Re: [Gmat-buildtest] [EXTERNAL] PerPassBiases Linux Runs

Jairus, Steve, Can you take a look at this on Monday and let me know if we are good to merge "per-pass" to "dev?" Thanks, steve -Original Message- From: Darrel Conway Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 10:11 PM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] ;

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2021-03-19 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

Reran failed tests a few time to get rid of some false failures: - Summary - System configuration: Tested build: 2021-03-19_Rerun_Rerun Regression build:

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2021-01-12 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

FYI - this a test of the latest Fermi Build (with predicted ephemeris buffer fix) and using the Fermi SVN repo. Steve S: please review -Original Message- From: d.s.coo...@nasa.gov Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 11:42 AM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ;

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] [EXTERNAL] Ubuntu Test results: 2021-01-08 (Houndstooth/Ubuntu-Linux/GmatConsole-64/M2019b/GCC9.3.0)

Numerous API failures in this linux run but didn't see in Windows? -Original Message- From: Darrel Conway Sent: Monday, January 11, 2021 10:49 AM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] ; gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net; Hughes, Steven P.

[Gmat-buildtest] Actions for Tuan and John (Test results)

Looks like just one test failure requiring attention: API_PD45PropagationE8x8SMPM (API) [pos err 0.000753381, tol 1e-07] John, do you think this is a problem or just an expected test variation? Tuan, you can merge your Return 3L Doppler code to the "Dev" branch now. Thanks, Steve

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2020-10-08 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

FYI-These results are for the Fermi build. I adjusted the repo storage location folder to show this. -Original Message- From: d.s.coo...@nasa.gov Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 10:40 AM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Test results:

[Gmat-buildtest] Dont forget to read lessons learned docs for Wednesday meeting

This message is as much for me as anyone else. ___ Gmat-buildtest mailing list Gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmat-buildtest

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] [EXTERNAL] Red Hat Test results: 2020-06-24 (Catsclaw/RHEL-Linux/GmatConsole-64/M2019b/GCC8.3.1)

In this linux run, the following tests failed New script errors: EKF_SpacecraftNavigation_OrbitErrorCovariance_Keplerian_GpsPosVec EKF_SpacecraftNavigation_SolveFors_KeplerianState_Cd_RandomConstant_GN EKF_SpacecraftNavigation_SolveFors_KeplerianState_Cr_RandomConstant_DSN

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Windows test run - 8 untagged errors

Update: Below are the results of successive re-runs to get rid of the (very annoying) false failures. We have 8 untagged tests in red. Truth failures: BatchEstimator_NormalMatrixReduction_UseInitialCovariance [#1 failed] [GMT-7274]

[Gmat-buildtest] Windows test run

Includes the Measurement Underweighting code update: - Summary - System configuration: Windows 10/MATLAB R2019b Tested build: 2020-06-19 Regression build: 2020-06-18

[Gmat-buildtest] Regression for test Tut_MultipleShootingTutorial_Step3

Morning all, This test started failing around 5/21. It involves the Yukon optimizer. Used to converge in 51 iterations. Now, it doesn't converge in 100 iterations. Any ideas? Steve ___ Gmat-buildtest mailing list

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] [gmat-nav] Windows Test Results - There are some new GroundStation, KalmanFilter_OutputWarmStartFile, Transmitter, and Transponder failures.

I re-ran just the failed tests to obtain: - All Known Issues - Crashes/hangs/etc.: None Script errors:

[Gmat-buildtest] Windows Test Results - There are some new GroundStation, KalmanFilter_OutputWarmStartFile, Transmitter, and Transponder failures.

