On 2010-07-26, at 4:56 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
Is the new linker designed to curtail extension, or to sanely encourage it?
The existing primary linkers ended up getting extended in brittle ways.
That's a good point. Let's make it a final class to start with, and open up
extension points
[manually forwarding to list due to subscription bug...]
Wow, this looks great. This is exactly what I had imagined.
Once dev mode is in place we should be able to switch dotspots over to
this from our current custom linker.
I was looking through the latest SelectionScriptLinker in trunk and
Hey all,
I've been fighting this JSNI formatting bug for a while now. The Google Plugin
for Eclipse is basically flattening the indents on all my JSNI methods when
using the format command. With the 'format on save' option chosen in Eclipse,
it unformats all the JSNI in the file after a save
.
I had to paste the entire contents of an ancient version of Douglas Crockford's
JSON library into a JSNI function earlier today as part of a unit test and I
ended up with a few hundred lines of unindented circa-2005 Javascript after
saving. :)
On 2010-04-02, at 10:13 AM, Matt Mastracci wrote
Quickly browsing easyXDM and comparing to gwt-rpc-plus, it looks like the
designs of both are very similar. easyXDM uses the term 'socket' where
gwt-rpc-plus uses the term 'transport'. Both of them allow you to plug in the
appropriate transport behind a socket-like interface. easyXDM adds some
I'm seeing the same thing in our application. I haven't had time to dig into
it, but I'm seeing 'unknown event DOMContentLoaded' in the developer tools
console. The GWT Showcase example works, however. Maybe some sort of doctype
issue?
On 2010-03-20, at 4:53 AM, nicolas.deloof wrote:
Hi,
On 2010-03-18, at 12:15 PM, BobV wrote:
- If the GWT module base path URL isn't absolute, getRequestModuleBasePath
fails. We use relative base paths to simplify our hosted mode development.
Can you describe this setup in more detail? What is the canonical URL
that the request's url
On 2010-03-18, at 12:15 PM, BobV wrote:
The code that you posted is about creating a payload for a object that
has custom serialization. What does looking at the fields of the
InvokeCustomFieldSerializerCommand object show?
I can reproduce this in a barebones project. It looks like it's this
you ever hear anything back from them about
this? It seems like it really ought to be fixed on their end, though I
applaud your spelunking for a workaround :)
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Matt Mastracci matt...@mastracci.com wrote:
On Mar 16, 12:42 pm, Matt Mastracci matt
I found a technical support number that I can try calling and seeing if I can
get escalated. If that doesn't work, it might be easier to submit a minimal,
harmless testcase from those keywords as a false positive. :)
Given their approach, that seems likely to get that exact source added
On 2010-03-17, at 1:15 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
I called their tech support line and left a message to be passed on to their
technical team, but the tech's solution was you'll have to submit your code
again every time it changes. He said he'd pass on the message, but wouldn't
guarantee that
We started getting reports of the HTML/Crypted.Gen being detected in our
Chrome extension again. I've managed to reproduce it - the signature seems to
be the exact set of strings they use:
.fromCharCode
.charCodeAt
nodeValue
for
0,0,0,0,0,0
Math.min
I kid you not - this is their
I kid you not - this is their signature for an encrypted JS virus. I can't
seem to remove a single character from any of these tokens without turning it
from a dangerous virus to a harmless bit of JS. Order doesn't seem to be
important (although I haven't experimented with this that much).
On Mar 16, 12:42 pm, Matt Mastracci matt...@mastracci.com wrote:
Holy cow -- how do they think that is an acceptable measure? Surely they
could at least change the warning to say potentially dangerous JS or
something rather than declaring it a virus.
This probably will likely affect
I took the plunge and started moving our codebase over to deRPC. It's pretty
simple to get bootstrapped, though there's some deployment work we needed to do
to ensure that our .gwt.rpc files are made available to the backends.
