Hi,
The mechanism looks pretty good from the demo, nice. I would only say that
I'm not sure I would use the same retry message for both network and
authentication failures. Do you really want to keep retrying
authentications for any other reason than a network failure?
On Tuesday, July 23, 201
Hi all,
I have a String username field on a user entity which I'd rather not
populate whenever I request it which is why I have not defined the getter
in the EntityProxy. This works fine, however there are some instances where
I would like to have RequestFactory populate that string field
I've added a Gmail like UI component and added it to the demo...
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 6:42:15 PM UTC+1, salk31 wrote:
>
> Doh. Looked to see how long it would take to put it up on GAE and only
> took ten minutes to actually do it.
>
> http://gwt-rf-queue.appspot.com/
>
> So good old DynaTab
Doh. Looked to see how long it would take to put it up on GAE and only took
ten minutes to actually do it.
http://gwt-rf-queue.appspot.com/
So good old DynaTableRf but with gwt-rf-queue but with the Transport
replaced and a bit of extra UI.
--
You received this message because you are subscr
I'm also quite interested but haven't had time to look.
On 18 July 2013 10:00, salk31 wrote:
> Ho k... I'll be very interested to hear your thoughts... If you think it
> is fixable maybe GAE demo with some UI may be next step for me?
>
>
> On Thursday, July 18, 2013 9:49:47 AM UTC+1, Thomas Bro
Ho k... I'll be very interested to hear your thoughts... If you think it is
fixable maybe GAE demo with some UI may be next step for me?
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 9:49:47 AM UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> FYI, I still haven't found the time to look at it…
>
> On Thursday, July 18, 2013 9:26:35
FYI, I still haven't found the time to look at it…
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 9:26:35 AM UTC+2, salk31 wrote:
>
> H. Guess not a lot of demand then. Will hold off doing any more work
> on this.
>
> Cheers
>
> Sam
>
> On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 9:04:53 AM UTC+1, salk31 wrote:
>>
>> https://gi
H. Guess not a lot of demand then. Will hold off doing any more work on
this.
Cheers
Sam
On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 9:04:53 AM UTC+1, salk31 wrote:
>
> https://github.com/salk31/gwt-rf-queue
>
> I've been allowed to open source this and given two hours a week to work
> on it...
>
> I thou
https://github.com/salk31/gwt-rf-queue
I've been allowed to open source this and given two hours a week to work on
it...
I thought it was worth sharing now that it compiles and there is a working
demo. I've grafted it onto the dynatablerf sample and added some controls
to fake auth and network
Thanks Thomas,
I think I get what RequestBatcher does. We do the same but just passing
around the RequestContext...
Seems like I wasn't making life difficult by mistake. Sort of a relief.
I've asked permission to share our code. I've a horrible feeling it will
get stuck with the lawyers.
Many
On Friday, July 12, 2013 12:18:36 PM UTC+2, salk31 wrote:
>
> Sadly I've looked at the source quite a few times.
>
> Can it be used for our use case (Send contents of the Editor to the server
> multiple times and perform different service methods each time)?
>
No. RequestBatcher only manages th
Sadly I've looked at the source quite a few times.
Can it be used for our use case (Send contents of the Editor to the server
multiple times and perform different service methods each time)? We got
stuck as we could only add (not remove) Requests to the RequestContext.
The code looks to me that
On Friday, July 12, 2013 11:48:56 AM UTC+2, salk31 wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I really do struggle with RequestBatcher sorry... However is it correct
> that it uses a single RequestContext? and that if any Request in a
> RequestContext is a success or a failure then the whole RequestContext is
});
manager.start();
transport.setDefaultSource(primary);
NB if you fire a RequestContext in the normal way it gets captured by the
QosManager... Really ugly code relying on the single threaded nature of JS.
Might ask for more hooks from the core GWT/RequestFactory.
btw This is definitely me
> But I'd be interested in seeing your code, particularly how you handle the
> feedback in this case (and what your "pipes" are about and how you use
> them); actually, I think I'd like to see a more complete sample, but I so
> much love digging into libraries'
pipes" are about and how you use
them); actually, I think I'd like to see a more complete sample, but I so
much love digging into libraries' code that I'd like to see it too ;-)
>
> Cheers
>
> Sam
>
> On Friday, July 12, 2013 9:24:32 AM UTC+1, Jens wrote:
shelf solution?
