:15 AM Bill Milewski <bmilewsk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think type 402 is a text entity. Can you drop names from your CAD model?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> > On Jul 13, 2016, at 5:41 PM, jeremy theler <jer...@seamplex.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all
>
Hi all
I get the following error:
Error : Impossible to transform entity 1 (of type 402)
when trying to rotate and/or translate a merged brep (attached):
Merge "solid.brep";
Translate {1, 2, 3} {
Volume{1};
}
Rotate {{4, 5, 6}, {1, 2, 3}, Pi/4} {
Volume{1};
}
Any comment?
Thanks
--
Mesh.RecombineAll = 1;
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#index-Mesh_002eRecombineAll
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:20 PM e-dub wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to use the option "Recombine all triangular meshes" in batch
> mode. I have not found out how via the
ption, say www.seamplex.com/fino
BTW, for the original developers, it would be nice to somehow being able
to change the hardcoded %.16g in runtime, for example to reduce the size
of the resulting ASCII mesh files.
Cheers
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Sat, 2017-01-21 at 22:53 +, Fabrice P
Hi
$ gmsh -2 myfile.geo
will generate myfile.msh without opening the GUI.
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 18:14 +1100, Thomas Charles Reading Moore wrote:
> I have a .geo file which I'd like to create a .msh file from. My
> current procedure is
>
>
If you go through the post-processing the .msh file you can also change
the ordering of the nodes in order to get the normals in the direction
you want.
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 12:15 +, DILASSER Guillaume wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
>
>
>
Define physical entities containing only volumes. See
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Elementary-vs-physical-entities
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 16:29 +0200, Nikhil Vaidya wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> I need a tetrahedral mesh for FEM simulations. I therefore need a mesh
> file only with the vertices
Hi folks
I wanted to share with you a development I a working on. It is a
web-based frontend for CAE analysis running on the cloud. Of course, it
uses Gmsh for the grid generation.
You can find a description and some videos at
www.caeplex.com
There is a Live Preview Demo that can be used
Hi Nikhil
>
> @Billy and Jeremy
> I am new to gmsh and do not really understand how to implement your
> suggestion.
>
Try
Physical Volume("bulk") = {1};
--
jeremy
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
AFAI, rotations should not give rise to singularities in the jacobian.
In fact, these orderings are equivalents as you state, they give the
same normals following the "right-hand rule".
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 11:04 +0100, Nan Li wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
>
> I met a problem about the node
Yey! You finally took my point!
http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/2016/010848.html
> I am aware of such cost. Maybe it could be lowered by switching to git
> and take advantage of its branching and merging mechanisms...
+1 for the Gmsh team :-)
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
)
at /home/gtheler/codigos/3ros/build/gmsh/Mesh/meshGFaceLloyd.cpp:948
948 s1 = borders[i].get_segment(0);
(gdb)
Any suggestions?
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
// use gmsh >= 2.16.0
SetFactory("OpenCASCADE");
Point(1) = {0, 0, 0, 0.125};
Point(2) = {0,
Can the new OpenCASCADE factory be used to first merge say an imported
2D BREP and the extrude the path? Pseudo-geo:
SetFactory("OpenCASCADE");
Merge("2dbrep.brep");
Extrude{0,0,0.3}{ Surface{1:3}; }
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 21:38 +0100
Make sure you do not have "recombine all triangular meshes" checked in
options -> mesh
you can explicitly turn it off by adding
Mesh.RecombineAll = 0;
to the geo
--
jeremy
On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 22:14 +, César Pablo Camusso wrote:
> Dear partners,
> I want a mesh with only triangles, but I
gt;
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: gmsh [mailto:gmsh-boun...@ace20.montefiore.ulg.ac.be] Per conto
> di Jeremy Theler
> Inviato: giovedì 29 giugno 2017 11:17
> A: gmsh@onelab.info
> Oggetto: Re: [Gmsh] Gmsh .msh file
>
> See
>
> http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.h
ot have internal faces;
> 2) if I check "save all" I loose the physical entities definition.
>
>
>
> -----Messaggio originale-
> Da: Jeremy Theler [mailto:jer...@seamplex.com]
> Inviato: giovedì 29 giugno 2017 11:53
> A: Alessandro Vicini; gmsh@onelab.info
Thanks for the example Christophe.
