Hi list, I can reproduce a segmentation fault on HAProxy 1.8.21. No problem
with 1.8.20, 1.9.10 or 2.0.5. Is there anything else I can provide or test on
my environment?
--
haproxy.cfg:
...
frontend f
mode http
...
filter spoe engine modsecurity config
Thanks a lot man, i'll take a look at that ! really appreciate it :) i'll come
back to you if needed, but the help was great! :)
-Message d'origine-
De : Aleksandar Lazic [mailto:al-hapr...@none.at]
Envoyé : vendredi 23 août 2019 11:14
À : ANTHOINE Andy (EXT)
Cc : haproxy@formilux.org
Am 23-08-2019 02:04, schrieb andy.anthoine@opt.nc:
REALLY SORRY ABOUT THAT lo
I'll copy paste my bad :D
admin@sld-loadb-01-prd-cit:~$ curl -v -o /dev/null --max-time 5
--http1.0 http://10.154.2.29:8080/iws/ curl -v -o /dev/null --max-time
5 --http1.0
REALLY SORRY ABOUT THAT lo
I'll copy paste my bad :D
admin@sld-loadb-01-prd-cit:~$ curl -v -o /dev/null --max-time 5 --http1.0
http://10.154.2.29:8080/iws/ curl -v -o /dev/null --max-time 5 --http1.0
http://10.154.2.29:8080/eoc/login
-bash: curl: command not found
Ok, i'll separate
Hi.
Am 23-08-2019 01:43, schrieb andy.anthoine@opt.nc:
Hi,
I can't launch the command from the LB
I love screenshots! It's so easy to copy paste from them 8-/
do you have any other tool which you can use to check if the
connection is possible from LB to Backend?
nc?
telnet?
...?
But
Hi,
I can't launch the command from the LB
[cid:image001.png@01D5599F.9D2D6E10]
But from the server he is what i get
[root@sli-ecmapp2-prd ~]# curl -v -o /dev/null --max-time 5 --http1.0
http://10.154.2.29:8080/iws/ curl -v -o /dev/null --max-time 5 --http1.0
Am 23-08-2019 00:49, schrieb andy.anthoine@opt.nc:
Hi,
Ehhe not an external ip don't worry, or i would have deleted it hehe
No change, the problem seems to be there since before i m here, and
they now need it to be fixed
I don't see anything in particular in the logs, beside that kind
Hi,
Ehhe not an external ip don't worry, or i would have deleted it hehe
No change, the problem seems to be there since before i m here, and they now
need it to be fixed
I don't see anything in particular in the logs, beside that kind of thing which
is normal since the server is rebooted at
Hi.
Am 23-08-2019 00:28, schrieb andy.anthoine@opt.nc:
Hi,
I got that email on this site, not sure if it's still working etc
https://www.slideshare.net/haproxytech/haproxy-best-practice
I'm having some issue with a service (white page sometimes for a
webservice), and i m not totally sure
Hi,
I got that email on this site, not sure if it's still working etc
https://www.slideshare.net/haproxytech/haproxy-best-practice
I'm having some issue with a service (white page sometimes for a webservice),
and i m not totally sure it has anything to do with issue on my load balancer
(i'm
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 04:33:13PM +0200, Geoff Simmons wrote:
> On 8/22/19 14:40, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >
> >> I would suggest naming it something like fc_authority or
> >> fc_pp_authority, to be specific about where it came from.
>
> Since you used fc_pp_authority in an example further down,
On 8/22/19 14:40, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
>> I would suggest naming it something like fc_authority or
>> fc_pp_authority, to be specific about where it came from.
Since you used fc_pp_authority in an example further down, I'll take
that as the choice (unless somebody yells). Seems better to me,
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:36:00AM +0200, Geoff Simmons wrote:
> Spot on, that's the PR that I'm working on with my colleague Nils. Mine
> is a PR to his PR, if that makes any sense; after review (assuming he
> approves), the part about setting the authority TLV will go into the
> Varnish PR.
OK,
On 8/21/19 21:50, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Thus welcome to the list :-)
Thanks for the informative and welcoming response. %^)
> Just to know a bit more about your use case, thus your client speaks
> in clear to haproxy by prepending a PPv2 header and lets haproxy serve
> as a TLS "onloader" if
14 matches
Mail list logo
