The helloMVP.zip file must have been using some of the old package
namespaces. I had to go through and fix every import. I also removed
the @Override annotations on interfaces so the project will compile on
1.5 JREs.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
This is something I'm really interested in as well Stephen.
-
How do you test these things? How does the next guy know
whether his event handler belongs in the view or the controller?
-
If the event doesn't change the view state, it doesn't belong in the
view. I would argue that clicking
If I was a guessing man, I'd say you're gettting into an infinite loop
with generics here and the SerializableTypeOracleBuilder.
ResultNodeT extends ResultNode? The ? is probably what is causing
this to break.
I'm the serializer, I'm making a serialization policy for ResultNodeT
extends
The contributing code doc lists Ant 1.7.0 as a minimum to build.
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html#contributingcode
On Nov 15, 12:08 pm, Hilco Wijbenga hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 November 2010 09:37, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010
Please review this at
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1149803/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
to include the new
caption stuff but I wanted to make sure I was going down the right
path before I jumped too far down that path.
On Nov 30, 11:29 am, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Thanks for the patch, Jeff. I'll try to look at it today.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Jeff Larsen
Personally, I'm a fan of having both. The default implementation can
be an abstract class but have that abstract class implement the
Activity interface. Developers will be making a conscious choice to
use the interface only knowing that they can introduce bugs.
--
bump.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
I'll hopefully have a chance to poke around at that code tonight and make a
decision then as to what I have time to implement.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:29 AM, larse...@gmail.com wrote:
I figured without the _en.properties file it wasn't picking up the _en
local. But after some more testing, it looks like you're right and it does
pick it up the _en local some places and not in others.
I'll pull the patch and submit a different issue.
--
I've developed a widget similar to decoratorpanel, except it facilitates
drag resizing and uses the layout panel architecture instead of the html
table layout of DecoratorPanel. I've got some more javadoc and tests to
write before I send it in for review (and possibly additions to showcase).
I am really, really excited about this.
+1 for aggressive Ruby style deprecation. It would be nice to get rid of the
FooListeners/SourcesFoo stuff that is just clutter now and has
been deprecated since 1.6
I have no problem with ButtonWidget naming style however. In eclipse you can
just type
*1) The ButtonCell(DefaultAppearance.Resources) constructor can be
confusing, I think it should be dropped.
*This constructor gives the impression that you are using the app-wide
Appearance where in fact you are using DefaultAppearance. This could lead to
the following confusing use case:
-
I thinks there is a misunderstanding. My proposal is just to not provide the
convenience constructor, so instead of:
new ButtonCell(resources);
You'd do:
new ButtonCell(new DefaultAppearance(resources));
Making it crystal-clear that your ButtonCell is using DefaultAppearance. The
On Saturday, February 26, 2011 9:14:37 PM UTC+1, Philippe Beaudoin wrote:
1) The ButtonCell(DefaultAppearance.Resources) constructor can be
confusing, I think it should be dropped.
2) Providing a custom DefaultAppearance.Resources lead to somewhat smelly
code.
-1 on both the above
(note:
at 2:23 PM, Philippe Beaudoin
philippe.beaud...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Jeff Larsen larse...@gmail.com wrote:
By forcing the user to do
new DefaultAppearance(Resource)
you're removing their ability to globally change the appearance. You've
now
I've got a patch for TabLayoutPanel which will allow for handling tabs that
scroll off the viewable area. For this I've got some horrifically ugly
images that I created with MSPaint. How do I include those in a patch? SVN
patches are just text files. I didn't spend any real time making these
Currently, Cell-backed Widgets redraw themselves every time a change is made.
This leads to degenerate performance where you create the widget, then call
4 setters, and the widget is rendered 5 times! I'm going to propose a
solution where we defer rendering and add a flush() command
In some instances, it would be nice to have LayoutPanel swap left and right.
I was thinking of something like adding a
private boolean bidi = false;
public void setWidgetLeftWidth(Widget child, double left, Unit leftUnit,
double width,
Unit widthUnit) {
assertIsChild(child);
:
The LayoutPanels' already swap properly in RTL locales, don't they?
http://gwt.google.com/samples/Showcase/Showcase.html?locale=ar_YE
http://gwt.google.com/samples/Showcase/Showcase.html?locale=en
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Jeff Larsen larse...@gmail.com wrote:
In some instances
Here are the images you'll need to get this to compile. Please don't release
with these images as they are hideous.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:51 PM, larse...@gmail.com wrote:
Reviewers: jlabanca, rjrjr, jgw,
Description:
I've fixed up the TabLayoutPanel to handle overflow. I've tested it both
would have to spend some more time
digging through that code to understand which one is the best fit.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Jeff Larsen larse...@gmail.com wrote:
Huh, I must be doing something wrong then in my test implementations
because layouts etc aren't being switched even though
I have a requirement that our users should be able to dynamically create
groups of rows inside a celltable.
For example, lets say a user was searching for books, and wanted to group by
Author. The Author column should be hidden (this isn't a problem), but there
should be a new row with a
John, can you elaborate what
- Expandable rows (really, a fully customizable table builder, probably
post GWT 2.3)
means?
I'm currently working on adding groupability to a copy of celltable and its
hierarchy. Will the fully customizale table builder be the solution I'm
looking for?
:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Jeff Larsen larse...@gmail.com wrote:
John, can you elaborate what
- Expandable rows (really, a fully customizable table builder,
probably post GWT 2.3)
means?
I'm currently working on adding groupability to a copy of celltable and
its hierarchy
Drag n Drop doesn't work in ie8 (expected). Perhaps use deferred binding to
get rid of the templates portion for all versions of ie9. Otherwise
those templates are pretty useless.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
@Bobv
One thing about RequestFactoryServlet is that it is somewhat difficult to
setup DI from containers such as Spring. I've been working on getting Spring
wired into the request factory framework and there are a bunch of examples,
but they all are pretty ugly. I think I've found a fairly
Created the issue as well and posted a link to the review.
