RE: [Gimp-user] Re: Speeding Up Gimp on WinXP Computer

2004-01-26 Thread craniac
Sven Neumann wrote:
 I don't think GIMP does anything special before opening the 
 file selector. It might be the file selector itself that 
 causes the delay. Do you observe similar problems with other 
 file selectors (for example when exporting a path or loading 
 curves presets)?

You're probably right as other file selectors are the same.  It takes about
2 seconds before the selector opens.  Changing the tile cache size appears
not to affect this.  Not a big issue really, just something I had noticed.
This might even not be present in later versions.  As I said I only use GIMP
occasionally on this machine so I haven't bothered to upgrade from version
1.2.3.

Cheers.
--
Steve Crane
http://craniac.afraid.org  
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Speeding Up Gimp on WinXP Computer

2004-01-26 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

craniac [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 You're probably right as other file selectors are the same.  It takes about
 2 seconds before the selector opens.  Changing the tile cache size appears
 not to affect this.  Not a big issue really, just something I had noticed.
 This might even not be present in later versions.  As I said I only use GIMP
 occasionally on this machine so I haven't bothered to upgrade from version
 1.2.3.

I guess you are using some slow network shares then. If at all this
would have to be addressed at the GTK+ level but I don't think it
makes sense to worry about the GTK+-1.2 file selector. You should
perhaps check if the new file chooser widget in GTK+ HEAD shows the
same problem.


Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Speeding Up Gimp on WinXP Computer

2004-01-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 TheGIMP -- being built on linux and the defaults set for the excellent 
 way that linux handles all the different little memory devises that 
 these computers have --  might need for you to consider your resources 
 while setting TheGIMP up. More than you are used to thinking about.
 
 A document has been carefully hidden on mmmaybe.gimp.org that should
 help you to figure out what your computer is doing.  This document also
 described accurately how to keep adobe photoshop from eating up outlook
 express ability, if this is an issue you have as well.  How nice for the
 gimp development team to provide such instructions for the operating
 system you paid for (one way or another), windows.  I am curious if
 Microsoft tech support could help you with your GIMP installation.  It
 runs fine on my computer; and I am usually running on windows users
 outdated equipment.  ie, your trash thanks to windows.
 
 for $600 i will make the image on linux for you faster than photoshop
 makes it on windows.  A second image a mere $150.  I will throw in the
 memory management documentation for your other apps for free.
 
 http://mmmaybe.gimp.org/unix/howtos/tile_cache.html
 
 i warn you, even simplified, computer memory management is a difficult
 concept.  There is a good chance that the developers would like you not
 to read carefully through this so they can keep their jobs.
 
 i can guarrentee that they will not reach out and tweak it for you.  they
 are unhappy with the way they needed to make your gui run stable as it
 is.

Please ignore Carol's ramblings. She is talking mainly bullshit here.
Albeit the fact that she has a gimp.org email address she is not
talking on the behalf of the GIMP developers. At least when she's in
this particular mood.

Please don't get a wrong impression from Carol's reply. We are
definitely interested to hear about your in your problems. Even though
most GIMP developers are using some flavour of UNIX, we are still
willing to make GIMP work well on the Win32 platform.


Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Speeding Up Gimp on WinXP Computer

2004-01-25 Thread Steve Crane
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:47:47PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
 Please ignore Carol's ramblings. She is talking mainly bullshit here.
 Albeit the fact that she has a gimp.org email address she is not
 talking on the behalf of the GIMP developers. At least when she's in
 this particular mood.

Thanks Sven, I was about to reply to Carol about her message but I won't
bother now.  I must admit that when I first read it I did a double take
and thought WTF, does Adobe pay this woman?  I'm sure she is trying to
be helpful in her own way but given the poison pen she writes with this
may not be a good thing.

 Please don't get a wrong impression from Carol's reply. We are
 definitely interested to hear about your in your problems. Even though
 most GIMP developers are using some flavour of UNIX, we are still
 willing to make GIMP work well on the Win32 platform.

I am not at all unhappy with GIMP's performance (using default settings)
on Windows XP other than the fact that I have noticed a lag before the
file chooser opens when using File|Save As.  I am a developer myself and
work on Windows, so I have GIMP on it for the odd occasions when I need
to do something graphical at work.  Because I don't use it much I
haven't bothered trying to optimise it but I will try doing so to see
what difference it makes.

My comment that I didn't think available memory would impact the time to
open the file chooser for Save As, revolves around the way I do this in
my own programs.  I do no processing before displaying the file chooser
and if the GIMP behaves the same there is no reason for there to be a
lag.  If however, some processing is done before displaying the dialog
then some delay might be expected.

Regards.
-- 
Steve Crane
http://craniac.afraid.org
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Re: Speeding Up Gimp on WinXP Computer

2004-01-25 Thread Carol Spears
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 04:57:56PM +0200, Steve Crane wrote:
 On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:47:47PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
  Please ignore Carol's ramblings. She is talking mainly bullshit here.
  Albeit the fact that she has a gimp.org email address she is not
  talking on the behalf of the GIMP developers. At least when she's in
  this particular mood.
 
 Thanks Sven, I was about to reply to Carol about her message but I won't
 bother now.  I must admit that when I first read it I did a double take
 and thought WTF, does Adobe pay this woman?  I'm sure she is trying to
 be helpful in her own way but given the poison pen she writes with this
 may not be a good thing.
 
i watched my friend wonder why photoshop was interfering with Outlook
Express.  I did not want to learn about Windows but I was interested in
her projects.  She looked it up in a book.  I watched this.  Her
explanation was the same as this document i showed later in this email.
i would like her not to have these problems either, she was doing work
for a really good organization, in my opinion.

how does one become qualified to know such things about computers?

  Please don't get a wrong impression from Carol's reply. We are
  definitely interested to hear about your in your problems. Even though
  most GIMP developers are using some flavour of UNIX, we are still
  willing to make GIMP work well on the Win32 platform.
 
 I am not at all unhappy with GIMP's performance (using default settings)
 on Windows XP other than the fact that I have noticed a lag before the
 file chooser opens when using File|Save As.  I am a developer myself and
 work on Windows, so I have GIMP on it for the odd occasions when I need
 to do something graphical at work.  Because I don't use it much I
 haven't bothered trying to optimise it but I will try doing so to see
 what difference it makes.
 
i was actually able to race gimp-1.2 with photoshop 5 on two computers,
although most of the racing was done with gimp-1.0.  gimp-1.0 ran slower
than photoshop5.  the gimp-1.0 was being run on a 486 that had a 42M
harddrive and two ram chips that would fit into the hewitt packard
computer that was purchased in 1992.  i do not have access to the
machine right now.  photoshop le was being run on the computer that i
use now.  

my friends husband had to upgrade twice, they kept the first computer
that replaced this one for the kids, and bought who knows what to make
windows and photoshop work together.  this is a 455 something and has
made my cool cpu-monitors useless.

she uses default settings and had several problems with new software.  i
believe you are all making your livings not telling girls how to do
simple little things like memory management.  it is your fault i had to
figure out my computer and watch her figure out hers.

photoshop and gimp are disturbingly the same, in my opinion.  just that
gimp can do more with less.  the reason for the similarity is that they
both use computers to work on pixels.  i think photoshop sets its
defaults for apple hardware.  so photoshop has many of the same issues
as gimp does when people want to use one piece of software on another
computer operating system.

 My comment that I didn't think available memory would impact the time to
 open the file chooser for Save As, revolves around the way I do this in
 my own programs.  I do no processing before displaying the file chooser
 and if the GIMP behaves the same there is no reason for there to be a
 lag.  If however, some processing is done before displaying the dialog
 then some delay might be expected.
 
how any application functions has everything to do with the memory
management.  there are things on your computer that the gimp cannot fix.
it can provide for you information on how to fix it however.

with the information i gave you, you can fix it yourself or hire someone
to fix it or do what i do and wait patiently for things to fix
themselves.

carol

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Re: Speeding Up Gimp on WinXP Computer

2004-01-25 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 GSR from this mail list wrote an excellent document on how to set the
 tile cache size:
 http://mmmaybe.gimp.org/unix/howtos/tile_cache.html
 
 the weird thing is, while it was written for linux, it seems to work
 for any computer i have had the luxury to use or observe.

I don't think there's anything OS specific about this HOWTO. Of course
there are always some subtle differences but since the GIMP tile-cache
code is the same on Win32 as on UNIX, of course the HOWTO applies to
Win32 as well. Why is it located in the unix section?


Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Re: Speeding Up Gimp on WinXP Computer

2004-01-23 Thread Carol Spears
hi Marc,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 02:29:52PM -0500, Marc Dver wrote:
 Can someone recommend ways of speeding up Gimp on a WinXP Pro machine? 
 I'm using GTK+ 2.0 and the stable version of Gimp (the development 
 version won't install on my machine because it has a AMD K6-2 450 
 processor).  When I use the bucket tool, it takes a fw minutes before it 
 fills, during which it freezes.  It never crashes, but takes a while to 
 perform the operation.
 
depending on the size of the image, your computer will only be able to
do so much.  My friend had some of the same issues with Photoshop, btw.

if you are working on a reasonable size image, i think that TheGIMP will
render the effect quicker doing things its way with reasonably the same
number of keystrokes as photoshop.

you ask TheGIMP to do what a corporation cannot.

carol

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user