On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 04:19:17PM -0400, David S wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
(...)
Otherwise your patch looks fine. Do you want me to merge it ? If so,
please could you provide a commit message with it ?
Thanks,
Willy
First, I'll
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 07:22:17PM -0700, tyju tiui wrote:
Hi,
I'm curious if anyone knows of any proxy protocol v2 implementations (client
or server)?
I've written my implementation against the spec
(http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.5/doc/proxy-protocol.txt) but I realize now
I have
Hi David,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 06:17:58PM -0400, David S wrote:
As a foundation for extending the proxy-protocol to include additional
information, I've implemented version 2 of the proxy protocol. As we
discussed in the Extending PROXY protocol for SSL thread, I made one
change
*/
+ unsigned int send_proxy_opts; /* PROXY protocol option flags */
Adding fields to struct connection is really not welcome, these ones should
remain as small as possible. I don't think there's anything in these
options
that cannot be deduced from the target. So we'd rather check the
connection's
; /* 0 = offset to (re)send from the
end, 0 = send all */
+ unsigned int send_proxy_opts; /* PROXY protocol option flags */
Adding fields to struct connection is really not welcome, these ones should
remain as small as possible. I don't think there's anything in these
options
support for
check-send-proxy-v2.
diff --git a/include/proto/connection.h b/include/proto/connection.h
index 8609f17..0db677e 100644
--- a/include/proto/connection.h
+++ b/include/proto/connection.h
@@ -41,7 +41,9 @@ int conn_fd_handler(int fd);
/* receive a PROXY protocol header over a connection
As a foundation for extending the proxy-protocol to include additional
information, I've implemented version 2 of the proxy protocol. As we
discussed in the Extending PROXY protocol for SSL thread, I made one
change to the protocol.
Version and Command are combined into one byte.
Length is now
Hi Shweta,
I have an active HTTP session serviced through the haproxy's virtual ip
and load balanced to one of the virtual servers. If the master haproxy
instance goes down in the middle of the active HTTP session, can the
backup haproxy instance that takes over the virtual ip ,know that
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Todd Lyons tly...@exim.org wrote:
Note that this probably marks the death of protocol v2 that nobody
implemented
yet, but that was supposed to be easier to parse...
Exim git HEAD has support (for the forthcoming 4.83 release) for Proxy
Protocol, when
has support (for the forthcoming 4.83 release) for Proxy
Protocol, when built with EXPERIMENTAL_PROXY. This includes support for
proxy protocols 1 and 2 both. (This is Exim as a server sat behind a
supported V2. So actually Exim can probably proudly claim to be the first
one to implement v2
Hi,
I have a question on the HA proxy's high availability provided by the
peers command,
I have two haproxy instances running - one as the master and another as the
backup through keepalived, Both are configured to listen on a virtual ip
and are servicing a couple of backend servers.
The same
Hi,
I'm curious if anyone knows of any proxy protocol v2 implementations (client or
server)?
I've written my implementation against the spec
(http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.5/doc/proxy-protocol.txt) but I realize now I
have no way to really validate my code.
Thanks!
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Note that this probably marks the death of protocol v2 that nobody
implemented
yet, but that was supposed to be easier to parse...
Exim git HEAD has support (for the forthcoming 4.83 release) for Proxy
Protocol, when built
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
(...)
We can also decide that we don't implement the extensions in v1 which
will motivate adoption for the new v2.
(...)
What's your opinion ?
Willy
I prefer to make the extension v2 only, mostly because I don't want to
Hi David,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 01:51:36PM -0400, David S wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
(...)
We can also decide that we don't implement the extensions in v1 which
will motivate adoption for the new v2.
(...)
What's your opinion ?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:54:19PM -0400, David S wrote:
Hello--
Part of my solution uses a non-HTTP protocol. My backend server need
L3/L4 information, so the PROXY protocol is a perfect fit. In addition
On 2014-04-15 at 12:13 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:54:19PM -0400, David S wrote:
[ SSL extensions for Proxy protocol ]
Please let me know your feedback.
[ many great improvements ]
Note that this probably marks the death of protocol v2 that nobody implemented
yet
Hi Phil,
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:46:05PM -0400, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2014-04-15 at 12:13 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:54:19PM -0400, David S wrote:
[ SSL extensions for Proxy protocol ]
Please let me know your feedback.
[ many great improvements ]
Note
Hi David,
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 01:03:37PM -0400, David S wrote:
(...)
