I installed gimp-1.2.3 from source on my OpenBSD machine. It works
fine (as far as I've used it anyway), but I did notice something odd.
The version numbers for libgimp.so and libgimpui.so are both 0.3, while
they were 2.0 with gimp-1.2.2 from the OpenBSD ports.
I tried to check with the package
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:03:45PM -0500, Walker, Sam wrote:
> This is a tough task that sounds simple.
>
> I would use Fuzzy Select tool on the background, playing with the threshold
> until the selection looked good. Then invert the selection, and use
> /Select/Shrink to unselect any extra bac
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 07:21:42AM -0500, Walker, Sam wrote:
> It would help to provide a link to the actual picture.
And perhaps a copy of the generated PostScript file (print to file).
> -Original Message-
> From: A.J. Limberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 20
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 12:14:28AM +0200, Ing. Karel Babka wrote:
> Hi,
> Have You same experience with this printer AND using gimp? What can I
> do, if my printer is'nt listed in 'printer setup' in Gimp?
http://www.linuxprinting.org/ppd-doc.html
http://www.linuxprinting.org/show_printer.cgi?rec
I'm trying to build gimp-1.3.22 within OpenBSD's ports framework.
It does a "fake install" and then builds a package from the "fake
install root". I'm having a problem with libtool relinking
libgimpmodule, and looking for libgimpbase in /usr/local instead
of the "fake install root".
Here's a tail
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:56:17PM -0800, Daniel Rogers wrote:
>
> On Saturday, November 8, 2003, at 07:01 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>I'm trying to build gimp-1.3.22 within OpenBS