I'm storing our history of .gwt.rpc files in S3, since we're
On 2010-03-04, at 11:13 AM, BobV wrote:
These factory methods need to live in the Java AST so that we can
use the type tightener to optimize the (usual-case) polymorphic
dispatch. Adding a JHasNameRef node to the AST would allow what
you're describing to be built, but I think that would
On 2010-02-12, at 1:15 PM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
- I dislike the whole transition period followed by having to forcibly
update all linkers, unless there's a really compelling reason to do so.
In general, I'd agree, but the
Hey all,
I've been playing around with UiBinder, hoping to start replacing a lot of our
custom templating code with it. One feature that would really improve the
experience for our designer/developer interface would be inline actions.
A lot of our boilerplate UI event code does one of the of
be simplified further for callback actions:
gq:click query=.actionLearnMore a
as(Effects().slideToggle();
/gq:action
-Ray
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Matt Mastracci matt...@mastracci.com wrote:
Hey all,
I've been playing around with UiBinder, hoping to start replacing a lot of
our
:
gq:click query=.actionLearnMore a
as(Effects().slideToggle();
/gq:action
-Ray
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Matt Mastracci matt...@mastracci.com wrote:
Hey all,
I've been playing around with UiBinder, hoping to start replacing a lot of
our custom templating code with it. One
If it's the same error we ran into, it's that there are things that look like
HTML script and comment tags in the linker script that throw the parser off.
Note how we broke up the script start tags and comment start/end tags the same
way as the script end tags:
XSLinker:
var
GWT 2.0 was so awesome, it'll be hard to top any of the new stuff with my
feature wishlist.
A few things I'd like:
- moving as many compiler properties as possible into configuration properties
so we can build an instrumented release (with type cast checking, assertions,
emulated stack
On 15-Dec-09, at 12:48 PM, Lex Spoon wrote:
I've now double checked on several browsers other than Opera, and I
agree that onerror works on non-IE and onreadystatechange works on IE.
Details here:
http://blog.lexspoon.org/2009/12/detecting-download-failures-with-script.html
One tricky
...@google.com wrote:
Were you able to get any information on the signature (assuming it's
signature-based) from Avira? Their page on the subject is, uh, less
than useful.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Matt Mastracci
matt...@mastracci.com wrote:
We've just had reports of people seeing
We've just had reports of people seeing this while installing our
chrome extension. I'm not near a Windows VM right now, but I can see
if it's easy to reproduce when I get back:
http://getsatisfaction.com/dotspots/topics/dotspots_plugin_for_chrome_installer_problems
There's a lot of
signature-based) from Avira? Their page on the subject is, uh, less
than useful.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Matt Mastracci
matt...@mastracci.com wrote:
We've just had reports of people seeing this while installing our
chrome extension. I'm not near a Windows VM right now, but I can
On 9-Dec-09, at 1:55 PM, Lex Spoon wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Matt Mastracci
matt...@mastracci.com wrote:
Do you know how to get onerror to fire in IE? It didn't seem to
work in my
testing.
No, but why do you need it if you have onreadystatechanged? It should
I'm seeing a strange dev mode error in WebKit. It started happening
recently and I can't put my finger on a specific change that would
cause it.
I'm returning an non-null JS native array from a JSNI method, cast to
JsArrayInteger. When I call JsArrayInteger::shift() on it, I get:
Result
Ray/Lex,
I'm starting to think that the dynamic iframe might not be a bad first
approach to this problem either. A single linker would be able to
provide cross-domain-capable, multi-module-safe code that doesn't
require any additional post-processing to support loading of
fragments. It
Hey all,
I installed the GPE 2.0-RC2 build (after cleaning out the old one) and
I'm running into some issues. The plugin thinks that we're using the
old-style layout, so it's attempting to launch GWTShell which won't
initialize a local Jetty w/war.xml.
I've worked around it by creating a
Webber wrote:
@Miguel: I've hit this before when upgrading projects, and I keep
forgetting what the trick was. I seem to recall the plugin was
making the project layout determination at the time the GWT nature
is added, but I'm not 100% certain.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Matt
Sure, I'd love to take a look at it. I've got a basic version of
globally-scoped, cross-domain code-splitting up and running that uses
simple script-tags for the cross-domain load right now.