How do I apply PointsOf{} to a merged BREP?
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 20:52 +0200, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
>
>
> Here's an example, for Gmsh 3.0.2:
>
>
> SetFactory("OpenCASCADE");
>
&
It is in appendix B.3:
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Mesh-options-list
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 15:49 +0200, Vincent HUBER wrote:
> Hello Guillaume,
>
>
> Thank you for your answer.
> I'm a bit confused : I do not find this option in the doc
> http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html
>
>
tools -> options -> geometry -> surface labels
--
Jeremy Theler
www.seamplex.com
On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 15:05 +0200, marcel_mueller...@web.de wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I'm a student of Engineering Sciences and a newbie in using gmsh but
> did some tutorials.
>
> Ju
> I have found an another way to import a brep file. However I can't
> understand how the characteristic sizes are applied. I want to apply a
> more dense mesh around the internal surfaces without the cost of a
> field command.
I don't either.
But what I do is I set the characteristic length
On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 12:13 +0200, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> I am looking for code in gmsh that reads the msh file (say of an 2d
> triangular grid as the msh file attached in the mail) and populates the
> faces which are displayed in the mesh but not written in the gmsh file.
> (As far as I
.
Will you guys at Gmsh also add an option to really return a compsolid
or will this behavior be the final one?
Thanks
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
then trying to find common nodes between volumetric elements:
https://bitbucket.org/seamplex/wasora/src/3dd04c3c1c236adae5799354114698112c46e232/src/mesh/neighbors.c?at=master=file-view-default
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ttp://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
> ___
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh@onelab.info
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
--
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
Hi Mayank
I have written that functionality into my own framework called wasora
(www.seamplex.com/wasora)
Say you have a .msh file with point-wise defined data as
inhttps://bitbucket.org/seamplex/wasora/src/0321d32894d66056e64b2035ac98887b7aa4f29b/examples/tiny.msh?at=master=file-view-default
Coherence
You need version >= 3.0.6
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 07:43 +0330, Ali Jamalifard wrote:
> Hello Dear
> I want to mesh a multi-domain three dimensional geometry using Gmesh.
> my geometry file is in .Step format.
> after generation of 3D mesh, the result mesh is not conformal between domain
>
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#index-FAQ
Answer E5.3
On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 19:28 +0100, Fabrice Pepin wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
>
>
> When 3D meshing, 1D and 2D elements are created ? Is there a command to
> delete 1D and 2D elements before exporting the 3D mesh ?
>
>
> Thank you.
>
Is the new property Geometry.OCCTargetUnit working as expected?
How can I revert back to the original behavior, i.e. do not assume anything
about units in an imported OCC
model and leave them as "non-dimensional"?
Thanks
--
Jeremy Theler
www.se
Hi Chrstophe
I tried setting it to "MM" and the result was the same. I will take a look
again and send a mwe illustrating the issue.
Regards
jeremy
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017, 08:45 Christophe Geuzaine <cgeuza...@uliege.be> wrote:
>
>
> > On 4 Dec 2017, at 10:59, Jeremy
Hey all
What's the difference between fields Attractor and Distance?
Regards
--
jeremy
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 08:46 +0200, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> How could I get point coordinates at python api?
> gmsh.model.getBoundingBox(0, point_tag)
Is there any way to get the center of gravity of a volume or surface?
--
jeremy
www.seamplex.com
RTFM
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Specifying-mesh-element-sizes
On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 02:10 +, Jianan Zhang wrote:
>
>
> Hi, all,
>
>
>
> I want to generate a mesh which has denser meshes in a specific area, but
> sparser meshes in other areas. How can I achieve this?
>
>
On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 12:42 +, michael.a...@infineon.com wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
>
>
> it would be indeed a valuable feature if there is a command to reorient
> surfaces of volumes
>
> automatically in a way that the normal is pointing outwards, as it would help
> to set the natural
file both with PythonOCC and Gmsh.
BTW, I love the new Gmsh API :-)
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
e are people that are happy with FORTRAN.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 20:02 +0900, 허준영 wrote:
> However, I can't find any part that can put physical properties of the
> model(like velocity, resistivity or etc) in Gmsh.
> Does the Gmsh not provide that kind of functions?
no, you have to define physical entities and then somehow (in your
Hi all!
Is it possible to choose mesh.algorithm in a surface-by-surface case?
