use them.
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi all,
I am new to GWT and face some problem here. I need to show up Google map on
a form in my GWT web.
First, there has a windowForm.class which extends FormPanel and I have
wrote a mapWindowForm.class which extends this windowForm.class as below.
http://paste.ideaslabs.com/show/Q0ThysUrSF
Hello all,
Does anybody have an example of a GWT-based tag cloud widget for filtering
search results. I attached a mockup image of the type of widget I'm
thinking about.
Many thanks,
Bruce.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit
Thanks Jaga,
I am setting the content-type response to text/html on the servlet
response. The issue occurs when the form is moved in the uibinder and other
GWT widgets are defined before the form.
Cheers,
Bruce.
On Wednesday, 19 February 2014 09:54:36 UTC-5, jaga wrote:
Hi,
You might need
, I would like to either find a way to get this scenario to work, OR,
find an alternative (e.g., serve up HTML forms in the same way, but extract
data from HTML fragment client side [how?] and then submit to server via
RPC).
Any ideas/thoughts are very much appreciated.
Many Thanks,
Bruce
I'm also quite newish, but I found the GWT-RPC very good.
If your backend is written in Java, then this makes sense since you can
work with the same POJO's on the back and front end.
If your backend is written in a different language or need more than one
client to consure data, and GWT is just
in dev mode, I'd assume the browser has the capability
of making the DnD work. Is there any way of me forcing GWT to let IE do
DnD?
Thx
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
page, and i seem to run in circles, can any one help me
out?
Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/QjqIalaiHwUJ.
To post
Many thanks Alan - saved me much frustration and re-installs!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
easier than make a check for all the events. I
am not clear
the background about why we need disabling the button . I think
handling all this
events is not necessary except that you really expect to this way.
thanks in advance!!
//Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
by OS. I want to know in this case which even should I monitor and
which handler should I add to createTxt so that I can catch the
content after user first click this 'paste'
option and the createTxt have the value.
thanks !!
//Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
please ignore this topic !! seems it is published by wrong operation
before I finished editing it . sorry for that!!
On Nov 28, 10:48 am, Bruce Zu bruce...@sonyericsson.com wrote:
background:
there is a variable : NpTextBox createTxt
there is a button, by default
When you read opinions like this, you have to interpret the author's
perspective relative to his/her incentives. Thus, GWT consultants will
observe the reasons GWT is really good. Consultants skilled in things other
than GWT will find reasons that their solutions are better. There isn't a
right
Can we use GWT for mobile web app development?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Hello
since there is no toolbarpanel for richtextarea i am trying to make mine.
Everything works except the fontsize.
I am tryng to use this code :
public final static HashMapString, String GUI_FSIZE = new
HashMapString, String();
static {
GUI_FSIZE.file(1,XX_SMALL);
how can I
Hello
When I would like to use this widget :
http://gwt.google.com/samples/Showcase/Showcase.html#!CwRichText
I am using eclipse 3.5 with 2.0.4 gwt plugin.
When I try the source of the page eclipse told me it can find the
import for RichTextToolbar.
How can I have this toolbar that is pretty
[+Scott and Kelly from Google]
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Damon Lundin damon.lun...@gmail.comwrote:
We are trying to upgrade from 2.0.4 to 2.1.0.m3 because of some bugs
in 2.0.4 but in doing so our GWT test cases have begun failing and I
have determined it's because the next test is
Fwiw, I don't actually care. It just seemed like something that needed
some devil's advocacy.
On Thursday, August 26, 2010, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Andrew, how would this be?
CheckBox cb = new CheckBox();
cb.setValue(null);
assertFalse(cb.getValue());
rjrjr
On Thu,
Can you provide a little more context for why it should work this way?
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
When we made the CheckBox widget implement HasValue, we had it throw an
illegal argument exception when setValue() is called with null.
I think we goofed.
is just the wrong UI there. Withdrawn.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Can you provide a little more context for why it should work this way?
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
When we made the CheckBox widget implement
Hello
I am new to gwt. I've done a few obvious website to try it.