- Summary - System configuration: Windows 10/MATLAB R2019b Tested build: 2020-06-16 Regression build: 2020-06-15 Total number of scripts: 15091 (+88 deferred) Percent

[Gmat-buildtest] Windows test results

- Summary - System configuration: Windows 10/MATLAB R2019b Tested build: 2020-06-15 Regression build: 2020-06-11 Total number of scripts: 15091 (+88 deferred) Percent

[Gmat-buildtest] Centos Test Results

- Summary - System configuration: Centos 7/MATLAB R2019b Tested build: 15-Jun-2020 Regression build: 01-Jun-2020 Total number of scripts: 15021 (+88 deferred) Percent

[Gmat-buildtest] JIRA End of Life this November - FYI

[cid:image001.png@01D639AE.5C2E4FC0] [cid:image002.png@01D639AE.5C2E4FC0] ___ Gmat-buildtest mailing list Gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmat-buildtest

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2020-05-19 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

The regression (comparison) build here is R2020a internal. ( I just labelled it as 2020-05-18) -Original Message- From: d.s.coo...@nasa.gov Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 3:55 PM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Test results: 2020-05-19

[Gmat-buildtest] Latest Windows test of Master

Notes 1) This build includes the two changes JM made for the fmincon issue. Note, we still have the usual false matlab failures for this run. But, it appears what JM did didn't break anything. 2) SES un-deferred some EKF failures so that stay in our focus 3) There are some

[Gmat-buildtest] Test and source code repo freeze still in affect

Hi All, We may decide that RC2 will be R2020a today. But, we still want to keep both the code and test repos frozen so that we can merge the Nav branch to Master. Thus, please consider both the two Master git source code repos and the Master SVN test repo frozen until further notice. Thanks,

[Gmat-buildtest] RC2 Checklist

All, I created an RC2 checklist for what we discussed at the CCB today. Recall our CCB Plan Forward (Items in green finished). * GMT-7243 approved. * DJC commit this. Send email to Team when finished. * Tuan create LatestComplete Version. Send email to DSC. * DSC run

[Gmat-buildtest] RC2 bundle location

All, The 4 Windows RC2 bundles can be found here: \\mesa-file\595\GMAT\Builds\windows\VS2017_build_64\R2020a\RC2 Steve ___ Gmat-buildtest mailing list Gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmat-buildtest

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] LatestCompleteVersion was created in mesa repo today

Kicked off Windows RC2 Internal AlphaOn Installer test. Results around 10 AM tomorrow. From: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 1:53 PM To: Nguyen, Tuan D. (GSFC-5830) Cc: Darrel Conway (d...@thinksysinc.com) ; Shoan, Wendy C. (GSFC-5830) ; Stark, Michael E. (GSFC-5830)

[Gmat-buildtest] FW: We will need an RC2

FYI. There will be an RC2. Plan below. From: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 12:24 PM To: John McGreevy ; Darrel Conway ; Hughes, Steven P. (GSFC-5950) ; Shoan, Wendy C. (GSFC-5830) ; Stark, Michael E. (GSFC-5830) ; Nguyen, Tuan D. (GSFC-5830) ; Royzman, Tetyana

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] [EXTERNAL] Test results: 2020-04-23 - RC1-Internal No Alpha (Houndstooth/Ubuntu-Linux/GmatConsole-64/M2019b/GCC7.3.0)

Results look pretty good! Are you concerned about any of the (few) failures? -Original Message- From: Darrel Conway Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 11:38 AM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] ; gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net; Hughes, Steven

[Gmat-buildtest] Do we have all the issues captured in JIRA?

Let me know if you see any missing issues? (If so, put in a ticket. Label = CCB) [cid:image001.png@01D6170C.59089770] ___ Gmat-buildtest mailing list Gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmat-buildtest

[Gmat-buildtest] RC0 test, Public, installer

Test system crashed half way through. I think cause was too long of a file name. Running mode 1 of 1 (script)... OrbitView_ViewDefinition_ViewPointReference_Mercury_Venus_Venus_Mars_Mars_Mars_CameraViewDirection_Luna_Mar_Luna_Venus_Mercury (1 of 1)... Error using save Unable to write to

[Gmat-buildtest] RC0 Test results, Internal, Alpha Plug-ins On, Zip File Installation

Results look pretty good - Summary - System configuration: Windows 10/MATLAB R2019a/TestBuild Tested build: RC0_AlphaOn_Internal_zip Regression build: $prevbuild$ Total

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Action Item for AREA LEADS: Messages received from running Sample scripts

Hi Folks, It is time for all the area leads to make sure there sample scripts work on RC0. We are finding some failures even though we did this a month ago. If you find issues, put in tickets for CCB to review. (No commits). Thanks, Steve From: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) Sent: Saturday,

