That looks good to me. I did it this way: contentHeight =
IFrameElement.as(yourFrame.getElement()).getContentDocument().getScrollHeight();
However, this will only work if the pages are in the same domain due to
security. See
Hi!
We've got an application on GWT 2.5.0 + GXT 3.0.4 with one main page,
containing a big table (like Excel) and a couple of heavy popups
(implemented using GXT Windows).
It works reasonably good at Chrome, FF, and IE9 but is incredibly slow in
IE8.
Memory consumption on opening the main
Basically, I want to use something like this:
https://twitter.com/about/resources/buttons#tweet
I found this page which suggests loading the script at the beginning, then
using jquery to look for certain elements and then renders relevant
elements:
IE8 is just a different beast than IE9. As IE9 is a lot faster than IE8 I
would guess they changed a lot internally and these changes also account
for the memory difference you are seeing. IE9 is just more efficient than
IE8.
I think you cant really change anything about it but I would be
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 1:37:21 PM UTC+2, Mohammad Al-Quraian wrote:
Basically, I want to use something like this:
https://twitter.com/about/resources/buttons#tweet
I found this page which suggests loading the script at the beginning, then
using jquery to look for certain elements and
Yeah, I now it is faster, I just wish there was something I could do
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 2:39:51 PM UTC+3, Jens wrote:
IE8 is just a different beast than IE9. As IE9 is a lot faster than IE8 I
would guess they changed a lot internally and these changes also account
for the memory
Hi,
IE8 consumes a lot of memory, especially in combination with GXT.
GXT relies on opacity which is know to consume a lot of memory in IE8.
GWT uses of DXTransform to enable alpha blending for PNGs. In fact it will
even constantly consume CPU power when you use the Image class.
If you don't
Great, thank you! v2 sounds like exactly what we need. Do you have any
estimate about when you might release v2?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
i deactivated the rpc blacklist
the class has a default contructor and no final fields
is it directly used in an rpc method
there is no error message during compilation
i have no idea what the reason could be. any ideas?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Wow that was easier than I expected. One question though, should I inject
the script at the beginning of the app or when I instantiate the presenter?
I'm expecting the code of the sharing provider to be accessed quite often.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Can you post the code of the class and the message of the exception please
? It would help to understand the problem i think.
Boris
Le 14 mai 2013 17:09, Dennis Haupt d.haup...@gmail.com a écrit :
i deactivated the rpc blacklist
the class has a default contructor and no final fields
is it
It does implement Serializable?
2013/5/14 Dennis Haupt d.haup...@gmail.com
i deactivated the rpc blacklist
the class has a default contructor and no final fields
is it directly used in an rpc method
there is no error message during compilation
i have no idea what the reason could be. any
please assume that i have already checked the dumb errors. i have about 200
serializable classes here, so i know how it works (usually...)
the error message is the one that says not included in the list of
serializable types. i don't see how posting the code would help without
providing access to
can i debug *why* the class is not included?
2013/5/14 Dennis Haupt d.haup...@gmail.com
please assume that i have already checked the dumb errors. i have about
200 serializable classes here, so i know how it works (usually...)
the error message is the one that says not included in the list
Sounds dumb too but does
class MyClass implements MyInterface, Serializable
work? I can hardly remember that I have done something like this once to
make GWT pick up MyClass in the whitelist although MyInterface extends
Serializable too.
-- J.
--
You received this message because you are
Did you try by just including step by step the class ? I mean just add an
empty class and check if it is working. I know you made a lot of classes so
you are skilled. So I guess this is a silly problem. Perhaps restarting
from scratch may highlight the issue.
Le 14 mai 2013 17:24, Dennis Haupt
i'm removing fields step by step now (since it has only 3)
2013/5/14 Boris Lenzinger boris.lenzin...@gmail.com
Did you try by just including step by step the class ? I mean just add an
empty class and check if it is working. I know you made a lot of classes so
you are skilled. So I guess
Consider also the interface other than serializable. It must be somerhung
around those things...
Le 14 mai 2013 17:31, Dennis Haupt d.haup...@gmail.com a écrit :
i'm removing fields step by step now (since it has only 3)
2013/5/14 Boris Lenzinger boris.lenzin...@gmail.com
Did you try by
the package the problematic class is in cannot access the gwt classes, so
it must use serializable. but i have done this several times now, it always
worked. removing all fields fixed the problem.
why doesn't the gwt complain about the fields at all, if they are the
problem?
2013/5/14 Boris
Are the type of your fields available on the client side ?
Le 14 mai 2013 17:40, Dennis Haupt d.haup...@gmail.com a écrit :
the package the problematic class is in cannot access the gwt classes, so
it must use serializable. but i have done this several times now, it always
worked. removing all
yes, the compiler can access them. i use the classes in an rpc call
2013/5/14 Boris Lenzinger boris.lenzin...@gmail.com
Are the type of your fields available on the client side ?