I would like to have most of them to be meshed with frontal but one particular
feature is complex and needs
the meshadapt algo.
Thanks
--
jeremy
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh
s (e.g. distributed load on a circular
> line segment or pressure on a curved surface).
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Pieter Reumers
> ___
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh@onelab.info
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
--
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
what would the resulting "script.geo" be?
On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 19:41 +0100, Octavio Castillo Reyes wrote:
> Dear gmsh users and support team,
>
> I'm working on meshing for geophysical applications using gmsh. I have
> special interest in tetrahedral meshes. Since last November I'm trying to
On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 12:35 -0500, Juan E. Sanchez wrote:
> Hello Jeremy,
>
> Is my understanding correct that there would only be one material volume
> per brep file? I would use freecad, but it seems painful to try to
no
> import one brep per material into gmsh, and then attempt to get
4
> >> Grubenstrasse 9, CH-8045 Zürich, benedikt.oswald@lspr.swiss
> >>
> --
> >>
> >>
> >> _______
> >> gmsh mailing list
> >> gmsh@onelab.info
> >> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
> >>
> > ___
> > gmsh mailing list
> > gmsh@onelab.info
> > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
> --
>
> --
> Dr. sc. techn. Benedikt Oswald - first engineer - LSPR AG - phone +41 43
> 366 90 74
> Grubenstrasse 9, CH-8045 Zürich, benedikt.oswald@lspr.swiss
>
> --
>
>
> ___
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh@onelab.info
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
--
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 06:52 +0200, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> If you link with the static gmsh lib you'll also need to specify all
> the additional dependencies.
>
> If you have trouble compiling/linking, I would suggest downloading
> the binary gmsh SDK from the website - we distribute it
Hi all
I see in contrib/HighOrderMeshOptimizer/OptHomRun.cpp:686 that if the
higher-order optimizer cannot make all the jacobian non-negative, then
an error is raised.
Why is this a hard error and not a warning? I have seen cases where the
optimizer cannot make all of then non-negative, yet the
mesh file for the
> gmsh. The test.msh file is the mesh file for our code. Any co-operation
> will be appreciable.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Mohammad
>
>
> _______
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh@onelab.info
>
coarse everywhere else.
>
> The reason I am not doing this manually is because I have 1000+ .iges
> files to mesh due to the scope of my project.
>
> any help would be greatly appreciated!
> Thanks,
> Terrence
>
> ___
> gmsh m
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
> _______
> gmsh mailing list
> gmsh@onelab.info
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
>
--
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 19:58 +0200, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> > On 14 Sep 2018, at 04:43, jeremy theler
> > wrote:
> >
> > Dear developers,
> >
> > I am updating my .msh parser for the new version 4 format. What I
> > found
> > was that nodes
That is how boundary conditions are set in the web-based interface
www.caeplex.com
Try uploading your CAD model and creating a dummy project. From step #2
you can download the mesh in .msh format (although 2.2 only for now).
On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 04:27 +, Wesley Ranger wrote:
> Hello
On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 14:31 +0200, Guilherme Saturnino wrote:
>
> I would also like to suggest 2 improvements for future Gmsh versions:
>
> 1. Is it possible to provide Gmsh 4 binaries that are compatible
> with
> CentOS 6? It is an old but still widely used Linux distribution.
> This
> has
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
SetFactory("OpenCASCADE");
a() = ShapeFromFile("cube.brep");
DBRep_DrawableShape
CASCADE Topology V1, (c) Matra-Datavision
Locations 1
1
1 0 0 0
0
Hey Yuri
I asked the same question back in 2011:
http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/2011/006878.html
All I got is a loose reference to Lohner's book:
http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/2011/006881.html
Someone asked it again in 2012 with no response:
http://onelab.info/pipermail/gmsh/2019/012933.html
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#index-Geometry_002eOCCTargetUnit
On Sat, 2019-03-30 at 20:22 +1300, Victor Kemp wrote:
> How does Gmsh decide what units to use for its dimensionless mesh
> made from a STEP file? I've noticed that
range(0, len(faces), 3):
> f = tuple(sorted(faces[i:i+3]))
> t = tets[i/12]
> if not t in txt:
> txt[t] = set()
> for tt in fxt[f]:
> if tt != t:
> txt[t].add(tt)
>
> print("neighbors by face: ", txt)
>
> gmsh.finaliz
what about Shepard or Modified Shepard?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_distance_weighting id="-x-evo-
selection-start-marker">
On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 12:00 +0100, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> > On 18 Feb 2019, at 16:36, Alessandro Vicini > el.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I was wondering
ed average? how? using the element's volume? the
element's quality? etc
regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com$MeshFormat
2.2 0 8
$EndMeshFormat
$Nodes
6
1 0 0 0
2 1 0 0
3 1 1 0
4 0 1 0
5 2 0 0
6 2 1 0
$EndNodes
$Elements
2
1 3 2 1 1 1 2 3 4
2 3 2 1 1 2 5 6 3
$EndElements
import gmsh
imp
, it could. This is why I am interested in this issue, and raised
the question on how to average if the solver has to output nodal values
of stresses. Weighted average? With the element's volume? With the
element's quality?