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2020-04-15 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

On Rerunning the failed tests, we only have: Truth failures: RotationMatrixTest_MercuryMJ2000Ec [max diff 1.09735e-09 > tol 1e-12] Which I have been assuming is just a tolerance issue for a relatively newly created test but correct me if I am wrong. -Original Message- From:

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2020-04-14 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

FYI: This run had alpha plug-ins turned on. (JM fix not in the build) -Original Message- From: d.s.coo...@nasa.gov Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 12:14 PM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Test results: 2020-04-14

[Gmat-buildtest] Repos Frozen

Hi All, Just a reminder. The Master code/docs (Git) and Test (SVN) repos are frozen. Unless you have explicit authorization from the CCB, you should not be making any updates. (John, Wendy, SPH, and DJC will be making a few updates the next few days per today's CCB) Thanks, Steve

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2020-04-07 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

On Re-Run, everything passes except Truth failures: RotationMatrixTest_MercuryMJ2000Ec [max diff 1.09735e-09 > tol 1e-12] -Original Message- From: d.s.coo...@nasa.gov Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 8:27 AM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net

[Gmat-buildtest] Stop All GIT commits until further notice (this includes docs)

Darrel has to do some GIT cleanup. ___ Gmat-buildtest mailing list Gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmat-buildtest

[Gmat-buildtest] Team Action: Put GMAT's new features in the Release Notes

Hi All, GMAT R2020a will include some Release Notes documentation. This is our chance to brag about the incredible number of GMAT new features and enhancements. Please make sure to include your accomplishments by editing the following Google Doc:

[Gmat-buildtest] Latest Save Mode test

Hi All, Folks have told me the Save Mode errors we have seen before are all accounted for. Great, but just as documentation, below are the Save Mode test results (tests marked as Save) of the latest (4/3) build. If you find Save Mode errors, go ahead and document them. (even if we are

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] [EXTERNAL] Action Item for AREA LEADS: Messages received from running Sample scripts

a tutorial on how to use socket interface – the sockets Python package is actually general, with the attitude telemetry being how we used it for Lunar Catalyst. Mike From: "Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) via Gmat-buildtest" mailto:gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net>> Reply-To: "Co

[Gmat-buildtest] Matlab Issues, Todays build

Hi Tuan, et. al. When I fire up today's GMAT build on the Windows test machine, I get the following error *** Error loading "libMatlabInterface": GMAT could not load the MATLAB interface. Please check that MATLAB is installed and configured correctly. See the User Guide for instructions, or

[Gmat-buildtest] SAVE Mode Test Failures

Hi All, Last Thursday, Steve H reviewed Test Freeze Wrap-up Activities, http://li394-117.members.linode.com:8090/display/GW/Engineering+Activities. One of those activities was Save Mode tests. If you find Save Mode test failures, you can use the following existing ticket: 1.

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] gmat test requirement matrix

e.g., we are missing a number of "GMAT Functions" requirements. Who can fix these? From: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 6:00 PM To: Hatten, Noble (GSFC-5950) Cc: j...@thinksysinc.com; Hughes, Steven P. (GSFC-5950) ; 'gmat-...@lists.nasa.gov' ;

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2020-03-17 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

I did a re-run of the failed tests (on the Lab test machine) to get rid of false failures. Results are pretty good. 3 comparator issues for OC. 2 rotation matrix tests. - All Known Issues

[Gmat-buildtest] Action Item for AREA LEADS: Messages received from running Sample scripts

Hi All, I ran the sample scripts. Some of them generated messages. Please review the messages below to see if they are expected. Update the sample scripts as needed. Steve S, Can you fix the sample scripts for the known 'CSSI_2004To2026.txt" issue. E.g., Ex_LEOStationKeeping.script.

