Looking into this now. Updates will be posted on the other thread that
Michael mentions.
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Michael Prentice splak...@gmail.comwrote:
This was also posted in the GPE Google Group here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-plugin-eclipse/V4MaZEXY24Q
Hey guys,
The source is on SVN, as Thomas says, but it's not up-to-date nor is it
buildable right now.
We have a hidden project on GitHub with the updated GPE source, but I don't
want to open it up until external people can actually build it. I'm working
on this as we speak. I'd expect to have
Hi Brandon,
The sources are on GitHub right now, but they are not public. I'm working
on externalizing the build system. I don't want to make the sources public
till then, as it's not much use to outside contributors if they can't build
the plugin themselves (which has been evidenced by the GPE
Hey Stephen,
We're in the process of moving the GPE source to github (and converting the
build system to Maven/Tycho so that external developers can build it) ,
which is why that repo hasn't been updated in a long time. I'll update the
homepage to reflect that.
As for the problem you've noted,
Ugh, thanks Unnur.
Sorry about that, Thomas.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Unnur Gretarsdottir unn...@google.comwrote:
OK - I'm just removing the bullet point entirely now - should be live soon
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday,
Thanks David - when I tested on the mac, I didn't have to refresh the
project after first import provided that I actually did an Update Project
after enabling Maven Annotation Processing on the project.
I noted this in bold on the Wiki page.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:15 AM,
right now.
-Daniel
Am 13.09.2012 um 01:09 schrieb Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com:
Sorry, this totally fell off the plate.
Daniel, would you be able to submit it to the Chrome Webstore?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Daniel Kurka kurka.dan...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Rajeev,
what
Hey Thomas,
Thanks for looking this over. I'll reply to the code-specific comments in
Rietveld itself, but I thought I'd respond to your more pressing concerns
first.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:57 AM, t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry I've only started to review the files (over the last few
in there.
Thanks.
Rob
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote:
Hey Daniel,
We do need to post the chrome devmode plugin to the webstore. I'll take
care of that this week.
I also need to rebuild the devmode plugin, as there were some fixes that
went
Patch posted here (had already submitted the original before that):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1801803
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:24 AM, tucker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012/07/30 19:10:14, rdayal wrote:
Since this is just a doc fix can you also fix 4575?
Daniel mentioned that somehow the CSS for the blackberry permutation is
ending up in the iPhone permutation. That can't just be a Cell Widget issue.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@google.comwrote:
Are you using any Cell widgets by any chance?
I've seen that the
Hey guys,
This is my fault. I mis-interpreted the code change. As the change to fix
this issue was basically a revert of the original commit that was
supposed to add ChromeFrame support, I incorrectly assumed that reverting
the code would prevent special behavior for ChromeFrame (which I figured
No prob, thx for your help in doing so :).
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:38 PM, j...@google.com wrote:
LGTM
Thanks for tracking this down and fixing it.
http://gwt-code-reviews.**appspot.com/1752803/http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1752803/
--
Hey,
I'm running into the same thing on a Linux workstation. It's a virtual
instance, so I'm not sure if that might have something to do with it, but
it's definitely strange.
Here's one exception that I see:
[junit] Exception in thread pool-1-thread-1
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.comwrote:
I don't think we support Java 1.5 anymore?
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6790
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/google-web-toolkit/fATw0rL8lSE/xbxX5Hf8ozUJ
I'm totally fine with
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Rajeev Dayal wrote:
Hey Thomas,
Thanks for pointing this out. This is pretty whacked, and is probably a
symptom of a problem that we've had for a long time - how do we handle
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:38 AM, James Nelson ja...@wetheinter.net wrote:
I wouldn't be opposed to having differing rules for the GWT SDK
package downloadable at code.google.com and the Maven artifacts.
AFAIK, the original idea of bundling them into gwt-user.jar (and
gwt-dev.jar) was to make
need with it.
On 7 June 2012 16:18, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote:
Thomas, thanks for jumping in.
James, as Thomas said, we'll defer this to 2.5.1, but we'd definitely like
to get it in there, as it's an important patch. We just didn't want to
force this patch in 2.5.0, which
Thomas, thanks for jumping in.
James, as Thomas said, we'll defer this to 2.5.1, but we'd definitely like
to get it in there, as it's an important patch. We just didn't want to
force this patch in 2.5.0, which is what we would have to do with the
current workload.
Thanks so much for working on
Committed as r11024.