Re: script tag error reporting. In my investigations, this has been
particularly bad and highly
GWT modules on a single dashboard. We
probably need to support both explicit scope and polluting options,
and allow the developer to choose.
-Ray
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Matt Mastracci
matt...@mastracci.com
The best approach is probably to upload the file in question to
Avira's false-positive reporting page:
http://analysis.avira.com/samples/index.php
On 24-Nov-09, at 8:19 AM, dflorey wrote:
Am I the only one with this issue?
On 19 Nov., 17:29, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hey all,
If I recall correctly, the original reason that GWT used iframe-
wrapped scripts was to work around the buggy compression of Javascript
some early versions of IE (example:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;823386Product=ie600)
.
The number of users on IE 6 SP1
('\n');
}
PerfLogger.end(); breakpoint here
I didn't see anything get added that shouldn't be there. Can you
dig into this a little or put together a small sample?
Thanks,
Scott
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Matt Mastracci matt...@mastracci.com
wrote:
Hey all,
Sorry
Filed a bug on this:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4268
On 23-Nov-09, at 12:40 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
let's remember to talk about this more for the release after 2.0
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Isaac Truett itru...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 deprecate and
be there. Can you
dig into this a little or put together a small sample?
Thanks,
Scott
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Matt Mastracci matt...@mastracci.com
wrote:
Hey all,
Sorry to keep spamming GWT 2.0 issues.
I've run into a difference in how TypeOracle works that seems to have
changed
Thanks, Scott. I'm applying it now and building GWT. It's been
catching some JSNI refs in the GWT source, possibly some false-
positive (the JSONParser ones seem to be valid?). The build doesn't
actually fail, though:
[java] [WARN] Warnings in 'jar:file:/Users/matthew/
Hey all,
I'm continuing my push forward to GWT 2.0-RC1 and I'm running into
some crashiness in OOPHM. I'm still trying to narrow down exactly
what causes it, but this is a common, reproducible crash that I'm
seeing:
Hey all,
Sorry to keep spamming GWT 2.0 issues.
I've run into a difference in how TypeOracle works that seems to have
changed in GWT 2.0. In previous versions, calling
context.getTypeOracle().getTypes() from a generator would limit itself
to types available on the source paths. I have
Hey all,
We're using GWT in a lot of places that aren't traditional webpages
(currently a Firefox extension and a Chrome plugin). We've rolled our
support for OOPHM in Firefox chrome code, but Chrome content scripts
are going to be a different story. For now, our code is simple enough
I think the impact of anonymous classes will be significantly less
once union types are implemented. As it stands right now, every
anonymous class gets typeinfo and getClass because some code elsewhere
is calling it on an variable that can't be tightened more than Object.
On 2009-11-03, at
The API is just a skeleton to experiment with all the strong-typing
that would go along with porting Oni to Java, so there's not much
there. It helped prove that the concept was sound if I had a chance to
take a go at it and gave me some code to look at while planning it
out. There's
? do you show a please wait or not?). What
we'd want is a framework that makes it easier to produce and reason
about necessarily async patterns.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Matt Mastracci
matt...@mastracci.com wrote:
The API is just a skeleton to experiment with all the strong-typing
I find that there are two sources of a lot of boilerplate code for the
async stuff I work on:
1. State machines
2. Coordinating multiple asynchronous events (ie: timers, multiple
inflight requests and user events)
For #1, the code usually ends up as a set of enums for simple states
Joel,
This is definitely a can of worms! I spent some time thinking through
the some of these points. Some additional comments inline...
On 17-Aug-09, at 10:02 AM, Joel Webber wrote:
At any rate, we *do* need something like this, and now seems as good
a time as any to bring it up. In
Hi all,
I've been hacking around the lack of a true JavaScriptObject window in
GWT for a while and I was wondering if there was any interest in me
providing a patch for it. While the current
com.google.gwt.user.client.Window works for most cases, you aren't
able to interact with other
Ray,
This is really cool!
On 13-Aug-09, at 1:22 PM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Revision: 5959
Author: cromwellian
Date: Thu Aug 13 12:21:36 2009
Log: Function Clustering, improves gzip compression by significant
margin.
