W dniu 06.10.2016 o 11:11, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason pisze:
> Change the log formatting function to know about "git describe" output
> such as "v2.8.0-4-g867ad08", in addition to just plain "867ad08".
>
> There are still many valid refnames that we don't link to
> e.g. v2.10.0-rc1~2^2~1 is also a
In a (private) repo project I have, I recently tried (and failed) to do:
git checkout v4.1-support
getting a "pathspec did not match any files known to git" error.
There's an origin/v4.1-support, there is no v4.1-support "local"
branch. Creating the tracking branch explicitly worked.
Other
Pranit Bauva writes:
> +test_expect_success 'check whether bisection cleanup is not done with bad
> merges' '
> + git bisect start $HASH7 $SIDE_HASH7 &&
> + test_expect_failure git bisect bad >out 2>out &&
I think you meant "test_must_fail" here.
> +
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Kevin Daudt wrote:
> Correct, this only works when it's unambiguous what branch you actually
> mean.
That's not surprising, but there isn't a warning. IMHO, finding
several branch matches is a strong indication that it'll be worth
reporting to the
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 04:25:49PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> In a (private) repo project I have, I recently tried (and failed) to do:
>
> git checkout v4.1-support
>
> getting a "pathspec did not match any files known to git" error.
>
> There's an origin/v4.1-support, there is no
W dniu 13.10.2016 o 11:04, Vegard Nossum pisze:
> On 10/13/2016 01:47 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 07:18:07PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>>
>>> Also, is it possible to make the repository in question available? I
>>> might be able to reproduce based on your description, but it
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:38:41PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> It is a very easy mistake to make to say test_expect_failure when
> making sure a step in the test fails, which must be spelled
> "test_must_fail". By introducing a toggle $test_in_progress that is
> turned on at the beginning of
It is a very easy mistake to make to say test_expect_failure when
making sure a step in the test fails, which must be spelled
"test_must_fail". By introducing a toggle $test_in_progress that is
turned on at the beginning of test_start_() and off at the end of
test_finish_() helper, we can detect
Not only does this DRY up the code (providing a better documentation what
the code is about, as well as allowing to change the behavior in a single
place), it also makes it substantially shorter to use the same
functionality in functions to be introduced when we teach the sequencer to
process
From: Michael Haggerty
If there is a broken symlink where a loose reference file is expected,
then the attempt to open() it fails with ENOENT. This error is
misinterpreted to mean that the loose reference file itself has
disappeared due to a race, causing the lookup to be
Normally when I use interactive add, I just want to add files to the
index via simple numbers, instead of typing paths. So I'll do this as
quick as I can:
1. Type `git add -i`
2. Press `u` after prompt appears
3. Press numbers for the files I want to add, ENTER key
4. ENTER key again to go back
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
builtin/commit.c | 2 +-
sequencer.c | 11 ++-
sequencer.h | 5 +
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/commit.c b/builtin/commit.c
index 1cba3b7..9fddb19 100644
---
git ls-tree goes into an infinite loop while serving pretty vanilla requests,
if the refs/heads/ directory contains a symlink that's broken. Added test
which check if git ends with expected exit code or timeout expires.
---
t/t3103-ls-tree-misc.sh | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
Quite a few error messages touched by this developer during the work to
speed up rebase -i started with an upper case letter, violating our
current conventions. Instead of sneaking in this fix (and forgetting
quite a few error messages), let's just have one wholesale patch fixing
all of the error
In a couple of commits, we will teach the sequencer to handle the
nitty gritty of the interactive rebase, which keeps its state in a
different directory.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
sequencer.c | 21 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+),
The write_message() function safely writes an strbuf to a file.
Sometimes it is inconvenient to require an strbuf, though: the text to
be written may not be stored in a strbuf, or the strbuf should not be
released after writing.
Let's refactor "safely writing string to a file" into
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
sequencer.c | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
index eac531b..9bca056 100644
--- a/sequencer.c
+++ b/sequencer.c
@@ -229,11 +229,8 @@ static int
In interactive rebases, we commit a little bit differently than the
sequencer did so far: we heed the "author-script", the "message" and the
"amend" files in the .git/rebase-merge/ subdirectory.
Likewise, we may want to edit the commit message *even* when providing a
file containing the suggested
It is not unheard of that editors on Windows write CR/LF even if the
file originally had only LF. This is particularly awkward for exec lines
of a rebase -i todo sheet. Take for example the insn "exec echo": The
shell script parser splits at the LF and leaves the CR attached to
"echo", which leads
This makes the code consistent by fixing quite a couple of error messages.