On Thu May 31 14:13:23 GMT-400 2012, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com
wrote:
Hey all,
I don't think I'll have a chance to look at this by the afternoon. John,
if you could check into this, that would be great.
I believe I was up-to-date; did a sync right before I ran
Hey Thomas,
Thanks for pointing this out. This is pretty whacked, and is probably a
symptom of a problem that we've had for a long time - how do we handle
dependencies on GWT? Should we bundle them, re-package them, or require the
user to add them to the classpath?
Other replies inline:
On Tue,
Ran the latest patch set through google's battery of tests; everything
passed.
On Thu May 31 09:22:21 GMT-400 2012, t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012/05/31 01:56:32, skybrian wrote:
LGTM (assuming tests still pass)
Because I must confess I didn't run them on the last few patch-sets, I
just
Sounds good.
On Thu May 31 11:51:45 GMT-400 2012, stephen.haber...@gmail.com wrote:
Double-ping. If we can't land this one soon, we'll defer it to 2.5.1.
Yeah, let's just defer. I haven't had time to get back in to it and
answer Scott's question. This is just an optimization anyway, and I
Committed as r11004.
On Thu May 31 11:34:33 GMT-400 2012, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com
wrote:
Ran the latest patch set through google's battery of tests; everything
passed.
On Thu May 31 09:22:21 GMT-400 2012, t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012/05/31 01:56:32, skybrian wrote:
LGTM
Hey all,
I don't think I'll have a chance to look at this by the afternoon. John, if
you could check into this, that would be great.
I believe I was up-to-date; did a sync right before I ran the tests. I
didn't check to see if some other change had landed that would have caused
this problem.
Just verified that you're added to the corporate CLA list. I think I was
looking at an outdated spreadsheet.
You're all good!
On Fri May 25 10:15:54 GMT-400 2012, Alexandre Ardhuin
alexandre.ardh...@gmail.com wrote:
Confirmation email forwarded.
Thanks,
Alexandre
2012/5/25 Rajeev Dayal
Hey Alexandre,
You're not able to verify that you signed the CLA in the corporate case. I
looked at our corporate CLA list, and I don't see your name (or that of
your company) listed there.
I'll do some more digging to see what happened. Did you receive any sort of
confirmation e-mail? If so,
Hey James,
Sorry, I have not had a chance to look this one over, but I am planning to.
The turnaround on patches has been pretty bad for the past while, and we're
actively going to make some changes soon that will result in big
improvements (I hope).
In the meantime, we're trying to review and
Hey Stephen,
Thanks for the feedback. Replies inline:
On Tue May 08 23:22:49 GMT-400 2012, Stephen Haberman
stephen.haber...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, but asking anyone to have to make changes in working code
Two things, one is that I don't think any code that relies on this
behavior
Hey Thomas,
Good find! I thought there was something funny with finishTestAndReset, but
I wouldn't have spotted that :).
Replies inline:
On Fri May 04 22:08:03 GMT-400 2012, t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, found it: the issue in EditorTest is that the SimpleBar that the
setUserName is applied
HA!
If it's important enough, we should land it, but my impression is that it
isn't - so maybe it should die a quiet death.
On Fri May 04 14:13:42 GMT-400 2012, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:15 PM, rda...@google.com wrote:
Was debating whether this one
Hey Stephen,
Thanks for the info. So we should probably try and land it. From my quick
summary of the comment thread, it looks like there's disagreement on the
implementation. Can you or John save me some time and fill me in on the
history?
Rajeev
On Fri May 04 14:24:11 GMT-400 2012,
Thanks, Thomas. I'll take a look and see what's going on in our
environment. I wonder if it's an order-of-execution failure (implying that
there's statefulness between test runs that's not getting cleared).
On Sun Apr 29 07:17:38 GMT-400 2012, t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012/04/29 10:42:26,
are failing, we also run with FF3, which Thomas
most likely doesn't
On Mon Apr 30 11:10:32 GMT-400 2012, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com
wrote:
Thanks, Thomas. I'll take a look and see what's going on in our
environment. I wonder if it's an order-of-execution failure (implying that
there's
No worries, we're leaving it in :).
On Thu Apr 05 19:37:49 GMT-400 2012, John Porter Simons porte...@google.com
wrote:
It's handy, and we depend on it now. Definitely let me know if you remove
it so we can subclass Column.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, jlaba...@google.com wrote:
Leave it
Thanks!
