I think she's talking about something like this in p-shop, saving the
psd plus flattened image:
http://www.laughing-lion-design.com/2007/09/photoshop-tip-create-a-flattened-layer-and-keep-all-your-layers-intact/
Dan
On 8/13/12, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Oon-E
How can I import this palette into the GIMP palettes?
/usr/share/kde4/apps/krita/palettes/1-classic-kit.gpl
- Enda___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
I am unable to decrease the width of the Palette Editor window. How do
I do so?
- Enda___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
The Palette Editor won't stay on top when GIMP is in Fullscreen mode,
yet does when GIMP is not in Fullscreen mode.
- Enda___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> How can I import this palette into the GIMP palettes?
>
> /usr/share/kde4/apps/krita/palettes/1-classic-kit.gpl
Windows > Dockable Dialogs > Palettes
Right-click on the list of palettes and select "Import Palette".
In the Import dialog, click the Palette file button and navigate to
that fil
> I am unable to decrease the width of the Palette Editor window. How do
> I do so?
Which version of gimp are you using? What OS?
Normally just drag a corner of the dialog.
--
Owen
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https:
> The Palette Editor won't stay on top when GIMP is in Fullscreen mode,
> yet does when GIMP is not in Fullscreen mode.
Maybe read http://docs.gimp.org/2.8/en/gimp-concepts-docks.html and go
from there.
--
Owen
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gi
> Von: Enda
> I am unable to decrease the width of the Palette Editor window. How do
> I do so?
You probably can't, if the current width is the minimum width - which is likely
determined by the entries for palette name and number of columns below the
editor.
Regards,
Michael
___
On 08/13/2012 11:29 PM, maderios wrote:
On 08/13/2012 09:45 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
We see the reasons behind the change
May you explain here the reasons of the change concerning save and
save as ?
Before:
- Creates complex images with several layers, paths, masks
- Wants a PNG to show Mr C
On 08/13/2012 10:30 PM, Rauh, Stuart wrote:
As one of the silent majority who are extremely happy with GIMP and the
behavior in latest version,
Hi
1) it's not because people are silent they approve...
2)I'm not complaining about Gimp, Gimp is a very good software. I'm just
saying the new Gi
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:24 PM, maderios wrote:
> 2)I'm not complaining about Gimp, Gimp is a very good software. I'm just
> saying the new Gimp-2.8 behavior (concerning save and save as ) is an error.
> This error takes away Gimp-2.8 of the world of the professionals.
Except professionals tend
On 08/14/2012 01:01 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
On 08/13/2012 11:29 PM, maderios wrote:
On 08/13/2012 09:45 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
We see the reasons behind the change
May you explain here the reasons of the change concerning save and
save as ?
Before:
- Creates complex images with several layers,
No, actually -- I sent a flattened GIMP image to a friend with photoshop and he
floored me by being able to separate the layers and manipulate them anyway. I
have some flattened images I would like to do that with and am wondering if it
is possible in GIMP. It would save me a lot of time._
I have area(the whole layer) that I have filled with semi-transparent gradient,
so now, I select it - (layer->alpha to selection) and trying to fill with
ordinary non-transparent color, but I get the same area with the same
semi-transparent gradient, the only thing that I changed - the main colo
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:13 PM, maderios wrote:
Earlier today:
> This error takes away Gimp-2.8 of the world of the professional_s_.
And now:
> What you call "safety belt/hard hat" is useless for _me_...
This is the main problem I have with your argumentation: talking for
many people, while
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Misty Day wrote:
> No, actually -- I sent a flattened GIMP image to a friend with photoshop and
> he floored me by being able to separate the layers and manipulate them
> anyway. I have some flattened images I would like to do that with and am
> wondering if it is
1) What if saving a flattened image is exactly what I want to do.
2) It is not exactly true that "further work is near impossible".
On 8/14/2012 4:01 AM, Ofnuts wrote:
With the previous behavior, if you "save" in a non-XCF file format, then all
you save is a flattened image on which further wo
On 08/14/2012 01:39 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:24 PM, maderios wrote:
2)I'm not complaining about Gimp, Gimp is a very good software. I'm just
saying the new Gimp-2.8 behavior (concerning save and save as ) is an error.
This error takes away Gimp-2.8 of the world
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:32 AM, scythargon wrote:
> I have area(the whole layer) that I have filled with semi-transparent
> gradient, so now, I select it - (layer->alpha to selection) and trying to
> fill with ordinary non-transparent color, but I get the same area with the
> same semi-transpa
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 7:16 PM, maderios wrote:
> Hi Alexandre
>
> Really ? In 1987, "digital photography" didn't exist... We (photographers)
> were using color slides, and the contrast was a big problem... Easier with
> negative but useless for commercial use. Then, 1990 years, some colleagues
On 08/14/2012 08:07 AM, Ken Warner wrote:
1) What if saving a flattened image is exactly what I want to do.
It's easy - just export it
2) It is not exactly true that "further work is near impossible".
But without the layers saved separately it's a lot more complex
-- of course, depending on s
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:45:48 +0200
From: ofn...@laposte.net
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp-2.8_Save and save as bad behavior
On 08/13/2012 09:09 PM, maderios wrote:
On 08/13/2012 09:00 PM, Archie Arevalo wrote:
On 08/14/2012 05:31 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 7:16 PM, maderios wrote:
Hi Alexandre
Really ? In 1987, "digital photography" didn't exist... We (photographers)
were using color slides, and the contrast was a big problem... Easier with
negative but useless for comm
> Von: Alexandre Prokoudine
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 7:16 PM, maderios wrote:
Both of you,
may I suggest that you move your private conversation to private mail? In my
opinion, there's no further insight that can be gained for the other readers,
although the quite civilized discussion is cer
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:24:58 +0200
> From: mader...@gmail.com
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP is GREAT!
>
> PS: sorry for my bad english, I'm french
Don't worry about that, the worst English always comes from native speakers who
are just too lazy to use even
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> may I suggest that you move your private conversation to private mail?
If it was a private conversation, I wouldn't be maintaining it :)
But yes, I agree. This is just tiresome. EOT for me.
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicswor
On 08/14/2012 07:05 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: Alexandre Prokoudine
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 7:16 PM, maderios wrote:
Both of you,
may I suggest that you move your private conversation to private mail? In my
opinion, there's no further insight that can be gained for the other readers,
1) Well then, if I open a jpg file and make layers and paths etc. and want to
save my work, why is it anathema to export it as an XCF file?
2) Your assumption is that there are layers after the image is flattened seems
odd.
On 8/14/2012 9:39 AM, Burnie West wrote:
On 08/14/2012 08:07 AM, Ken W
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Ken Warner wrote:
> 1) Well then, if I open a jpg file and make layers and paths etc. and want
> to save my work, why is it anathema to export it as an XCF file?
Gmail tells me there are 58 deleted messages in this conversation
(yes). That is, after 58 messages yo
...and it still seems as if you have a reading comprehension problem.
I asked a simple question -- I think if you would take the time to try
and understand the question, you wouldn't be so insulting to people who
disagree with your "design principles".
On 8/14/2012 12:21 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Burnie West wrote:
>> IMO, it would be cool somehow if layer group will handle color correction
>> and filters as well.
>>
> Sounds like a good plug-in idea - - -
Only if 3rd party... In 2.10 plug-ins as we know them are either dead
or struggling to survive :)
Al
On 08/14/2012 09:21 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Ken Warner wrote:
1) Well then, if I open a jpg file and make layers and paths etc. and want
to save my work, why is it anathema to export it as an XCF file?
Gmail tells me there are 58 deleted messages in thi
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:40 PM, maderios wrote:
> Only "a native file format and a lossy file format" ?
> Hum (in french, sorry)
> Native for who ?
61 deleted messages later you finally started asking the right kind of
questions :)
As already explained on a frigging huge amount of occasio
1. Export it to JPEG and exit GIMP or close the file clicking No you don't want
to save as XCF. The point is for many work that are done and when it is saved
as a PNG, and OMG the file was now opened as PNG and I closed it ... all your
layers are gone! It's a failsafe.
2. Then it really is a min
On Tuesday 14 August 2012 21:40:24 maderios wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 09:21 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Ken Warner wrote:
> >> 1) Well then, if I open a jpg file and make layers and paths etc. and
> >> want
> >> to save my work, why is it anathema to export it
On Tuesday 14 August 2012 23:58:25 Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:40 PM, maderios wrote:
> > Only "a native file format and a lossy file format" ?
> > Hum (in french, sorry)
> > Native for who ?
>
> 61 deleted messages later you finally started asking the right kind
36 matches
Mail list logo