Top-level block restructuring for IE7 is now done purely
/etc for download. The DTOs are numerous / complex
enough that writing some kind parallel serializer is prohibitive. Have
you come across this use case before ?
Thanks,
Alex
On Aug 8, 8:53 pm, Matt Mastracci matt...@mastracci.com wrote:
Bart,
One principle of design for the alternate RPC
.
Naturally the same annotation would appear on value types with List
properties. Perhaps something similar could be used to whitelist
sub class
serializer generation.
Comments ?
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Matt Mastracci
matt...@mastracci.comwrote:
Bart,
One principle
Guijt
E: bgu...@gmail.com
T: +31 6 30408987
Check out my blog: http://bart.guijt.me/blog/
A pizza with the radius 'z' and thickness 'a' has the volume
pi*z*z*a
On 8 aug 2009, at 8 aug, 04:58, Matt Mastracci wrote:
Hey all,
We've been working on a number of RPC enhancements locally
Issac,
Are you running under Linux? If so, your embedded Mozilla browser may
be showing a prompt, but its window is hidden. Try running with -
notHeadless.
On 2009-08-08, at 11:55 AM, Isaac Truett itru...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to run the unit tests in GWT trunk. I've tried with
Hey all,
We've been working on a number of RPC enhancements locally and thought
that it might be helpful to open-source some of them (prompted by a
recent suggestion from Ray Cromwell). I've created a new Google Code
project that encapsulates them here:
On 6-Aug-09, at 9:57 AM, John Tamplin wrote:
If the transparency is just binary, then IE6 already supports PNG
transparency, right? Aside from the hassle of detecting if a one-
bit alpha channel will do, I think the J2D libraries we currently
use won't generate one-bit alpha channels
Hey all,
We've been struggling with the issue of RPC forward/backward
incompatibility for a little while and I thought I'd bring it to the
list for discussion.
As some of you know, one of our use-cases for GWT is embedding the
compiled JS in a Firefox extension. Unfortunately, the
On 24-Jul-09, at 6:39 PM, BobV wrote:
I have a design wave going on about how to add this to the new RPC
implementation. Here's a cruddy copy-and-paste of the current state
of the document.
Bob, this is awesome!
Is the plan to land this as part of deRPC, or is this a future feature
that
On 24-Jul-09, at 9:11 PM, BobV wrote:
Also, will this be supported on methods themselves? For instance,
can
I mark a new method parameter as @Optional so that older clients
don't
need to provide it? Conversely, could we remove a parameter from a
method and still support clients
I've been pondering an SSA structure for the compiler that would make
some of this stuff a lot easier to deal with. Instead of keeping the
AST for the Java and JS trees around, we'd put everything into a
unified data flow graph in memory (with appropriate side-effect
barriers), optimize
I do as well - I'm mmastrac.
On 15-Jun-09, at 8:02 PM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
I do, cromwellian is my id on the sandbox.
-Ray
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Bruce Johnsonbr...@google.com
wrote:
I'm starting to make a bit o' progress on this. I'll send out a
design doc
real soon
No problem... I haven't handled the common super-expression case (if
(test) { return a; } else {return b; } - return test ? a : b), but
that one should be pretty easy to tackle for a limited set of common
super-expressions.
On 11-Jun-09, at 5:53 AM, Joel Webber wrote:
FWIW:
Both LGTM. Good catch, thanks. :)
On 11-Jun-09, at 1:15 PM, Scott Blum wrote:
Matt,
Could you review these two follow-on patches? The second depends on
the first. This is mostly non-functional cleanup to make things a
little simpler to read. The only substantive change is this:
SGTM. I'll start a new review with the remainder of the changes.
On 10-Jun-09, at 2:16 PM, Scott Blum wrote:
I thought I'd go ahead and commit what you have so far, if you don't
object?
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:12 PM, mmastrac.altern...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll update the patch with this
After I sent that message, I peeked into EqualityNormalizer which is
basically pre-munging all the equality operators that compare against
null to Cast.isNull() and Cast.isNotNull() as I described below.