On Fri Apr 06 10:52:30 GMT-400 2012, jlaba...@google.com wrote:
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1573803/https://www.google.com/url?sa=Dq=http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1573803/
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
We're gearing up for a GWT 2.5, so I'd either like to get this in, or close
the issue if it will never make it into a GWT release.
On Thu Apr 05 15:42:05 GMT-400 2012, scheg...@google.com wrote:
On 2012/04/05 19:39:54, rdayal wrote:
Ping. Is this patch dead, or do we still want to get this
Wow, you're right. Good catch. I'll follow up and see what's going on here..
On Thu Apr 05 17:02:10 GMT-400 2012, stephen.haber...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like this one is not going to be accepted.
It was actually already committed...if the decision was to not add it,
it needs to be
On Fri Mar 02 13:09:00 GMT-500 2012, cromwell...@google.com wrote:
On 2012/03/02 10:39:39, acleung wrote:
Are you missing the module files (.gwt.xml) that define this new
property?
Okay, thanks for checking this out. I'll run some more tests and report back
my results.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Miguel Méndez mmen...@google.com wrote:
Actually, I'm not sure that this is accurate. I just tried it out against
gwt-user and gwt-dev with natures and builders on in a
No, I don't think it will. I think the nature will be ignored. But let me
verify that before putting my foot in my mouth.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
And all the examples as well.
I thought one of you GPE guys told me that eclipse would barf if it saw
Sorry, I'm not sure what you're referring to here.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, does that mean we would still be stuck using only static methods?
I mean, it's not that far out to introduce a helper class to find
types.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010
!
Martin
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 18:30, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote:
If you uninstall GPE and leave the Scala plugin, does everything work?
What type of launch configuration are you using? Is it a Web Application
launch configuration?
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Martin Mauch
If you uninstall GPE and leave the Scala plugin, does everything work? What
type of launch configuration are you using? Is it a Web Application launch
configuration?
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Martin Mauch martin.ma...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm running into the same problem here.
Is there any
I missing?
FWIW, when launching from STS (Run as-Web Application), it launches a
Finder window and prompts me to select a WAR directory, which defaults
to target/extrack-0.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com
wrote:
The roo directory should
I wonder about the version of Roo that you're using. If you navigate down
into your STS folder, do you see a roo-related directory there? What is the
name of that directory? I think you need to be using the milestone version
of roo, which is located at sts dir/roo dir/bin/roo.{sh, bat}.
On Fri,
The roo directory should be roo-1.1.0.M1; so you should be using Roo
1.1.0.M1 to generate the app, as opposed to Roo 1.0.2.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote:
I wonder about the version of Roo that you're using. If you navigate down
into your STS folder, do
window and prompts me to select a WAR directory, which defaults
to target/extrack-0.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote:
The roo directory should be roo-1.1.0.M1; so you should be using Roo
1.1.0.M1 to generate the app, as opposed to Roo 1.0.2
Oh, also, did you enable AspectJ weaving (when STS asked you about this)?
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote:
[by the way, the second link you posted is broken]
Hm, this is odd. What actions are you taking (in the UI) when the RPC
exceptions happen
If that's the main use case, then I agree. The reason I brought it up was
because App Engine also does its own validation of the web.xml file, so it
seemed like we were doing double-work here.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
I think that would just make
I'm testing that if you try to use MessageTransport.executeRequestAsync(..)
and the server side of the network has closed its input stream, then an
exception will be thrown (an ExecutionException with an underlying cause of
IllegalStateException).
I don't think shutdownInput(..) would work,
Hi Jeff,
The method you've outlined below will work. Alternatively, you can blow away
everything google related in eclipse/dropins, and then unzip the RC2 archive
into the dropins directory. There is no dependency between the RC1 and RC2
plugins. That is, one does not have to be installed on top
Glad its working for you. I'll keep my eyes out for any other reports of
this.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Jeff Chimene jchim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rajeev,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote:
Hi Jeff,
The method you've outlined below will work
Ok, I did confirm it - check out the documentation on
DevModeUI.setStartupURLs - that defines the values in the map.
2009/11/24 Miguel Méndez mmen...@google.com
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:17 AM, rda...@google.com wrote:
Thanks for the review!
The Rietveld link does not seem to be working, but LGTM.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 5:18 PM, mmen...@google.com wrote:
Reviewers: rdayal, jat,
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/103813
Affected files:
M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/DevModeBase.java
Index:
Based on some recent discussions, we're going to make a change where we
modify the log levels depending on what UI the user is using. I'll send out
a CL for this shortly.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:07 PM, j...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/103812/diff/1/2
File
Happy to hear you're interested in hacking away on the plugin ;)
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Sam Gross colesb...@gmail.com wrote:
I opened issue 4124 (
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4124).