Cheers
Sam
On Friday, July 12, 2013 9:24:32 AM UTC+1, Jens wrote:
>
> Batching in RequestFactory can be done using RequestBatcher [1] and
> retries, as well as sending status events about pending requests, can be
> done by implementing a custom RequestTransport [2] f
Batching in RequestFactory can be done using RequestBatcher [1] and
retries, as well as sending status events about pending requests, can be
done by implementing a custom RequestTransport [2] for RequestFactory. Not
sure if there is anything pre-implemented in case of the RequestTransport
Hello,
We have some code that lets us manage the requests from the RequestFactory.
So do things like retry after auth failure or network outage...
So simple usage is something like:
NonAtomicBatch batch = new NonAtomicBatch();
batch.add(new RfEntry(someRequestFactoryRequest));
batch.add(new
Server stack trace would be interesting. Looks like a NullPointerException
on server side.
Extend RequestFactoryServlet and then use the protected super constructor
which allows you to provide a custom ExceptionHandler. The custom
ExceptionHandler could log the server exception to see whats goi
Hello Group,
I am using GWT2.5.1 wit standard package (DataNucleus on Appengine).
In case client creates an Entity that holds string longer than 500 chars,
the RequestFactory call will create an error since the Appengine dos not
allow Strings longer that 500 characters. - This is how it should
On Thursday, June 27, 2013 12:20:37 PM UTC+2, Jens wrote:
>
> RequestFactory has many limitations that can make it hard to use in an
>> application. Once those limitations will be removed (next year maybe; in
>> GWT 3.0; depends if/when I have time to do it), it
>
> RequestFactory has many limitations that can make it hard to use in an
> application. Once those limitations will be removed (next year maybe; in
> GWT 3.0; depends if/when I have time to do it), it'll be much better and
> become as usable as GWT-RPC.
>
Out of inte
On Thursday, June 27, 2013 9:59:57 AM UTC+2, Miklós Szabó wrote:
>
> Thank you for your answer!
>
> To build up a frontend to use complex business services (Spring based
> application with service and business layer on top of it) would you
> recomend GWT RPC instead of Reque
Thank you for your answer!
To build up a frontend to use complex business services (Spring based
application with service and business layer on top of it) would you
recomend GWT RPC instead of RequestFactory?
On 27 June 2013 00:25, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, June 26, 201
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 4:09:55 PM UTC+2, Miklós Szabó wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I've a question on bean validation using RequestFactory. Here's my
> scenario.
>
> There's an application based on Spring Framework with a service layer. A
> WebApplicationCont
Hi!
I've a question on bean validation using RequestFactory. Here's my scenario.
There's an application based on Spring Framework with a service layer. A
WebApplicationContext is initialized and the services can be used by firing
RequestContext on client side. Let's sup
Oh... thanks Thomas for the link and your answer which make sense.
Sorry about this silly question, was looking into domain object
Le mercredi 26 juin 2013 10:04:22 UTC+2, Thomas Broyer a écrit :
>
>
> "phones" is the name of the property, corresponding to a getPhones()
> getter (note: on the pro
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:03:47 AM UTC+2, aurelie...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi chaps,
>
> Have a problem understanding one thing regarding .with
>
> In the following
> example<http://code.google.com/p/gwtinaction2/source/browse/trunk/gwtia-ch08-requestfactory/src/c
Hi chaps,
Have a problem understanding one thing regarding .with
In the following
example<http://code.google.com/p/gwtinaction2/source/browse/trunk/gwtia-ch08-requestfactory/src/com/manning/gwtia/ch08/v1/client/TestPanel.java?spec=svn216&r=216>
,
http://code.google.com/p/gwtinacti
I have successfully obtained a token using the gwt-oauth2 api in my GWT
project. Using the RequestFactory for RPC, how do I relay that token to a
backend of my choosing? For example, if I were using app engine, how does
app engine now know who the requesting user is? What must be done from
Hi Thomas,
I just submitted the issue
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8204, thanks
again.
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 9:39:33 AM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, June 17, 2013 9:55:09 PM UTC+2, GWTter wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> So I went back using the dev t
On Monday, June 17, 2013 9:55:09 PM UTC+2, GWTter wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So I went back using the dev tools, inspected the payload, and confirmed
> what I had before: the ID is not set at all in the user object payload.