Suggested by Jakub Narębski.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
sequencer.c | 22 +++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sequencer.c
The definition of this function goes back all the way to 043a449
(sequencer: factor code out of revert builtin, 2012-01-11), long before a
serious effort was made to translate all the error messages.
It is slightly out of the context of the current patch series (whose
purpose it is to
The subcommands are used exactly once, at the very beginning of
sequencer_pick_revisions(), to determine what to do. This is an
unnecessary level of indirection: we can simply call the correct
function to begin with. So let's do that.
While at it, ensure that the subcommands return an error code
Hi,
I have realized that this wasn't fixed after all when refs.c
was "rewritten". Issue is caused by broken symlink under refs/heads,
which causes infinite loop for "git ls-tree" command. It was replied
earlier [0] and Michael previously fixed that in better way probably,
then my proposed patch
The `git-rebase-todo` file contains a list of commands. Most of those
commands have the form
The is displayed primarily for the user's convenience, as
rebase -i really interprets only the part. However, there
are *some* places in interactive rebase where the is used to
display
When we came up with the "sequencer" idea, we really wanted to have
kind of a plumbing equivalent of the interactive rebase. Hence the
choice of words: the "todo" script, a "pick", etc.
However, when it came time to implement the entire shebang, somehow this
idea got lost and the sequencer was
Mark messages for translation printed to stderr.
Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida
---
apply.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/apply.c b/apply.c
index 201d3a7..13b2064 100644
--- a/apply.c
+++ b/apply.c
@@ -3554,7 +3554,7 @@ static
Mark plural string for translation using Q_().
Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida
---
apply.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/apply.c b/apply.c
index b03d274..201d3a7 100644
--- a/apply.c
+++ b/apply.c
@@ -4869,10 +4869,12 @@ int
Mark error messages for translation passed to error() and die()
functions.
Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida
---
apply.c | 48
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/apply.c b/apply.c
index
The run_git_commit() function already knows how to amend commits, and
with this new option, it can also clean up commit messages (i.e. strip
out commented lines). This is needed to implement rebase -i's 'fixup'
and 'squash' commands as sequencer commands.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
In the upcoming commits, we will implement more and more of rebase -i's
functionality inside the sequencer. One particular feature of the
commands to come is that some of them allow editing the commit message
while others don't, i.e. we cannot define in the replay_opts whether the
commit message
This teaches the run_git_commit() function to take an argument that will
allow us to implement "todo" commands that need to amend the commit
messages ("fixup", "squash" and "reword").
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
sequencer.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4
The return value of do_recursive_merge() may be positive (indicating merge
conflicts), or 0 (indicating success). It also may be negative, indicating
a fatal error that requires us to abort.
Now, if the return value indicates that there are merge conflicts, we
should not try to commit those
As we are slowly teaching the sequencer to perform the hard work for
the interactive rebase, we need to read files that were written by
shell scripts.
These files typically contain a single line and are invariably ended
by a line feed (and possibly a carriage return before that). Let's use
a
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:16:50PM +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> I have realized that this wasn't fixed after all when refs.c
> was "rewritten". Issue is caused by broken symlink under refs/heads,
> which causes infinite loop for "git ls-tree" command. It was replied
> earlier [0] and Michael
Robert Dailey writes:
> Normally when I use interactive add, I just want to add files to the
> index via simple numbers, instead of typing paths. So I'll do this as
> quick as I can:
>
> 1. Type `git add -i`
> 2. Press `u` after prompt appears
> 3. Press numbers for the
This patch series marks the '4' in the countdown to speed up rebase -i
by implementing large parts in C (read: there will be three more patch
series after that before the full benefit hits git.git: sequencer-i,
rebase--helper and rebase-i-extra). It is based on the `libify-sequencer`
patch series
This change is not completely faithful: instead of initializing all fields
to 0, we choose to initialize command and subcommand to -1 (instead of
defaulting to REPLAY_REVERT and REPLAY_NONE, respectively). Practically,
it makes no difference at all, but future-proofs the code to require
explicit
Hey everyone,
It took me some time to get to the next version as I was a bit
preoccupied with my assignments and exams. The diff between the v14[1]
and v15[2] can be found here[3] because gmail web client will wrap the
lines. Thanks Junio for the reviews in v14. I have tried to solves
every issue
Junio C Hamano writes:
> *1* Would we need a wrapping struct around the array of results?
By the way, I do see a merit on the "check" side (tl;dr: but I do
not think "result" needs it, hence I do not see the need for the
"ugly" variants).
Take "archive" for example. For
The `bisect-clean-state` subcommand is no longer used in the shell
script while the C code uses `bisect_clean_state()` thus remove the
subcommand.