-Sam
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jason Parekh
Could we modify the hosted mode servlet so that it set the appropriate
no-cache headers on hosted.html? I've also run into this issue due to
browser caching.
Also, is this file re-generated every time hosted mode is started up? If
not, it definitely should be.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 1:26 PM,
Do you also need to apply the same fix for the launch configurations that
are generated by WebAppCreator?
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:10 PM, sco...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/68803/diff/1/3
File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/tools/WebAppCreator.java (right):
@Ray: To clarify, you need to add -d32 to the launch config though, right?
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:22 PM, cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2009/09/03 19:07:53, knorton wrote:
Ray,
Can you confirm that this patch fixes the Snow Leopard issue. It's the
same
patch as before with the typo
Hi,
As some of you may recall, there as an issue with debugging if you're using
JDK 1.6.0_14. You'll find that your breakpoints are not hit. More details on
the issue can be found here:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6862295
This issue has been recently fixed in JDK 1.6.0_16.
Nice job Freeland! You're an ant-master!
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Freeland Abbott fabb...@google.comwrote:
Well, if I've saved serious time by 10:30am, I'm happy indeed.
I've got another depends-on-your-hardware-but-I-saw-4min-saving (for
work-to-do rebuild of samples, so no gain if
Hey Freeland,
All of this sounds great. The build scripts have been in severe need of
tweaking for a while, and I'm glad that you've decided to tackle this tricky
issue. I've got a couple of comments about the ant test behavior.
If it is the case that a subsequent ant build after running ant
You probably have already considered this, but there are made-up locales in
the I18N tests (PigLatin, for example).
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:56 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
Does anyone use any made-up locales with GWT?
I am getting ready to commit some changes which, among other
FWIW, similar sorts of things were done in HorizontalSplitPanel and
DockPanel for the RTL work that was done as part of 1.5. Both of these
panels had a concept of LEFT or EAST in GWT 1.4, but the bidi-friendly
LINE_START and LINE_END contants were added in GWT 1.5.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:43
Hi Scott,
I'd like to you do a code review. To apply this patch, navigate to the the
root of the GWT 1.6 releases branch, and perform the following steps:
svn update -r4449
patch -p0 updatedWebAppCreatorWithProjectNameParam-r4449.patch
Description:
In the migration from ApplicationCreator to
WebAppCreator do its thing.
Sorry about the unnecessary traffic, and thanks for your input.
Rajeev
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote:
Hi Scott,
I'd like to you do a code review. To apply this patch, navigate to the the
root of the GWT 1.6 releases branch
Hey all,
Sorry to derail from the security question that is being debated, but I
wanted to mention some of my observations as I've been playing around with
the DynaTable2 sample.
If the -out directory is unspecified, the application fails to launch. I
think this is probably because it is looking
LGTM. If your document legitimately has a parsererror tag contained by a
body tag, you're really having a bad day.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Bob Vawter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a version that should allow a tag named parseerror, as long
as it's not contained by a body tag.
--
HTTPRequests no long POST instead of GET in some IE installs because of
incorrect XHR selection
should be
HTTPRequests no longer POST instead of GET in some IE installs because of
incorrect XHR selection
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:20 PM, John LaBanca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright, please
, Alex Rudnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Rajeev :)
Thanks for the quick review!
Responses inline.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Rajeev Dayal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DialogBox.java
199: Spelling: sceen -- screen
OK
243: @Overrides on an a method that implements
Hey Alex,
Thanks for putting this fix together. Comments below:
DialogBox.java
199: Spelling: sceen -- screen
243: @Overrides on an a method that implements an interface only works in
Java 1.6. While GWT on the the trunk currently support JDK 1.6, the code
base still compiles under GWT 1.5. If
Hey Alex,
Good job with this. Generally, looks good, with a bunch of nits (many
related to doc). I've mentioned them on a per-file basis below. If you could
take care of these nits (provided that you agree with them), go ahead and
commit; there's no need to iterate again on this patch unless you
I noticed the following issue (I did not review the entire patch):
About.java, line 35: Need the static keyword here; this should be a static
initializer, not an instance initializer.
Rajeev
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Scott Blum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:03
74 matches
Mail list logo
