A week after the previous release candidate, GoboLinux 013rc2 is
available for download
(http://www.gobolinux.org/index.php?page=downloads). Fixes were
performed at a small set of packages, specially Firefox, Pinfo, TeTeX
and Udev. Bug reports are welcome at our bug tracker
(http://bugs.gobolinux.o
On 10/22/06, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> André Detsch wrote:
> > Patch looks fine, but I would prefer to commit it right after 013 release.
> > Ok?
>
> Why? It's a quite serious bug with an easy fix.
The -f option works, reducing the severity of the problem, IMHO.
I would like
On 10/22/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/22/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure. Old packages have all sorts of problems (bad
> > dependencies, bad Dependencies, etc.) and many are seriously outdated.
> > The 013 store, in contrast, is much cleaner (w
André Detsch wrote:
> Patch looks fine, but I would prefer to commit it right after 013 release.
> Ok?
Why? It's a quite serious bug with an easy fix.
--
/Jonatan-=( http://kymatica.com )=-
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gob
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:27:07 +0200, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only --force (-f) is working. Looking at the code, it seems that the
> introduction of --force has made the -c option being ignored.
>
My fault. Forgot that checks against passed options has to be done with
the functio
On 10/22/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patch looks fine, but I would prefer to commit it right after 013 release.
> Ok?
In this case, the best to do is to keep the patch posted as an open bug at Bugs.
-- Hisham
> On 10/22/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun,
On 10/22/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure. Old packages have all sorts of problems (bad
> dependencies, bad Dependencies, etc.) and many are seriously outdated.
> The 013 store, in contrast, is much cleaner (wasn't it almost entirely
> built using ChrootCompile?) and do
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:27:21 -0200
"Hisham Muhammad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't have any firsthand experience, but everybody tells me dealing
> with branches in CVS is a pain, so we never made separate branches.
In some ways, yes, but manageable. Ie, after some branches/merges, you get
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:18:20 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 10/22/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Patch looks fine, but I would prefer to commit it right after 013
>> release.
>> Ok?
>
> In this case, the best to do is to keep the patch posted as an open
On 10/22/06, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:27:21 -0200
> "Hisham Muhammad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Don't know if we really need to at this point, hopefully the freeze
> > will last only one more week, I think we can collect patches in the
> > me
Patch looks fine, but I would prefer to commit it right after 013 release.
Ok?
On 10/22/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:27:07 +0200, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Only --force (-f) is working. Looking at the code, it seems that the
> > introdu
Only --force (-f) is working. Looking at the code, it seems that the
introduction of --force has made the -c option being ignored.
On 10/22/06, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SymlinkProgram -c overwrite doesn't work. It doesn't overwrite...
>
> --
> /Jonatan-=( http://kymatica.
SymlinkProgram -c overwrite doesn't work. It doesn't overwrite...
--
/Jonatan-=( http://kymatica.com )=-
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:40:53 -0200
"Lucas C. Villa Real" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If the version should be 0.09, then ignore this patch. :)
>
> Applied, thanks!
Good, thanks! :)
Just nit picking: the patch for the man is important too, as there's an
option collision (-h both for hide and
On 10/22/06, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SymlinkProgram -c overwrite doesn't work. It doesn't overwrite...
Ouch. I can't look at it in the next hour-and-a-half, but please post
it at bugs.gobolinux.org so it doesn't get overlooked. (I'm really
liking this bugtracker thing, it's
On 10/22/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/22/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since 013 final is coming soon, its probably time for us to start
> > compile official packages with Glibc 2.4.
> >
> > At this moment, packages at the official repository are all
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:06:44 -0200
"André Detsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I would recommend holding non critical commits for some days.
Agreed. Is there any "committers handbook" I could refer to, in order to
both avoid committing frozen things and patch-bombing the list?
Oh, and I not
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:43:46 +0200, Lucas C. Villa Real
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/22/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Since 013 final is coming soon, its probably time for us to start
>> compile official packages with Glibc 2.4.
>>
>> At this moment, packages at the offici
On 10/22/06, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 12:06:44 -0200
> "André Detsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So, I would recommend holding non critical commits for some days.
>
> Agreed. Is there any "committers handbook" I could refer to, in order to
> b
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:29:36 +0200, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since 013 final is coming soon, its probably time for us to start
> compile official packages with Glibc 2.4.
>
> At this moment, packages at the official repository are all compiled
> against Glibc 2.3.2. Packages compi
On 10/22/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since 013 final is coming soon, its probably time for us to start
> compile official packages with Glibc 2.4.
>
> At this moment, packages at the official repository are all compiled
> against Glibc 2.3.2. Packages compiled with Glibc 2.4 (incl
Since 013 final is coming soon, its probably time for us to start
compile official packages with Glibc 2.4.
At this moment, packages at the official repository are all compiled
against Glibc 2.3.2. Packages compiled with Glibc 2.4 (including most
of the 013 packages) were kept separate, at
http://
On 10/22/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I see no problem on doing commits in tools that aren't going to
> be repackaged to the iso -- or do you feel better to apply a big lock
> in everything for a while?
Hopefully, we will not need to repack GoboHide (like there was no
23 matches
Mail list logo