> Just to make sure I wasn't crazy or missing something I created just a User
Hi,
So I went back using the dev tools, inspected the payload, and confirmed
what I had before: the ID is not set at all in the user object payload.
Just to make sure I wasn't crazy or missing something I created just a User
object and tried to save it. I checked the payload in that request and
Hi Ümit,
I was actually checking the payload via the DefaultRequestTransport, I
could see the user proxy object but I could not see the id anywhere in the
payload. I had also put a println in the setID method in the DTO but it was
never called which is what I thought was strange since the objec
For debugging: Check the RF payload with Chrome Developer Tools and put a
breakpoint in the siteId() method of your backend DTO (it should be called
after the object is created).
On Monday, June 17, 2013 3:59:02 AM UTC+2, GWTter wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have the same setup as in question
> ht
On Monday, June 17, 2013 10:47:56 AM UTC+2, Nermin wrote:
>
>
>
> Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013 23:52:08 UTC+2 schrieb Thomas Broyer:
>>
>>
>> I'll see if I can improve the documentation. Feel free to propose patches
>> yourself though: http://www.gwtproject.org/makinggwtbetter.html#webpage
>>
>
> T
Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013 23:52:08 UTC+2 schrieb Thomas Broyer:
>
>
>
> On Friday, June 14, 2013 5:55:03 PM UTC+2, Nermin wrote:
>>
>> Hello Thomas,
>>
>> Open Session In View is the right approach to go for. Thank you for this
>> advice!
>> I have implemented it and it works fine now.
>>
>> How
Hi all,
I have the same setup as in question
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/GUQjZ98mL7s/MoA2gEMmS28J .
I've included the relevant code from the question below for quick
reference. My problem is that once the booking entity gets to the server
and I look for the user, the use
On Friday, June 14, 2013 5:55:03 PM UTC+2, Nermin wrote:
>
> Hello Thomas,
>
> Open Session In View is the right approach to go for. Thank you for this
> advice!
> I have implemented it and it works fine now.
>
> However, I have one question regarding OSIV-Pattern:
> In the Hybernate example (s
can you help me for building your exemple using netbeans?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
ist
>> is always empty).
>> I checked the DB, it is all fine there.
>>
>> Can it be that the Bug 6115 has not been fixed, even though its status
>> says so, or am I doing something wrong here?
>>
>
> Have you checked whether the caller is called? if it is,
jobCategoryReq.findAllJobCategories().with("*subCategories*");
>> req.fire(receiver);
>>
>> ... The call will return categories but without subcatgeories. (The list
>> is always empty).
>> I checked the DB, it is all fine there.
>>
>> Can it be tha
tatus
> says so, or am I doing something wrong here?
>
Have you checked whether the caller is called? if it is, does it return a
populated set?
You're supposed to use an open-session-in-view (aka session-per-request)
pattern with RequestFactory, rather than creating/closing an EntityM
Hello group,
Is the issue 6115 Fixed in GWT 2.5 or not??
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6115
My problem is that on a entity with recursive relation the ancestors are
not loaded when calling with(ancestors).
Here is my code:
@Entity
public class *JobCategory *{
Hi GWT Gurus,
I have a pretty fundamental question about how to design the server-side
of my system using RequestFactory. I'm sure I'm missing something pretty
obvious, so I apologize in advance for the stupidity of the question.
I have a server side entity (using Objectify for p
pengine-api-labs-1.6.0.jar
>>> appengine-jsr107cache-1.6.0.jar
>>> apps-marketplace.jar
>>> datanucleus-appengine-1.0.10.final.jar
>>> datanucleus-core-1.1.5.jar
>>> datanucleus-jpa-1.1.5.jar
>>> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1.jar
>>> ger
.5.jar
>> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1.jar
>> geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1.jar
>> gwt-servlet-deps.jar
>> gwt-servlet.jar
>> jdo2-api-2.3-eb.jar
>> jsr107cache-1.1.jar
>> objectify-3.1.jar
>> requestfactory-apt.jar
>> requestfactory-server.jar
>>
s-core-1.1.5.jar
> datanucleus-jpa-1.1.5.jar
> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1.jar
> geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1.jar
> gwt-servlet-deps.jar
> gwt-servlet.jar
> jdo2-api-2.3-eb.jar
> jsr107cache-1.1.jar
> objectify-3.1.jar
> requestfactory-apt.jar
> requestfactory-server.
