MB goal, 8 P
28 + 64 ms SW (if I understand this correctly) to collect what 6-7 MB?
tis 5 dec. 2017 kl 08:25 skrev Dave Cheney :
> Oh yeah, I forgot someone added that a while back. That should work.
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Henrik Johansson
> wrote:
> > So
er. This will reduce GC frequency by 10x or
> 100x and if your tail latency is a GC problem the 99%tile latency numbers
> will become 99.9%tile or 99.99%tile numbers.
>
> On Tuesday, December 5, 2017 at 2:39:53 AM UTC-5, Henrik Johansson wrote:
>
>> I am watching with childlike f
> these pauses look like in the beta. If you have the time could you send
> them to us after the beta comes out.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Henrik Johansson
> wrote:
>
>> Ok so it's not bad, thats good!
>>
>> The inital ~20 sec numbers come from t
is issue.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Henrik Johansson
> wrote:
>
>> I would gladly help with this but afaik Heroku only makes stable versions
>> available:
>> https://github.com/heroku/heroku-buildpack-go/blob/master/data.json
>> I gues
I have a vague memory of +Rob Pike tweeting something about
astronomy or perhaps an observatory a few months ago.
Perhaps there was no programming involved but if so I imagine Go is safe
bet.
But building pipelines using something like Pachyderm would allow for a
very polyglot "use the tool that
Isn't the lock operation an memory acquire operation that means that the
next load of the done field needs to be loaded from memory?
Perhaps it is not stated in the memory model exactly but this seems safe.
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017, 08:11 Dave Cheney wrote:
>
>
> On 29 Dec 2017, at 18:01, Caleb Spa
Surely single goroutine scenarios are trivial? Anything else would be a
compiler bug. In multiple goroutine scenarios a lock must be held or some
of the atomic functions are needed. Any other use that "works" are by
accident say on x86 or some other stricter arch. I am no expert in this but
surely
I think this one by Rick Hudson is very good as well.
https://www.infoq.com/presentations/go-gc-performance
tors 11 jan. 2018 kl 18:38 skrev :
> Hi!
>
> Currently go uses concurrent mark'n'sweep. Best talk about gc in go and
> theory:
> https://pusher.com/sessions/meetup/the-realtime-guild/golang
I think "go mod vendor"
does the trick as stated in "go mod help vendor".
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 11:12 AM 唐彦昭 wrote:
> I need put my project on the server to compile.But my server can't connect
> to internet.
> So I need to put all my relay in my vendor folder in my develop
> environment.
> Ho
Wow! I live outside the US but this really makes me want to work for
Mattel. Sounds like a great place to work.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019, 22:07 Nate Finch wrote:
> Want to work with me at Mattel on a Go platform?
>
> Mattel’s Connected Products Platform team is *the model* of where Mattel
> is going
On a practical note I think thread local storage is more or less
discouraged in for example Java as well
because it makes all the new shine "reactive" tools break since they make
no guarantees as to which thread you are running on.
That may or may not be relevant to your case but to say that it's
I am pretty sure it's the latter case with lazy loading when needed during
the Next() call.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 2:59 PM 杜沁园 wrote:
> When we operate with mysql with Go, as follow:
>
>
> rows, err := db.Query()
>
> for rows.Next() {
> .
> }
>
>
> When the driver get data?
>
> Get
I for one like the try proposal. It removes much of my gripes with the
verbosity of error handling.
I think that it will become more readable than explicit error handling
quite fast. Note that it is still explicit, if you don't use the try
notation the error can be handled as it is now or ignored
in quite a few situations and simplify, not in a
>> drastic way, but subtle and valuable one.
>>
>> My 2c.
>>
>> Le samedi 29 juin 2019 21:31:19 UTC+2, Henrik Johansson a écrit :
>>
>>> I for one like the try proposal. It removes much of my grip
If it is as bad as "every sane Go shop" comes to this conclusion then I am
sure "try" will not be added...
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 12:57 PM Wojciech S. Czarnecki
wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 12:33:16 +0200
> Henrik Johansson wrote:
>
> > That is one big str
This is funny since you are perfectly describing the Go core team... ;)
I really can't get my head around it that this topic generates so much
vitriol (maybe harsh).
Generics I kinda get but this is just incredible.
Don't like try? Don't use it.
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019, 18:42 Robert Engels wrote:
>
hy even
> have these conversations in the first place? Why have any community
> involvement at all? I am pretty sure this is not the position of the "Go
> team".
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Henrik Johansson
> Sent: Jul 1, 2019 12:14 PM
> To: robert en
Not sure if anyone has already mentioned the possibility that "try" could
actually improve error handling
by simply removing much of the tediousness. Both reading and writing all
the error checks becomes a
nail in my eyes even if realize that it is very important. What if "try"
could take some of t
Reports of violations are not violations.
I assume the standard coc procedure kicks in to determine if violations
occurred or not.
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019, 10:24 Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 10:39 PM Cassandra Salisbury
> wrote:
> >
> > I encourage everyone to take
Why make any distinction between pointers and non pointers? Isn't the
(usual) point to allow the caller to decide upon instantiation?
We define a contract in terms of an unknown set of types and then let
whoever uses it fullfil the contract however they want?
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019, 21:57 wrote:
>
The race is between the len call and the use of the channel. Entries can
have been added in between.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016, 17:40 dc0d wrote:
> Would you please elaborate on that?
>
> As I understand it there is no concurrent use of len happening here. It's
> a for loop and all calling to len is
Hi,
How does the aliasing support in Glide work.
There is a couple of hints in the Github readme that it can help when
working with forks.
I can't find anything in the otherwise nice documentation pages.
Anyone knows how to use this feature?
/ Henrik
--
You received this message because you ar
t; this helps ?
>
> https://github.com/Masterminds/glide/blob/a20b232c135529d4d73b5cf95f66954d34750ced/docs/example-glide.yaml#L30
>
>
> Le jeudi 1 septembre 2016 22:15:27 UTC+2, Henrik Johansson a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How does the aliasing support in Gli
but it feels like cheating...
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016, 00:51 Henrik Johansson wrote:
> I did try it but perhaps I did something wrong.
> Is 'glide update' enough after such an addition?
>
> The cloned repo has a glide.yaml and lock file checked in so these would
> have to b
Or maybe it works the other way? Because sync/atomic is covered then by
accidental extension so is unsafe.
tors 8 sep. 2016 kl 15:00 skrev Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:51 PM T L wrote:
>
> > Aren't the parameters of atomic.Load/Store/SwapPointer functions
> (*)unsafe.
Some distros suffer less from this. Arch is perfectly up2date in line with
its rolling approach.
I agree with Dave that a supported repo is very nice.
It is not unusual for companies to lag behind even on LTS installs but
still having a need for updates of a particular software.
mån 12 sep. 201
Perhaps something like this?
https://github.com/pachyderm/chess
mån 12 sep. 2016 kl 18:32 skrev David Crawshaw :
> The map-reduce systems I've worked with in the past bundle up the map
> and reduce functions in a binary, distribute it, and then communicate
> with it by an IPC or RPC system. Th
I think this will be an interesting read especially if you come from Java.
https://shipilev.net/blog/2016/close-encounters-of-jmm-kind/
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016, 19:08 sqweek E. wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 10:57:47 PM UTC+8, Alan Donovan wrote:
>
>> On 13 September 2016 at 10:33, 'Pa
This is just how type assertion works.
If you don't use the dual return it panics if the actual type is different
from the one you try to assert.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, 05:26 T L wrote:
> package main
>
> func main() {
> var m = map[string]int{}
> _, _ = m["abc"] // ok
> _ = m["abc"]
nics> occurs."
>>
>> Here "hold" means if it succeeds.
>>
>>
> I know of the syntax in spec.
> I just want to understand what is the deep reason for the syntax
> inconsistency between map index and type assert.
>
>
>>
>> On Thu,
I don't think it is based on the zero value being useful but a desire to be
as exact as possible when working with unknown data. You reach for X when
you have Y. Why would you magically get an X back? Panic can arguably be
seen as too strong but the multiple return is awesome.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016
But that is just syntactic sugar around the fact that Java does not have
first class functions. At least not in the sense Go does.
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016, 17:31 Pietro Gagliardi wrote:
> In Java, if an interface contains exactly one method, and that method is
> not already part of java.lang.Object,
Yet a notable such marker interface Serializable is known by almost all
Java developers ;)
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016, 02:04 wrote:
> An interesting aside about Java Interfaces that most people don't know is
> that you can have an empty Interface without methods or members and then
> declare different
But do these types of spin locks provide the same memory effects as
standard locks? I get that only one goroutine at a time can run the given
block but assigning to shared vars inside the block will still need to use
the methods from sync/atomic right?
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016, 22:47 wrote:
> The ru
r go routines will sit there spinning in
> the infinite loop until some other routine unlocks which is going to cost
> CPU.
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 11:20:15 PM UTC-5, Henrik Johansson wrote:
>
> But do these types of spin locks provide the same memory effects as
>
Forgot the list, sorry.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Henrik Johansson
Date: ons 12 okt. 2016 kl 08:32
Subject: Re: [go-nuts] Re: Go locking and channels much slower than Java
equivalent, program spends most of time in sync.(*Mutex).Lock() and
sync.(*Mutex).Unlock()
To: Dustin
ng atomic load
> (atomic.Value for example) or something similar?
>
>
>
> Not if everyone accessing them is using a mutex to synchronize the access.
>
>
>
> John
>
> John Souvestre - New Orleans LA
>
>
>
> *From:* golang-nuts@googlegroups.com [mailto:golang
regular sync/Mutex does as well or better. The fast path
> (when there’s little congestion) isn’t much more than a CAS.
>
>
>
> John
>
> John Souvestre - New Orleans LA
>
>
>
> *From:* Henrik Johansson [mailto:dahankz...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 2016 October 12, We
omic operation, for example. So
> mixing the two could be disastrous. But there are some cases where it can
> be done.
>
>
>
> John
>
> John Souvestre - New Orleans LA
>
>
>
> *From:* Henrik Johansson [mailto:dahankz...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 2016 October
ing and there is
> causal ordering here. The only reason I hesitate to go further is because
> that isn't formalized as part of the spec I don't believe, hence the issue.
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 6:16:00 AM UTC-5, Henrik Johansson wrote:
>
> I am sor
ncerning synchronization – which Go’s
> >> sync/atomic operations provide. And I would certainly agree.
> >
> > I surely maybe completely wrong in interpreting what Henrik Johansson
> > tries to express but I think I share confusion with him on this point so
> > let
The confusion I have had is rather with nilability.
A channel can be nil even though it is not explicitly a pointer.
The whole "call by reference" debate is fun but usually with beer...
fre 21 okt. 2016 kl 15:39 skrev Ian Lance Taylor :
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:47 PM, T L wrote:
> >
> > On
Oct 21, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Henrik Johansson
> wrote:
> > The confusion I have had is rather with nilability.
> > A channel can be nil even though it is not explicitly a pointer.
>
> It's a basic design decision in Go that every type has a zero value.
> For the "re
There was a long thread just recently about SpinLocks and the memory model.
There are several implementations on github. I cannot vouch for the quality
of any of them.
fre 21 okt. 2016 kl 16:14 skrev Roberto Zanotto :
> Maybe you can solve this with atomics.
> You keep an int32 that acts as mutex
I agree with Nate. The consistency in typing is a very compelling argument.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016, 22:14 Nate Finch wrote:
> Because it's consistent with how you get a pointer for other types... if
> I'm used to using &T{x} for structs, maps, and slices, then it's perfectly
> natural to try that
It seems like you encode the valid json string?
If you have a string that is json you should be able to post the string as
is no?
Just make sure you set the application/json content type.
tis 25 okt. 2016 kl 14:32 skrev Rich :
> Hi All,
>
> I have code that is similar to this:
> https://play.gol
I actually read through the thread and unless everyone in that thread got
the same message then I Aram should not have gotten the note.
I recognize the potential value of the CoC but it always boils down to
opinions. Imho this was a bad call. Bad calls happen and we should be able
to get past it a
To me the wording with a warning in it sounds extremely harsh. Adding any
number of pleases only makes it worse. I still think this should not have
been acted upon at all. What sort of de facto empirical outcome has there
been previously? Are there any previous incidents that have not gone
public?
The problem isn't the CoC or that the group it responded to a complaint but
that it right away started with a very aggressive warning email.
Why not talk to Aram like human being explaining the situation. This would
have given him a chance to resolve it on his own.
Seems like a much simpler and mo
n unwarranted,
> disproportioned response. I'm just trying to understand where the
> strawmans/tangents (or what I perceive as, willing to be corrected) are
> coming from. And I didn't list all.
>
> Surgical arguments > narratives.
>
>
> On 29/10/16 01:31, Henrik Johansson wrot
This is however not the whole truth.
Further down it states:
"The Working Group will reach a decision as to how to act. These may
include:
Nothing.
A request for a private or public apology.
A private or public warning.
An imposed vacation (for instance, asking someone to abstain for a week
from a
You also have to name the fields using struct tags to match the actual json
field names.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016, 12:28 Pietro Gagliardi wrote:
> You need to export the fields of tData in order for encoding/json to see
> them.
>
> On Oct 30, 2016, at 6:01 AM, MaReK Olšavský
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> m
I think there is a race on the WaitGroup. Add all of them before the loop.
It might not matter for what you are seeing but anyway.
What happens with an unbuffered channel?
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016, 07:08 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've written a small program to demonstrate what I am seeing. If I use a
>
Also what makes you think that ordering is mandated? Any of the goroutines
can be scheduled to run. The odds of 1 running first seems intuitively
higher but the should be nothing stopping the last to run first.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016, 07:11 Henrik Johansson wrote:
> I think there is a race on
Groupcache is really cool but for mutable data it requires some hoops to be
useable.
ons 16 nov. 2016 kl 20:50 skrev Tamás Gulácsi :
>
>
> 2016. november 16., szerda 15:10:30 UTC+1 időpontban Slawomir Pryczek a
> következőt írta:
>
> Hi Guys, I wrote memcached like PHP-client and GO-server, with
Seriously if the community is really a community then it will pop up in
another form. If not then it was never really a community to begin with.
I agree with Brad that this isn't something I want to condone. In fact if
people stopped using services with mgmt like this more often then crap like
thi
Relax, it was a primarily personal statement from Brad and he wanted to to
see if it was shared by others.
I am more baffled that not everyone agrees with him but that again is a
personal view...
fre 25 nov. 2016 kl 15:41 skrev :
> It is not up to the Go team to decide where the community choose
For us it started with me rewriting a small service. It was done quickly
and with great performance which led to curiosity from other developers
which in turn led to a larger system of services being built in Go with
great results. The initial usual fears about knowledge and "risks" was
quickly all
For us they interact exclusively through either plain http based services
or via Nats, no other interactions take place. It works as expected without
any particular issues. I would suggest that you start with a similar
approach and create a self contained little service to show that Go not
only wor
I would go with vendoring and proper education combined with peer review.
The hoops you go through to maintain "control" seems awkward at best. I
mean, you do after all trust the developers with you production code...
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017, 20:16 Jacek Furmankiewicz wrote:
> I doubt that will fly
Mgo https://labix.org/mgo seems to be very well maintained.
tors 12 jan. 2017 kl 16:26 skrev snmed :
> Thank you for your answer, so far i think at least for the rdbms there are
> maintained drivers. So i need just a reliable NoSql Driver for a
> Document-Based Storage.
> Go is awesome i hope the
That's Mongodb itself, not the Go driver.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017, 14:08 Konstantin Khomoutov <
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:42:38 +0300
> Josh Kamau wrote:
>
> [...]
> > I have read good reviews for mgo but i have not used it personally
>
> Okay, there's a negavi
Honestly I have had some less than pleasant incidents with Mongodb as well
but the fault was due to simply overusing it for stuff it's not meant for.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017, 14:36 Konstantin Khomoutov <
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 13:20:28 +
>
Expose properties as methods and do the check in the method can make the
caller use easier.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017, 14:41 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some simple leads,
>
> Use one line initialization of Person
> p := &Person{Attr:&Attribute{}}
>
> Enhance the if conditions statement
> if p.Attr != nil &
How does it compare to https://godoc.org/launchpad.net/xmlpath?
I have been using it with great satisfaction but it is not complete to my
knowledge xpath feature wise.
mån 13 juni 2016 kl 01:48 skrev Chris Trenkamp :
> https://github.com/ChrisTrenkamp/goxpath
>
> I've created an XPath 1.0 parser
Note the _excessive_ caveat. Used with some restraint I think it is a very
powerful construct.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016, 03:42 adonovan via golang-nuts <
golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 16 June 2016 18:00:43 UTC-4, Zauberkraut wrote:
>>
>> would an extended usage of this paradigm
The second one, the redhat Bugzilla does. They only want to ship a select
set of curves distro wide apparently. If it is motivated by security or
something else is less clear.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016, 07:08 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 9:18 PM, wrote:
> >
> > Nothing is stop
Really? I find that counting digits in large numbers is harder, for me at
least, than expected. The scientific notation is sweet.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016, 14:57 Manlio Perillo wrote:
> Il giorno martedì 21 giugno 2016 18:35:13 UTC+2, Caleb Spare ha scritto:
>>
>> This was shut down without much dis
Cache headers, etags etc and dynamic scheduling of re-fetch sounds useful.
Why not start a little library?
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016, 13:51 Johann Höchtl wrote:
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, 23. Juni 2016 17:04:54 UTC+2 schrieb Shawn Milochik:
>>
>> What do you need it to do, specifically? Doing an http.Get o
Hi,
For all Gb aficionados there is now a gb (http://getgb.io) plugin.
https://github.com/robbyrussell/oh-my-zsh/blob/master/plugins/gb/README.md
Hope it helps using this awesome tool from the cmd line.
/Henrik
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"gol
I use gb. I like it a lot and I have had no issues.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016, 14:15 Johann Höchtl wrote:
> I use godep. There has been lots of rumour lately to use gb.
>
> What do others use?
>
> If there is a blog post available somewhere comparing the pros and cons,
> please provide one.
> I know
I am unsure about pprof but running tests with race for example works
great. I would guess that it works.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016, 16:41 Ian Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016, at 09:23 PM, Henrik Johansson wrote:
>
> I use gb. I like it a lot and I have had no issues.
>
>
> A q
I don't really know much about the other tools but afaik the difference is
more in the fact that Gb is more similar to other build systems in other
languages. It focuses on making the current thing you are working on easy
and simple to build rather than being a tool to work around the strangeness
t
For repeatable builds there are many ways and tools that work fine, Gb is
not unique in this respect.
I don't get why this should be a controversial topic however. It seems to
be an issue only in the go community.
In all the other languages (newer more modern anyway) it is considered a
solved prob
I start wondering what I
missed.
Hope it makes some sense.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016, 19:13 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Henrik Johansson
> wrote:
> > For repeatable builds there are many ways and tools that work fine, Gb is
> > not unique in this r
ibrary I'd definitely stick to the go tool chain given
> that GB projects aren't go gettable.
>
> - Will
>
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Henrik Johansson
> wrote:
>
>> Well they have issues too of course. The most recent left-pad debacle is
>> most str
Yes like Jan previously said. It is the very use case WaitGroup was
developed for.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016, 15:45 T L wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, August 20, 2016 at 2:29:41 PM UTC+8, Yulrizka wrote:
>>
>> Dear gophers
>>
>> I have discussion with my colleague about this code
>>
>>
>> func process() *
I am truly sorry for resurrecting this old thread but I found my self
needing to emit xml containing:
today and I am unsure how to deal with it.
I have to do it for legacy reasons and there is very little leeway in what
the clients can accept.
It is also high volumes and no files are generat
Aha yes well if thats the only way then I guess it could work.
Would anyone object to adding some config for this to Encoder?
Thanks,
mån 30 jan. 2017 kl 17:54 skrev C Banning :
> https://play.golang.org/p/W5cQkqS0h_
>
>
> On Monday, January 30, 2017 at 9:06:49 AM UTC-7, Henr
What makes strings harder than for example []byte?
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017, 06:15 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Eliot Hedeman
> wrote:
> > I was writing up a proposal about adding the small string
> > optimization(putting strings on the heap if they will fit within the
Ok that clarifies it for me :)
ons 1 feb. 2017 kl 15:29 skrev Ian Lance Taylor :
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Henrik Johansson
> wrote:
> > What makes strings harder than for example []byte?
>
> Sorry, I'm not sure who you are asking, or, really what you are
&g
I have xml that looks like this:
sadasd
gfdfg
...
...
Where a and be can appear in any order and this order needs to be preserved.
I have managed to Marshal xml decently using a struct such as:
type Holder {
A A
B A
}
type A string
type B string
using a MarshalXML method on the
Ahh fantastic thanks a lot!
tors 2 feb. 2017 kl 15:11 skrev :
> Here is a playground link: https://play.golang.org/p/_wJEBd1L9x
>
> ABStuff string `xml:",innerxml"`
>
> You can capture the innerxml with an appropriate tag; you can also, as my
> third example in the above link demonstrates, captur
I ended up using the excellent package https://github.com/clbanning/mxj by
Charles Banning.
Thanks a great bunch it really made my day much easier!
tors 2 feb. 2017 kl 15:39 skrev Henrik Johansson :
> Ahh fantastic thanks a lot!