Now I should do a website with an text editing zone. I guess a
RichTextArea widget may be enough.
But It must be able to export and save the text in online database, in
a microsoft word file, and a pdf.
It would be better it was
50%? That would be astonishing, but I must admit I'm skeptical :-)
Thomas, have you tried it on a bigger app? Something like Showcase or the
Expense Report app?
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Lex Spoon sp...@google.com wrote:
It's a fun idea! Methods that are only there for their type
(freeze
vs. create) than to simply say, It's unusual, but easy to learn and
maximally efficient.
And there's also an argument to be made that fewer classes are easier,
all else being equal. Which would favor not having a builder that is
quite redundant to mutable array.
-- Bruce
--
http
manage to share state between created instances in some cases.
Dan
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
On 3/25/10, Daniel Rice (דניאל רייס) r...@google.com wrote:
I disagree with point (1). The APIs are not the same, just almost the
same. IMHO
What John said. JSO cross-casts allow this.
On Thursday, March 25, 2010, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Rodrigo Chandia rchan...@google.com wrote:
(Sorry for the spam, Bruce. I forgot to press reply to all.)
I seem to be missing some piece from
Here's how freeze() got introduced.
You need to be able to have ImmutableArray without any mutators, and you
need to be able to create them, thus you need a builder. A very frequent
pattern will be to build up an array with a builder (the hypothetical
ImmutableArrayBuilder) and then want to get
(e.g. I have a MutableFoo, and
return to you casting to Foo... I can change it, you can't).
If you want a copy, copy it yourself (and pay the copy cost explicitly,
then freeze one, and you can go on changing the other). Bruce wants to run
pretty close to the wire, so if you mess it up
I think Rodrigo's point already subsumed what I'm about to say, but there
are three cases here:
1) A read-only reference to a collection that may or may not be mutable by
someone else. This is the purpose of the root type Array, which has not
mutators but doesn't make a guarantee about whether
re: package...consider skipping the client convention because it's
meant to be used on the server too. that new form of target-less
naming is part of the design experiment I hope this work can include.
On Friday, March 19, 2010, Rodrigo Chandia rchan...@google.com wrote:
Sure!
2010/3/19 Ray
@John: I was thinking about actually not even designating the package as
shared -- instead just make it a regular-looking Java package. As an
experiment.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:23 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Rodrigo Chandia
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Andi Mullaraj andimulla...@gmail.comwrote:
Also, my coworkers and I are wondering if GWT is single.?
I am not an English native (so I might have read smth you didn't mean :)),
but this is very funny. I love her too.
ha ha -- i'm totally stealing that joke.
Since module-mutator amounts to an API change (and sounds pretty weird
from a distance), please update the (nice) design doc and get unanimous
consent from the SDK team (after getting contributor feedback from the group
here).
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:31 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
Here's
Thanks for the explanation. Would be really useful to add to the design doc
with enough formatting to make it easy to understand. It just seems like a
very powerful feature that could interact in very hard-to-understand ways
with various build systems, IDEs, etc. So it would need a lot of vetting.
very exciting! nice work.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
w00t! That's a lot of work that just landed!
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
And if we can get GwtQuery to the point where a lot of people really like
it, I think we'd seriously consider rolling it into GWT proper.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
GwtQuery was developed before Gwt 2.0 and it's been a while since it's
been
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Paul Robinson ukcue...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] I, and maybe quite a few others here, don't have access to Wave.
We can probably do something about that. I'll start another thread where
people who don't have Wave access yet can indicate interest in signing up.
to this thread if you'd like to get an invitation.
-- Bruce
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
@John T: Are you saying we wouldn't want those methods on JsArray classes,
though? Seems like that's an appropriate place to put them. People don't
usually subclass containers like that (do they?).
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Tom Schindl tomson...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Sami Jaber sami.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm agree with Thomas. RegExp integration should have been discussed in the
list. It is landing into the trunk from nowhere for us...
I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that we were switching to a different
version control
Nightly or perhaps less frequent stable snapshot builds is something
we'd like to do for sure. Not sure about exactly when, but it's good
to know there would be an audience to justify looking into it a bit.