Just like everyone else, I was stuck at this validation error.
Following
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation,
I deleted the classes manually from WEB-INF folder and that did the job.
Basically, obfuscator classes should appear in .apt_generated fol
Thanks yet again Thomas.
Although I don't extend RequestContext there directly it does interact with
it so that I have some interfaces extending both RequestContext and this
interface which maybe causing the issue. So I think you're right. I added
my post to the issue, hopefully it helps. I gu
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 7:54:29 PM UTC+2, GWTter wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I can't figure this out, haven't found anything on the interwebs, and it's
> really, really getting to me. I have the following interface:
>
> public interface PersistedClassRC Serializable> {
> Request save(P entityProxy,i
We just ran into the same issue.
SEVERE: Unexpected error
java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not parse payload: payload[0] = N
at com.google.web.bindery.autobean.vm.impl.JsonSplittable.create(
JsonSplittable.java:70)
at com.google.web.bindery.autobean.shared.impl.StringQuoter.create(
StringQuoter
Hi all,
I can't figure this out, haven't found anything on the interwebs, and it's
really, really getting to me. I have the following interface:
public interface PersistedClassRC {
Request save(P entityProxy,int version);
Request delete(P entityProxy);
Request findById(N id);
}
Now in Eclipse t
Hello,
i'm having a problem when using RequestFactory and resetting the session
timeout.
Here is what i have:
- GWT + GWTP Projekt
- A separate GWT Projekt for RequestFactory Service
- All running on JBoss 6.1.0 Final
- I'm also using JAAS and SSO Valve (didn't get it to work
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 6:28:00 PM UTC+2, Yan wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Using GWT 2.4 request factory, but observed this.
>
> I have an EntityProxy (parent) containing a list of EntityProxy
> (children). I put the parent in edit mode, update an attribute on the
> parent and then persist the pa
Hi there,
Using GWT 2.4 request factory, but observed this.
I have an EntityProxy (parent) containing a list of EntityProxy (children).
I put the parent in edit mode, update an attribute on the parent and then
persist the parent, I noticed that the entire list of children are sent
across the
On Friday, April 26, 2013 6:05:42 AM UTC+2, Aman Sharma wrote:
>
> I am still not able to persist poll entity using Requestfactory in GWT.
> Please point out if there's anything wrong with following code.
>
> view.setMsg("preparing");
> PollReques
I am still not able to persist poll entity using Requestfactory in GWT.
Please point out if there's anything wrong with following code.
view.setMsg("preparing");
PollRequest pr = requestFactory.pollRequest();
UserRequest ur = requestFactory.userRequest();
final UserProx
I am able to persist this entity in a servlet with following code:
PersistenceManager pm = PMF.getInstance().getPersistenceManager();
User abcd = new User();
abcd.setEmail("em...@email.com");
abcd.setName("name");
VerificationToken token1 = new
VerificationToken(abcd,VerificationToken.Verifica
I'm only having problem persisting this entity.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to
I have checked localhost:/_ah/admin there's no Poll entity created in
datastore.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+un
No,there's no error or exception. And the control never reaches onSuccess
block.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsub
What do you mean? There's an error? or your method isn't called but
everything goes as if it had?
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 3:12:51 PM UTC+2, Aman Sharma wrote:
>
> I am trying to persist this http://pastebin.com/7KtXaBGe entity using
> following piece of code:
>
> PollReques
I am trying to persist this http://pastebin.com/7KtXaBGe entity using
following piece of code:
PollRequest pr = requestFactory.pollRequest();
PollProxy createdPoll = pr.create(PollProxy.class);
createdPoll.setQuestion(view.getQuestion());
createdPoll.setOptions(view.asEditor().ge
>
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9TG7OzsZqQ&feature=player_detailpage#t=910s
>>>
>>> It looks like the new Cloud Endpoints implement a lot of
>>> the functionality that makes RequestFactory attractive.
