Max Horn m...@quendi.de writes:
Aha, now I understand what this patch is about. So I would suggest this
alternate commit message:
remote-testgit: make it explicit clear that we use the 'done' feature
Previously we relied on passing '--use-done-feature ' to git fast-export,
which is
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
I'd state it like this, but I may have guessed what Felipe intended
incorrectly.
remote-testgit: advertise done feature and write done ourselves
Instead of letting fast-export advertise the feature and ending
On 11.11.2012, at 22:22, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Max Horn m...@quendi.de wrote:
On 11.11.2012, at 14:59, Felipe Contreras wrote:
People seeking for reference would find it useful.
Hm, I don't understand this commit message. Probably means I am j git
Max Horn wrote:
Aha, now I understand what this patch is about. So I would suggest
this alternate commit message:
remote-testgit: make it explicit clear that we use the 'done' feature
Previously we relied on passing '--use-done-feature ' to git
fast-export, which is easy to miss when
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
Max Horn wrote:
Aha, now I understand what this patch is about. So I would suggest
this alternate commit message:
remote-testgit: make it explicit clear that we use the 'done' feature
Previously we relied on
On 11.11.2012, at 14:59, Felipe Contreras wrote:
People seeking for reference would find it useful.
Hm, I don't understand this commit message. Probably means I am just too dumb,
but since I am one of those people who would likely be seeking for reference, I
would really appreciate if it
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Max Horn m...@quendi.de wrote:
On 11.11.2012, at 14:59, Felipe Contreras wrote:
People seeking for reference would find it useful.
Hm, I don't understand this commit message. Probably means I am j git
fast-export --use-done-featureust too dumb, but since I
7 matches
Mail list logo
