On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:42 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be nice if there was a way to wrap Java methods with an opaque
Javascript function object so that you could pass them around in the native
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:59 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
The way you get a method reference in pure Java is via reflection, which
in general is not feasible though there have been some discussions
Worked for me. Did you use the XPI or XPCOM one?
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:11 PM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Comment by henr...@yahoo.fr:
The provided firefox plugin doesn't work for me (Linux x86_64).
I had to build a new firefox plugin from SVN.
For more information:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:26 PM, j...@google.com wrote:
- This class also appears to be doing runtime detection of
(document.evaluate). I think we
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:26 PM, j...@google.com wrote:
Thanks for digging into this -- it'll be helpful for a lot of
developers.
And sorry I've taken so long to get around to reviewing -- I've been
pretty swamped lately.
I'm going to ask Ray to come back and review some of the DOM details
PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Does IE8 still have non-standards compliant behaviour? I thought they
were supposed to introduce pretty strict standards compliance with IE8 (in
fact, some/all? legacy non-standard stuff is unavailable). Shouldn't IE8
extend DOMImplStandard
Kinda like with GCC, allow detection of constant values (i.e.
__builtin_constant_phttp://developer.apple.com/documentation/developertools/gcc-4.0.1/gcc/Other-Builtins.html).
This way, you could do something like
void addParameter (HashMap h, int size, String key, Object value)
{
if
operators.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Kinda like with GCC, allow detection of constant values (i.e.
__builtin_constant_p). This way, you could do something like
void addParameter (HashMap h, int size, String key, Object value
Wow that takes me back. I've stopped using my hotmail actively for already
about 2-3 years. I have my thunderbird on my desktop occassionally download
filter through all the spam for archival purposes. It just annoys me how
locked down it is. With gmail (not a plug, just the best web-based
There's a link on the website to download the xpi off the web. It does not
come with GWT trunk (it's in a branch). The gwt-dev-oophm.jar is built
when you build trunk.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:15 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Freeland Abbott
Is FF3.5 on the plan as well? Safari 4? Opera 10? Chrome? Are there
guidelines on when a browser version gets its own axis (i.e. HTML5 support)
or is it just when it feels appropriate or there are significant changes?
Shouldn't then we refactor the other browsers as well to be named after the
)
Thanks again,
joel.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops - missed some compile errors in the JSNI code. This is meant to be
applied over top of the previous patches. I've verified that if
getElementsByClassName is not used then no code related
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
I signed the CLA. Should be OK for now since I haven't started my job
yet.
I'm getting a HTTP SERVER 500 error creating the issue. I've tried both
upload.py the web interface.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Joel
Oh I missed the open issue. Please mark 3582 a duplicate.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
gwt-code-reviews
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Joel, you created an issue for this last month:
http://code.google.com/p
Is there a compelling reason that the default HTML generated by the GWT
project creator uses quirks mode instead of strict?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
track of all gwt-related patches.
Thanks,
joel.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok - got it to upload now.
http://codereview.appspot.com/44041/show
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.comwrote:
Oh I missed the open issue
.
If it is used, then there's only the overhead of performing the
implementation selection once on startup.
Thank you,
Vitali
On 4/18/09, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, what's the difference between DOMImplMozilla DOMImplMozillaOld
in terms of Firefox versions?
And what
need to test whether or not the implementations work write unit
tests.
Just for easy reference for myself, [].slice.call(nodeList, 0); is the code
to convert a nodelist into an array.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's my second attempt at the patch (2
Verified that that test case does indeed work using regular Java
serialization.
Main.java
---
import java.io.*;
public class Main
{
public static void main(String [] args) throws Exception
{
PipedOutputStream output = new PipedOutputStream();
PipedInputStream
You asked on your blog how to quote spaces in bash.
$@. bash understands that automatically does the right thing.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Matt Mastracci matt...@mastracci.comwrote:
Jason,
Thanks for the idea, it works well. I blogged the full instructions
below and included
. There are many js
libs out there so it's not hard to find the best way to do it fir the
various browsers...