Le 14 mai 2013 17:40, Dennis Haupt d.haup...@gmail.com a écrit :
the package the problematic class is in cannot
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 5:11:26 PM UTC+2, Mohammad Al-Quraian wrote:
Wow that was easier than I expected. One question though, should I inject
the script at the beginning of the app or when I instantiate the presenter?
I'm expecting the code of the sharing provider to be accessed quite
does it matter if the fields are interfaces?
2013/5/14 Dennis Haupt d.haup...@gmail.com
yes, the compiler can access them. i use the classes in an rpc call
2013/5/14 Boris Lenzinger boris.lenzin...@gmail.com
Are the type of your fields available on the client side ?
Le 14 mai 2013 17:40,
Are they serializable ? Or is their implementation serialiazable ? Try to
replace for test purpose with a string for instance to identify faulty
fields.
Le 14 mai 2013 17:54, Dennis Haupt d.haup...@gmail.com a écrit :
does it matter if the fields are interfaces?
2013/5/14 Dennis Haupt
yes, they are all serializable
2013/5/14 Boris Lenzinger boris.lenzin...@gmail.com
Are they serializable ? Or is their implementation serialiazable ? Try to
replace for test purpose with a string for instance to identify faulty
fields.
Le 14 mai 2013 17:54, Dennis Haupt d.haup...@gmail.com
And you have already used them in rpc calls ? Sorry for those basic
questions but it is to be sure that, before searching for complex things,
simple one have been discarded.
Le 14 mai 2013 17:59, Dennis Haupt d.haup...@gmail.com a écrit :
yes, they are all serializable
2013/5/14 Boris
I will create a release candidate this weekend, which contains all the
features that will be in the final release. I will then be working on the
documentation over the next couple months, and then make the final release
once all the documentation is done.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 6:56 AM, V.B.
Every time I get this it is because I have coded a constructor that takes
args, but forgot to add a no-arg constructor for rpc to use.
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 8:08:14 AM UTC-7, HamsterofDeath wrote:
i deactivated the rpc blacklist
the class has a default contructor and no final fields
is it
W dniu wtorek, 14 maja 2013 22:14:51 UTC+2 użytkownik Travis napisał:
Every time I get this it is because I have coded a constructor that takes
args, but forgot to add a no-arg constructor for rpc to use.
Oh, this happens to me once every month:). I suspected some fault in my
brain, but I
I'd have to agree with Rob on that one! :-)
Looks like there are two sessions:
GWT Roadmap for the Future:
https://developers.google.com/events/io/sessions/327833110
Demystifying MVP and EventBus in GWT:
https://developers.google.com/events/io/sessions/331474237
On Monday, March 11, 2013
I want to try and help improve GWT, and I was wondering if that is
possible. I noticed for instance in the Simple Pager, the words are still
in English even when the selected locale is Arabic.
--
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received this message
Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Workaround JSONTest failure in Firefox 17
..
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1
(1 comment)
Did you have any chance of looking at the -draft JS to try to understand
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Workaround JSONTest failure in Firefox 17
..
Patch Set 2:
Yeah, this is the best workaround I have at the moment. The infuriating
thing is the test
Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Add SafeUri overloads for setting properties used for
navigation
..
Patch Set 4:
Bah, let's go with getSafeHref then…
--
To view, visit
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Add SafeUri overloads for setting properties used for
navigation
..
Patch Set 4:
Just to be clear though, we already fixed our internal users to
Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Add SafeUri overloads for setting properties used for
navigation
..
Patch Set 4:
I just looked at what we did back when we added SafeUri: we added
Hello Matthew Dempsky, Goktug Gokdogan,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2110
to look at the new patch set (#4).
Change subject: Adds isStandalone to ImageResource so Image can used an
UnclippedState.
Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Adds isStandalone to ImageResource so Image can used an
UnclippedState.
..
Patch Set 3:
(2 comments)
* Fixed ImageResourceCellTest by using
Hello Matthew Dempsky, Goktug Gokdogan,
I'd like you to reexamine a rebased change. Please visit
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2110
to look at the new rebased patch set (#5).
Change subject: Adds isStandalone to ImageResource so Image can used an
UnclippedState.
Thomas Broyer has submitted this change and it was merged.
Change subject: Workaround JSONTest failure in Firefox 17
..
Workaround JSONTest failure in Firefox 17
For some reason, calling JSONValue.isNull() sometimes returns
Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Workaround JSONTest failure in Firefox 17
..
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+2
Let's merge this then.
Ideally, we'll try to track down the issue later, or assume the
John Stalcup has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Make sub/superclass queries in JTypeOracle more efficient.
..
Patch Set 4: Code-Review+1
(8 comments)
seems like it would be nice to have a test to show that
John Stalcup has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: makes GWT boolean flags togglable
..
Patch Set 1:
yeah i was hesitant to change public class names since it would introduce
the danger of breaking some
Goktug Gokdogan has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Add SafeUri overloads for setting properties used for
navigation
..
Patch Set 4:
Actually I'm not much concerned about the breaking part, it is an easy
Goktug Gokdogan has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Adds isStandalone to ImageResource so Image can used an
UnclippedState.
..
Patch Set 5:
(2 comments)
45 matches
Mail list logo
