very well with these
images and bigger images.
Is this correctly, so gimp don't work well with these big image?
P.s. This is not a critical about gimp, only a little question.
Thanks for replies and for gimp work,
Michele Petrazzo
Italy
Roel Schroeven wrote:
Michele Petrazzo wrote:
hardware: cpu amd 2600+, 1GB ram, hd 80GB Maxtor, ati 7000 64MB
Is this correctly, so gimp don't work well with these big image?
Did you use the default value for the tile cache size, or did you adjust
it? The default value is 128 MB IIRC, b
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Michele Petrazzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Did you use the default value for the tile cache size, or did you
adjust it? The default value is 128 MB IIRC, but if you're going to
open large images and you have 1 GB of RAM, it should be much
higher than tha
Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 10:30:12AM +0100, Michele Petrazzo wrote:
I try to install photoshop on win and it work very well with these
images and bigger images.
how about some numbers showing that windows/photoshop work better?
On the same machine with photoshop, a preview of a
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Michele Petrazzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On the same machine with photoshop, a preview of a "curves" tool
spend only 4-5 seconds, but when press the OK button, it spend about
the same time of gimp.
As you already guessed, the preview of the color manip
