thought it was time to rename the thread since I have gone past
the problems with pygtk.
I had a successful cvs/compile/install cycle on Gimp stable. Then
I thought I would try Gimp unstable, or bleeding edge. I
followed the instructions for CVS of Gimp stable with one
modification (see below)
I
John R. Culleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Earlier in my journey autogen.sh had complained about an
> obsolete intltool so I installed version 32 of that package.
Did you rerun autogen.sh after updating intltool?
> BTW I switched from stable cvs to unstable by deleting the
> entire ~/cvs/gimp
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 01:14 pm, Simon Budig wrote:
> John R. Culleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Earlier in my journey autogen.sh had complained about an
> > obsolete intltool so I installed version 32 of that package.
>
> Did you rerun autogen.sh after updating intltool?
I removed the cvs
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:52 am, John R. Culleton wrote:
> thought it was time to rename the thread since I have gone past
> the problems with pygtk.
>
> If anything else comes up of interest I will report back.
It seems that the error reported earlier prevented final
compilation so I had unst
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 12:40, John R. Culleton wrote:
> Back to the drawing board. :<(
poor you :(. i am reading this thread with interest and am thinking of
having a go myself but i am reluctant to do this incase it overwrites my
current installation. can i install, or try to install the gi
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:40, John R. Culleton wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:52 am, John R. Culleton wrote:
> > thought it was time to rename the thread since I have gone past
> > the problems with pygtk.
> >
> > If anything else comes up of interest I will report back.
>
> It seems tha
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 23:27, Richard Nagle wrote:
> Too bad one can¹t use the real epson driver... with Gimp.
it seems to me your problem is with gimp print and not gimp per se. did
you ask at the the gimp print forum as i suggested some while ago ?
sammi
_
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 04:55:16PM +0100, sam ende wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 June 2005 12:40, John R. Culleton wrote:
>
> > Back to the drawing board. :<(
>
> poor you :(. i am reading this thread with interest and am thinking of
> having a go myself but i am reluctant to do this incase it overwr
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 12:59:31PM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:40, John R. Culleton wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:52 am, John R. Culleton wrote:
> > > thought it was time to rename the thread since I have gone past
> > > the problems with pygt
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 03:59 pm, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:40, John R. Culleton wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 June 2005 08:52 am, John R. Culleton wrote:
> > > thought it was time to rename the thread since I have gone past
> > > the problems with pygtk.
> >
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 02:41 pm, John R. Culleton wrote:
upgraded to
> version 32.1 That gave problems with both cvs downloads.
>
> Now I have upgraded to 33 (which comes with the 2.3.1 gimp
> tarball BTW) and now stable will compile and install without
> complaint.
>
> I still have the 2.3.1 t
I am working with unstable CVS (2.3.2) and am just trying things
out. I can find plugins on my disk that have the suffix .py
which means of course that they are written in python. But often
they have identical names and functions as older script-fu
products. So how to I specify the python plug in a
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 05:56:35PM +, John R. Culleton wrote:
> I am working with unstable CVS (2.3.2) and am just trying things
> out. I can find plugins on my disk that have the suffix .py
> which means of course that they are written in python. But often
> they have identical names and funct
I tried rebuilding Gimp 2.2.6. Closer inspection of the 'gmake' output
revealed the following.
...
Making all in plug-ins
gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/share/src/gimp/gimp-2.2.6/plug-ins'
gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/share/src/gimp/gimp-2.2.6/plug-ins'
gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for
14 matches
Mail list logo