Mentored-by: Lars Schneider
Mentored-by: Christian Couder
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva
Thank you for info, I totally missed that. Yes, this fixes the issue
perfectly.
Petr
On 14.10.2016 15:42, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 03:16:50PM +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote:
>
>> I have realized that this wasn't fixed after all when refs.c
>> was "rewritten". Issue is caused by
Reimplement the `bisect_next` and the `bisect_auto_next` shell function
in C and add the subcommands to `git bisect--helper` to call it from
git-bisect.sh .
Along with this conversion of `bisect_start` has also finished and thus
it has been fully ported to C.
A lot of parts of bisect.c uses
Reimplement the `bisect_log` shell function in C and also add
`--bisect-log` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it from
git-bisect.sh .
Using `--bisect-log` subcommand is a temporary measure to port shell
function to C so as to use the existing test suite. As more functions
are ported,
Reimplement `bisect_reset` shell function in C and add a `--bisect-reset`
subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it from git-bisect.sh .
Using `bisect_reset` subcommand is a temporary measure to port shell
functions to C so as to use the existing test suite. As more functions
are ported, this
Add test to explicitly check that 'git bisect reset' is working as
expected. This is already covered implicitly by the test suite.
Mentored-by: Lars Schneider
Mentored-by: Christian Couder
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva
The `--write-terms` subcommand is no longer used in the shell script and
the function `write_terms()` is called from the C implementation of
`set_terms()` and `bisect_start()`.
Mentored-by: Lars Schneider
Mentored-by: Christian Couder
is_empty_file() can help to refactor a lot of code. This will be very
helpful in porting "git bisect" to C.
Suggested-by: Torsten Bögershausen
Mentored-by: Lars Schneider
Mentored-by: Christian Couder
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva
Reimplement the `bisect_start` shell function partially in C and add
`bisect-start` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it from
git-bisect.sh .
The last part is not converted because it calls another shell function
`bisect_start` shell function will be completed after the `bisect_next`
Reimplement the `check_and_set_terms` shell function in C and add
`check-and-set-terms` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it from
git-bisect.sh
Using `--check-and-set-terms` subcommand is a temporary measure to port
shell function in C so as to use the existing test suite. As more
Reimplement `bisect_clean_state` shell function in C and add a
`bisect-clean-state` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it from
git-bisect.sh .
Using `--bisect-clean-state` subcommand is a measure to port shell
function to C so as to use the existing test suite. As more functions
are
Reimplement the `bisect_write` shell function in C and add a
`bisect-write` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it from
git-bisect.sh
Using `--bisect-write` subcommand is a temporary measure to port shell
function in C so as to use the existing test suite. As more functions
are ported,
The bisection cleanup should be performed with bad merge base so that
the user can return to its original position with `git bisect reset`.
Mentored-by: Lars Schneider
Mentored-by: Christian Couder
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva
Reimplement the `get_terms` and `bisect_terms` shell function in C and
add `bisect-terms` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it from
git-bisect.sh .
Using `--bisect-terms` subcommand is a temporary measure to port shell
function in C so as to use the existing test suite. As more functions
The `--check-expected-revs` subcommand is no longer used in the shell
script and the function `check_expected_revs()` is called from the C
implementation of `bisect_next()`.
Mentored-by: Lars Schneider
Mentored-by: Christian Couder
`--next-all` is meant to be used as a subcommand to support multiple
"operation mode" though the current implementation does not contain any
other subcommand along side with `--next-all` but further commits will
include some more subcommands.
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin
Reimplement the `bisect_state` shell function in C and also add a
subcommand `--bisect-state` to `git-bisect--helper` to call it from
git-bisect.sh .
Using `--bisect-state` subcommand is a temporary measure to port shell
function to C so as to use the existing test suite. As more functions
are
Reimplement the `bisect_autostart` shell function in C and add the
C implementation from `bisect_next()` which was previously left
uncovered. Also add a subcommand `--bisect-autostart` to
`git bisect--helper` be called from `bisect_state()` from
git-bisect.sh .
Using `--bisect-autostart`
Reimplement the `check_term_format` shell function in C and add
a `--check-term-format` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it
from git-bisect.sh
Using `--check-term-format` subcommand is a temporary measure to port
shell function to C so as to use the existing test suite. As more
If I do "git checkout -b fleem", with no additional flags, why does it
need to rewrite the index? Or even read the index?
(this is kind of a bug report, I guess, but it's a pretty minor bug that
I only noticed because I was out of hard drive space)
The `--bisect-autostart` subcommand is no longer used in the shell
script and the function `bisect_autostart()` is called from the C
implementation.
