[GROW] WGADOPTION - draft-spaghetti-grow-bcp-ext-comms - ENDS 04/08/2024 - Apr 8th 2024

Howdy WG folks! The authors of: draft-spaghetti-grow-bcp-ext-comms (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spaghetti-grow-bcp-ext-comms/) are interested in seeking WG Adoption for their new missive. The abstract is included here-in: "This document outlines a recommendation to the Internet

Re: [GROW] Peering API: Internet Draft submission

hope to meet some of you there. > > I was corrected off list by a different reader/wg-member... howdy this is JENNY not JEREMY. I hope to have new glasses (srsly) before the next meeting ;( > > Thanks! > > > > Jenny > > > > From: GROW on behalf of Christoph

Re: [GROW] Peering API: Internet Draft submission

Jeremy, you'll want to take a moment to join the mailing-list... else someone will have to keep accepting your mails in the mailman interface :) (delaying and unnecessarily gatekeeping your part of the conversation) thanks! -chris (also, thanks for the submission!) On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:32 

[GROW] TODO Items from F2F meeting

* note about BMP and TLV and how lovely the new world will be * note about WG Adoption for BGP Events in BMP * adoption call for loc-peer ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

[GROW] Meeting Tues Jul 25, 2023

Howdy GROW Folks! We have a face-to-face meeting scheduled for Tues 25th July 2023! If you are on the agenda to present please send your presentation material to grow-cha...@ietf.org no later than Monday July 24 2023 - 2100 Pacific time. As always, pdf or I reserve the right to rot13 the binary

Re: [GROW] Call for agenda items for GROW @ IETF 117

Hey there potential watchers of GROW meeting materials: "There is an agenda posted!" "If your name is on the agenda, we meet at 1500 Pacific Tues the 25th of July, slides are due 0900 Monday the 24th of July" - please mail them to grow-cha...@ietf.org If I missed your request for an agenda item

Re: [GROW] Call for agenda items for GROW @ IETF 117

howdy folks! The meeting is coming up in ~15-ish days (meeting week anyway) and we have 1 presentation on deck. If we don't get more topics we'll be stuck with Job talking about something 'fascinating'... and we do(not?) want that? :) Seriously though, if you have a topic you'd like to share or

Re: [GROW] Preparations for Today's Meeting

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 4:18 PM Job Snijders wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 03:16:24PM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:02 AM Christopher Morrow > christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Howdy folks! > > > If you have

Re: [GROW] Preparations for Today's Meeting

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:02 AM Christopher Morrow < christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Howdy folks! > If you have a presentation slot, ideally know this already... > Ideally you ALSO have prepared slides? > > If so, please email these supposed 'slides' to the chairs, p

[GROW] Preparations for Today's Meeting

Howdy folks! If you have a presentation slot, ideally know this already... Ideally you ALSO have prepared slides? If so, please email these supposed 'slides' to the chairs, prior to 2pm Eastern US time. As always PDF is preferred, if you send any other format ... it's going to be sad for all of

[GROW] [WG ADOPTION] draft-spaghetti-grow-nrtm-v4 - ENDS: 05/11/2022 (May 11, 2022)

Howdy WG Folks! Please take this note as the start of a WorkingGroup Adoption call for the subject draft, who's Abstract is contained here: "This document specifies a one-way synchronization protocol for Internet Routing Registry (IRR) records. The protocol allows instances of IRR

Re: [GROW] draft-spaghetti-grow-nrtm-v4-00

On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 2:23 PM Sasha Romijn wrote: > Hello all, > > At the last GROW session at IETF 113 I presented this draft, and we had > some good discussion about several aspects. To me it seemed the working > group supported at least the general direction and need for this. > > I would

[GROW] Status Check for: draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang

Folks, During our last meeting Camilo gave a presentation on: draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang I believe the authors' intention was to gauge whether or not the WG wanted to adopt this work item? So: 1) Was that the intent? 2) Did the group also understand that to be the case? 3) if 1 and 2 I'll

[GROW] Upcoming meeting note(s)

Howdy GROW Folks! For those in Vienna, happy sleeping time, see you in the 'morning'? :) For those not in Vienna (or not sleeping), but whom have presentations to present at the presentation time... (roughly 15 hrs from 'now') Please send your presentation materials along to:

Re: [GROW] [Sidrops] IXP Route Server question

> > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 9:26 PM Christopher Morrow < > christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:15 PM Robert Raszuk wrote: >> >>> Well I think the answer is - it depends. >>> >>> First IXP fa

Re: [GROW] [Sidrops] IXP Route Server question

examples you provided. (well in a bunch of cases it would, you COULD hook up some tomfoolery to get this to work, but... that sounds complex and prone to disaster) > Best, > R. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 9:05 PM Christopher Morrow < > christopher.