[1] https://www.seamplex.com/blog/say-modeling-not-simulation.html
--
Jeremy Th
nother;
> > the elements in one component are not connected to the elements in
> > another.
> >
>
> You need to fuse the two surfaces: this can be achieved with the
> "fragment" operation - see attached file.
Would there be any difference
Browse
https://bitbucket.org/seamplex/wasora/src/9edef2db1f04bdb49e604722dce8df18879709b1/src/mesh/?at=master
and look for the routines that compute the volumes, like line 405 of
the following file
Read further an use Distance + Threshold fields.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
ersions used by Gmsh
> > under different OS (I see version 7.3.0 under Linux, and 7.3.1
> > under Win).
> >
> > A.
> >
> >
> >
> > Da: Peter Johnston
> > Inviato: venerdì 6 settembre 2019 08:54
> > A: Jeremy Theler ; g...@geuz.org; Al
Indeed, see attached png.I am using latest Git linked against OCE 7.3.0
in GNU/Linux.
On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 08:13 +, Alessandro Vicini wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> I’m using 4.4.0 (under windows), and your script seems to work for
> me…
>
> A.
>
>
>
> Da: gmsh
> Per conto di Peter
If anyone is interested, that very same case can be solved
directly from Onshape in less than 30 seconds:
https://youtu.be/iure4rn6GRg
In a couple of weeks I will add the possibility to download the .step
and .geo to modify it offline.
Regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon, 2019-07
Hi Alessandro
I am not sure what happens in your case but I have seen different numbering
of entities when using OCE 6.9.1 and OCCT 7.x, even under the same OS.
You might want to check you are using the same kernel.
Regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019, 09:46
Hi
Is there a way to get a string with the OCE/OCCT version the Python
Gmsh SDK was linked against?
So far I could only get it by grepping `gmsh -info` for OCC but I would
like to know the version after importing gmsh in a python script.
Regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
eferences to how the different optimization
methods work?
Regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
Have you tried FacesList instead of EdgesList?
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 15:52 +0100, Sabrina Zacarias wrote:
> Dear gmsh team,
>
> I Have a surface (which is a tube) embedded in a volume (a cylinder),
> and I have two questions regarding the meshing:
>
> 1. Is it possible/is there an easy way to
https://dev.opencascade.org/doc/overview/html/occt_user_guides__boolean_operations.html
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020, 19:01 tao song wrote:
> Dear Christophe,
> It's really solved my problem, and i'm looking forward to the new
> algorithm!
> Is there any
the bigger one. This is the code:
>
>
>
>
>
> Sphere(1) = {0, 0, 0, 1, -Pi/2, Pi/2, 2*Pi};
>
> Sphere(2) = {0, 0, 0, 3, -Pi/2, Pi/2, 2*Pi};
>
>
>
> BooleanDifference{ Volume{2}; Delete; }{ Volume{1}; Delete; }
This actually works. See attached png.
delx = 0.5;
xend = 20;
Point(1) = {0, 0, 0, delx};
Point(2) = {xend, 0, 0, delx};
Line(1) = {1, 2};
Physical Point("left") = {1};
Physical Point("right") = {2};
Physical Line("bulk") = {1};
On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 23:11 +0530, Deepa wrote:
> >
> > I am a beginner here.