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2020-03-13 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

Hi All, We have some unexplained failures. Please review the failed tests - send out an email to team letting us know which tests you are reviewing. For example, John, Steve, Tuan : Can you figure out what is going on below? Using default potential file

[Gmat-buildtest] Using ANACONDA with GMAT

All, 1. 2. I can confirm that Tuan's sleuthing (with an assist from JM) work paid off. Good catch Tuan! Recall that we had to add the following environment variable to the users environment: PYTHONHOME C:\ProgramData\Anaconda3 (directory where python.exe installed) I have

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2020-03-05 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

FYI: For this run, the local path variable points to the python.org python version 3.7.6 This fixed the python errors we saw the other day but seemed (?) to cause issues with a number of other OC tests. Noble/Josh, Did I need to set some other path variable to get the OC tests to work with

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] anaconda install

I am using Tuan build. Tuan, and you tell me what you used? From: Hatten, Noble (GSFC-5950) Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2020 12:09 PM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; Darrel Conway ; Hughes, Steven P. (GSFC-5950) Cc: gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: anaconda install Here is what

[Gmat-buildtest] anaconda install

Hi All, Darrel tells me that GMAT looks for a python DLL. Does anyone know the exact name for windows? Here are the DLL's I see in the expected directory [cid:image003.png@01D5F2E6.67A67620] I tried adding 3 different folders to the path but GMAT still crashes. Could GMAT be looking for

[Gmat-buildtest] R2020a Release paperwork - S/W that GMAT uses?

Hi Steve H, et. al., The R2020a s/w release paperwork requires us to list s/w that GMAT uses. See the 3 tables below. Am I missing any s/w? Any corrections to my 3 tables? If so, can you fill in the tables and send back to me? (There is also a question in red below about some s/w) Thanks,

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2020-02-17 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

Hi All, If you know your test has random output and thus the data will change everytime, you may consider adding the following to your TC file: HasRandomOutput: True SPH added this feature a few years back to avoid seeing your test in the " Output changes (but still pass):" category

[Gmat-buildtest] Regression test System - method to automatically generate an *.m file to re-rerun failed tests

Hi All, Often when we run a regression test, a number of tests fail. Sometimes it is an erroneous failure. In any event, we may need to re-run just the failed tests. 1. This is a cumbersome tedious cut-and-paste process. Per GMT-6841, Test

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] JIRA work today

I think you should just do it in an hour or so. I copy everyone so that they know to copy down things they need. thanks From: Parker, Joel J. K. (GSFC-5950) Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 2:11 PM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; darrel.con...@thinksysinc.com Cc: Hughes, Steven P. (GSFC-5950)

[Gmat-buildtest] For after the new year: Need some Visual Studio Debug for script Simulator_AsteroidOccultation

Hi Tuan, The Windows results, with the Nplate capability, look pretty good. One possible issue, however, is that the entire regression run takes about 1 1/2 hours longer. (roughly 9 % increase) It would be nice to know cause. I propose that after the holidays, Tuan, with possible

[Gmat-buildtest] No commits to Master

Hi All, Tuan is working some issues with his latest merge of Nplate to Master. It is probably best to avoid further commits to Master at this time. Thanks, Steve ___ Gmat-buildtest mailing list Gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Merge Nplate to Master

Lets hold off until after the Nplate merge. From: Valenzuela, Gustavo F. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 9:48 AM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: Merge Nplate to Master Can I commit code to master or should I wait until

[Gmat-buildtest] Merge Nplate to Master

Hi all, If tonight's run looks good, the plan is to merge Nplate to Master tomorrow. Should we hold off on other GMAT commits until after we do the merge? Steve ___ Gmat-buildtest mailing list Gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] [EXTERNAL] Results: Linux Regression Test requested

Thanks for doing the Linux run Darrel. Do you have any insight into the Linux crash SES mentions below? From: Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 10:16 AM To: darrel.con...@thinksysinc.com; Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; Nguyen, Tuan D. (GSFC-5830) ;

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2019-12-06 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

I think these are the test results for the Beta release. If so, looks good. -Original Message- From: d.s.coo...@nasa.gov Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2019 10:35 AM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Test results: 2019-12-06

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2019-10-18 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

Despite fact API/GMATpy (as SES noticed) not installed, test results look good. I assume API tests not yet committed? -Original Message- From: d.s.coo...@nasa.gov Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2019 5:12 AM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net Subject:

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] [EXTERNAL] Test results: 2019-10-10 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

We could use Network R2019a but remember that comes with a price - a higher frequency of false matlab failures. (Network R2017b works better in this respect) I didn't know you were using later matlab features. SPH: Do we still have left over funds to buy a stand alone matlab?

