On 4/5/07, Jeremy Visser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hisham Muhammad wrote:
> >> /System/Links/Executables/Compile: line 398: Arg: command not found
> >
> > Ouch. Compile depends on a recent Scripts package as well. Looks like
> > that dependency is not specified in Compile's Dependencies file as
Hisham Muhammad wrote:
>> /System/Links/Executables/Compile: line 398: Arg: command not found
>
> Ouch. Compile depends on a recent Scripts package as well. Looks like
> that dependency is not specified in Compile's Dependencies file as it
> should.
OK, will try upgrading Scripts as well.
FYI,
On 4/5/07, Jeremy Visser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
> > Just run 'InstallPackage Linux' and it will download the package for
> > you. The kernel image/modules is now handled by the standard
> > GoboLinux tools, not needing to be in a separate repository/directory
> > a
Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
> Just run 'InstallPackage Linux' and it will download the package for
> you. The kernel image/modules is now handled by the standard
> GoboLinux tools, not needing to be in a separate repository/directory
> anymore.
OK, done. So far, it appears to work fine, thanks!
On 4/4/07, Jeremy Visser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/5/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/4/07, Benjamin Bruheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I recently gave out that url for somebody who needed to install the
> > > ISO kernel sources for compiling a network driver. S
On 4/4/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't the kernel headers linked at
> http://gobolinux.org/?page=downloads
> suffice?
You are right. This is the link I was looking for hehe.
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists
On 4/5/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Benjamin Bruheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I recently gave out that url for somebody who needed to install the
> > ISO kernel sources for compiling a network driver. So there's a valid
> > scenario why somebody wants the 2.6.17
On 4/4/07, Benjamin Bruheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently gave out that url for somebody who needed to install the
> ISO kernel sources for compiling a network driver. So there's a valid
> scenario why somebody wants the 2.6.17 package.
Wouldn't the kernel headers linked at
http://goboli
I recently gave out that url for somebody who needed to install the
ISO kernel sources for compiling a network driver. So there's a valid
scenario why somebody wants the 2.6.17 package.
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 05:58:54 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 4/3/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 4/4/07, Jeremy Visser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > http://www.gobolinux.org/download/kern
On 4/4/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/3/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/4/07, Jeremy Visser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > http://www.gobolinux.org/download/kernel/ has only 2.6.17. I will look
> > > in Manager when I get a chance and see if it's th
On 4/3/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Jeremy Visser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > http://www.gobolinux.org/download/kernel/ has only 2.6.17. I will look
> > in Manager when I get a chance and see if it's there anyway.
>
> I wasn't even aware that existed. I assume it
On 4/4/07, Jeremy Visser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Are there any updated kernels I can/should download?
> > You need at least 2.6.20; InstallPackage Linux/Compile Linux will pull
> > that in for you. You need to be running it when you ins
On 4/3/07, Jeremy Visser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Are there any updated kernels I can/should download?
> > You need at least 2.6.20; InstallPackage Linux/Compile Linux will pull
> > that in for you. You need to be running it when you ins
On 4/4/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are there any updated kernels I can/should download?
> You need at least 2.6.20; InstallPackage Linux/Compile Linux will pull
> that in for you. You need to be running it when you install the new
> Glibc, so you'll have to restart in between.
On 4/4/07, Jeremy Visser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems to still be an issue. I am running GoboLinux 013 on a virtual
> machine, and when upgrading Glibc, I too got the "kernel too old" error.
>
> Are there any updated kernels I can/should download?
You need at least 2.6.20; InstallPackage
On 3/6/07, mpb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/6/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Are you referring to /Programs/Linux-Headers? As I understand it, that's
> > only the kernel headers for which the current libc is compiled against,
> > and not the headers corresponding to the
On 3/6/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/6/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Disk space is cheap. I guess we could have a config file somewhere to
> > > prune Unmanaged. It would we worthwhil
On 3/6/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you referring to /Programs/Linux-Headers? As I understand it, that's
> only the kernel headers for which the current libc is compiled against,
> and not the headers corresponding to the actually installed kernel. So,
> we need both.
Is
Jonas Karlsson wrote:
> 2007/3/6, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a
2.3 system moving to a 2.4. I have ne
On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/6/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007/3/6, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > I think this can have something to do with glibc's --with-kernel
> > > parameter. We used a very recent release, so this can b
On 3/6/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With a 2.6.20 kernel everything is fine. It was actually VERY smooth.
> > Nice job.
>
> Ah, good to know it worked!
>
> > Disk space is cheap. I guess we could have a config file so
On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With a 2.6.20 kernel everything is fine. It was actually VERY smooth.
> Nice job.
Ah, good to know it worked!
> Disk space is cheap. I guess we could have a config file somewhere to
> prune Unmanaged. It would we worthwhile for packages oth
On 3/6/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/6, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I think this can have something to do with glibc's --with-kernel
> > parameter. We used a very recent release, so this can be a problem.
> > Should be the case of adding Linux 2.6.x to
2007/3/6, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a 2.3
> > > system moving to a 2.4. I have never tried myself
On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a 2.3
> > system moving to a 2.4. I have never tried myself to upgrade Glibc.
> > Can anyone take a look into this? Maybe
On 3/6/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/6, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a 2.3
2007/3/6, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a 2.3
> > > system moving to a 2.4. I have never tried myself to upg
On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a 2.3
> > system moving to a 2.4. I have never tried myself to upgrade Glibc.
> > Can anyone take a look into this? Maybe
On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a 2.3
> system moving to a 2.4. I have never tried myself to upgrade Glibc.
> Can anyone take a look into this? Maybe by running gobo inside qemu or
> other emulator.. I don't ha
2007/3/6, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/5/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Were you running an updated version of Scripts? The current version
> > > should handle Glibc installation fine.
> > michael@ ~]ls -l /Programs/Scripts/Current
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 gobo gobo 5
On 3/5/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I meant more "should I drop -u keep?" - I don't know if it has any
> unmanaged files (or how to find out if it does), although since
> /S/S/ld.so.cache is a real file and not a symlink to
> /P/Glibc/Settings/ld.so.cache I thought it might.
Th
On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Were you running an updated version of Scripts? The current version
> > > should handle Glibc installation fine.
> > michael@ ~]ls -l /Programs/Scripts/Current
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 gobo
On 3/5/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Were you running an updated version of Scripts? The current version
> > should handle Glibc installation fine.
> michael@ ~]ls -l /Programs/Scripts/Current
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 gobo gobo 5 Mar 1 22:35 /Programs/Scripts/Current -> 2.6.2
> I can't fi
On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > While working on Freshen I managed to break my system by having it
> > automatically install a new Glibc package (I fixed it from another
> > distro, so that part's ok). But i
On 3/5/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> While working on Freshen I managed to break my system by having it
> automatically install a new Glibc package (I fixed it from another
> distro, so that part's ok). But is there a safe way to do that?
>
> There's no minimum kernel depende
36 matches
Mail list logo