> >
> > I'm looking for
For linear transformations (and non-linear too if you are flexible enough)
you could write a python script to read all the nodes coordinates,
transform them algebraically and then write them back into a .msh file.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020, 22:49 Max Orok wrote
No, the problem is that Gmsh does import the volume but after it you
ask it to perform either one or more of the OCC "healing" procedures and for
some reason these procedures remove the volume.
See if you have something like
Geometry.OCCFixDegenerated
Geometry.OCCFixSmallEdges
an animation that shows the real
time advancement?
Python and linear interpolation between the two closest sets of data
are fine. I would like to get the general idea, I can work out the
details.
Regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh
Dear Nicolas
I asked the very same thing here:
https://gitlab.onelab.info/gmsh/gmsh/-/issues/450The answer is here:
https://gitlab.onelab.info/gmsh/gmsh/-/issues/644
TLDR; perform a boolean fragments operation between the line and the
point:
SetFactory("OpenCASCADE");
Point(1) = {0,0,0, 0.1};
Any ideas?
Regards
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
Yes, but the difficult part here is to know if a new node needs to be added
or another element already added it, and in such case what is the
already-added node id.
Maybe Gmsh already has this somewhere near the "refine by splitting" tool.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Thu, Ma
On Thu, 2020-03-19 at 13:02 +0100, Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
> In a .geo file:
>
> Merge "file.msh";
> SetOrder 2;
> Save "file2.msh";
Great! I was close, but it is always wise to ask the boss.
Thanks.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
_
If you do not need curved elements set
Mesh.SecondOrderLinear = 1
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, 11:22 Stephen Wornom wrote:
> Tell the list if it removes the negative values.
> Thanks,
> Stephen
>
> - Original Message -
> > From:
a graphical interface
> context
Add an Exit instruction in the .geo and call it without the '-'
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
___
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
What does "I cannot create it online" mean?
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 10:19 +0200, Zuheyr Alsalihi wrote:
> Thank you so much!!
>
> I am using a geo file with which I can create a png file using the
> display but I cannot create
> it
> Using the coherence command I get a large list of errors of the type:
>
> Error : could not find extruded vertex (0.08443279255020152,
> -0.053826794978966, 0).
Try to re-use line 18 for the last extrude instead of creating a new
edge 35.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
I am not sure because I seldom use the GUI. But what I am pretty sure of is
that Gmsh works the way it should.
It would help to know what the actual errors you get are.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020, 07:25 Bart Deschoolmeester <
bart.deschoolmees...@bbri.be>
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Specifying-mesh-element-sizes
On Sat, 2020-05-30 at 00:21 -0700, Tian Xia wrote:
> Hi Gmsh developers,
> Thank you for developing this extremely useful tool. Recently I have
> encountered a couple of problems about generating 3D non-uniform
> mesh:
>
> 1.
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#t10_002egeo
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Sun, May 31, 2020, 03:56 Tian Xia wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> Thanks for directing me to the documentation. I can see my first
> question answered there. But I still can't see a clear way to c
Defining physical groups or not control what is saved in the .msh file not
what is shown in the GUI.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020, 04:40 Keith Sloan wrote:
> I am new to Gmsh and trying to reproduce the following but still seeing
> triangles on the surface.
>
RT(F)M, section F.5 question 3 in
http://gmsh.info/doc/texinfo/gmsh.html#Mesh-module-questions
How can I only save tetrahedral elements (not triangles and lines)?
By default, if physical groups are defined, the output mesh only
contains those elements that belong to physical entities. So to save
Add
Coherence;
and you'll be fine.
On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 10:43 +, Bart Deschoolmeester wrote:
> Hi,
> I am a beginner.
> While working on a larger 3D project I noticed some gaps and
> overlaps.
> I plan to simulate the heat transfer.
> I assume gaps and overlaps are to be avoided to get a
Sure, the Coherence command performs a Boolean Fragments operation and
the ids of the entities are modified.Just set the appropiate id of the
new entities in the EdgesList of your field:
Field[1].EdgesList = {25,26};
Regards--jeremy thelerwww.seamplex.com
On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 13:41 +, Bart
(.msh) file , and we can directly get the physical Ids from
> > the DMPlex object?
>
> I have no idea... PETSc/DMPlex reads .msh files?
>
Yes indeed. Here's the implementation:
https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/blob/master/src/dm/impls/plex/plexgmsh.c
Thank you
--
jeremy theler
ww
88 matches
Mail list logo