with WinXP that has never had a service pack installed, which
has been used for web browsing
almost every day for almost 10 years, and has never had any security
issues.
> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:17:04 -0800
> From: jc
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Windows XP - Service Pack?
> To:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> a rant
Considering Gimp runs on so many systems, it's amazing how rarely
these MS vs OSS flamewars occur on this mailing list. But that's all
this is, a flamewar that has become completely unrelated to Gimp.
Please everyone, keep your replies
On Monday, January 31, 2011 01:55:20 pm Jernej Simončič did opine:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:39:06 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Oh oh, he's been drinking the koolaid. What we FOSS people are
> > objecting to is the WGA that gets installed with SP2 I believe it
> > was, and this thing does phone
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:39:06 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Oh oh, he's been drinking the koolaid. What we FOSS people are objecting
> to is the WGA that gets installed with SP2 I believe it was, and this thing
> does phone home on every reboot to check if its a legally purchased and
> registere
On Monday, January 31, 2011 12:19:44 pm Jernej Simončič did opine:
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:24:37 -0500, Jay Smith wrote:
> > Though giving M$ access is the definition of compromised as far as I
> > am concerned.
>
> What kind of access, and what do you mean by "phone home"? If you're
> that para
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:24:37 -0500, Jay Smith wrote:
> Though giving M$ access is the definition of compromised as far as I am
> concerned.
What kind of access, and what do you mean by "phone home"? If you're that
paranoid about Windows Update, you can always prevent the service from
running (an
On 01/30/2011 05:17 PM, jc wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:57:14 -0500, Jay Smith wrote:
>>> I'm not sure why you would want to skip the service packs - I use an
>>> XP VM for legacy apps and testing, but the first thing I did when
>>> setting it up was to install SP3. Why not install SP2 (or S
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:57:14 -0500, Jay Smith wrote:
>> I'm not sure why you would want to skip the service packs - I use an
>> XP VM for legacy apps and testing, but the first thing I did when
>> setting it up was to install SP3. Why not install SP2 (or SP3)?
>> Just
>> curious.
>
> However,
On 01/30/2011 02:11 PM, Chris Mohler wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:54 PM, jack white wrote:
>> Thank you, but that's not installing it with no SP's installed though (as
>> the question was).
>
> I'm not sure why you would want to skip the service packs - I use an
> XP VM for legacy apps and
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:54 PM, jack white wrote:
> Thank you, but that's not installing it with no SP's installed though (as
> the question was).
I'm not sure why you would want to skip the service packs - I use an
XP VM for legacy apps and testing, but the first thing I did when
setting it up
Thank you, but that's not installing it with no SP's installed though (as the
question was).
> Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 01:03:10 +0100
> From: Jernej Simon?i?
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Windows XP - Service Pack?
> To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
>
> On Fri
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 17:51:04 +, jack white wrote:
> Is there a way to trick 2.6.11 into installing on XP with no SP's installed?
Install SP2, install GIMP, uninstall SP2.
--
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ >
___
Gimp-user
Is there a way to trick 2.6.11 into installing on XP with no SP's installed?
> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 05:03:25 +
> From: jack white
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Windows XP - Service Pack?
> To:
>
>
> Except that 2.6.6 installs without SP2, but 2.6.11 won't
Except that 2.6.6 installs without SP2, but 2.6.11 won't install without it.
> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:20:17 +0100
> From: Jernej Simon?i?
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Windows XP - Service Pack?
> To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
>
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:21:11
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:21:11 +, jack white wrote:
> I noticed the 2.6.11 says SP2 is required for Windows XP. I know 2.6.6 works
> fine without a Service Pack. Does 2.6.11 really require SP2? If so, is
> 2.6.7 the first version to require it?
I've had the SP2 requirement in the installer f
I noticed the 2.6.11 says SP2 is required for Windows XP. I know 2.6.6 works
fine without a Service Pack. Does 2.6.11 really require SP2? If so, is 2.6.7
the first version to require it?
___
Gimp-user mailing
16 matches
Mail list logo