Re: [GROW] [Sidrops] IXP Route Server question

On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 2:36 PM Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) wrote: > This question has relevance to the ASPA method for route leak detection. > > Is it possible that an ISP AS A peers with a customer AS C via a > non-transparent IXP AS B? > IOW, the AS path in routes propagated by the ISP A for

Re: [GROW] draft-spaghetti-grow-nrtm-v4-00

Sasha, would you be able to present this draft and reasoning/etc for it's existence at the next f2f meeting? (ietf 113 in vienna in ~1 month or so) you can present virtually if travel to vienna is problematic (as it is for me). -chris co-chair-persona On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 7:05 AM Sasha Romijn

Re: [GROW] draft-lucente-grow-bmp-tlv-ebit

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 11:29 AM Paolo Lucente wrote: > > Dear WG colleagues, > > A brief email to say i have just refreshed > draft-lucente-grow-bmp-tlv-ebit to version -02. > > The draft expired already for some time, my bad, despite we authors did > receive some useful feedback at the end of

Re: [GROW] draft minutes. ietf 112

On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 12:25 PM tom petch wrote: > From: Christopher Morrow > Sent: 09 December 2021 15:42 > > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 5:07 AM tom petch ie...@btconnect.com>> wrote: > Sent: 09 November 2021 16:26 > To: grow@ietf.org<mailto:grow@ietf.org> > Su

Re: [GROW] draft minutes. ietf 112

On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 5:07 AM tom petch wrote: > Sent: 09 November 2021 16:26 > To: grow@ietf.org > Subject: [GROW] draft minutes. ietf 112 > > I place these in the ietf notes app: > > https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-112-grow > > pretty short so it shouldn't be hard to review. > > > > They

Re: [GROW] IRTF - An "interim" workshop on Evolving Routing Security in the Internet

odd that this didn't: 1) get sent to grow directly? 2) get sent to sidroops directly? On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:42 PM Warren Kumari wrote: > Hi there, > > I stumbled across an announcement of a workshop on Evolving Routing > Security in the Internet on the IRTF list: >

Re: [GROW] Upcoming Meeting Deadlines - IETF111

A kind reader noted that my math of timezones was WAY WAY OFF! :( I noted 'EASTERN' time, but of course... the meeting site shows times in 'local to the meeting not 'local to chris' :( how inconvenient! So, the meeting time is US-PACIFIC, not US-EASTERN ... see you all at the appropriate time! :)

Re: [GROW] Call for Agenda Items - IETF <###> Virtual Meeting!!

Reminder that there's a meeting coming... if there are topics please send them along :) On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:06 AM Christopher Morrow < christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Howdy Grow Folks! > Shortly (in about 8 weeks?) we'll be having a virtual meeting! > Please send

[GROW] Call for Agenda Items - IETF <###> Virtual Meeting!!

Howdy Grow Folks! Shortly (in about 8 weeks?) we'll be having a virtual meeting! Please send in some agenda topics for the meeting, if you have pending work and would like to chat about it, please let us know! If there's new work, please also send that to the list and perhaps plan on discussion

Re: [GROW] BGP Looking Glass Capability

(as normal netizen) On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 3:33 PM Randy Bush wrote: > > Place LG info in peeringdb.com & peeringdb's api. > > +1 > huh,I had thought this was already actually included in peeringdb? Looking Glass URL http://route-server.ip.att.net

Re: [GROW] Call for agenda items for GROW @ IETF 110

One last call for agenda items... we have 1 slot filled in 2 parts, we have ~45 mins that could be filled still :) On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 9:42 AM Job Snijders wrote: > > Dear all, > > I'd like to draw attention to our fairly empty agenda... please help fill it! > :-) > > Kind regards, > > GROW

Re: [GROW] Call for agenda items for GROW @ IETF 110

Note - we still have agenda time...we have 1 presentation on slate (bmp/yang/hackathon), but can always use another 3 more :) It looks like there's interest in starting at the 1-hour in mark: Normal start: 1300 UTC Proposed start; 1400 UTC because folk want to attend netconf for the first

