The organised Left should not
be undermined of its power to manipulate perfomances that excert the
polemical energy to tranform discourses at the public realm
As I find here, this statement by Ranju is most probably meant to be
read as ..organized left ..should be and not as ..should not be.
For Bangaloreans
-- Forwarded message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/11/11
Subject: 12th Nov 2008, at Townhall, at 5 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], MANAS Bengal
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Natalie Benway [EMAIL PROTECTED],
prakash belawadi [EMAIL
it can be read as; The power of the organised left should not be undermined
which it uses to exert polemical energy in manipulatng dicourses at the
public realm.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 1:38 PM, venukm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The organised Left should not
be undermined of its power to
*Professor quota red face for Centre*
CHARU SUDAN KASTURI
*New Delhi, Nov. 10:* Less than one per cent of India's central university
professors are from the Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes, the latest
government data show.
The figure is just 10 per cent for teachers of all designations
Ranju,
Kindly make your point a bit clearer.
I can't find( why) the power of the organized left in manipulating
discourses should not be undermined,,,Instead, I find it as most
urgent in view of defending the polemical energy you mentioned.
Regards,
Venu
On Nov 11, 1:31 pm, ranju radha [EMAIL
Plz correct the line in my earlier post as
as polemical energy that exists outside the organized/official
left..
On Nov 11, 2:10 pm, venukm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ranju,
Kindly make your point a bit clearer.
I can't find( why) the power of the organized left in manipulating
discourses
Thanks
:)
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 5:52 PM, venukm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, that's what I suggested as a possible oversight in your typing.
Thanks for the response here.
Regards,
Venu.
On 11 Nov, 15:14, ranju radha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh yes.. u may be right. undermine or not
http://www.countercurrents.org/stephen061108.htm
*The United States Of India?*
*By Cynthia Stephen*
06 November, 2008
*Countercurrents.org*
*A*s the world watches with envy, America celebrates the election of its
first African-American President and celebrates a triumph of democracy. This
is
Ah, that's what I suggested as a possible oversight in your typing.
Thanks for the response here.
Regards,
Venu.
On 11 Nov, 15:14, ranju radha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh yes.. u may be right. undermine or not but one can't underestimate it.
that could be a better expression perhaps.
On
The country by definition belongs even to the Hindus (including the dalits)
I am not sure whther Dalits constitute ONLY Hindus or not. There could be
Hindus; as they could be christians, muslims, sikh, buddhist. This is
against a Gandhian way of looking at Dalits as 'harijans'. harijan can be
Intellectuals talking. Stay away, we, the commons can't engage in the
polemical polymorphism of Ranju's positions that are coherent to
congnitive but dual to the core, it succeeeds to evoke insignificant
potentialities of power and agency within the organised left's
subconcious. There by it is a
Indian woman stripped of her job for wearing nose stud in UK
http://www.rss.org:8080/New_RSS/News/NewsDetail.jsp
London: A Hindu worker at Heathrow Airport has lost her job for
wearing a tiny nose stud. Amrit Lalji has been sacked just because she
wore a small nose stud to workShe told The
not only organised left but also the Right whose jokes have been the bane of
our society
it s joke to be Indians
so, thanks
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Ramanan KP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Intellectuals talking. Stay away, we, the commons can't engage in the
polemical polymorphism of
13 matches
Mail list logo