>>>
>>>- Patch com
Done:
https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8104
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 10:23:43 AM UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> Please open an issue. I don't have time to do it right now but
> (tentatively) reproducing the issue is really easy in the current RF test
> suite
>
, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> Not sure what you're trying to do but it's not a supported usecase.
> RequestFactory only supports proxies created by its RequestContexts.
>
> On Friday, April 12, 2013 5:32:15 PM UTC+2, GWTter wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>
Not sure what you're trying to do but it's not a supported usecase.
RequestFactory only supports proxies created by its RequestContexts.
On Friday, April 12, 2013 5:32:15 PM UTC+2, GWTter wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having an issue using an implementation of an extended
Hi all,
I'm having an issue using an implementation of an extended EntityProxy. I
have the setup below, now when I call setBarProxyExt(BarProxyExt
barProxyExt) I get no errors and I am sure that the setBar method is
receiving the correct bar however the field is not set.
This however is not t
Please open an issue. I don't have time to do it right now but
(tentatively) reproducing the issue is really easy in the current RF test
suite
(com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.gwt.client.RequestFactoryTest#testNullEntityProxyResult),
so no need to attach a repro case (just link to this t
In pretty basic RF scenario, I'm fetching one EntityProxy from server:
myRequestContext.search(url).with("path1", "path2").to(...).fire()
MyRequestContext.java:
@Service(ModelService.class)
public interface MyRequestContext extends RequestContext {
Request search(String url);
}
ModelService.s
How to do the all of these steps if no IDE's including Eclipse.
On Saturday, September 24, 2011 2:33:49 AM UTC+5:30, Jonas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this Wiki entry helped me to solve the problem:
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/RequestFactoryInterfaceValidation
> Do exactly what is
That's interesting. Would you mind filing a bug? We should handle that better
(fail at serialization rather than deserialization, with a better error
message; or find a way to send the NaN: NaN cannot be represented in JSON)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I ran into the same problem. With a bit of debugging I found out that I was
trying to send NaN in one of my Float attributes to the GWT Client.
Dňa streda, 6. februára 2013 23:07:19 UTC+1 Sydney napísal(-a):
>
> If you have a test case to reproduce that issue, you can provide it to
> that issue
FYI writing my own ServiceLayerDecorator with the following worked like a
charm so extra thanks for the suggestion
private static Method getBeanMethod( BeanMethod methodType, Class
domainType, String property, Class propertyType ) {
for ( Method m : domainType.getMethods() ) {
Makes sense. Thanks!
On 28 February 2013 13:27, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, February 28, 2013 1:50:03 PM UTC+1, James Horsley wrote:
>>
>> I'll take a stab at writing a ServiceLayerDecorator as that should get me
>> unblocked without writing DTO's and if the correct setter is called
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 1:50:03 PM UTC+1, James Horsley wrote:
>
> I'll take a stab at writing a ServiceLayerDecorator as that should get me
> unblocked without writing DTO's and if the correct setter is called the
> NPE's won't be an issue. Thanks to you both for the suggestions!
>
> Th
I'll take a stab at writing a ServiceLayerDecorator as that should get me
unblocked without writing DTO's and if the correct setter is called the
NPE's won't be an issue. Thanks to you both for the suggestions!
Thomas, is this issue likely to end up as PatchesWelcome or WontFix? If the
former then
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 11:18:22 AM UTC+1, Ignacio Baca
Moreno-Torres wrote:
>
> If you don't want to have a delegator DTO, you may try AOP. For example,
> with guice you can match the classes you have the NPE problem, and return
> null before de NPE.
>
or in this specific case, use a
sues/detail?id=8039
>
>
> On 27 February 2013 17:04, James Horsley wrote:
> Thanks for the quick and detailed reply.
>
> Given a big win using RequestFactory is having it work well with existing
> server side data models it'd seem like something we'd want to fix,
Issue filed
https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8039
On 27 February 2013 17:04, James Horsley wrote:
> Thanks for the quick and detailed reply.
>
> Given a big win using RequestFactory is having it work well with existing
> server side data models it
Thanks for the quick and detailed reply.
Given a big win using RequestFactory is having it work well with existing
server side data models it'd seem like something we'd want to fix, relative
to other priorities of course. In this specifc case I don't own the domain
class as it
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 4:05:30 PM UTC+1, James Horsley wrote:
>
> I'm running into an issue where RequestFactory isn't calling the correct
> setter on the domain object in DevMode and I've not tried it compiled yet.