Re: [GROW] IETF 109 Agenda Request

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 6:09 PM Christopher Morrow wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:15 AM Christopher Morrow > wrote: > > > > One presenter lost in the shuffle has come forward, and we even got slides! > > :) > > > > For the remaining presenters

Re: [GROW] IETF 109 Agenda Request

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:15 AM Christopher Morrow wrote: > > One presenter lost in the shuffle has come forward, and we even got slides! :) > > For the remaining presenters please send slides in the next ~16 hrs. > (so by ~0200 UTC Tuesday Nov 17) Ok,. the hour is getting nigh.

Re: [GROW] IETF 109 Agenda Request

One presenter lost in the shuffle has come forward, and we even got slides! :) For the remaining presenters please send slides in the next ~16 hrs. (so by ~0200 UTC Tuesday Nov 17) On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 4:43 PM Christopher Morrow wrote: > > Morning-ish! > Our agenda is uploaded:

Re: [GROW] IETF 109 Agenda Request

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:35 AM Christopher Morrow wrote: > > Howdy folks! > We have a meeting slot for IETF109 in BKK time... (2hrs tues 1600 BKK time) > We should have some agenda information from you all :) > > Please send your agenda topics to the list/chairs and we'll so

Re: [GROW] IETF 109 Agenda Request

yet, but :) if so... err, oops!) > > Thanks! > > BR, > > Yunan > > -Original Message- > From: GROW [mailto:grow-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 12:43 AM > To: ; grow@ietf.org > grow@ietf.org ; grow-...@

Re: [GROW] IETF 109 Agenda Request

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:35 AM Christopher Morrow wrote: > > Howdy folks! > We have a meeting slot for IETF109 in BKK time... (2hrs tues 1600 BKK time) > We should have some agenda information from you all :) > > Please send your agenda topics to the list/chairs and we'll so

Re: [GROW] Proposed updates to GROW charter

logies impact the global system GROW should keep aware and be able to offer relevant operational guidance to the community (and to the standards body) about how to stay safe in this uncertain world. -chris > Thanks, > Jim Uttaro > > -Original Message- > From: GROW

[GROW] IETF 109 Agenda Request

Howdy folks! We have a meeting slot for IETF109 in BKK time... (2hrs tues 1600 BKK time) We should have some agenda information from you all :) Please send your agenda topics to the list/chairs and we'll sort out the chaff :) -chris co-chair-persona

Re: [GROW] [WG ADOPTION]: draft-mcbride-grow-as-path-prepend-01 - ENDS 08/12/2020 (Aug 12)

Howdy WG Folks, It seems a bunch of folk would like to keep this conversation going as an adopted document. Could the authors please submit a renamed draft when they can? thanks! -chris co-chair-persona On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 1:17 PM Christopher Morrow wrote: > > Howdy WG Folks! >

Re: [GROW] Proposed updates to GROW charter

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:54 PM Alvaro Retana wrote: > > Job: > > Hi! > > > Thanks for addressing my comments! > > > I have just a couple more things: > > - The use of "Internet networks" doesn't sound right...perhaps "Internet- > connected networks"? Looking at the rest of the charter, I

Re: [GROW] [WG ADOPTION]: draft-mcbride-grow-as-path-prepend-01 - ENDS 08/12/2020 (Aug 12)

+ the real slim-shady. On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 5:17 PM Christopher Morrow wrote: > > Howdy WG Folks! > There's been significant chatter on-list about: > draft-mcbride-grow-as-path-prepend-01 > > Abstract: > "AS_Path prepending provides a tool to manipulate the

[GROW] [WG ADOPTION]: draft-mcbride-grow-as-path-prepend-01 - ENDS 08/12/2020 (Aug 12)

Howdy WG Folks! There's been significant chatter on-list about: draft-mcbride-grow-as-path-prepend-01 Abstract: "AS_Path prepending provides a tool to manipulate the BGP AS_Path attribute through prepending multiple entries of an AS. AS_Path prepend is used to deprioritize a route or

Re: [GROW] Proposed updates to GROW charter

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:55 AM Jeffrey Haas wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 09:38:03AM +0800, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > I'd say: "Sure, make a protobuf definition, provide a common toolset > > to parse to/from this, evangelize that to the networks you c