On 10-Jun-09, at 8:16 PM, Matt Mastracci wrote:
That construct isn't a generically
Yeah... I would love to have a single AST to represent both of the
language states - many optimizations don't happen because we toss all
the Java type info during the conversion to JS.
For instance, you can't safely optimize this:
if (blah != null)
to this:
if (blah)
without knowing
On 7-Jun-09, at 8:39 AM, John Tamplin wrote:
Yes, the very thing you want for real apps (async so you can drop
back to the event loop and let the browser respond while waiting on
IO) is the very thing you can't have for OOPHM, since you have to be
able to block the executing code in
On 6-Jun-09, at 6:24 PM, Mark Renouf wrote:
Wow, I like it! This isn't as crazy as it sounds. After just watching
the V8 talk from I/O, I've learned the JavaScript library is
implemented in JavaScript (preloaded in a heap snapshot).
The efficiency level they are hitting now makes this seem
While this subject is up...
Has anyone considered writing the OOPHM client stub as a Java applet
and using netscape.javascript.JSObject to deal with the JS references?
While it wouldn't support direct field references like the current
plugins do, the server-side Jsni class could rewrite
On 5-Jun-09, at 10:08 AM, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
2009/6/5 Matt Mastracci matt...@mastracci.com:
While this subject is up...
Has anyone considered writing the OOPHM client stub as a Java applet
and using netscape.javascript.JSObject to deal with the JS
references?
Please no java
I've posted a couple of patches to the codereviews site, but I noticed
that it's using my main google account as the from email (mmast...@gmail.com
) instead of my mailing list subscription address
(matt...@mastracci.com).
Any ideas how I might be able to set my from address on the
expect it in a future release.
As an absolute workaround, could you rename your java binary and
create a shell script in its place that launches the real java binary
with whichever args you want (prepended to the args given to the shell
script)?
jason
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Matt
a method
body, otherwise, you'll have to inline the whole method at the
callsite (yuck!)
-Ray
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Matt Mastracci matt...@mastracci.com
wrote:
+1 for this implementation.
This is a lot clearer than a class - implementation lookup map or
inlining the whole
+1 for this implementation.
This is a lot clearer than a class - implementation lookup map or
inlining the whole method at each call site. As long as the bytecode
is rewritten in hosted mode to match the expected order of operations,
there shouldn't be any surprises at compile time.
Lex,
Have you tried using the string constructor for Function()? I believe
that it creates a function whose lexical scope is bound to the top-
level, no matter where it is executed.
script
var a = 2;
function x() {
var a = 3;
return new Function(alert(a); a = 4;);
}
x()();
alert(a);
() method in Firefox which allows an
additional parameter to be specified as the context (see
http://ajaxian.com/archives/evalfooa-objfn-how-you-arent-private-in-firefox)
e.g.
eval(script, $wnd);
-Ray
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Matt Mastracci
matt...@mastracci.com wrote:
Lex,
Have
On 5-Mar-09, at 4:53 PM, Lex Spoon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Matt Mastracci
matt...@mastracci.com wrote:
function x() {
var a = 3;
return new Function(alert(a); a = 4;);
}
I hadn't thought of that! Unfortunately, the code in question has
definitions like function foo
Bob,
Changes look really good.
Some review notes:
This code will terminate early if you have two anonymous functions in
your call stack (possible for some DOM stack traces), since both will
have name == anonymous:
+// Avoid infinite loop: caller is not an activation record
+
Bob,
We've been doing the same thing for a while using a slightly different
method. Some notes from our implementation:
1. The callee chain represents functions, rather than activation
records as you'd expect. If you call a method re-entrantly, you'll
end up in an infinite loop
exceptions.
--
Bob. (Android)
On Feb 13, 2009 1:25 PM, Matt Mastracci matt...@mastracci.com
wrote:
Bob,
We've been doing the same thing for a while using a slightly different
method. Some notes from our implementation:
1. The callee chain represents functions, rather than activation
79 matches
Mail list logo