Mentored-by: Lars Schneider
Mentored-by: Christian Couder
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva
The `--next-all` subcommand is no longer used in the shell script and
the function `bisect_next_all()` is called from the C implementation of
`bisect_next()`.
Mentored-by: Lars Schneider
Mentored-by: Christian Couder
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva
The `--bisect-auto-next` subcommand is no longer used in the shell
script and the function `bisect_auto_next` is called from the C
implementation.
Mentored-by: Lars Schneider
Mentored-by: Christian Couder
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva
Reimplement the `write_terms` shell function in C and add a `write-terms`
subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it from git-bisect.sh . Also
remove the subcommand `--check-term-format` as it can now be called from
inside the function write_terms() C implementation.
Also `|| exit` is added
Reimplement `is_expected_rev` & `check_expected_revs` shell function in
C and add a `--check-expected-revs` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to
call it from git-bisect.sh .
Using `--check-expected-revs` subcommand is a temporary measure to port
shell functions to C so as to use the existing
Reimplement the `bisect_replay` shell function in C and also add
`--bisect-replay` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it from
git-bisect.sh
Using `--bisect-replay` subcommand is a temporary measure to port shell
function to C so as to use the existing test suite. As more functions
are
The `--bisect-write` subcommand is no longer used in the shell script
and the function `bisect_write()` is called from the C implementation.
Mentored-by: Lars Schneider
Mentored-by: Christian Couder
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva
On 10/13/2016 10:43 PM, Jeff King wrote:
No problem. I do think you'll benefit a lot from packing everything into
a single pack, but it's also clear that Git was doing more work than it
needed to be. This was a known issue when we added the racy-check to
has_sha1_file(), and knew that we might
W dniu 06.10.2016 o 11:11, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason pisze:
> Change the minimum length of an abbreviated object identifier in the
> commit message gitweb tries to turn into link from 8 hexchars to 7.
>
> This arbitrary minimum length of 8 was introduced in bfe2191 ("gitweb:
> SHA-1 in commit log
W dniu 06.10.2016 o 11:11, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason napisał:
> Change a typo'd MIME type in a comment. The Content-Type is
> application/xhtml+xml, not application/xhtm+xml.
>
> Fixes up code originally added in 53c4031 ("gitweb: Strip
> non-printable characters from syntax highlighter output",
Improve type safety by making arguments (whether from configuration or
from the command line) have their own "struct arg_item" type, separate
from the "struct trailer_item" type used to represent the trailers in
the buffer being manipulated.
This change also prepares "struct trailer_item" to be
Replace the existing handwritten implementation of a doubly-linked list
in trailer.c with the functions and macros from list.h. This
significantly simplifies the code.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan
---
trailer.c | 258
Currently, creation and addition (to a list) of trailer items are spread
across multiple functions. Streamline this by only having 2 functions:
one to parse the user-supplied string, and one to add the parsed
information to a list.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan
---
Currently, interpret-trailers requires that a trailer be only on 1 line.
For example:
a: first line
second line
would be interpreted as one trailer line followed by one non-trailer line.
Make interpret-trailers support RFC 822-style folding, treating those
lines as one logical trailer.
Currently, interpret-trailers requires all lines of a trailer block to
be trailers (or comments) - if not it would not identify that block as a
trailer block, and thus create its own trailer block, inserting a blank
line. For example:
echo -e "\na: b\nnot trailer" |
git interpret-trailers
Change "const char *" to "char *" in struct trailer_item and in the
return value of apply_command (since those strings are owned strings).
Change "struct conf_info *" to "const struct conf_info *" (since that
struct is not modified).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan
---
Ah, I knew I forgot something. These are exactly the same as v2, except
that these are signed off.
Jonathan Tan (6):
trailer: improve const correctness
trailer: use list.h for doubly-linked list
trailer: streamline trailer item create and add
trailer: make args have their own struct
Jeff King writes:
> So it's certainly better. But 7500 packs is just silly, and squeezing
> out ~400ms there is hardly worth it. If you repack this same case into a
> single pack, the command drops to 5ms. So yes, there's close to an order
> of magnitude speedup here, but you get
W dniu 13.10.2016 o 01:40, Jonathan Tan pisze:
> Replace the existing handwritten implementation of a doubly-linked list
> in trailer.c with the functions and macros from list.h. This
> significantly simplifies the code.
> ---
> trailer.c | 258
>
Reimplement `bisect_next_check` shell function in C and add
`bisect-next-check` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it from
git-bisect.sh .
Also reimplement `bisect_voc` shell function in C and call it from
`bisect_next_check` implementation in C.