Re: [GROW] Proposed updates to GROW charter

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:51 AM Job Snijders wrote: > > Dear all, > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 07:21:13PM +, Job Snijders wrote: > > Milestones > > == > > > > Jan 2020 - "Support for Local RIB in BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP)" to IESG > > Feb 2020 - "BMP Peer Up Message Namespace" to

Re: [GROW] Agenda and Slides

ok, we now have all slides :) thanks everyone! On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:49 AM Christopher Morrow wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:47 PM Christopher Morrow > wrote: > > > > Howdy Grow Folks! > > The agenda > > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting

Re: [GROW] Agenda and Slides

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:47 PM Christopher Morrow wrote: > > Howdy Grow Folks! > The agenda > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/agenda-106-grow-01) This is still the agenda > has 4 presentations on deck, of which I see only 1 set of slides so far... > if

[GROW] Agenda and Slides

Howdy Grow Folks! The agenda (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/agenda-106-grow-01) has 4 presentations on deck, of which I see only 1 set of slides so far... if you are to present tomorrow ... please send slides 'now'. -chris co-chair (I'm looking at you Colin... directly)

Re: [GROW] BGP deaggregation

Where does it no longer make sense to deaggregate? Isn't that a bunch related to what problem the initial announcement is trying to solve? On Sun, Nov 3, 2019, 15:29 Robert Raszuk wrote: > Folks, > > Allow me to express a bit of a different view - this time from enterprise > perspective. > >

Re: [GROW] Request WG Adoption for draft-lucente-bmp-tlv

Whoops! I didn't realize that a chair didn't ask for this adoption call, but ... ok! cool, can the authors ship a renamed document into the fray please? :) On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:50 AM Marco Marzetti wrote: > > I do support adoption. > By adding TLVs we'd make the protocol more flexible and

Re: [GROW] Presentation materials for GROW @ IETF 105 meeting

Reminder for slides pls :) (we have 1 set... but more than 1 presentation planned... I will make slides for you if you do not provide, you may not like what I make) On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:03 PM Job Snijders wrote: > > Dear presenters, GROW, > > Please submit your slides for our Montreal

Re: [GROW] WG Adoption: draft-scudder-grow-bmp-peer-up - ENDS: 06-11-2019 (Jun 11)

ument. > > Kind regards, > > Job > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:13:45PM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > Howdy GROW folks, > > During the last meeting (or really the Thailand meeting) I believe > > John asked for a WG Adoption call for the draft named: > >

Re: [GROW] working group last call draft-ietf-grow-bmp-registries-change (ends 2019.06.12)

With overwhelmingly positive response, let's move this forward! I'll see about sending the IESG bits forward in the next day. Thanks! -chris On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 1:25 PM Job Snijders wrote: > > Dear GROW, > > We have a fairly short procedural document to consider for publication. > As

Re: [GROW] Adoption - new baby (draft) - draft-scudder-grow-bmp-peer-up

(I apparently did not add 'grow' to the initial mail, ugh) On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:12 AM Christopher Morrow wrote: > > With the call past due and folk generally in favor, could the authors > publish a replacemently named file at their convenience please? > > t

Re: [GROW] working group last call draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib (ends 2018.11.26)

Tim did this 6/7/2019 (june 7) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-04 huazzah! moving forward I think is ok now? -chris co-chairy On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 5:23 AM Tim Evens (tievens) wrote: > > Hi John, > > We will submit a revision update shortly that incorporates the

Re: [GROW] WG Adoption: draft-scudder-grow-bmp-peer-up - ENDS: 06-11-2019 (Jun 11)

equent publication.) > > -- Jeff > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 01:13:45PM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > Howdy GROW folks, > > During the last meeting (or really the Thailand meeting) I believe > > John asked for a WG Adoption call for the draft named: > &

Re: [GROW] working group last call draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out (ends 2018.11.26)

And it's headed north now (sorry for the delay) On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:25 AM Tim Evens (tievens) wrote: > > Done... This should be good to go. > > On 12/18/18, 5:55 PM, "Job Snijders" wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 01:44:21AM +, Tim Evens (tievens) wrote: > > Just to

[GROW] WG Adoption: draft-scudder-grow-bmp-peer-up - ENDS: 06-11-2019 (Jun 11)

