Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu

2016-03-23 Thread uga...@talktalk.net
__ >From: gimp-user-list on behalf of uga...@talktalk.net >Sent: 23 March 2016 10:22 >To: ofn...@gmx.com; gimp-user-list@gnome.org >Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu > >Intersting idea, but running Python interactively before launching GIMP >doe

Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu

2016-03-23 Thread Kevin Payne
March 2016 10:22 To: ofn...@gmx.com; gimp-user-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu Intersting idea, but running Python interactively before launching GIMP does not seem to make a noticeable difference. Thanks. >Original Message >From: ofn...@gmx.com >

Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu

2016-03-23 Thread uga...@talktalk.net
Intersting idea, but running Python interactively before launching GIMP does not seem to make a noticeable difference. Thanks. >Original Message >From: ofn...@gmx.com >Date: 22/03/2016 21:04 >To: >Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu > >On 22/03/16 21:3

Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu

2016-03-23 Thread uga...@talktalk.net
I take the point. Thanks. >Original Message >From: ke...@ve3syb.ca >Date: 22/03/2016 20:34 >To: >Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu > >On 16-03-22 03:04 PM, uga...@talktalk.net wrote: >> I don't see the difference to be about efficiency.

Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu

2016-03-23 Thread uga...@talktalk.net
Here is the link: http://gimpbook.com/scripting/gimp-script-templates/pyui.py >Original Message >From: payn...@hotmail.com >Date: 22/03/2016 19:51 >To: "gimp-user-list@gnome.org" >Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu > >As you haven't provide

Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu

2016-03-22 Thread Ofnuts
On 22/03/16 21:34, Kevin Cozens wrote: On 16-03-22 03:04 PM, uga...@talktalk.net wrote: I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is noticeable lag when executing python-fu. Script-Fu is always loaded in memory when GIMP starts. For Python scripts the Python interpreter must be

Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu

2016-03-22 Thread Kevin Cozens
On 16-03-22 03:04 PM, uga...@talktalk.net wrote: I don't see the difference to be about efficiency. There is noticeable lag when executing python-fu. Script-Fu is always loaded in memory when GIMP starts. For Python scripts the Python interpreter must be loaded before it can run the script. Th

Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu

2016-03-22 Thread Kevin Payne
it's entirely dependent on what you are trying to do. Kevin From: gimp-user-list on behalf of uga...@talktalk.net Sent: 22 March 2016 19:04 To: ofn...@gmx.com; gimp-user-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu I don't see t

Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu

2016-03-22 Thread uga...@talktalk.net
the UI. I note show_py_ui.py is a smaller file size, 3kb compared to test-sphere.scm's 6kb (12kb inc comments). Is it just me on pre-build OSX? Thanks. -u >Original Message >From: ofn...@gmx.com >Date: 22/03/2016 16:34 >To: >Subj: Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu > &

Re: [Gimp-user] python-fu vs script-fu

2016-03-22 Thread Ofnuts
On 22/03/16 12:27, uga...@talktalk.net wrote: Is there a known performance issue for python-fu compared with script- fu? I have a pair of comparable scripts, and I find python-fu to be noticeably lagged. I am running 2.8.16 on OSX. -u A script is normally just glue around operations carried