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] [EXTERNAL] Test results: 2019-10-10 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

Yes, the trial (r2019a stand alone) was over. We went back to the network R2017b. How could you tell? -Original Message- From: Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] via Gmat-buildtest Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 6:38 AM To: gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re:

[Gmat-buildtest] Windows Regression test results - Saturday's build

- Summary - System configuration: Windows 10/MATLAB R2019a/TestBuild Tested build: Sep28 Regression build: $prevbuild$ Total number of scripts: 14406 (+58 deferred)

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] [EXTERNAL] [Gmat-users] Doubts related to Gmat

@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Gmat-buildtest] [EXTERNAL] [Gmat-users] Doubts related to Gmat I've basically been asked by FDSS management not to respond to this type of question in the public forums. - DJC (Trying to keep folks from getting in "trouble") On 9/25/19 6:48 AM, Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] [EXTERNAL] [Gmat-users] Doubts related to Gmat

Sure, go ahead if it doesn’t take too much of your time. From: Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 9:47 AM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) Cc: gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [Gmat-users] Doubts related to Gmat I can

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] [EXTERNAL] [Gmat-users] Doubts related to Gmat

Not sure. A lot of his questions seem to be non-GMAT. I forward to team From: Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 7:45 AM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] [Gmat-users] Doubts related to Gmat Does someone handle responding to

[Gmat-buildtest] Matlab False failures, one step forward, one step back

For the last 4 regression test runs, we have been using a trial stand-alone (no need to grab license over the network) version of Matlab as an experiment. The good news is that we received none of the following messages: Solver subsystem exception: Error attempting to access

[Gmat-buildtest] A Global Look at how GMAT handles File line endings

FYI: Gustavo is going to take a look at all the files GMAT reads in to make sure they are line ending agnostic. Please Reply All if you have any comments/questions/guidance. (Wendy, since you are already looking at the EOP file, can you check it for agnosticism?) Thanks, Steve From:

[Gmat-buildtest] Today's Windows run

As an experiment, I tried the following for today's run (results tomorrow morning) 1. Use stand-alone (no network license) version of Matlab R2019a and Opt. toolbox (trial version) just in case license issues are a problem 2. Ran C:\Program

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2019-09-09 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

Ugh. False matlab failures, I presume. I wonder what happened all of a sudden to cause so many failures? -Original Message- From: d.s.coo...@nasa.gov Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 5:46 AM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Test results:

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2019-09-06 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

I spoke too soon at last week's GMAT weekly meeting. We still have false test failures just not at the same rate: Optimize_fmincon_cvg_status - Matlab not available message Formation_MultiRegime_LEOandGEOFormation_Synchronization2 - run didn't complete (test normally takes 5

[Gmat-buildtest] HEads-up

I implemented/committedGMT-6644, Remove libGeometricMeasurements from startup file Windows smoke tests pass. I don't expect to see any issues. ___ Gmat-buildtest mailing list Gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Soliciting Advice for Gustavo - Line Ending tickets

We don't want to return an error if we have the wrong line endings. We want any system to read any file. (Djc, wendy, correct me if I am wrong) I think we are supposed to already have something like you suggest (agnostic getline) but clearly it doesn't seem to be doing the trick. From:

[Gmat-buildtest] Soliciting Advice for Gustavo - Line Ending tickets

Hi All, Gustavo is working the line ending tickets below * GMT-6780, With wrong line endings in weather file, GMAT runs to completion, w/o generating an error message, but does not use the input data *

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Issues with ACE INP, GMAT is using SPICE Toolkit 65 Instead of 66

Sure, we can also talk about it. Do the best you can to document what the issue is. (this really helps s/w developers make greater progress) You can also demo the issue at a future GMAT and/or GMAT Nav meeting. From: Aviles, Jorge A. (GSFC-444.0)[KBRwyle] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 3:22

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Issues with ACE INP, GMAT is using SPICE Toolkit 65 Instead of 66