Thanks!
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1448804/
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/list?cursor=6393updated=6393ts=1306206518
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Oh and I did test this to make sure it would with Spring. If you're
interested here is a link to my test project.
https://github.com/larsenje/SpringRequestFactoryExample
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 10:21:18 AM UTC-5, Thomas Broyer wrote:
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 3:29:35 PM UTC+2, Jeff Larsen wrote:
Wow, this is awesome.
+1
I haven't started digging into the code yet, but I would like to point out
a minor nit. In Firefox giving the scrollbars
@Bobv
Thanks for committing the previous change, and I've got one more change that
will make my, and probably a bunch of other people's, lives easier. By being
able to setup a DefaultLocator, it would stop me from having to copy/paste
@ServiceName(value=com.my.service.MyService *
Good riddance. I wish it was possible to do the same with IE versions 9.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
I had about an hour-hour and a half to play with this over the weekend and I
have to say it looks great. I have to ask though, is there a reason why
ColumnT,? doesn't contain the header and footer cell? It would sure make
it easier for things like reordering columns, hiding columns. Also it
I'm inclined to agree with Stephen here. No where else in GWT widgetry is
there a reference to database related things. I don't think this is a big
deal either, but it seems like a more application specific thing rather than
something that belongs inside GWT proper.
--
Does this mean something similar to RequestFactoryInterfaceValidator will
still need to be present? I ask because of
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6640 where
RequestFactoryInterfaceValidator seems to be getting in my way.
--
oops, I missed your first reply.
The server code won't accept the RequestFactory interface if it hasn't
been validated. A runtime error will occur, telling the user to run the
ValidationTool.
answers my question.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
With my minimal spare time right now I'm working on getting a new library
based around these Grids, adding more functionality.
What I've ended up doing is Extending DataGrid and maintaining my own List
of my own Column implementation. I have a bunch more data that lives in
Column, its size,
I'm doing trunk builds as well and I've been pushing files manually into my
repo. It is a PITA. It would be awesome if there was an ant target that you
could call after the build that would push the artifacts into your local
maven repo, probably appending -SNAPSHOT to the version.
Would you
I cancelled the review. I didn't realize this would cause fat slow apps.
Sorry about that.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
The general practice I've seen the GWT guys do for that is to do an initial
patch where they autoformat, then 2nd patch with the actual changes.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
How about a new dist-maven ant target that would create a maven bundle
(folder with the JARs and POMs laid out just like in a Maven repository)?
You would then run ant -Dgwt.version=2.4.0 dist dist-maven [1] instead of
just ant dist to build a release, and the generated maven bundle would be
Are you interested in an ant build target that pushes gwt builds into your
local repo? If so, I've got that setup on my machine locally, and with some
minor tweeks to it, I could use what you guys have for your push script.
I've found it useful for myself.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:13 PM, David
I know I would like it if the RequestFactory stuff was pushed into maven
central.
Don't make gwt-servlet into a real dependency, add it to the list of
dependencies in your plugin.
plugin
groupIdorg.bsc.maven/groupId
artifactIdmaven-processor-plugin/artifactId
eclipse run as webapp.
I just spent a few hours debugging problems with this around the office and
I know where the problem is now. I just haven't implemented the solution.
When you do both of these things (note I cut useless bits for clarity)
resource
For historical purposes, I figured out a working solution ( at least it
works for me) and posted it in the gwt-maven-plugin user group.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/codehaus-mojo-gwt-maven-plugin-users/Lha85tfYiz4
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
So it does!
Turns out if you import a maven project it just works the way you describe,
if you import the project as an eclipse project with a maven nature, it just
gives you errors in your pom and you have to decide how to deal with them.
--
To be blunt, Trying to get styling to work right in IE is somewhat of a
nightmare. Especially with the lack of css3 support.
There is a library out there that fixes some of the major headaches css3pie.
http://css3pie.com/
border-radius,
If ie8 and 9 didn't need a bunch of heavy lifting to get all of the
advantages of css3 styles, then you would probably be right, but
unfortunatetly, ie10 is going to be when ie finally starts meeting the
standards.
The point is semi-moot. I've started a project
All the issues marked patcheswelcome are reasonably hidden from view because
they do not show up as open anymore.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Is there a way to add patcheswelcome to the dropdown of the issue tracker? I
think people will not find these issues and know to work on them.
If I went to the issue tracker hoping to work on something where I would be
able to help out the gwt community, I would start looking at open issues. I
Switch to datagrid, that allows for horizontal scrolling.
I've got a local version of drag resizing for columns working locally for
the most part. I was waiting to pull a patch in until I figured out how to
get the sizes of all the columns first. The only way I could get drag
resizing of
I got my own (slightly buggy version) done in a weekend.
If you're not interested in waiting for me to submit either a patch or my
own grid component project, you can look at DialogBox for some tips on how
to hand the dragging events.
The components to build this are all there, they just
Do these classes only exist to test RequestFactory in jre mode or are they
used for something else as well?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Nevermind, I found the answer in the package-info.java file.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
This is probably a better discussion for the users group, but I'll answer it
anyway. I'm using HighCharts for some of my charting needs, you'll just need
to send the data down to the charting software and either poll for new data,
or implement server push/cometd and have it update the graph
Ray was in the process of reviewing a patch of mine before he left. Who
should take that over, or should I continue to try to work with Ray on that?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Escaping css3 is a PITA. I'm 100% on board.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
57 matches
Mail list logo