Howdy GROW folks, During the last meeting (or really the Thailand meeting) I believe John asked for a WG Adoption call for the draft named: draft-scudder-grow-bmp-peer-up Abstract of which is: " RFC 7854, BMP, uses different message types for different purposes. Most of these are Type,

Re: [GROW] Minutes from GROW @ IETF 104, Prague

(I uploaded these to the meeting-material-site) On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 4:26 AM tom petch wrote: > > --- Original Message - > From: "Job Snijders" > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 1:25 PM > > > Dear all, > > > > Attached are the minutes for the GROW meeting at IETF 104 in Prague. I > > am

Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-chen-grow-enhanced-as-loop-detection-00.txt

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:21 AM Guyunan (Yunan Gu, IP Technology Research Dept. NW) wrote: > > > > > > From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:rob...@raszuk.net] > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 6:05 PM > To: Guyunan (Yunan Gu, IP Technology Research Dept. NW) > Cc: grow@ietf.org; Brian Dickson > Subject:

[GROW] WGLC: draft-ietf-grow-wkc-behavior - ENDS: Nov 27, 2018 (11/27/2018)

Howdy Grow Folks, This is the long awaited WGLC for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-wkc-behavior-00 The abstract of which is included here: "Well-Known BGP Communities are manipulated inconsistently by current implementations. This results in difficulties for operators. It

Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

> > > > On 05 Nov 2018, at 03:21, Christopher Morrow < > christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Sorry, I should have said this much earlier: "please send PDF only, if > you send PPT, I convert and you will (likely) suffer" > > > > want

Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 1:13 PM Guyunan (Yunan Gu, IP Technology Research Dept. NW) wrote: > > > Hi Chris, > > That one will do. > > > Terrific, uploaded to the materials site (and agenda adjusted) > Yunan > > *From: *Christopher Morrow > *To: *Guyunan (Yunan

Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

ussion tomorrow at the meeting, we > do hope to solicit more comments. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Yunan > > > > > > *From:* GROW [mailto:grow-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Guyunan (Yunan > Gu, IP Technology Research Dept. NW) > *Sen

Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

Randy, I'm going to use your IEPG slides, please bear in mind that we have 1hr, so your time slot is ... short. -chris On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 3:14 AM Randy Bush wrote: > grow may, or may not, be interested in our imc paper, also presented at > ripe77, on bgp communities as weapons. > >

Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

s, I’d like to get some minimal time (15-20 mins total) to provide an > update on the two drafts. > > Paolo > > > On 23 Oct 2018, at 22:40, Christopher Morrow < > christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Howdy Grow Folks... topics for discussion? &g

Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

Behalf Of *Guyunan (Yunan > Gu, IP Technology Research Dept. NW) > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 24, 2018 9:28 AM > *To:* Christopher Morrow ; grow@ietf.org > grow@ietf.org > *Cc:* ; > grow-...@tools.ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103 > > > > *Hi

Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

sounds good to me. On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:04 PM Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) < kotikalapudi.sri...@nist.gov> wrote: > Chris, > > >Please send along agenda requests as time permits... We are planning to > meet in Bangkok, unless no one can find agenda topics? :) > > If possible to accommodate,

Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

(15-20 mins total) to provide an > update on the two drafts. > > Paolo > > > On 23 Oct 2018, at 22:40, Christopher Morrow < > christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Howdy Grow Folks... topics for discussion? > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:16 PM

Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

4] to provide a routing > >security scheme suitable for ISPs to detect BGP route leaks within > >their own networks. > > > > > > *From:* GROW [mailto:grow-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Christopher > Morrow > *Sent:* 2018年10月24日 4:41 > *To:* grow@ietf.or

Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

Howdy Grow Folks... topics for discussion? On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:16 PM Christopher Morrow < christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Howdy GrowFolks: > > Please send along agenda requests as time permits... We are planning to > meet in Bangkok, unless no one can

[GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

Howdy GrowFolks: Please send along agenda requests as time permits... We are planning to meet in Bangkok, unless no one can find agenda topics? :) -chris ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Re: [GROW] Making BMP registries FCFS

yeeesh :) people are touchy this week :) On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 3:29 PM Randy Bush wrote: > > This seems like a sane plan ... I or Job can either unilaterally accept > > this, or ask for adoption... > > > > If there's enough immediate call to avoid the 2wk call for adoption I'd > be > > happy

Re: [GROW] Making BMP registries FCFS

Hello Grow Folks, This seems like a sane plan ... I or Job can either unilaterally accept this, or ask for adoption... If there's enough immediate call to avoid the 2wk call for adoption I'd be happy to just put it on the docket... On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 1:12 AM John Scudder wrote: > Hi

Re: [GROW] Discourage asdot+/asdot?