Hi All, Thanks for creating the ticket. Can you attach the following information to the ticket at http://bugs.gmatcentral.org/browse/GMT-6975 ? This will help the CCB with their work. 1. What is INP? 2. What is current GMAT version being used? 3. Can you give examples of current

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Repo access restored

I had to pull out my ID card. Then do a pull. Then it asked me to insert card. Can you try that and let me know? From: Valenzuela, Gustavo F. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 1:44 PM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; John McGreevy Cc: Darrel Conway ;

[Gmat-buildtest] out Thursday and Friday- Let me know if you need anything

Sorry, I am out Thursday and Friday. From: gmat-nav On Behalf Of Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) via gmat-nav Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 1:42 PM To: gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net; 'gmat-...@lists.nasa.gov' Cc: Richardson, Timothy (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] Subject: [gmat-nav] Out This

[Gmat-buildtest] Out This Wednesday and Thursday - Let me know if you need anything

Hi All, I am out this Thursday and Friday. I completed my BSR today and I do plan to have my Nav Area Plan uploaded to One Drive by COB Wed. I am also triaging as many tickets as I can. Since DJC is only available for API work until 10/31, I may assign some of DJC's tickets to

[Gmat-buildtest] Repo access restored

Same here From: John McGreevy Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 12:01 PM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) Cc: Valenzuela, Gustavo F. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] ; Darrel Conway Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Incident #32,317 status has been changed to Open I have repo access again From: Cooley, D S.

[Gmat-buildtest] FW: GMAT Git permissions

I cant seem to get in either. (GMAT source code) Anyone else see this? Anyone know how to best phrase the IT ticket we need to put in? FYI *General Code 500 IT ticket portal: https://etd-support.ndc.nasa.gov/EndUserPortal.jsp From: Valenzuela, Gustavo F. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON]

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2019-08-21 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

To try to get rid of the "didn't finish write to log file" issue, I tried adding a 1/2 second wait in the DetectCrash function. This made things worse: 1. GMAT didn't finish writing to a Report. (using Report command) 2. Matlab ddepoke error: Interface Exception Thrown: ".m",

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2019-08-20 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

The two new failures appear to be spurious. They are a result of a qualitatively new type of failure. The log files for the two failed cases are truncated. The file must have been closed before the write was finished. The Timeout variable is set to 600 seconds by default. Any ideas?

[Gmat-buildtest] Location of WIndows Beta Release

Hi All, I want to test the Voldemort deliveries using the version they will be using. Is the Latest Beta Release on mesa-file? Location? Thanks, Steve ___ Gmat-buildtest mailing list Gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net

[Gmat-buildtest] debug of test, Optimize_vf13ad_SolveMode_SaveAndContinue_GMT-4346

John, Can you take a look at this failure? It appears to first appear, 4/19, around the time of the "ManeuverOD Branch" test run. (I surmise we introduced the error in the ManeuverOD branch and then we merged it into Master) I think we didn't notice it because it has a ticket number in the

[Gmat-buildtest] Debug of test, FMParams_GMAT_UserAsteroid(OSIRIS)_HarmonicGravity_SRP_PointMasses

A search of my email box shows this failure goes back, at least, to -Linux run, 7/26 -Windows run, 7/30 The error message received is ODEModel Exception Thrown: Input coordinate system undefined for Harmonic Field GravityField.RQ36 Anyone have any ideas? We can assign this to

[Gmat-buildtest] Debug of test, Formation_MultiRegime_MultiSat_MultiProp2 - What caused the Log file not to finish?

This test failed in the nightly run. It appears that the log file didn't finish writing out before the file was closed. See below. Has anyone seen this before? Could setting "Timeout : 60" in the TC file help? The test passed on re-run. (the lines in red below are the missing lines

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2019-08-16 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

Good sign. I don't see any matlab failures. (with Matlab R2017a and new startup file) We do have 4 tests, in red, that need to be looked at. If you look at them, let folks know you are investigating and send out the fix info to the team. -Original Message- From:

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2019-08-15 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

Good News: Use of the startup.m file seems to have fixed the fopen "fid" problems. Bad News: We still have about 7 fmincon tests that fail because GMAT "Failed to open MATLAB engine." This is weird though because the license logs show the licenses were pulled. However, it appears, for

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Source of one matlab issue found - but how do we fix it?

