Jeff King writes:
> [1] Is there a word to mean the "pluralness" of a noun or verb (similar
> to "tense" for a verb).
I've seen "plural vs singular" often mentioned in the context of
subject and verb agreement.
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/concord talks about agreement "in gender,
number, person,
Jeff King writes:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:31:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> -- >8 --
>> From: Chris Angelico
>> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:07:08 +1100
>> Subject: [PATCH] config.txt: third-party tools may and do use their own
>> variables
>> [...]
>> +Other git-related tools may and
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:31:59AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> -- >8 --
> From: Chris Angelico
> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:07:08 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] config.txt: third-party tools may and do use their own
> variables
> [...]
> +Other git-related tools may and do use their own variables.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Chris Angelico writes:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Jeff King wrote:
>>> Thanks, the new text looks good to me. Please follow SubmittingPatches
>>> (notably, you need to sign-off your work, and please send patches inline
>>> rathe
Chris Angelico writes:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Jeff King wrote:
>> Thanks, the new text looks good to me. Please follow SubmittingPatches
>> (notably, you need to sign-off your work, and please send patches inline
>> rather than as attachments).
>
> Ah, didn't see that file.
It appea
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> Thanks, the new text looks good to me. Please follow SubmittingPatches
> (notably, you need to sign-off your work, and please send patches inline
> rather than as attachments).
Ah, didn't see that file.
>From 6e1fc126ece37c6201d0c16b76c6c87781f
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:46:15AM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> oohh. Heh. I thought the "porcelain" sections of git were the
> lower-level or machine-readable versions of other tools, and didn't
> really think of mine as fitting into that.
The term sometimes gets used confusingly. The
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>> A comment there to the effect that "Third party tools may also define
>> their own variables" or something would make it clear that this is the
>> intention.
>
> I think this sentence from the section you linked is meant to express
> that:
>
>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 03:51:16AM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > 1. I would say yes. git config is made to be extended and doesn't
> > require a config item to be known.
> > 2. Namespacing the config items like you did is a good thing to do so
> > it won't interfere with other options.
>
> Exc
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Chris Angelico writes:
>
>> file. It doesn't really care about the full history, and wants to be
>> reasonably fast (as the user is waiting for it). It's just a
>> convenience, so correctness isn't a huge issue. The easiest way to
>> keep i
Chris Angelico writes:
> file. It doesn't really care about the full history, and wants to be
> reasonably fast (as the user is waiting for it). It's just a
> convenience, so correctness isn't a huge issue. The easiest way to
> keep it moving through quickly is to limit the search:
>
> $ git log
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Kevin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Two parts to the question, then. Firstly, is it acceptable to use 'git
>> config' for a hook like this? And secondly, either: Is there a naming
>> convention to follow? or, what alternative
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Two parts to the question, then. Firstly, is it acceptable to use 'git
> config' for a hook like this? And secondly, either: Is there a naming
> convention to follow? or, what alternative would you recommend?
1. I would say yes. git config
I have a bit of a weird question. Poking around with Google searches
hasn't come up with any results, so I'm asking here :)
Short version: What's the most appropriate way to configure a git hook?
Long version: I have a git hook (handles prepare-commit-msg and
commit-msg) and part of what it does
14 matches
Mail list logo
