Re: Announcing GWT 2.10.1 and 2.11 releases

Nice to see such a quick follow-up to a security finding and also fast progress for Java 17/21 support! Kind regards David Nouls On 9 Jan 2024 at 22:36 +0100, Colin Alworth , wrote: > I'm excited to announce the release of 2.10.1 and 2.11.0! This is our second > release under the new g

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Compiling gwt on Mac ?

I managed to find a jdk 8 for my system and the build works. Thanks for the quick response. On 22 Mar 2023 at 13:23 +0100, Colin Alworth , wrote: > That patch is delayed since it turns out there are some tests that rely on > specific behavior from the JVM - a few JPMS violations in legacy dev

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2 Roadmap as it applies to future deprecations

In my case we have different codebases that overlap with reusable components. Not all projects are willing to invest in a newer jdk since they are basically in maintenance mode. If GWT would drop Java 8 it would be a problem. On the other hand, maybe it will finally force people to move on

GWT and UserAgent

Hello I read that FireFox and Chrome are deprecating the useragent string. Is GWT depending on this and will it be impacted ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

Re: Pbs with GWT + Eclipse + Jetty + Neo4J

What is the exception stack trace ? On 12 Oct 2021, 19:09 +0200, Guillen Antonio , wrote: > Hi all, > > I am struggling with a pb using RPC: > > When I use the service to create and store my objects in my DB (Neo4J) using > remote service, all is Fine. > When I try to load my objects all is ok in

Re: 2/? Pbs with GWT + Eclipse + Jetty + Neo4J

> no more Class.forName but CartographyImpl > 3. see above. > > So can you give me more informations... > > Thanks a lot for your help > > Antonio > > > > > Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 12:03, David Nouls a écrit : > > > > > > I see mu

Re: 2/? Pbs with GWT + Eclipse + Jetty + Neo4J

I see multiple problems with your code. The most important being that you are ignoring the fact that an rpc call is asynchronous. So the load method will ralways return null because the request has not been executed when the method returns. Another problem is the fact that the async is

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Goodbye IE 8–9 

+1 for dropping support for ie8-10. We still need to support IE11 in our app right now. But not for much longer. We are currently still compiling with 2.8.2 due to compilation issues with the 2.9 release (issues with generics) so dropping IE11 is not a big issue as well. On 30 Sep 2021, 18:49

Re: Upgrade GWT from 2.7 to 2.9

Hi, Migration is nearly invisible but if you depend on 3rd party gwt libs then there is always risk that they are no longer supported. I ran into some backward compatibility issue with generics support with GWT2.9. It compiled on 2.8 but fails with 2.9. I did not find the time to create a bug

Re: Change CodeServer URL

In my project we solved this issue by putting a reverse proxy in front of both the CodeServer running on localhost and our application running on another machine. We are not using facebook authentication but we have our own SAML based auth system I based that implementation on thomas his

Re: Change CodeServer URL

I don’t think that is possible. In my project I am using a reverse proxy that fronts both my website and the codeserver and it replaces the nocache file. I also change the generated output of the codeserver because otherwise the sourcemaps do not work with newer versions of Chrome. I would

Re: DominoKit release announcement

Great work, thanks! On 29 Mar 2021, 21:28 +0200, Juan Pablo Gardella , wrote: > Awesome! Thanks!! > > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 16:10, Vegegoku wrote: > > > Dears > > > > > > DominoKit team are very happy to announce the first Dominokit toolset > > > release candidate, it took us too long but it

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Goodbye IE 8–9 

We still need IE11 support in the banking sector. We still have a majority of customers that use IE11 due to technical reasons (plugins needed for accessing secure token don’t install properly in Chrome without internet access amongst others). What do you mean with “next version of GWT” if

Re: New Article "10 Best Java Frameworks to Use in 2021"

I have the opposite experience with Mockito. By using mockito I am improving my designs so that they become simple to use and easy to test. That in combination with an injection framework (using Guice/Jukito) makes it really easy to compose software and to test in isolation. You do have to

Re: Superdevmode and ReferenceErrors

I just browse to the sdm website at http://localhost:9876 and click on de button to clear the cache On 24 Feb 2021, 22:20 +0100, Stik , wrote: > Aha, how do you clear the cache? i've never been sure where SDM is hiding it > Stik > > > On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 8:40:05 PM

Re: Superdevmode and ReferenceErrors

It is a known issue with incremental compilation. It is annoying but I tend to just clear the sdm cache and reload. On 24 Feb 2021, 20:50 +0100, Stik , wrote: > Occasionally when running under SDM in Eclipse I will get a "ReferenceError: > _g$ is not defined" from the browser.   The usual "fix"

Re: [ANN] JRS gwt-time 1.4.15/2.0.3 release

Oh it seams I have a conflict with my dependency on gwt-common-lang3 ... included in de.knightsoft-net On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 4:45:22 PM UTC+1 David Nouls wrote: > I'm trying out gwt-time in my project. But I get some GWT compiler issues. > > I am using the 1.4.15 release

Re: [ANN] JRS gwt-time 1.4.15/2.0.3 release

I'm trying out gwt-time in my project. But I get some GWT compiler issues. I am using the 1.4.15 release with GWT 2.8.2 (we can't migrate to 2.9 due to some issues with unsupported generic constructs in that version). I am using the tbroyer plugin, but I tried adding the module manually just in

Re: Our 10+ year journey with GWT (+ job opening)

te: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice to hear from everyone! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's to the next ten years :-) > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Our 10+ year journey with GWT (+ job opening)

Hi Alex, Same story here. I have been working with GWT since it first came out. For our current project we again opted for GWT because we share a lot of code between client and server and productivity is high. I’m not available at the moment (maybe end of next year)… but living in

Re: Why Don’t You Use Java for Programming the Client-Side Web Apps on Web Browser?

Hi Lofi, In my company we are the only group that is working with GWT to develop a new customer facing application. We have a few products in maintenance mode that are also using GWT. But most new developments are using Angular. The biggest problems we are facing with using GWT/Java for the

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: HashCode H$ property should be not enumerable

Working in the bankings sector. We support all IE versions that are still available with a (payable) supported version of Windows. So for us it is IE11 and Edge. On 14 Jun 2020, 07:38 +0200, Alberto Mancini , wrote: > Hi, > I think that keeping just IE11 is ok. > > Thanks, >    Alberto > > >

Re: GWTC 2.9.0 has problems compiling my generics

> > Fortunately, we're not actually using that class, and the build actually > only fails because of -failOnError. This means I can work around the issue > by excluding the file with some gwt.xml trick (I want to keep the > -failOnError). > But you get an idea (and repro-case, alb

Re: GWTC 2.9.0 has problems compiling my generics

, 2020 at 4:16:14 PM UTC+2, David Nouls wrote: > > I don't have access to eclipse in my work environment - not allowed. > > On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 3:02:00 PM UTC+2, Jens wrote: >> >> So the Eclipse JDT version GWT uses has a generics bug then. Have you >> tried op

Re: Issue with GWT 2.9.0 and Annotations/Predicates emulation

t;> Can you give an example so we can check to see if JDT has handled this in >> a later update that we can migrate to? >> >> On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 9:21:54 AM UTC-5, Thomas Broyer wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Friday, May 29, 2020 at

Re: GWTC 2.9.0 has problems compiling my generics

I don't have access to eclipse in my work environment - not allowed. On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 3:02:00 PM UTC+2, Jens wrote: > > So the Eclipse JDT version GWT uses has a generics bug then. Have you > tried open the project/code in Eclipse to see if Eclipse complains as well? > If Eclipse

GWTC 2.9.0 has problems compiling my generics

I switched from GWT 2.8.2 to GWT 2.9.0 and I get some GWTC compilation errors when compiling with certain generic constructs. It compiles fine with JDK11 and in IntelliJ, but GWTC no longer seems to support this: [INFO] --- gwt-maven-plugin:1.0.0:compile (default-compile) @

Re: Issue with GWT 2.9.0 and Annotations/Predicates emulation

he" of all annotations - the two fixes are to either exclude the > jsinterop annotations from the cache (abbreviated rant: a cache like this > should be based on a whitelist, not a blacklist), or provide sources and a > .gwt.xml file for the annotations. > > -Colin > >

Re: Issue with GWT 2.9.0 and Annotations/Predicates emulation

Strange, just retried today and now the compile worked properly. Thanks for the support! On 19 May 2020, 16:41 +0200, Colin Alworth , wrote: > Nothing should have changed here as far as I am aware - GWT itself continues > to have emulation for Annotation, Enum, etc (Predicate doesnt seem to be

Issue with GWT 2.9.0 and Annotations/Predicates emulation

Compiling module com.swift.cloud.platform.multitenant.event.SerializationTest.JUnit    Resolving com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JacksonAnnotation   Found type 'com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JacksonAnnotation' [WARN] Unable to resolve interface java/lang/annotation/Annotation   

Issue with GWT 2.9.0 and Annotations/Predicates emulation

I'm in the process of trying out GWT 2.9.0 with a big project. I noticed that for some reason I suddenly get errors about sources java.lang.annotation.Annotation (also about Predicate) not being available. I guess there was a big cleanup of the inherits in all the packages ? Did I miss that

Re: GWT 2.9.0 release

Congratulations on a big milestone and great news to hear for the plan to release more frequently. Is that just an intent or is it automated ? On Thursday, May 14, 2020 at 5:40:25 AM UTC+2, Colin Alworth wrote: > > Today we are pleased to announce the next release of GWT, version 2.9.0. > Some

Re: GWT SuperDev sourcemaps suddenly not being loaded by Chrome/FireFox/IE/Edge

ase has the same problem? > > > On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 14:12, David Nouls wrote: > > > I am using GWT for many years now. My project uses 2.8.2 and we are using > > > SDM for debugging. > > > For some reason suddenly I can no longer debug my application in

GWT SuperDev sourcemaps suddenly not being loaded by Chrome/FireFox/IE/Edge

I am using GWT for many years now. My project uses 2.8.2 and we are using SDM for debugging. For some reason suddenly I can no longer debug my application in any of my browsers on my machine. I was working up to 2 weeks ago and now it no longer works. I have searched the internet for any

Re: [ANN] (Unofficial) GWT 2.8.2-v20191108 release

Has it only been 3 years ? I also don’t understand why dwt devs are so out of touch with their user base. Nobody will take gwt 3 as a serious option. All old GWT apps will have been migrated to other toolkits by the time it gets released. Why are these incremental changes not officially

Strange problem with casting an object to Comparable in GWT 2.8.2

I'm having a problem with Date objects in GWT 2.8.2. As part of a GUI component to create query objects for searching through our database I have this piece of code that tries to compare from/to objects (Object types are normally Date/BigDecimal/Integer/...) I have this piece of code: if

Re: Chrome Canary 73.0.3680.0 breaks pretty much ALL GWT apps :(

On Thursday, 24 January 2019 09:27:47 UTC, David Nouls wrote: > > > > Watch out with about:blank, if your app is running on SSL you will get > > mixed content warnings on some browsers... not sure if that is still the > > case, but that is one of the reasons why gwt was usi

Re: Chrome Canary 73.0.3680.0 breaks pretty much ALL GWT apps :(

Watch out with about:blank, if your app is running on SSL you will get mixed content warnings on some browsers... not sure if that is still the case, but that is one of the reasons why gwt was using javascript:”” On 24 Jan 2019, 10:01 +0100, Rob , wrote: > > > On Thursday, 24 January 2019

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: 2.9 progress

Is it acceptable that an official GWT implementation of the time API would be based on moment.js ? Or is it expected that it is all implemented with standard browser API and pure Java code ? On 5 Dec 2018, 15:03 +0100, Jens , wrote: > > > For the emulation changes I can live with what is

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: 2.9 progress

I am using var in some simple cases and the gwt compiler did not have a problem. I don’t use them on lambda parameters though. So my code is using   Java 10 but not 11 features. For the emulation changes I can live with what is available now and get some more in a later release. But how does

Re: GWT compiler isn't allowing 'default' as a javascript object property in my JSNI block

try ‘default’ instead On 30 Nov 2018, 15:17 +0100, Dylan DSouza , wrote: > I'm porting my Java LIBGDX game to Javascript. There's some JSNI code that > looks something like this: > > private native void hello() > /*-{ >     var object1 = {default: 'foo', b: 42}; >    

Re: A German Short Article for J2CL Open Source Release

I noticed you mentioned that elemental2 allows us to use the browser storage API’s. By coincidence I was looking for those but failed to find them (in the Window class). Am I looking in the wrong location again ? For now I just created my own JsInterop classes to acces it. On 19 Nov 2018, 23:14

Re: GWT Future plan

Hi Marko, I guess you have not been following GWT discussions a lot. GWT 3 is going to build on top of this j2cl and from what I followed here, on gwt-user and on gitter, there are already a lot of packages of GWT converted to work with j2cl. There will be problems supporting everything in GWT

Re: Compilation issue on GWT 2.8.2 (modular maven project)

By just adding sources to jaxb it will not work. You need to have these sources in a gwt source folder. so it javax.xml.bind package must be declared as a source folder in a gwt.xml files before the GWT compiler picks it up to cross compile. I don't think that adding the package in you

Re: Preferred IDE

I converted from Eclipse to IntelliJ CE a few months ago. I agree that it works much better when combined with maven builds as compared to eclipse. one thing though is that you dont get much assistance with uiBinder templates. So it might be more difficult to pick up as a beginner (unless you

Re: Passing method references to HTMLElement.removeEventHandler

It makes sense somehow, but it took me by surprise. Thanks for the explanation. Is it still good practice to remove listeners when you don’t need the html element anymore ? or do modern browser garbage collectors cope with circular references between DOM and JS objects ? It was one of the

Passing method references to HTMLElement.removeEventHandler

I think I found a little bug in the java 8 support in GWT. Or at least, it does not work as I expected it would. I am using Elemental2 and I am trying to remove an EventListener from a HTMLElement. The listener was previously installed like this: element.addEventListener(“click”,

Re: GWT behaves differently in Chrom vs Firefox

clear your temp folder, sdm puts lots of stuff there and sometimes it gets corrupted and you get these kind of errrors. On 24 Jul 2018, 18:53 +0200, Velusamy Velu , wrote: > Hi Michael > > I appreciate your recommendation. Yes it's in SDM mode. I don't have the > luxury to try your suggestion

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Java10 support

Thanks Thomas, that fixed the problems! On 13 Jul 2018, 16:13 +0200, Thomas Broyer , wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 12, 2018 at 4:18:38 PM UTC+2, stuckagain wrote: > > Thomas, > > > > would you mind pushing a new snapshot release of your maven plugin release > > to sonatype ? > > I see that you

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Java10 support

Just a little bit, but mostly because we can’t seem to get the Java 10 working properly. We are having problems running the GWTTestCase using the maven plugin from Thomas. The snapshot release in sonatype of the maven plugin looks to be quite old so it is still depending on older versions of

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Java10 support

I guess I am bit overworked :) ignore the last statement! On 12 Jul 2018, 16:18 +0200, stuckagain , wrote: > Thomas, > > would you mind pushing a new snapshot release of your maven plugin release to > sonatype ? > I see that you have migrated to a newer version of the surefire plugin on >

Re: [gwt-contrib] Update on J2CL

Thanks for the update, I fail to understand why the prerequisite of using bazel was enforced and why it seems to have such a big impact on opensourcing J2CL. As far as I understand Google is probably the only company that uses bazel, and internally that is not even the same product as the

Re: Have charts to work with a RootPanel based application

Did you try to put the chart inside a SimpleLayoutPanel ? On 6 May 2018, 16:48 +0200, yaniv54321 , wrote: > > hello, > > i have a GWT app based on RootPanel and not RootLayoutPanel > > but it seems that the only way i can use charts (gwt-charts-0.9.10.jar) is by > using

Re: UoBinder Database store

Watch out with gxt licensing when you allow users to modify screen leyouts. Sencha  sees this as a developer and your user needs to pay for a license. I had to remove GXT from a project for such a case. On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Łukasz Bączek bacze...@poczta.fm wrote: Hello, He needs

Re: You have to try : Putnami Web Toolkit your next GWT Framework.

Thanks, it works now. Nice work! Quite an extensive widget set you have created. It will take me some time to investigate. Is it created by 2 people ? On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Théophane Charbonnier theophane.charbonn...@gmail.com wrote: Oups ! My bad, I did not set the DOCTYPE on the

Re: Petition for a standalone Chome installer allowing DevMode

It is a bit ironic but developping gwt apps is easiest on ie11 :) But you can't stop progress.  By focussing more on unit testing I no longer depend on DevMode. The only thing where I use it is when I am working on CSS or widget changes. But there SuperDevMode is just as helpful if the