably lagged.
I am running 2.8.16 on OSX.
-u
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:
11 matches
Mail list logo