On Thursday, January 21, 2010, Arthur Kalmenson arthur.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, a
bumps as we get the syncing
thing working properly -- we've tested it a lot, but there's always a chance
of turbulence
2) to let you know to yell if anything looks messed up in the repo, so we
can find and fix those bumps faster :-)
-- Bruce, on behalf of the GWT team
--
http://groups.google.com
Happy belated birthday!
On Monday, January 4, 2010, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
A hearty +1 from me. We've been needing to do this for a while, but have
been so heads-down on new features that it's fallen by the
Lex/Bob: To clarify one thing, did you mean
set-configuration-property
vs.
set-property
in the example of adding a linker conditionally? I think the latter is what
we'd want, right?
I agree it sounds like a nice, unifying change. In the process of cleaning
all this up (e.g. deprecation,
Let's take this to a separate thread or a wave, just to keep things
organized.
2009/12/22 John Tamplin j...@google.com
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Related future discussion: I'm not really a fan of
set-configuration-property and would love to see
Definitely do need to escape, as you said.
On Thursday, December 17, 2009, John Huss johnth...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you have to escape the css attributes that start with a dash
like this:
\-moz-box-shadow: 2px 2px 5px #000;
You should be getting a warning about it in dev mode if you are
Working on a draft one.
What do folks here think is important?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:42 AM, tfreitas tfrei...@gmail.com wrote:
What about roadmap?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
This needs to be its own thread, but heads up: flags that affect compiler
output (other than -draftCompile) need to become deferred binding properties
so that we can have per-perm flags. Then, we can produce standard sets of
module flags such as Release and Debug that would make easy to activate
What John said :-)
On Saturday, December 5, 2009, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Sami Jaber sami.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
I know that post RC 2 rules disallow to get last minute modification into the
2.0 release. However, this modification would be
I'm hitting the error shown below in my code in the following manner...
Working with a fairly complex object composed of several component objects -
so quite a bit of memory probably...
a) Editing an object, saving the results, then without clearing the screen,
request the another object via RPC
with GWT 2.0.0-rc1 and rc2 with JDK1.5 update 22.
I switched to JDK 1.6 and the problem went away. I only had this
happen in development mode, and consistently so.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Bruce Petro brucepe...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm hitting the error shown below in my code
@Bob: You rock.
@Ray: I like.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
Bob,
I love your proposal, if Bruce like's it, I'll go ahead and implement it
(perhaps without the A/B testing part? We can leave that as a Wiki entry?)
-Ray
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009
We need to call out some use cases that show how these settings would be
used in practice, for posterity if nothing else.
Could you describe how we would handle each of these high-level intents that
a developer might have?
A) I want stack traces everywhere that it isn't costly.
B) I want stack
I have a scroll panel that I fill with several lines of text, but I only
display one line at a time.
Currently if I click on the down arrow, it scrolls a pixel or two at a time
requiring 8-10 clicks to get to the next text line.
Is there a way to tie into the scrolling nature and have it scroll
Maybe not a warning, but maybe an INFO-level log entry, or perhaps a
TRACE-level one. I think the default introduction of source path=client is
net confusing. Forcing people to specify it would have helped (forced?)
people to understand what is going on.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:40 PM, John
let's remember to talk about this more for the release after 2.0
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Isaac Truett itru...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 deprecate and warn.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
FWIW, this confusion is exactly why webAppCreator no longer
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/112806
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Toolkit Developer Forum:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit
If you find specific bugs to report, please do so at the GWT Issue Tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues
See you online. Happy coding :-)
-- Bruce, on behalf of the GWT team
--
You received
And, by the way, a lot of this stuff is still in flux. If you're grabbing
bits and pieces as they appear, you mileage is bound to vary widely :-)
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Mark Renouf mark.ren...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, sorry... I *just* saw r6956. That worked. Thanks!