On 18/04/2009, at 12:39 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Just my first attempt at adding some initial support for
getElementsByClassName. This is by no means tested
that checks
if(document.getElementsByClassName) exists, and if not, falls back to
document.evaluate.
-Ray
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have any suggestions regarding how to do the proper deferred
binding for the various versions? Should I just
AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
If I put the check in a static block, then the check is only done once
on startup, right? Is this acceptable, or is it frowned upon because
it adds a slight penalty to the startup even if the developer never
uses the function.
Something like,
static
getElementsByTagName missing from DOM class.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
diff --git a/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/DOM.java
think of
the DOM classes as semi-deprecated, in that many of the methods are
now subsumed by overlay types.
-Ray
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
getElementsByTagName missing from DOM class
I think the issue is broader from my understanding. The way I interpret the
thread is that if you wrap any DOM element with a GWT widget, you cannot
wrap any child DOM elements with GWT widgets (you can have nested DOM
elements, but you can only wrap 1 of those elements with a GWT widget).
On a
Well that changes the layout doesn't it. Depends what you want to do. If
you just want to add styles using Javascript, then use the DOM class. If
you actually want GWT widgets out of them, consider building the page using
GWT to begin with rather than trying to wrap existing HTML into GWT
Hey guys,
Rhino http://www.mozilla.org/rhino/ (one of Mozilla's javascript engines)
is written entirely in Java supports JS 1.7 if that helps. I'm sure
there's a parser component in there that can be extracted if the license is
compatible (MPL/GPL).
There's also GromJS
I'd just like to confirm that ToT is indeed broken right now. Same thing
happens when I try to run in hosted mode.
Getting
[java] Loading module 'module name'
[java][ERROR] Unexpected error while processing XML
[java] java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Found interface
Thanks, that fixed it.
Shouldn't you be on vacation :D?
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
Try an 'ant clean'
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd just like to confirm that ToT is indeed broken right now. Same thing
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:13 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
The attached patch, relative to trunk r5191, adds a new tests which fails
only in web mode and only for the JsniSuper case. It appears the problem
isn't directly related to super, but rather with making calls to private
[java]Scanning for additional dependencies:
file:/home/vlovich/workspace/sacred_heart/src/ece456/client/services/ResourceFactory.java
[java] Computing all possible rebind results for
'ece456.client.services.comm.rpc.StaffService'
[java] Rebinding
the crash, start commenting out lines of code in
the offending constructor until it no longer crashes. Or start refactoring
out pieces of the constructor into individual methods. By playing around,
you can probably figure out what's killing it.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Vitali Lovich
Hi,
I've encountered this pattern a few times, and think it would be great if
the RPC layer could be given a serializable object that is always
transferred on every RPC call.
In the GWT security documentation it says not to use cookies but instead
pass the session id manually on every RPC call,
Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
Okay, I think the issue might be your using trunk then. My patch jar was
for 1.6, and the commit you're commenting on here (r5077 r5078) were to
1.6. So I would not expect that to be fixed in trunk.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov
Hi,
Would it be possible to update the Eclipse classpath for gwt-user to be
platform agnostic?
Since Eclipse doesn't support variable project references, one way would be
to move .classpath to .classpath-template provide scripts that instrument
the .classpath file based on the environment
to not include a bundled browser or
container for an embedded browser, but an IPC connection to a browser plugin
of your choosing. This will allow the gwt-dev-oophm.jar file to be platform
agnostic.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible
[java] Compiling module com.google.gwt.benchmarks.viewer.ReportViewer
[java] #
[java] # An unexpected error has been detected by Java Runtime
Environment:
[java] #
[java] # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x0625665c, pid=17105, tid=3762477968
[java] #
[java] # Java VM: Java
I tried to use my own custom class that extends AsyncCallback in the async
interface, the compiler told me that the async version didn't match the
sync version.
For instance: public interface NoResultCallback extends
AsyncCallbackVoid. It's not really an issue, but I prefer to use the more
:36 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
[java] Compiling module com.google.gwt.benchmarks.viewer.ReportViewer
[java] #
[java] # An unexpected error has been detected by Java Runtime
Environment:
[java] #
[java] # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x0625665c, pid=17105, tid
/rebind/rpc/RemoteServiceAsyncValidator.java#185
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to use my own custom class that extends AsyncCallback in the async
interface, the compiler told me that the async version didn't match the
sync version
You can also has the hs_err for the 32-bit vm
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Ugggh... you want me to do all the work don't you :D
On a separate note 5094 compilation is broken (JUnitShell fails to
compile). In 5096 the problem is resolved.
