Re: [git-users] What does +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* mean ?

# mpc8...@gmail.com / 2015-08-18 09:11:13 -0700: > what does +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* mean ? see "CONFIGURED REMOTE-TRACKING BRANCHES" in git-fetch(1). -- roman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe

Re: [git-users] Interactive rebase, reorder, squash not working

# flatw...@users.sourceforge.net / 2015-05-19 22:28:51 +0300: > On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:42:54 -0400 > Michael Powell wrote: > > > I have set the global editor to Notepad++ via a shell script: > > > > #!/bin/sh > > "C:/Program Files (x86)/Notepad++/notepad++.exe" -multiInst -notabbar > > -nosessio

Re: [git-users] Help with git reset, please.

# keybou...@gmail.com / 2015-05-13 07:37:34 -0700: > > These modes are selected by a special command line option: --soft, > > --hard or --mixed, with the latter being the default. > > > > The --soft option only repositions the branch's tip, > > This is problem number one. That's pretty much wh

Re: [git-users] Divide the text file on the number of rows

# kreol2...@gmail.com / 2015-03-27 05:33:21 -0700: > There is a text file in UTF 2 GB. > Tell me how to divide it by 800,000 lines in different files? man 1 split nb: this is totally unrelated to git. -- roman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git

Re: [git-users] push or clone?

# fpespos...@gmail.com / 2015-03-22 10:27:55 -0700: > Hello -- I just created a bare repo (say on github) and I want to get my > local repo to for for the first time -- should I "push" or "clone" the > local repo to remote report for the first time? Thanks git clone cannot "push" changes,

Re: [git-users] Re: GIT

# lasiew...@gmail.com / 2015-03-13 16:03:12 -0700: > I figured this out. I need to make another branch and it worked. you need to change the way you ask for help people who owe you nothing. we understand you are upset because Git is not a Perforce replica and your attempts to pretend otherwise ha

Re: [git-users] Git - Deployment and Rollback

# nayaksur...@gmail.com / 2015-01-30 00:00:21 -0800: > 1. What are the best strategy for git based deployment and rollback on > large setup. (around 500 servers). the best strategy is to (mostly) leave git out of the deployment picture. minimal recipe: to deploy to /srv/http/thisapp/current/ (on

Re: [git-users] On bash doing git add '' troubles

# wor...@alum.mit.edu / 2014-11-17 10:21:55 -0500: > > From: Guilherme > > git add '' CDD/CDD_Diag.c > > When I experiment, "git add ''" seems to have the same effect as "git > add .", which is not surprsing. (i'm not the OP) it *is* very much surprising, at least if you're used to deal with qu

Re: [git-users] How to give credit to contributors by user name

# chinask...@gmail.com / 2014-10-06 16:59:43 -0700: > This might be a repeat and if so, sorry. > > I have a public GitHub where only a few of us have write access (IOW, only > a few of us can merge pull requests). When a user submits a pull request to > us, initially it has their name on the req

Re: [git-users] configure names for temporary files

# ferreroser...@gmail.com / 2014-10-07 07:17:23 -0700: > I typed the following on Git Bash: > > git config --system mergetool..cmd '"" > -base "$BASE" -local "$LOCAL" -remote "$REMOTE" -merged "$MERGED"' > git mergetool -t .mdl > This command properly launches the GUI of the merge tool, howeve

Re: [git-users] git rev-list --objects doesn't show moves

# wor...@alum.mit.edu / 2014-10-01 11:37:38 -0400: > > From: Roman Neuhauser > > > yup, i'd like a plumbing equivalent of `git log --raw ...`. AFAICT > > the closest to that is git-diff-tree, except that implies N invocations > > instead of one, a sad loss

Re: [git-users] git rev-list --objects doesn't show moves

# wor...@alum.mit.edu / 2014-09-29 11:45:00 -0400: > > From: Roman Neuhauser > > > > i'm writing an alternative to git-requet-pull. its output includes > > a log of the commit range, eg: > > > > 1/3 76a23b86 043603cc README fancier > > 162

[git-users] git rev-list --objects doesn't show moves

hello, i'm writing an alternative to git-requet-pull. its output includes a log of the commit range, eg: 1/3 76a23b86 043603cc README fancier 162441d0 README 2/3 87990615 ab984c9b ignore vim swapfiles 32682119 .gitignore 3/3 2c842d2d 2ab371a4 README is now README.txt each comm

Re: [git-users] Re: git merge --abort deleted my files!

# an...@webkr.de / 2014-09-15 03:13:06 -0700: > On Monday, September 15, 2014 4:22:39 AM UTC+2, Rick Umali wrote: > > The "git add ." should have created Git objects for these untracked files. > > When you did the "git merge --abort", you reset the working directory, > > deleting those files, but

Re: [git-users] git replace

# alcol...@gmail.com / 2014-09-12 04:49:43 -0700: > I'm using git replace command to alter ancestry of commits. > I want to delete merged branch then I suppress the branch parent of the > merge commit. > > But, I see that the old reference of replaced commits still exists. this reads like you sh

Re: [git-users] how corporates handle git repositories?

# mrz@gmail.com / 2014-09-09 12:27:03 -0400: > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > you seem to be unaware that if you pay some money you can have "private" > > repos in github. those are accessible only to users authorized by you. > >

[git-users] git-diff-tree --root

hello, git-diff-tree without --root is absolutely silent for the root commit, and i see no bad effects of --root on non-root commits. are there any hidden gotchas? IOW, why is the --root behavior not the default? cram[1] testcase:: $ git init -q scratch $ cd scratch $ echo '.*.sw?' > .gi

Re: [git-users] how corporates handle git repositories?

# madhan.dhanikacha...@gmail.com / 2014-09-04 21:26:59 -0700: > I see github is a place to hold repositories so multiple people can work on > a project. > my question would be, I know for sure my company won't be OK with hosting > our code in github or anywhere else outside of our internal server