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 10:36 AM Job Snijders wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 01:26:41PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > > > On Aug 6, 2018, at 8:20 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > > > > > Job Snijders wrote on 06/08/2018 14:22> > > >> RFC 5396 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5396 described the

Re: [GROW] WG ADOPTION - draft-ss-grow-rpki-as-cone - ENDS: June 04, 2018

howdy grow folken, this adoption call seems to have ended up in the category of: "send renamed draft pls" so, aside from comments and possible discussion/changes there-in, let's get a re-named draft into the repository and then chat about comments :) On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:08 AM C

Re: [GROW] Presentation Materials for Meeting: Wed (tomorrow) July 18 2018

osted :) so, sure... we have 90 mins, 60 is full, 15 seems great! :) I'll update the agenda. > > > Thanks, > > Shunwan > > > > *From:* GROW [mailto:grow-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Christopher > Morrow > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 18, 2018 10:20 PM > *To:* ; g

Re: [GROW] Presentation Materials for Meeting: Wed (tomorrow) July 18 2018

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:35 PM Christopher Morrow < christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Howdy! > If you thought: "Great idea, I'll present something wonderful in the GROW > meeting this week!" and your name is not: "Dr Yunan Gu"... you owe > pr

[GROW] Presentation Materials for Meeting: Wed (tomorrow) July 18 2018

Howdy! If you thought: "Great idea, I'll present something wonderful in the GROW meeting this week!" and your name is not: "Dr Yunan Gu"... you owe presentation materials to the chairs now. If there is not a presentation in hand prior to 10am tomorrow morning I'll make one with ascii art... and

Re: [GROW] draft-ss-grow-rpki-as-cones-00

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 4:36 PM Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote: > Christopher Morrow wrote: > > (who hopes to one day have better answers for this than: "err, ask the > > customer / peer which irr they use?" > > congrats, you just stood on the trust mod

Re: [GROW] draft-ss-grow-rpki-as-cones-00

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:33 PM Job Snijders wrote: > > The signing AS is saying they created (and named) the list. This helps > resolve various issues, such as "does AS-STEALTH belong to AS41847 or to > AS8002"? > > wait, they signed this data and put it in their RPKI

[GROW] WG ADOPTION - draft-ss-grow-rpki-as-cone - ENDS: June 04, 2018

howdy GROW-WG denizens, please have a read through: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ss-grow-rpki-as-cones/ Abstract: "This document describes a way to define groups of Autonomous System numbers in RPKI [RFC6480]. We call them AS-Cones. AS-Cones provide a mechanism to be

Re: [GROW] draft-ss-grow-rpki-as-cones-00

It seems reasonable to ask for adoption... I'll send a note forthwith requesting input on same! On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 8:41 AM Job Snijders wrote: > Hi Chris, WG, > I’d like to ask for a call for working group adoption for this document. At the RIPE 76 Routing Working Group

Re: [GROW] A Simple BGP-based Mobile Routing System for the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network

olk ought to chime in then. > Thanks - Fred > > > > >in a 2547 sort of scenario (any of the vpn overlays really) the carrier > network doesn't have to know anything at all about the vpn content or > routes. > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Christopher

Re: [GROW] A Simple BGP-based Mobile Routing System for the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network

e vpn overlays really) the carrier network doesn't have to know anything at all about the vpn content or routes. > > > Thanks - Fred > > > > *From:* Christopher Morrow [mailto:christopher.mor...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, March 12, 2018 12:31 PM > *To:* Templin, Fr

Re: [GROW] A Simple BGP-based Mobile Routing System for the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network

(as a normal participant) On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote: > Hello, > > We have published a document that proposes BGP as the core of a mobile > routing > service for worldwide civil aviation in the Aeronautical > Telecommunications Network >

Re: [GROW] slot

This sounds like a good thing to hear about. On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:23 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > can we take ten minutes to discuss > > draft-ymbk-grow-wkc-behavior-00.txt > > randy > > ___ > GROW mailing list > GROW@ietf.org >

[GROW] Canceled Meeting

howdy! we have no presenters/presentations - so we're choosing to cancel. I'll follow up with the secretariat later this evening. ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Re: [GROW] Agenda Items for IETF100 - SIN ?