On Fri
Sorry - forgot to mention that this happened when I tried to load the
hosted mode browser.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Might be related. Just set up my project to run under the regular
hosted mode w/ 32-bit JVM:
LoadPlugin: failed to initialize
Ok - i'm almost positive it is the same problem. I think the
loadplugin thing is a misdirection. The project appears to crash
compiling the code.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry - forgot to mention that this happened when I tried to load
Is there by any chance a public git repository (preferably one that
tracks trunk fairly closely)? git svn clone takes forever.
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
from a
personal webpage of mine...
http://www.shaftnet.org/~sinth/gwt-repo.tgz
Just download, unpack, checkout, and you should be g2g. git svn fetch isn't
so painful if you're nearly up to date already.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there by any
. This
configuration boots whether or not I have war/WEB-INF/lib/log4j-1.2.15.jar
in there.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.comwrote
This didn't fix my log4j issue, but there's a workaround:
adding -Dlog4j.ignoreTCL to the VM arguments fixes it.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Toby Reyelts to...@google.com wrote:
Overall, the change to treat server classes vs system classes separately,
such that system classes are API
on the server anyways.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
Vitali, can you remind me what your issue is?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
This didn't fix my log4j issue, but there's a workaround:
adding -Dlog4j.ignoreTCL
?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
og4j:ERROR A org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender object is not assignable
to a org.apache.log4j.Appender variable.
log4j:ERROR The class org.apache.log4j.Appender was loaded by
log4j:ERROR [sun.misc.launcher$appclassloa
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
If I don't put the log4j file into my WEB-INF/lib directory, then it's
fine. If it is put there, then it gets the conflicting version (regardless
What IDE are you using? I know there are issues with hot-swap between JDT
and Javac, so if you aren't using Eclipse you may have some hot-swap issues
(Eclipse and GWT both use JDT), which allows you to change some classes
without doing a refresh. That is independent of a refresh, which is
, 2009 8:13 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
What IDE are you using? I know there are issues with hot-swap between
JDT and Javac, so if you ar...
I'm seeing this problem again. Debugging in Eclipse, change code
hotswapping fails. I was wrong before though - the debugged code
I just tested the XPCOM plugin in FF3.1 got the following on startup:
00:00:21.687 [WARN] JSNI method '__defineStatic' returned a value of type
boolean but was declared void; it should not have returned a value at all
00:00:21.891 [WARN] JSNI method
I just tried the patch with trunk (5072) got
java.lang.NullPointerException
at sun.misc.MetaIndex.mayContain(MetaIndex.java:243)
at sun.misc.URLClassPath$JarLoader.getResource(URLClassPath.java:761)
at sun.misc.URLClassPath.getResource(URLClassPath.java:185)
at
I think it might be a good idea to also reference the -localWorkers flag. I
find that it cuts down on my startup time significantly (especially on my
desktop which is quad-core, but even on my dual-core laptop). With OOPHM I
find this to be particularly more annoying because the browser freezes
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:59 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it might be a good idea to also reference the -localWorkers flag.
I find that it cuts down on my startup time significantly (especially on my
Gotcha. I was stupid and for some reason thought XPCOM had something to do
with COM would be linux only. I've been getting no sleep thanks to this
databases project :(.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:29 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov
In the HTML file created by GWT's project creator, it puts the browser into
quirks mode by default.
Shouldn't it put in a standards compliant mode by default (AFAIK, doesn't
Google push for standards adoption) provide a comment saying that the user
should change it to quirks if they really
In the HTML file created by GWT's project creator, it puts the browser into
quirks mode by default.
Shouldn't it put in a standards compliant mode by default (AFAIK, doesn't
Google push for standards adoption) provide a comment saying that the user
should change it to quirks if they really
First major concern is that I got a ConcurrentModificationException when
iterating over a HashSet - this exception is completely meaningless in the
context of the browser (no threading). There's also not really any
meaningful message in the stack trace:
00:20:24.446 [ERROR] Uncaught exception
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
First major concern is that I got a ConcurrentModificationException when
iterating over a HashSet - this exception is completely meaningless
Sorry - it was my fault. I tracked it down. Within the listener, I was
unregistering it - stupid me.
Thanks for your help
Vitali
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope
got confused about what's going on.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
FWIW, the HandlerManager class introduced in 1.6 allows concurrent
mods. Because really you're not so silly to want to do that.
rjrjr
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov
HostedMode w/ OOPHM. rev 5009 if that helps.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
Is this using old-style GWTShell, or the new HostedMode?
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just wondering if this is a bug
a little more detail about what you're doing? What exact errors are you
seeing?
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
HostedMode w/ OOPHM. rev 5009 if that helps.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
Is this using old-style
Yeah, sorry if I haven't made that clear. I am using the patch that was
posted earlier that enables OOPHM for HostedMode. I'll try increasing the
log level.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:01 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com
I'm not 100% sure if this is related to the patch, but I'm seeing an issue
in the following situation:
Started a project in OOPHM HostedMode
Firefox 3.1 with plugin (version bumpbed to 3.1).
Put laptop to sleep
On wakeup, Firefox locks up.
Now some variables do change - the connection drops out
Oh I wasn't complaining. It's not an issue at all since FF has session
restore. Just wondering if it was a known issue if I should file a bug.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:08 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm
with to find the path to javac instead of looking at the javac on the path,
so I also had to do an update-alternatives for java.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:58 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't feel like you need
to be
updated to pull in the appropriate files from core/.
Otherwise, thanks keep up the amazing work.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
*S*orry meant to put this in my previous e-mail.
GWT OOPHM Plugin File name: npOOPHM.dll GWT OOPHM Plugin MIME Type
Description
Oh - one question I had is if there's a way to set the browser path?
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm getting the plugins from the gwt-oophm branch. The current install.rdf
says 3.0.*. I manually set it to 3.1.*.
Installs fine now in 3.1.
I just
:17 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh - one question I had is if there's a way to set the browser path?
Right now it just execs firefox URL, so if you set the PATH GWT sees to
include the Firefox you want to run
Would it be possible to have the annotation in the image bundle also include
the desired size, so that the GWT compiler can auto-scale the source image
to the appropriate size. That way we wouldn't have to maintain a high-res
version of the icons in addition to the scaled down version we want.
The OOPHM is registered in Firefox 3.0. Firefox 3.1 doesn't have it
registered (which used the XPCOM plugin instead of the Firefox one).
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
OK - I'll check as soon as I get the chance to work on my GWT project.
On Sun, Mar
*S*orry meant to put this in my previous e-mail.
GWT OOPHM Plugin File name: npOOPHM.dll GWT OOPHM Plugin MIME Type
Description Suffixes Enabled application/x-gwt-hosted-mode Plugin to allow
debugging of GWT applications in hosted mode.
Yes
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:13 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Yup - using Firefox. No warnings came up. I grabbed the XPCOM plugin
from the oophm branch it installed on both FF3.1 FF3.0. The one
OK - I'll check as soon as I get the chance to work on my GWT project.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:21 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
It said that the (firefox) plugin is incompatible with this version of
firefox
Wait - I'm confused. I am running with trunk I've been unable to get
OOPHM working. Thanks.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:50 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Allahbaksh Asadullah
a.allahba...@gmail.com wrote:
I am also using OOPHM from past one month. I
I've been using Vista x64. I'll try it out on Linux x64 once I get the
chance - I have to get some other stuff done before Monday.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:40 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
Wait - I'm confused
- that has a 64-bit browser 64-bit
JVM.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 9:36 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Vitali Lovich vlov...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been using Vista x64. I'll try it out on Linux x64 once I get the
chance - I have to get some other stuff done
Darn. Would there be any branch that does work?
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:27 PM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
[+John Tamplin, lead dev on OOPHM]
@John: Would you have any time to write a short wiki article about
82 matches
Mail list logo
