Re: [GNUnet-developers] contrib folder

Christian Grothoff transcribed 2.8K bytes: > It converts the output of gnunet-zonewalk (from src/dns/) into the input > format for gnunet-gns-benchmark, as documented in the first few lines of > the shell script. Nothing that would ever concern normal users. I know, but I think contrib is messy

Re: [GNUnet-developers] contrib folder

It converts the output of gnunet-zonewalk (from src/dns/) into the input format for gnunet-gns-benchmark, as documented in the first few lines of the shell script. Nothing that would ever concern normal users. On 05/17/2018 10:15 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote: > Hi, > > I'm cleaning up the contrib

Re: [GNUnet-developers] New gnunet bibliography

Schanzenbach, Martin transcribed 3.7K bytes: > Ok. Commit 2902e10ead621f4b2172edbc7161e36af9bfb42f should make it build the > full bib now. > I had to add a few "author" fields as "author = {TODO}", else it failed. I > did not bother to find the actual authors for now. Unfortunately you cannot

[GNUnet-developers] contrib folder

Hi, I'm cleaning up the contrib folder a bit. Restructuring and moving some files into new folders. What I wasn't able to find is information about "zonewalk-to-types", is it used manually? grep returned nothing. ___ GNUnet-developers mailing list

Re: [GNUnet-developers] New gnunet bibliography

> On 17. May 2018, at 21:13, Nils Gillmann wrote: > > Schanzenbach, Martin transcribed 3.1K bytes: >> I do not want to hijack the other thread so I open this. >> I can help with the bib, but when I do a "make" in the gnunetbib (after I >> fix all the quote errors) I get 2295

Re: [GNUnet-developers] New gnunet bibliography

Ok. Commit 2902e10ead621f4b2172edbc7161e36af9bfb42f should make it build the full bib now. I had to add a few "author" fields as "author = {TODO}", else it failed. I did not bother to find the actual authors for now. Unfortunately you cannot leave the field blank. The selectors do not work,

Re: [GNUnet-developers] New gnunet bibliography

Schanzenbach, Martin transcribed 3.1K bytes: > I do not want to hijack the other thread so I open this. > I can help with the bib, but when I do a "make" in the gnunetbib (after I fix > all the quote errors) I get 2295 "ERROR"s a la: > > ERROR: Misformed pages in 1962 > ERROR: reed60polynomial

[GNUnet-developers] New gnunet bibliography

I do not want to hijack the other thread so I open this. I can help with the bib, but when I do a "make" in the gnunetbib (after I fix all the quote errors) I get 2295 "ERROR"s a la: ERROR: Misformed pages in 1962 ERROR: reed60polynomial has no www_section field ERROR: Misformed pages in

Re: [GNUnet-developers] website and logo rework

Schanzenbach, Martin transcribed 5.6K bytes: > Thanks. > > Wait. So look at the gnunetbib.bib file line 526. > This cannot possibly go through the parser, right? Yeah, 526 is wrong, as I got annoyed at some point and did some replacement which fixed tons of errors that were there before and left

Re: [GNUnet-developers] website and logo rework

Thanks. Wait. So look at the gnunetbib.bib file line 526. This cannot possibly go through the parser, right? I just fixed a _lot_ of those locally but I am not sure if that was correct? Also, most of the "abstract" values are in double quotes {{}}. Is there a reason for that? Now that I have

Re: [GNUnet-developers] website and logo rework

Schanzenbach, Martin transcribed 10K bytes: > Hey, > > > On 17. May 2018, at 17:12, Nils Gillmann wrote: > > > > Christian Grothoff transcribed 34K bytes: > >> Dear all, … > >> On 05/17/2018 04:07 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote: > A very good reference for all of this is this

Re: [GNUnet-developers] website and logo rework

Hey, > On 17. May 2018, at 17:12, Nils Gillmann wrote: > > Christian Grothoff transcribed 34K bytes: >> Dear all, >> >> >> I think this is the time where I have to disclose a major unfortunate >> development (but which may be resolved soon without too much drama). >> >>

Re: [GNUnet-developers] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: website and logo rework

Nice analysis Bastian! I've attached the SVG file of my version, if anyone wants to improve/build upon it. Cheers, Marcel On 17.05.2018 16:11, Nils Gillmann wrote: > Hi Bastian, > > thanks for this refreshing long Email, I hope to reply to the > logo part at some point. The image is very low

Re: [GNUnet-developers] website and logo rework

Christian Grothoff transcribed 34K bytes: > Dear all, > > > I think this is the time where I have to disclose a major unfortunate > development (but which may be resolved soon without too much drama). > > Basically, GNUnet e.V. has received a cease and desist letter from > Deutsche Telekom AG

Re: [GNUnet-developers] website and logo rework

Dear all, I think this is the time where I have to disclose a major unfortunate development (but which may be resolved soon without too much drama). Basically, GNUnet e.V. has received a cease and desist letter from Deutsche Telekom AG (DTAG) over the use of the letter "T" in the logo on

Re: [GNUnet-developers] website and logo rework

Hi, > On 17. May 2018, at 13:25, hyazin...@emailn.de wrote: > > Hello, > > seeing the logo, this network forming the silouette of a gnu, sparked > excitement in me. > This is an improvement to the current logo. And it motivated me to > play a little bit around with its relationship to added

Re: [GNUnet-developers] website and logo rework

Hello, seeing the logo, this network forming the silouette of a gnu, sparked excitement in me. This is an improvement to the current logo. And it motivated me to play a little bit around with its relationship to added writing. Here's the result: