Why can't I upload a file named libstdc++5-3.3.6-2-i586.pkg.tar.gz ?
Can't I use the plus sign in the filename? If so I think this is an
unfair restriction since several linux libraries have a plus in their
name.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message beca
Thanks a lot!
On Mar 1, 1:49 pm, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Done!
>
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 4:35 AM, massimiliano.brocchini
>
> wrote:
>
> >> > Do deprecated versions count for disk quota usage?
>
> >> Yes. Or you can just delete old objects if you don't need them anymore.
>
> >> > Can I
Is it possible to have directories in the download area? I need to
separate my packages into three categories.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Hosting at Google Code" group.
To post to this group, s
> > Does it delete the download entirely
> > in certain circumstances (assuming that it hasn't been downloaded yet at
> > all)?
>
> No, it's an unconditional delete. It will flash warnings at you,
> asking you to reconsider. We consider it a best practice to keep
> releases around forever -- even
Done!
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 4:35 AM, massimiliano.brocchini
wrote:
>
>> > Do deprecated versions count for disk quota usage?
>>
>> Yes. Or you can just delete old objects if you don't need them anymore.
>>
>> > Can I deprecate versions with some command line tools (like
>> > ScriptedUploads)?
> > Do deprecated versions count for disk quota usage?
>
> Yes. Or you can just delete old objects if you don't need them anymore.
>
> > Can I deprecate versions with some command line tools (like
> > ScriptedUploads)?
>
> No, not yet.
>
> > How can I upload packages which are bigger than 40 MB?
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:14 PM, massimiliano.brocchini
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 27, 7:28 pm, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:16 AM, massimiliano.brocchini
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> Actually, no, you're free to delete 'downloads' any time, and replace
>> >> them with a new obje
On Feb 27, 7:28 pm, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:16 AM, massimiliano.brocchini
>
> wrote:
>
> >> Actually, no, you're free to delete 'downloads' any time, and replace
> >> them with a new object by the same name. And you have at least 2GB of
> >> space in the downloa
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:16 AM, massimiliano.brocchini
wrote:
>
>> Actually, no, you're free to delete 'downloads' any time, and replace
>> them with a new object by the same name. And you have at least 2GB of
>> space in the downloads-quota.
>>
>> Perhaps you can move all of your packages to '
The problem with replacing files with the same name is that packages
versions are part of the name. For example I have built 3 versions of
samba and file names are:
samba-3.2.8-1-i586.pkg.tar.gz
samba-3.3.0-1-i586.pkg.tar.gz
samba-3.3.1-1-i586.pkg.tar.gz
Any suggestion is really welcome.
Thanks
> Actually, no, you're free to delete 'downloads' any time, and replace
> them with a new object by the same name. And you have at least 2GB of
> space in the downloads-quota.
>
> Perhaps you can move all of your packages to 'downloads', and just
> keep your distribution-assembly scripts in svn?
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Darren Pearce wrote:
> Does it delete the download entirely
> in certain circumstances (assuming that it hasn't been downloaded yet at
> all)?
No, it's an unconditional delete. It will flash warnings at you,
asking you to reconsider. We consider it a best prac
>
> > Sorry to butt in but in thought that downloads were indeed unchangeable?
> I
> > just checked one of my projects' download tabs and there doesn't seem to
> be
> > a way to change the content.
>
> Downloads Tab -> Click on a download's summary -> Click the 'Delete'
> link near the search box.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Darren Pearce wrote:
>> > I'm using subversion since I know that your download are keeps storing
>> > old version of binaries and I need to update packages quite often (in
>> > almost two months I released 4-5 versions of some packages).
>>
>> Actually, no, you're
>
> > I'm using subversion since I know that your download are keeps storing
> > old version of binaries and I need to update packages quite often (in
> > almost two months I released 4-5 versions of some packages).
>
> Actually, no, you're free to delete 'downloads' any time, and replace
> them wi
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:24 PM, massimiliano.brocchini
wrote:
>
> I'm using subversion since I know that your download are keeps storing
> old version of binaries and I need to update packages quite often (in
> almost two months I released 4-5 versions of some packages).
Actually, no, you're fr
I'm using subversion since I know that your download are keeps storing
old version of binaries and I need to update packages quite often (in
almost two months I released 4-5 versions of some packages). So using
subversion was the only way for me to not finish my gigabyte in ten
days.
Anyway I don'
On another note, a quick inspection shows that you seem to have
checked in a lot of tarballs for various projects (presumably, those
that you will provide for your distro). Aside from the fact that it's
abusing Subversion as Ben explained, I doubt that all of those are
licensed as GPLv2, which is
Hi, we're happy to help you here, but you're really abusing
subversion. It's a version control system, not a generic distribution
system for "release packages". It should contain source code -- like
rpm or deb definitions, but not the binary packages themselves. And
definitely not whole ISO im
>
> Hi,
> my name is Massimiliano Brocchini and I'm the owner of Archlinux-i586
> project (http://code.google.com/p/archlinux-i586/).
> This morning I hit 932 MB of disk space and I was wondering if I can get
> two or three gigabytes of additional disk space.
> I'd like to release an ISO CD image s
20 matches
Mail list logo
