On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 21:26 -0500, Eric P wrote:
> Check out this png. I'm not sure if it is editable in the GIMP.
> http://i34.tinypic.com/rtzshs.png
>
> First of all it's an indexed image. You'll see two white arrows on the right
> hand side. Switch the mode to RGB and
> you'll see two new a
> On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 21:26 -0500, Eric P wrote:
>> Check out this png. I'm not sure if it is editable in the GIMP.
>> http://i34.tinypic.com/rtzshs.png
>>
>> First of all it's an indexed image. You'll see two white arrows on
>> the right hand side. Switch the mode to RGB and
>> you'll see two
> > Check out this png. I'm not sure if it is editable in the GIMP.
> > http://i34.tinypic.com/rtzshs.png
> >
> > First of all it's an indexed image. You'll see two white arrows on the
> > right hand side. Switch the mode to RGB and
> > you'll see two new alpha transparent arrows appear on th
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 21:26 -0500, Eric P wrote:
> Check out this png. I'm not sure if it is editable in the GIMP.
> http://i34.tinypic.com/rtzshs.png
>
> First of all it's an indexed image. You'll see two white arrows on the right
> hand side. Switch the mode to RGB and
> you'll see two
Attempts to download gimp 2.6.1 into Debian Lenny resulted in 2.4.7.
I don´t know how to fake it out further.
So I went back to Slackware, which takes a lot of fussing but usually
can be worked out with successive downloads/compiles of all the
library bits and pieces. I succeeded with
downlo
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 10:21 -0400, John Culleton wrote:
> Attempts to download gimp 2.6.1 into Debian Lenny resulted in 2.4.7.
> I don´t know how to fake it out further.
Is http://getdeb.net a solution? It worked for me on Ubuntu.
Rolf (http://meetthegimp.org - videopodast about GIMP and more
Greetings,
I am running a Debian GNU/Linux 'Etch' distribution with The Gimp 2.2.
I have Akkana Peck's book: Beginning GIMP From Novice To Professional.
My background is in Art. I have a small Art Bronze foundry, a small
woodworking studio, a sculpture studio, and an animation studio.
I also tink
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 10:21 -0400, John Culleton wrote:
> So I went back to Slackware, which takes a lot of fussing but usually
> can be worked out with successive downloads/compiles of all the
> library bits and pieces. I succeeded with
> downloading/making/installing latest babl and glib
On Saturday 18 October 2008 11:56:08 am Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 10:21 -0400, John Culleton wrote:
> > So I went back to Slackware, which takes a lot of fussing but
> > usually can be worked out with successive downloads/compiles of
> > all the library bits and pieces. I
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 12:07 -0400, John Culleton wrote:
> Fixed in a Gimp svn or a gegl svn?
I said GEGL won't build with this combination of glib and gtk+. We can
hardly fix the GEGL build in GIMP.
Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lis
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > /usr/local/include/glib-2.0/glib/gspawn.h:22:2: error: #error "Only
> > can be included directly."
>
> The gegl binary won't build with a brand-new GLib but an older copy of
> GTK+. This is fixed in SVN. But to get the tarball compiled you need to
>
Hi
the pages are now translated to english.
So, is there a chance that you'll place a link on gimp.org's download pages
to point to either ot http://gimp.lisanet.de or to the sourceforge project
site http://sourceforge.net/projects/gimponosx ?
This would make it easier for users to find the recen
bhaaluu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote (in part) (on 2008-10-18 at 11:20):
I am running a Debian GNU/Linux 'Etch' distribution with The Gimp
2.2.
Can you upgrade to Gimp 2.6.1? - Following probably works with Gimp 2.2
but I don't have it anymore.
Next, I need to know how to actually implem
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 22:54 +0200, Simone wrote:
> the pages are now translated to english.
> So, is there a chance that you'll place a link on gimp.org's download pages
> to point to either ot http://gimp.lisanet.de or to the sourceforge project
> site http://sourceforge.net/projects/gimpon
Hi,
I try to write a gimp-fu script to save the current image as a gif.
I found a sample script on the web that seems to fit:
(define (script-fu-glogo-simple2 srcimg dummy filename)
(let*
(
(im
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 23:49 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> SF-VALUE "File Name" "/tmp/x.gif"
> )
>
> (In the script file-gif-save is commented out,
> it fails at refresh, if not commented out)
>
> However when I run this scri
Script:
http://flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com/GIMP/Scripts/save-anim-layers.scm
(apparently by Saul Goode 3/11/2008)
This script was mentioned in bugzilla:
Bug 556548 – Layer extraction script
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556548
Attempts to execute it result in:
Error while executi
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 18:19 -0400, Alec Burgess wrote:
> Error while executing script-fu-save-anim-layers:
> Error: Bad syntax of binding spec in let* : ((image) (buffer))
>
> I think this is due to changes in script-fu (?) but don't know enough
> about script-fu to correct it. Could someon
>Would you mind to fix the spelling of GIMP on your web pages? The
>application is called "GNU Image Manipulation Program", or short "GIMP",
>not "Gimp". Thanks.
... done.
Simone
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists
I would recommend first reading the reference documentation that is included
with the source code.
Online at:
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gimp-gap/trunk/docs/reference/txt/plug-in-gap-onionskin-configuration.txt?revision=470&view=markup
Next, your scanned files should be named sequentially in the
Script has been updated.
Quoting Alec Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Script:
> http://flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com/GIMP/Scripts/save-anim-layers.scm
> (apparently by Saul Goode 3/11/2008)
>
> This script was mentioned in bugzilla:
> Bug 556548 – Layer extraction script
> http://bugzilla.gnome.or
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote (in part) (on 2008-10-18 at 18:45):
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 18:19 -0400, Alec Burgess wrote:
> > Error while executing script-fu-save-anim-layers:
> > Error: Bad syntax of binding spec in let* : ((image) (buffer))
> >
> > I think this is due to changes
22 matches
Mail list logo