Using `--bisect-next-check` is a
Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> >> * sb/submodule-ignore-trailing-slash (2016-10-10) 2 commits
>> >> (merged to 'next' on 2016-10-11 at e37425ed17)
>> >> + submodule: ignore trailing slash in relative url
>> >> + submodule: ignore trailing slash on superproject URL
Johannes Schindelin writes:
>> I think my puzzlement comes from here. What makes it OK for "am" to
>> expect the contents of author-script file to be quoted but it is not
>> OK to expect the same here? What makes it not quoted for _this_
>> reader, in other words?
>
Matthieu Moy writes:
> We clearly can't guess, but we can be consistent with Mail::Address, so
> that git's behavior depends less on its availability.
>
> Patch follows doing that.
Thanks. I love that somebody counters with a much better way to
solve it whenever I
Kevin Daudt writes:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 06:10:17PM +0200, Heiko Voigt wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 06:17:05PM +, David Turner wrote:
>> > Presently, uninitialized submodules are materialized in the working
>> > tree as empty directories. We would like to consider
David Turner writes:
> If I do "git checkout -b fleem", with no additional flags, why does it
> need to rewrite the index? Or even read the index?
The "reading" part can be explained easily.
It needs to show the list of dirty paths, which involves reading the
index,
Dequoting the arguments was introduced in 25b48b5c to port the function
`bisect_next()` but after the `bisect_replay()` porting, the dequoting
is carried out itself when it passes the arguments to `bisect_start()`
in a simpler way thus dequoting again isn't required. So remove the
extra
FYI,
I modified the patch slightly.
On 14.10.2016 15:16, Petr Stodulka wrote:
> From: Michael Haggerty
>
> If there is a broken symlink where a loose reference file is expected,
> then the attempt to open() it fails with ENOENT. This error is
> misinterpreted to mean that
There was actually only one error message that was not yet marked for
translation.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
sequencer.c | 26 --
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
index
The sequencer was introduced to make the cherry-pick and revert
functionality available as library function, with the original idea
being to extend the sequencer to also implement the rebase -i
functionality.
The test to ensure that all of the commands in the script are identical
to the overall
We really do not need the *pointer to a* pointer to the options in
the read_populate_opts() function.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
sequencer.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
index
Interactive rebase's scripts may be indented; we need to handle this
case, too, now that we prepare the sequencer to process interactive
rebases.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
sequencer.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/sequencer.c
Over the next commits, we will work on improving the sequencer to the
point where it can process the todo script of an interactive rebase. To
that end, we will need to teach the sequencer to read interactive
rebase's todo file. In preparation, we consolidate all places where
that todo file is
The sequencer is our attempt to lib-ify cherry-pick. Yet it behaves
like a one-shot command when it reads its configuration: memory is
allocated and released only when the command exits.
This is kind of okay for git-cherry-pick, which *is* a one-shot
command. All the work to make the sequencer
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:39:52AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > So it's certainly better. But 7500 packs is just silly, and squeezing
> > out ~400ms there is hardly worth it. If you repack this same case into a
> > single pack, the command drops to 5ms.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 08:55:29AM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> On 10/13/2016 10:43 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> > No problem. I do think you'll benefit a lot from packing everything into
> > a single pack, but it's also clear that Git was doing more work than it
> > needed to be. This was a known
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> I just ran into an example of a better reason for doing it like my
> patch is doing, which is that if you have some tag like:
>
> deployment-20160928-171914-16-g42e13d8
>
> With my patch the whole thing will be a link to the 42e13d8 commit,
>
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>>
>>> Change the log formatting function to know about "git describe" output
>>>
Vasco Almeida writes:
> Mark plural string for translation using Q_().
>
> Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida
> ---
Thanks for waiting (patiently) for 'master' to become ready to take
these three patches.
Jonathan Tan writes:
> Replace the existing handwritten implementation of a doubly-linked list
> in trailer.c with the functions and macros from list.h. This
> significantly simplifies the code.
> ---
The handcrafted one in trailer.c somehow did not use the common
Jakub Narębski writes:
> s/SHA1/SHA-1/g in above paragraph (for correctness and consistency).
>>
>> I think it's fairly dubious to link to things matching [0-9a-fA-F]
>> here as opposed to just [0-9a-f], that dates back to the initial
>> version of gitweb from 161332a ("first
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 08:20:40AM -0500, Robert Dailey wrote:
> Normally when I use interactive add, I just want to add files to the
> index via simple numbers, instead of typing paths. So I'll do this as
> quick as I can:
I'd generally second Matthieu's suggestion to use a combination of "git
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo