ckendrick, there is not a single word that may be called as abusive from my
side. Please be articulate and you should have a substantial arguments in
your reply.
In the provided threads, it is clear that i am a newbie to this framework
and asking queries because there isn't sufficient informat
Isomorphic Support routinely receives kudos from customers and the
community, with 20-30 forum posts a day coming right from the dev and
support teams. When we aren't helping individuals, we're creating new
samples and writing new docs for everyone.
This person (sbt) is not a customer, posted
It is free but their support is pathetic I experienced it.
On Saturday, May 19, 2012 3:12:36 AM UTC+5, Akram.Moncer wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> is SmartGwt free for the commercial use ?
>
> thanks
>
> --
> Akram MONCER
> Personne
>
>
On Saturday, May 19, 2012 3:12:36 AM UTC+5, Akram.Moncer wrote:
>
hello i verify, that not all the version of smartGwt are free, only the
LGPL version, so be careful
i find it in ths link, http://www.smartclient.com/product/competition.jsp
2012/5/18 Akram Moncer
> thank u very much
>
>
> 2012/5/18 Assiya EL
>
>> yes it is free
>>
>> 2012/5/18 Akram Moncer
>
thank u very much
2012/5/18 Assiya EL
> yes it is free
>
> 2012/5/18 Akram Moncer
>
>> hello,
>>
>> is SmartGwt free for the commercial use ?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> --
>> Akram MONCER
>> Personne
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Google Web T
yes it is free
2012/5/18 Akram Moncer
> hello,
>
> is SmartGwt free for the commercial use ?
>
> thanks
>
> --
> Akram MONCER
> Personne
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google
> Need help in SmartGUI layout issue mentioned below:
Why don't you try http://forums.smartclient.com/ ???
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsu
That will depend on the SmartGWT developers (or any community members that
want to use it). We (Google) have no plans to provide support
for SmartGWT 3.0 on our end. Support for SmartGWT 3.0 is a big project, and
now that GWT Designer is open source along with the rest of GPE, this is a
project
Did you check the release notes to ensure that the version of Smart
GWT that you are using is compatible with the version of GWT that you
are using?
Smart GWT 2.5 lists compatibility from 1.6 to 2.3 of GWT or something
like that...
On Oct 7, 8:36 am, Boris H wrote:
> I am migrating my app from 1
Recompiling the application (red icon "compile" in GPE) may solve the
issue if it happens on other browsers.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsub
I'm just relaying this:
http://forums.smartclient.com/showthread.php?t=8159#aChrome
(in particular, try it in compiled mode)
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Alexandre Dupriez <
alexandre.dupr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Strange, I can work with SmartGWT 2.5 & GWT 2.3 on Chrome.
> Which is your GWT
Strange, I can work with SmartGWT 2.5 & GWT 2.3 on Chrome.
Which is your GWT version?
On 17 sep, 04:32, Tom Carchrae wrote:
> SmartGWT does not work well with the developer plugin in Chrome. Try
> compiling it (red GWT box) and then using Chrome without the ?gwt.codesvr=
> 127.0.0.1:9997 at the
SmartGWT does not work well with the developer plugin in Chrome. Try
compiling it (red GWT box) and then using Chrome without the ?gwt.codesvr=
127.0.0.1:9997 at the end of the URL.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Serge wrote:
> Hi,
> when I'm using smartgwt 2.5 in my gwt web application, I g
UiBinder does not provide an API for non-standard parsers, so, in
general, SmartGWT won't work with GWT Designer in UiBinder mode.
SmartGWT works fine using GWT Designer and GWT Java UIs.
On May 2, 7:03 pm, richip wrote:
> Has anyone successfully used the above products / technologies to
> creat
Certainly feels like this could be it
Roger
On Dec 22, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Chris Conroy wrote:
> just guessing, but you could be hitting a different manifestation of this
> bug: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5778
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Roger Studner
just guessing, but you could be hitting a different manifestation of this
bug: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5778
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Roger Studner wrote:
> When I try to start dev mode in firefox, things work perfectly.
>
> When I try with Chrome, I g
Remove everything related to smartGWT and test that your GWT code works for
start.
Make sure that you are compiling for the right browser etc.
Then add a small smartGWT feature like a Label and test to see if you can
make it appear in your application.
That should have prepared the road for you to
Is the browser actually loading the GWT nocache.js file ?
Use firebug plugin (Firefox) or equivalent to ensure that the browser is in
fact loading the GWT JS file.
Sometimes the script tag will not actually execute if you for example don't
have start end tags.
and there used to be a "feature" i
Solution ::
Found the solution:
CalendarEvent calevent=event.getEvent();
eventname=calevent.getName();
Window.alert("eventname ::"+eventname);
eventdescription=calevent.getDescription();
Window.alert("eventdesc ::"+eventdescription);
Date startdate=calevent.getStartDate();
startdayofw
Try calendar.addEventClickHandler(..) and call CalendarEventClick.getEvent()
to obtain the CalendarEvent instance.
In the future please post Smart GWT related questions on the Smart GWT forum
: http://forums.smartclient.com/forumdisplay.php?f=14
Thanks,
Sanjiv
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Nav
As you mentioned in your previous mail, you are not a lawyer. So you can
come with theories and interpretations of LGPL and decide on use of a
library. I suspect you are a happy user of GWT and the widgets it provides
out of the box and that if you really wanted to use SmartGWT LGPL, you'd
consult
Sanjiv Jivan wrote:
> SmartGWT has had the same clause since for a long time now. Read the
> actual license file - COPYING.html that is included in the SmartGWT
> distribution.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/smartgwt/source/browse/trunk/distro-source/core/src/COPYING.html
You're right. SmartGWT has m
This makes sense since it's reasonable to expect that for LGPL code. Don't
use Hibernate, but many libraries distributed as JARs can do this easily as
they don't get mixed into the source code such that you can put a new
version in by just replacing the JAR and not needing any recompile of the
orig
SmartGWT has had the same clause since for a long time now. Read the actual
license file - COPYING.html that is included in the SmartGWT distribution.
http://code.google.com/p/smartgwt/source/browse/trunk/distro-source/core/src/COPYING.html
Since most of us are not lawyers, second guessing whats
Well, I'm not a lawyer either, but I assume you are referencing the clause
in Section 4 about combined works (the app you develop that uses GWT plus
some LGPL GWT library):
"You may convey a Combined Work under terms of your choice that, taken
together, effectively do not restrict modification of
Open eSignForms wrote:
> If you need the widgets now, SmartGWT seems like a fine solution, and
> the LGPL is a nice license if you don't otherwise need their
> server-side/enterprise features.
IANAL, but I will not touch any LGPL library for use in my GWT apps.
I believe LGPL is written in such a
On Jan 12, 3:43 pm, Open eSignForms wrote:
> If you need the widgets now, SmartGWT seems like a fine solution, and the
> LGPL is a nice license if you don't otherwise need their
> server-side/enterprise features. Pure GWT just doesn't have those grids and
> such yet, but it sounds like the basics
This is all working just fine in our application with SmartGWT.
On Jan 12, 6:56 am, Stine Søndergaard wrote:
> Hello again :) It would be fantastic if you could maybe attach a few more
> words to this:
>
> "SmartGWT is a javascript wrapper - which
> means you don't get the advantages of the compi
Thanks a lot for all your inputs!! :) I have decided to start with just
plain GWT... not that that is not challenging enough!! ;D
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googl
Yeah, I expect that many enterprise apps need most of the major library
components on the main window and it's panels, with one potential area for
benefit being a login view that could then have the rest downloading in the
background since logging in at least takes some user time, though I have no
On Jan 12, 12:39 pm, Kenny G wrote:
> I found it well worth the time to use, even though I did
> not use the Datasource features to populate grids.
Whoah! Kenny you should really try the DataSource feature next time,
you have so far used less than half of what even the free (LGPL)
version provi
Probably what they mean to say is that the SmartGWT library will not
get any more efficient when you recompile your app that uses it under
future GWT releases. This is because it is comprised of hand written
(I assume) Javascript and is not like the native GWT widgets like say,
com.google.gwt.use
Also, when debugging the java code version, you can step into all the code
easily, but this breaks down for the javascript code, which is in fact the
vast majority of the library. The wrappers essentially package
parameters/options and then call the javascript, making it much harder to do
useful s
It indeed helped!! :) Thank you so much!!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr.
A wrapper means that it is not written in Java. It is javascript
code, with just a calling Java wrapper around it so that it can be
used from GWT. By not being written in Java you don't get the
advantages the GWT compiler offers. Some of those I listed. First
was code elimination. GWT compiler
Hello again :) It would be fantastic if you could maybe attach a few more
words to this:
"SmartGWT is a javascript wrapper - which
means you don't get the advantages of the compiler, browser specific
code compiles, code elimination, and runAsync (code splitting)."
... I am not sure I understand
I will take a look right away - thank you!! :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsu
On Jan 11, 9:50 am, Stine Søndergaard wrote:
> Famous video? :)
http://code.google.com/events/io/2009/sessions/GoogleWebToolkitBestPractices.html
This is a great talk by Ray Ryan on GWT best practices.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Tool
Famous video? :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For
Some things to consider. SmartGWT is a javascript wrapper - which
means you don't get the advantages of the compiler, browser specific
code compiles, code elimination, and runAsync (code splitting). It
also has its own paradigm which you may or may not like, but isn't
really in the vein of the
... approaches are a lot different when chosing raw GWT or SmartGWT,
are they not? :}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group,
... when using SmartGWT I feel that I have to chose one of the looks
in the show case set (here http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/showcase/)
and then adjust my application to this... I don't clearly see how I
can exploit SmartGWT to achieve a look grabbed out of the air! ;)
Sorry if I am all rub
ATom,
If you really want to be constructive, how about actually reporting what
does not work in Opera instead on passing a such unfounded comments. Have
you reported any issue related to Opera on the Smart GWT forum, or created
an issue in tracker with a standalone testcase?
Opera is fully support
Problem of SmartGWT is that doesn't support all browser. For example
opera doesn't work. But in ExtGwt library work Opera perfect!
On Dec 14, 8:17 pm, Yozons Support on Gmail wrote:
> Excellent. I'm going to give this a try right away.
>
> For server integration, would a HashMap based interface
Nope, it's not stupid, and it is a good suggestion.
The example I am using shows 'id' as integer, 'name' as String, and 'date'
as Date.
So, I made those changes.
I did manage to fix this issue. What I did was to look again at the sample
and realized at the bottom of the DataSource code and noti
I know this might sound stupid, but always double check the names between
the ListGridField and the DataSourceField . If the do not exactly match the
data won't be pulled by the ListGrid. A good way to make sure your ListGrid
works with your DataSource is to set the DataSource as clientOnly and use
Yep, I tried those forums and have left many messages over there.
Some have gotten replies, and many have not ... that is VERY
frustrating.
So, I just figured someone over here might know something about the
smartgwt-extensions,
specifically the gwtrpcds (gwt rpc datasource).
On Sep 24, 4:58 pm
might try the smartclient forums - http://forums.smartclient.com.
they have one specific to SmartGWT, believe the authors are pretty
active on it.
there's a sticky thread - GWT-RPC DataSource implementation with
sample code. using that i was able to build a GWT-RPC datasource
successfully.
On
The problem was: if "System library (added to the boot class path)" is
checkmarked the user library (here SmartGWT) is added to the bootstrap
section and not available in the application's Default Classpath.
So a simple checkmark is the origin of a several-days-nitemare...
Ekki
On Aug 27, 1
Maybe adding the jars to sources in the Eclipse java build config?
On Aug 24, 4:29 pm, CI-CUBE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm fighting for several hours :-( but still get this 'No source code
> is available for type ...' error. From my
> setup on the home office I know it works but until now I did not fi
If I subscribe the two individual SmartGWT jars instead of a 'Library'
SmartGWT (that as components has those two jars) then it works!
Doesn't make sense to me :-( but it's working now, that's all what
counts for me at the moment...
BTW GWT itself is integrated the same way I originally did inte
no one who can help? It's just crazy :-( SmartGWT jar's are registered
in the Classpath - no matter if in the Bootstrap or User Entries,
there are also in the Source Path - under Default.
Once again, if I copy the whole project directory and install it at
home, in an identical setup (Eclipse, GWT
strange thing... I've one and the same project directory in an obvious
identical setup; in one environment A the SmartGWT types are correctly
resolved, in the other (B) not. Moving the project to A - yeah,
everything works, moving it to B - errors - this can be repeated as
you want...
Is there an
Problem solved,
use setOperator(OperatorId.CONTAINS);
Greets,
Jan
[CODE]
final DynamicForm filterForm = new DynamicForm();
filterForm.setIsGroup(true);
filterForm.setGroupTitle("Search");
filterForm.setNumCols(6);
filterForm.setDataSource(AnimalXmlDS.getInstance(
Sanjiv,
I thought of doing it. But I also thought I won't make me any friends
crossposting.
Greets,
Jan
On Aug 18, 2009, at 9:32 AM, Sanjiv Jivan wrote:
> Jan,
> Please post SmartGWT specific questions on the SmartGWT forum :
> http://forums.smartclient.com/forumdisplay.php?f=14
>
> Thanks,
Jan,Please post SmartGWT specific questions on the SmartGWT forum :
http://forums.smartclient.com/forumdisplay.php?f=14
Thanks,
Sanjiv
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Jan wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am just new to GWT and experiencing a little bit with SmartGWT,
> implementing and trying to
Wow. very nice!
On Aug 12, 8:01 am, Sanjiv Jivan wrote:
> Hi,
> SmartGWT 1.2 has just been released. This version supports GWT 1.7 and has
> improved support for interoperability with core GWT widgets. Some other
> features include full Safari 4.x support, ListGrid performance improvements,
> su
I am also evaluating SmartGWT after a brief stint with GXT.
Regarding the GWTRPC code mentioned, it is now part of SmartGWT Extentions.
If you are using maven, it's this:
com.smartgwt
smartgwt-extensions
1.
If you use the free version, you use RestDataSource as the starting
point for integration. RestDataSource simply specifies XML or JSON
messages to send and receive with your server; it is totally agnostic
as to how your server is implemented (it could, for instance, be PHP).
http://www.smartclie
Hi Ed,
You probably have a stale jar as the API exists. Try getting a new download,
or use the one from your linux box.
If you're still having issues, please post on the SmartGWT forum :
http://forums.smartclient.com/forumdisplay.php?f=14
Sanjiv
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:16 PM, eoc...@googlemai
Sevan,
A user has posted a pretty complete solution of using GWT-RPC with SmartGWT.
See this forum post : http://forums.smartclient.com/showthread.php?t=4556
Rajesh,
The SmartGWT discussion forum can be found here :
http://forums.smartclient.com/
Please post your SmartGWT specific questions there.
Hi Sanjiv,
Thanks for the great work. We have already started using it from the
SVN.
Today I came across a small problem with SmartClient.
I have done
dataSource.addData(new MyRecord(a));
here "MyRecord" implements Record and 'a' is a JavaScriptObject
On a double-Click event of list grid I ha
Dear Sanjiv,
Thank you for all your hard work on the SmartGWT api, I have just
started using it. As said earlier, I am also interested in using gwt-
rpc with smartgwt on an existing application that already uses gwt-rpc
so I tried overriding the transformRequest to intercept in order to do
my own
Hi Sanjiv,
thanks a lot! I'll check it for sure!
Benoit
On 28 fév, 11:21, Sanjiv Jivan wrote:
> Hi Benoit,You can essentially override the transformRequest(DSRequest
> requeest) of DataSource and read the request parameters like startRow,
> endRow, sort / filter params and issue your own GWT-
Hi Benoit,You can essentially override the transformRequest(DSRequest
requeest) of DataSource and read the request parameters like startRow,
endRow, sort / filter params and issue your own GWT-RPC call and set the
returned data on the DataSource.
Several users have asked for such a sample and I'l
Hi Sanjiv,
good work for this release!
i have a question. I want to use RPC Calls with data grid and you
wrote you made something better in the release notes : "improved
support for users to wire DataSource's with GWT-RPC calls".
Can you add as example in your showcase of a datasource using RPC
Hi Sanjiv,
SmartGWT is really interesting, but I tried to use the smartGWT 1.0b1
version and I finally return to basic GWT because it was hard to make
rpc calls to populate data grid.
Now, I am really interested with your current release, especially for
this element in the release notes :
"impro
Debugging in Firebug is something that I'd like to avoid as much as I
can. Especially for a GWT app which usually are pretty big. The nice
thing about Ext-GWT is that I don't need to do that (probably once in
the blue moon on a very extreme case).
Knowing the internal Ext-GWT which is written in
Sanjiv,
It's not a problem of taking time to load. Big load time is normal
with given the size of showcase.
AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3200+, 2GB ram, Firefox 3.0.2
After the showcase is completely loaded, I click ComboBox & Family,
Styled ComboBox. The second(12 items) and third combobox (3 item
Lest anyone get the wrong idea from francesco, when using SmartGWT you
can debug your GWT *application* code normally within hosted mode.
If you had a need to debug the core SmartClient libraries (normal
users will not have a need to do this), you'd use debugging tools like
Firebug and SmartClien
Hi Sanjiv,
It's a really great work!
I'm happy to see that you continue to develop GWT frameworks and
you've developed a new great tool. Actually I'm using GWT-Ext. I'll
check a SmartGWT in my new projects.
Best regards,
Arthur
On 24 nov, 09:32, francescoNemesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
Hey Sanjiv
Great work as always. Good to see you back - involved in GWT
development work.
Riyaz
On Nov 24, 12:34 am, "Sanjiv Jivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Fransceso,
> If you found a library that meets your needs, then good for you.
> Compile output size and runtime performance are tw
Hi Sanjiv,
thanks for your reply, agree with your comments. Re-reading my post I
agree it might look like I was, in a way, attaching smartGWT. It was
not meant to come through that way, nor was my intention to praise
GXT.
It was only meant to be a comparison between approaches, JSNI vs Pure
GWT,
Hi Fransceso,
If you found a library that meets your needs, then good for you.
Compile output size and runtime performance are two separate issues. A third
party widget written in GWT Java, regardless of how small it compiles down
to, doesn't magically make it run fast. Nor does it make it magicall
Hello,
smartGwt looks very appealing and very rich in features, but it is
very slow. This is due to the fact that it is a JSNI wrapper around
the Smart Client framework. This means loosing all the benefits of
having a pure GWT implementation (I will not go into details on this).
I think a compar
Hi,
I am wondering if the performance is due to too many items inside the demo
or it is just slower than gwt-ext? In gwt-ext, the demo is much smaller.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:27 AM, rakesh wagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> great job Sanjeev. Keep up the good work. Always love smart-client
great job Sanjeev. Keep up the good work. Always love smart-client.
Smart client is much better compared to ext-js as far as licensing is
concerned. However the showcase looks little slow compared to the
original js based smart-client as well as gwt-ext.
Thanks!
On Nov 22, 6:48 pm, Tim <[EMAIL P
Excellent Job!
some things are rough around the edges but overall this release is
impressive! Gotta fix those image downloads though. And adding a
couple of the "standard" schemes wouldn't hurt. But you already
mentioned these things in your release announcement post anyway. Can't
wait.
Cool stu
This looks cool.
Ann.
On Nov 18, 9:50 am, "Sanjiv Jivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,I have just released SmartGWT 1.0.
>
> Here is the release announcement
> :http://www.jroller.com/sjivan/entry/smartgwt_1_0_released
>
> Google Code Project Page :http://code.google.com/p/smartgwt/
>
> S
Beside the licence problems, why?
gwt-ext seems to be a little bit faster to me.
On Nov 21, 10:11 pm, Vinay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SmartGWT Showcase looks awesome. I think GWT-Ext will be out ;-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you ar
SmartGWT Showcase looks awesome. I think GWT-Ext will be out ;-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To
Is this going to be the end of older GWT-Ext library? :-))
Cheers,
Sorinel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegro
Have you found the showcase responsive enough for use in intensive
data entry applications ?
Thanks,
Geraldo
On 19 nov, 00:13, rlaferla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's awesome. Is it native Java/GWT or a JavaScript wrapper?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You receive
That's awesome. Is it native Java/GWT or a JavaScript wrapper?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To u
84 matches
Mail list logo