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > >> draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-clarify-00.txt > >> > > I don't know that GROW was listening to SIDROPS docstream, though it's > > certainly a good idea to keep abreast of possible changes coming to > > their world-view. > > this one

Re: [GROW] Agenda Items for IETF100 - SIN ?

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:31 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > > 10 days past... no replies, are there things to talk about? or should we > > give back our meeting slot? > > i would listen to any comments on the last rev of > > draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-clarify-00.txt > > or do i need to

Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut-12.txt

I believe this is scheduled for IESG Telechat 12/2/2017. (dec 2 2017) -chris On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:07 AM, wrote: > Hi all, > > Draft has been updated as per the latest comments and discussions on the > list. > > > A diff from the previous version is available at:

[GROW] Agenda Items for IETF100 - SIN ?

Howdy folks, Are there pending items that you would like to discuss? Would you like to put together a few slides and chat about your topic with the group? We'd love to hear your discussion topics... Please send topics along to grow-cha...@ietf.org with proposed time required. thanks! -chris

Re: [GROW] New Version Notification for draft-hilliard-grow-no-export-via-rs-00.txt

Do you all want to chat about this in singapore? or just keep discussing on-list? do you seek WG Adoption of the draft 'now' or would you like to chat about it a bit more first? On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Wolfgang Tremmel wrote: > > just reading your

Re: [GROW] working group last call draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut

pport moving ahead with publication. > > Jay B. > > > On 17-Aug-2017, Christopher Morrow writes: > > I agree the document is almost done, I think there's one commentor > waiting > > on Bruno to return from holidays to chat hi

Re: [GROW] working group last call draft-ietf-grow-bgp-session-culling

thanks folks! On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Will Hargrave wrote: > On 6 Sep 2017, at 15:29, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > >>> Obligatory: "Are there any IPR claims outstanding by the authors?" > >> I am not aware of any IPR. > > I am also not aware of any outstanding IPR claims. >

Re: [GROW] working group last call draft-ietf-grow-bgp-session-culling

Obligatory: "Are there any IPR claims outstanding by the authors?" On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Christopher Morrow < christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yup, thanks! > I'll send out a shepherds doc + request for publication ... in this coming > week. > >

Re: [GROW] working group last call draft-ietf-grow-bgp-session-culling

Yup, thanks! I'll send out a shepherds doc + request for publication ... in this coming week. On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Job Snijders <j...@ntt.net> wrote: > Hi all, > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 02:18:26PM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > Howdy folks, no one

Re: [GROW] working group last call draft-ietf-grow-bgp-session-culling

Howdy folks, no one spoke up upset about this... and there were even some supporters! I think we can close out the WGLC and send along the latest version to the IESG for review/etc. On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Theodore Baschak wrote: > > On Jul 24, 2017, at 10:13

Re: [GROW] working group last call draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut

I agree the document is almost done, I think there's one commentor waiting on Bruno to return from holidays to chat him up... please wait on jayb@att to say something in this thread before sending along. On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24,

Re: [GROW] WG Adoption call: draft-iops-grow-bgp-session-culling ENDS - 03/28/2017

+wg - because of course they are also interested. On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Christopher Morrow < christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks to the editors/authors and the reviewers. > > This adoption call seems to have gone well, let's get the authors to >

Re: [GROW] WGLC - draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage - ENDS 04/06/2017 (Apr 6th)

thanks much! this was what I expected to happen I'm also positive that people will turn knobs in the iesg review and the ietf last-call... :) On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Job Snijders <j...@ntt.net> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 09:26:21PM -0400, Christopher Morrow wro

Re: [GROW] WGLC - draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage - ENDS 04/06/2017 (Apr 6th)

I presume that the authors will come to closure on the additional/changed wording in 4.3.2, I'll start the publication request at this time noting consensus was reached. thanks! On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Adam Chappell wrote: > Yes, agreed - 4.3.2 using the UN

[GROW] WG Adoption call: draft-iops-grow-bgp-session-culling ENDS - 03/28/2017

howdy WG folk: Noting the large amount of discussion on this draft already on-list, I'd like to open a call for WG Adoption of this draft. The abstract: "This document outlines an approach to mitigate negative impact on networks resulting from maintenance activities. It includes guidance

  1   2   3   >