On Nov 17, 12:05
Toolkit Developer Forum:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit
If you find specific bugs to report, please do so in the GWT Issue Tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues
See you online. Happy coding :-)
-- Bruce, on behalf of the GWT team
--
http
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/104802
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
I'm especially excited about goto! Think of how powerful and flexible that
will be!
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Rice (דניאל רייס)
r...@google.comwrote:
// future reserved words
abstract, int, short, boolean, interface, static, byte,
long, char, final, native, synchronized,
Two other things:
- Can we do something about the icon?
- Where on earth is that About dialog box coming from? It has a
completely random version string.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/103804/diff/1/2
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/BootStrapPlatform.java (right):
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/104801
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
of code, and then back again when it finishes!
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
I'm especially excited about goto! Think of how powerful and flexible that
will be!
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Rice (דניאל רייס) r...@google.com
wrote:
// future
Hi John (and Hi, contrib group!),
I've been fighting to find just the right incantation to make the missing
plugin flow go smoothly. I think it's pretty close now.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/102815
-- Bruce
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Committed to tr...@6891 and merged to 2...@6892.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:06 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:03 PM, br...@google.com wrote:
Thanks for the review. Reply below.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/102815/diff/1002/3
File hosted.html
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:12 AM, David david.no...@gmail.com wrote:
Do I read this correctly that stacktraces in exceptions will just be
available (also on IE if the emulated mode is enabled at compile time)
? That would make my current implementation of finding the source of a
Trace
Refresh seems to work as expected now. Note the one impl comment, tho.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/96801/diff/1002/4
File user/src/com/google/gwt/resources/css/GenerateCssAst.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/96801/diff/1002/4#newcode716
Line 716:
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/96801
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
I just committed to trunk but haven't merged to 2.0. Feel free to roll
mine back and do something better.
On Wednesday, November 4, 2009, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Thanks for the patch, Bruce. It's is a bit more complicated than it needs to
be, though (if parent doesn't have a prefix
This topic usually centers on all the little types needed for various event
handlers. Happily, @UiHandler in UiBinder removes the whole issue. The
UiBinder code generator can do whatever nastiness it needs to in order to
create the most efficient event handler/dispatch code. IOW, it's not only
Reviewers: jgw,
Description:
Forgetting a namespace prefix on a child elem of DockLayoutPanel causes
an NPE, for example:
g:DockLayoutPanel unit=PCT
westg:HTMLPanelfoo/g:HTMLPanel/west
east/east
/g:DockLayoutPanel
Unfortunately, even after the patch the error message is confusing. It
LGTM. This might be enough without auto-expanding the nodes in error. We
can wait on that.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/89813
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
At a quick glance, something like this seems way better than a wholesale
sync-async rewriter.
It's actually important not to hide genuine asyncrony from the developer,
because it represents an actual app state the developer should account for
(e.g. what UI should be disabled while an async
If you're confident in the fix, Dan, instead of adding a test right now,
please just add an issue instead to remind us to review in the future what
kind of testing mechanism we would have needed to make a unit test easy to
create for this case. I want to make sure we revisit this at some point to
Very cool find.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:00 PM, cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
Note, that if you don't desire correct stack traces, you can use the
following construct:
_.foo = function() { ... }
This results in a 6% post-gzip size reduction on Showcase. It might be
useful to introduce a
I wish we could wrap that all up in a simpler-to-understand package.
But a good article would make it at least bearable.
On Saturday, October 31, 2009, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
In terms of design, I
checking, aggressive optimization, or stack info,
there'd be one centralized place to look at and document all the flags.?
-Ray
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
I wish we could wrap that all up in a simpler-to-understand package.
But a good article would
SGTM
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
If you don't feel strongly about it, I'd like to leave it where it is.
It's a pretty integral part of binder itself.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
both lgtmd kthxbye
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Hey, Bruce. I TBR'd you on these:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=6550
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=6552
Hi Ray,
http://codereview.appspot.com/144046
The only thing controversial is that I'm including only the .client package
for now. It wasn't clear what else should go in there.
-- Bruce
P.S. What's up with these guys: .sample, .testing, and .resources? Seems
like there are already established
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
We usually use gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com, but LGTM'd anyway.