>
> tors 2 feb. 2017 kl 15:11 skrev :
>
> Here
The Context as "a bag of stuff" is attractive since it makes your code
easier to refactor (knock, knock) but gives me void* or as Jakob said
map[string]interface{} vibes.
I think I think it should be avoided but probably not unconditionally. I
guess there can be cases where it makes sense.
ons 8
The cognitive difference is huge in Go's favor. Aside from that the new
impressive gc results built for low latency can be a good argument.
We have deployed a number of services in Go over the past months and are
very happy with the performance. We used to do all these in Java but Go is
easier to
This comes down to encapsulation I guess. You may want to hide some
internals and perhaps not other.
Simple data types are probably fine but say that you have an interface
Store then you can have redisStore or cassandraStore both implementing the
same interface and the rest of your program just ope
With the whole "Reactive" movement thread locals have started to vanish at
least in the Java ecosystem.
I agree with Sameer that, while convenient, it comes with a whole set of
obscure bugs.
On Fri, May 12, 2017, 14:57 Sameer Ajmani wrote:
> Hmm, I'm not finding good open-source examples of Thre
Init seems very harsh, how can you ensure proper configuration then?
Otherwise I don't mind oanics during object creation or explicit
initialization.
Panics in mid execution less so but parhaps there are cases where it is
warranted.
ons 31 maj 2017 kl 21:25 skrev Peter Kleiweg :
> If a package ca
Yes those I also use in init sometimes but then you are in control of your
templates and regexes and things usually blow up quickly during development
which makes you fix it promptly.
It is not quite the same though as I understood Peters question to be. The
analogy would be the html/template to h
I have seen syntactic sugar like that in Scala. It can be very powerful but
at the same time very confusing when you need to fix a bug since you have
the mental overhead of the dsl to actual code to worry about as well.
fre 2 juni 2017 kl 16:16 skrev :
> Right, now show me the contents of the *a
I must have missed this but just clarify my thoughts are all file reads
async now? That would a pretty big deal for apps that read a lot of files.
tors 15 juni 2017 kl 19:30 skrev Ian Lance Taylor :
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:37 AM, wrote:
> >
> > With go1.9beta1 (Linux / amd64) I noticed an e
Ah well. Still cool though!
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, 22:12 Ian Lance Taylor, wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Henrik Johansson
> wrote:
> >
> > I must have missed this but just clarify my thoughts are all file reads
> > async now? That would a pretty big deal for
I think perhaps http://www.grpc.io/ can help if you want remoting but
perhaps it will also give you too much bootstrap.
tis 20 juni 2017 kl 22:00 skrev Ian Lance Taylor :
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 8:38 PM, Dat Huynh wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 4:07:46 AM UTC+10, Ian Lance Taylor
I agree a typed concurrent map would be very neat but each type that make
has to support requires AFAIK specialisation in the compiler(?) which seems
to be burdensome. Perhaps backwards compatibility prohibits the use of the
name 'cmap', not sure.
mån 10 juli 2017 kl 05:23 skrev :
> I do not u
Outstanding IDE!
I was always impressed with JetBrains stuff but Goland really rocks!
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:20 AM Florin Pățan wrote:
> Hi Gophers,
>
> I'd like to announce the start of the 2020.1 Early Access Program of
> GoLand IDE, the JetBrains dedicated IDE for Go development.
> A few h
Sure, writing these system in a non-GC language is harder but that's not
really what is talked about here right?
There is a reason why databases are not really successful in Java for
example. Caching software are predominantly in C/C++.
Beating highly tuned C/C++ is not something that a GC can do b
Well, Cassandra has a rewrite in C++ ScyllaDB hat performs many times
better so that particular example isn't really helping the GC case.
I don't mind the GC myself but I hear the "GC is actually faster" often and
it seems not to be true in the wild although I am sure theoretical cases
can be envi
the GC tuning is not designed for latency with
> max pauses of 500ms.
>
> Re-run the tests on Shenandoah or Zing and see how they compare.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Henrik Johansson
> Sent: Feb 12, 2020 9:10 AM
> To: Kevin Chadwick
> Cc: golang-nuts
&g
st, say 20-40 years, is that GCs are slowly
> eating more and more of the cake. As they improve, it definitely converges
> toward more viability, not less. There will always be programs for which
> they fare badly. But as they are detected, so are GCs improved.
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2
101 - 200 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