As a data point, R2019a was installed on the test machine 4/18. From: Slojkowski, Steven E. (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 3:44 PM To: Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) ; gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net; Shen, Haijun (GSFC-595.0)[OMITRON] Subject: RE: Source of one matlab

[Gmat-buildtest] Source of one matlab issue found - but how do we fix it?

All, We reviewed my matlab debug script today at the Nav meeting. Thanks to Haijun for suggesting a possible file path issue. The matlab routine diff_gmd_files issues an fopen command using a relative path as given in the example below.

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] First Attempt at Matlab fix

It didn't work. Let's brain storm at GMAT Nav meeting. Attached is routine. Maybe, there is a better way to do it. From: gmat-nav On Behalf Of Cooley, D S. (GSFC-5950) via gmat-nav Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2019 1:48 PM To: 'gmat-...@lists.nasa.gov' ; gmat-buildtest@lists.sourceforge.net;

[Gmat-buildtest] First Attempt at Matlab fix

More info below. 3 of the failures involve diff_gmd_files.m. This routine opens up two files and creates its own file. I added pause(2) to the beginning and end of the routine. (Make sure read in files are fully created before read. Make sure written file is fully closed before test system

[Gmat-buildtest] Question on cause of matlab failure in Windows regression test

Hi All, Syeda has been working on this issue for weeks. I think she is stumped. Can anyone offer her guidance on what to do?: Most of the matlab failures for the recent Nav run have the error, "Invalid file identifier. Use fopen to generate a valid file identifier. " Thoughts anyone? Who

[Gmat-buildtest] Nav Test Run using latest Windows build

Hi All, Results below. With the addition of EKF tests, the Nav tests now take more time than the non-Nav tests. The Nav tests are calculation-heavy. I wonder if this means a faster processor would somewhat significantly decrease the run time. Updated script to run the Nav tests attached.

[Gmat-buildtest] (no subject)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Eastern Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Matlab question

How about if we created a list of all GMAT scripts that needed matlab. Then inside the main Windows matlab test script, T6_NightlyRunDef_RetrySVN.m, we add logic to kill existing server matlab processes right before we ran a script that needs matlab. Right now, we have the following before

[Gmat-buildtest] Matlab question

John, Suppose you have a GMAT script that uses the fmincon matlab interface. Suppose that before you even call your matlab function, you want to kill all existing Matlab command window, regserver, processes (not the main matlab window but the process spawned by previous GMAT calls to Matlab.

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2019-07-26 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

Syeda, Below is log file message for the test Steve S mentions: Please wait while MATLAB engine opens... Failed to open MATLAB engine ... Please wait while MATLAB engine opens... MATLAB engine successfully opened Interface Exception Thrown:

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2019-07-26 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

Test results look pretty good. Most of the un-tagged failures appear to be false matlab related failures. For example, the log for test, Optimize_fmincon_cvg_status, shows: Please wait while MATLAB engine opens... Failed to open MATLAB engine ...

[Gmat-buildtest] Re-Rune of build used in 2019-07-24 test shows more false matlab failures, Side Notes to Syeda, JM, SES

Hi All, I re-ran the test system using the same build as the 2019-07-24 run (test script repo updated though). I wanted see if the number of false matlab failures changed. It turns out that we received quite a bit more false matlab failures. Aside to Syeda: As an example, the

Re: [Gmat-buildtest] Test results: 2019-07-24 (GS580W-GMAT-T6/Win7-64/GMAT-64/M2016a/VS2017)

I reran nine of the failed tests: (An Aside to Syeda: Tuan has fixed the fmincon issue. Looks like two false matlab related failures) Running comparison mode 1 of 1 (comparisonmoderator.TruthModerator)... script (1 of 1)...

[Gmat-buildtest] Problems with Windows Nightly build procedures

Tuan, I think there is a problem with the nightly build procedure. Can you take a look? The following problems occur on the nightly build but not on my local build. 1. Error loading "libFminconOptimizer" error upon GMAT start 2.

  1   2   >