Oh yeah -- thanks. Duh.
Testing is on its way out of user/src and into user/testing, review
pending.
'k.
sample isn't really a sample, it's become a test
Thoka, I hope previous replies didn't come across as a debate as to whether
the use cases you describe are valuable or not; clearly they are.
The point is just that we want to identify exactly what the pros/cons of
each world view are to decide, among other things, if there is one right
answer
What's the best way to tie a border into the auto show scroll bars?
In other words,
a) if the contents fit - no scroll bar AND no border... it’s a nice bland
panel that blends in...
BUT
b) if the contents do not fit - add the scroll bar (automatically handled)
*AND* add a border to go along
Hey everyone,
What's the best way to tie a border into the auto show scroll bars?
In other words,
a) if the text fits - no scroll bar AND no border... its a nice bland panel
that blends in...
BUT
b) if the text doesn't fit - add the scroll bar (automatically handled)
*AND* add a border to go
(as in, anyone reading this email) have tried the new RPC stuff and
have feedback, now would be the right time to give it a thumbs up or thumbs
down. At the moment, we're leaning thumbs down -- mainly to be conservative.
-- Bruce
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Sami Jaber sami.ja...@gmail.com wrote
about it.
My 2 french euros,
Sami
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
So, here's the deal on deRPC. It doesn't yet have the miles on it that
we'd like, so we're pretty much on the fence as to whether to really ship it
in GWT 2.0 or not.
It has been
@Thobias: I want to make sure I'm understanding the root motivation. Is the
problem that compiles are taking too long when you create permutations per
locale? Perhaps the more fundamental question I should ask is: would you
describe exactly what's unserviceable about the current static approach
Assuming you've tested the RESCUE SSW behavior and that Joel likes it,
this LGTM.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/77820
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
@John L: You taking this one?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Pascal Muetschard
pmuetsch...@google.comwrote:
I've uploaded another patch set, which merges in the latest changes from
the trunk.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:34 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at
Overall, very nice. The key, though ultimately superficial, design
question is whether to make the main methods non-static. See the comment
in Scheduler.java for details.
There are a couple of other minor points.
N.B. I didn't really scrutinize it for logical correctness, although the
basic
LGTM with a typo fix. An idea for an incredibly trivial improvement if
you just want to change something more for the heck of it.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/78816/diff/1/2
File user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/StyleInjector.java (right):
LGTM
On 10/12/09, b...@google.com b...@google.com wrote:
Hi Scott and Bruce,
@Bruce, can I get feedback on the API that $entry() provides.
@Scott, this changset just has the changes to the compiler and hosted
mode, can you review them?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/77810
Looks convenient, but I have a few questions/comments.
1) What happens if the module returned by getModuleName() already specifies
a fix value for a given property? More generally, how should one think about
how these annotations dovetail with the settings in the module config?
2) The
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Pascal Muetschard
pmuetsch...@google.comwrote:
1) What happens if the module returned by getModuleName() already specifies
a fix value for a given property? More generally, how should one think about
how these annotations dovetail with the settings in the
somehow a function of the client that
is requesting the script.
-- Bruce
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Another w00t!
This is brilliant.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
W00t, thanks. Looking forward to using this.Thanks for doing this review,
Lex.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:36 PM, rj...@google.com wrote:
On 2009/09/10 19:54:05, Ray Ryan wrote:
;
}
/ui:style
ui:style field='otherStyle'
.pretty {
color: green;
}
/ui:style
div
div class='{style.pretty}'I am red./div
div class='{otherStyle.pretty}'I am green./div
/div
/ui:UiBinder
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com
of those patterns being
useful (like completion queues, which would be useful for staged
animations).
-Ray
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
Okay, here's a strawman for a new-and-improved proposal. All these would
be in core.
// Deferred command = on the other
the queue, you only need to add the roots to the DOM,
attaching/modifying enmasse.
This would preserve the OO-ness of constructing widget hierarchies
without requiring 'foreign' string-based templating.
-Ray
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.comwrote:
On Wed, Sep 2
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