> Looking
I'm running into an issue where RequestFactory isn't calling the correct
setter on the domain object in DevMode and I've not tried it compiled yet.
Looking at the code it appears that ReflectiveServiceLayer.getBeanMethod is
just picking the first setter it finds based on SET/SET_BU
Pheww,
Caught the culprit... The Locators.
---
@Override
*public* MyDto find(Class clazz,*final* Integer id) {
*return *new MyDAO.findById(id);//Earilier -> return create(clazz
Hi,
It's seems if I use the same RequestContext reference to create Proxy it
doesn't give a problem...
But what if I am getting a proxy from somewher else already populated with
values ...
is there a way to use that proxy or I just have to do all the setters and
getters to create new proxy
Hi all,
At first is it a necessity to use 'InstanceRequest<>' for persisting
Entites?
Anyway what I am doing is
_
client
creating a proxy -> calling edit() [request.edit(proxy)] -> set the data
to proxy e.g.
proxy.setName("name')
...
...//Also some where setting th
yProxy.
>
> On Friday, February 15, 2013 11:07:10 PM UTC+1, Aryan wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> RequestFactory seems to fetch whatever the collection I have in my
>> ValueProxy eagarly.
>>
>> Lets see the code
>>
>> @Entity
>> public class V
Because a ValueProxy has no "identity" (and therefore cannot be retrieved
again later), .with() doesn't apply to it; it only applies to EntityProxy.
On Friday, February 15, 2013 11:07:10 PM UTC+1, Aryan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> RequestFactory seems to fetch whatever the
Hi all,
RequestFactory seems to fetch whatever the collection I have in my
ValueProxy eagarly.
Lets see the code
@Entity
public class Venue implements Serializable {
private name;
private Address address;
private Set contacts;
@OneToMany(fetch
hi have find a sollution for this problem"requestfactory+ejb"
Le vendredi 2 septembre 2011 19:02:15 UTC+2, thiago borges martins a écrit :
>
> Good afternoon staff,
>
> I am developing a system and adopted the gwt + smart for the
> presentation layer and the back
Dear Thomas,
thank you for the answer to my question.
I head a JPA problem with an entity being used two times. However, I could
not figure this out from the error message.
I figured this out by creating the entities without using the
RequestFactory.
How ever it works fine now.
Best regards
Try to re-generate the DeobfuscatorBuilder for your RequestFactory (maybe
run the ValidationTool manually). This error would generally happen if the
generated DeobfuscatorBuilder doesn't know about a particular proxy.
On Friday, February 8, 2013 6:11:27 PM UTC+1, Nermin wrote:
>
See
https://github.com/tbroyer/gwt-maven-archetypes/tree/master/guice-rf-activities/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/__rootArtifactId__-server/src/main/java
The RequestFactoryServlet is instantiated by Guice (configured in the
ServletContextListener); the ServiceLayerDecorators are instanti
Dear Community,
I have a problem with my application which uses JPA on Datanucleus and
RequestFactory,
It has 3 JPA Entiries:
(User) -> (Address) -> (City)
@Entity
@Table(name = "T_USER_1")
public class User {
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
Hi there,
I wish to use Guice to inject objects in ServiceLocator class. I am having
trouble getting it done, end up with injector.injectMembers(), which I
should avoid.
Any suggestion how I use Guice in the code below so that my object can be
injected into either MyServiceLocator or MyServi
Hi,
I am having problems with using RequestFactory with Datanucleus to persist
data into children of entity children. The situation is this: I've got a
parent entity, a child entity, and a child's child entity. I have managed
to use RequestFactory to persist data into both the pare
I just recently began working with RequestFactory and I have also come
across this issue. Can anyone more experienced with this solution shed
some light on the behavior of EntityProxyChange events? I am simply
performing a read from the database. I would expect EntityProxyChange
events
If you have a test case to reproduce that issue, you can provide it to that
issue on google app engine:
https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=8471
On Friday, January 18, 2013 9:23:52 PM UTC+1, El Mentecato Mayor wrote:
>
> I should have thought of that, sorry. Unfortunately
201 - 300 of 2057 matches
Mail list logo