This makes sense. With all the possible fields, I would prefer a more
machine friendly format. (I think that is your preference too.)
Actually yes.
How about a proxy protocol extension that can be appended
Hi David,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:54:19PM -0400, David S wrote:
Hello--
Part of my solution uses a non-HTTP protocol. My backend server need
L3/L4 information, so the PROXY protocol is a perfect fit. In addition to
TCP and IP addresses, my backend server needs information from
Hello--
Part of my solution uses a non-HTTP protocol. My backend server need
L3/L4 information, so the PROXY protocol is a perfect fit. In addition to
TCP and IP addresses, my backend server needs information from the client
SSL connection. So, I would like to extend the PROXY protocol
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:29:25PM +0200, Thomas Heil wrote:
Hi,
On 31.03.2014 10:45, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:57:09PM -0400, Rajat Chopra wrote:
Hi!
This solution very much solves the problem that I have been facing i.e.
large number of acl rules
- Original Message -
From: Steven Le Roux ste...@le-roux.info
To: Rajat Chopra rcho...@redhat.com
Cc: haproxy haproxy@formilux.org
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 4:04:55 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proxy: support use_backend with dynamic names
Hi !
Since I experienced the same behaviour
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:57:09PM -0400, Rajat Chopra wrote:
Hi!
This solution very much solves the problem that I have been facing i.e.
large number of acl rules causing latency in requests. Been in discussions
separately about it and today I got a chance to test out this patch. I
Hi,
On 31.03.2014 10:45, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:57:09PM -0400, Rajat Chopra wrote:
Hi!
This solution very much solves the problem that I have been facing i.e.
large number of acl rules causing latency in requests. Been in discussions
separately about it and
Le lundi 31 mars 2014 à 10h45, « Willy Tarreau » a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:57:09PM -0400, Rajat Chopra wrote:
Hi!
This solution very much solves the problem that I have been facing i.e.
large number of acl rules causing latency in requests. Been in discussions
separately
Hi !
Since I experienced the same behaviour with a similar configuration, don't
you have a huge startup time due to the ACL parsing ?
--
Steven Le Roux
Le 28 mars 2014 01:59, Rajat Chopra rcho...@redhat.com a écrit :
Hi!
This solution very much solves the problem that I have been facing
: [PATCH] proxy: support use_backend with dynamic names
Hi !
Since I experienced the same behaviour with a similar configuration, don't
you have a huge startup time due to the ACL parsing ?
--
Steven Le Roux
Le 28 mars 2014 01:59, Rajat Chopra rcho...@redhat.com a écrit :
Hi
Hi Rajat,
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 07:40:45PM -0400, Rajat Chopra wrote:
Haproxy 1.5 and earlier cut the lines in words around spaces, so above your
expression does not work because it's split in two. Just remove the space
before map and it will do exactly what you need. Also I think
not mean
there was no regression since, but I'd like to see the exact setup that is
exhibiting a handshake failure.
Here is the configuration I used for experimenting with proxy protocol with
SSL between two HAProxy servers. This configuration results in a handshake
failure between HAProxy1
verify required ca-file /etc/haproxy/keys/rootCA.pem send-proxy
#=== HAProxy 2 =
frontend h2
mode tcp
bind 10.10.10.242:443http://10.10.10.242:443 name example1
ssl crt /etc/haproxy/keys/haproxy2.pem verify required ca-file
/etc/haproxy/keys/rootCA.pem accept-proxy
default_backend b
Hi Rajat,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:57:09PM -0400, Rajat Chopra wrote:
Hi!
This solution very much solves the problem that I have been facing i.e.
large number of acl rules causing latency in requests. Been in discussions
separately about it and today I got a chance to test out this
Haproxy 1.5 and earlier cut the lines in words around spaces, so above your
expression does not work because it's split in two. Just remove the space
before map and it will do exactly what you need. Also I think it's better
to use a map than the plain header because this way you can ensure
Hi!
This solution very much solves the problem that I have been facing i.e.
large number of acl rules causing latency in requests. Been in discussions
separately about it and today I got a chance to test out this patch. I report
that it works great! I have been able to route 150k backends
Hi,
Basic question on send-proxy:
If the HAProxy server configuration has both SSL and send-proxy, should
the proxy protocol header be sent encrypted within the SSL packet?
Good question. In my opinion send_proxy should be cleartext, as a proxy
may or may not terminate SSL.
Imagine
On 26 March 2014 11:01, Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Basic question on send-proxy:
If the HAProxy server configuration has both SSL and send-proxy, should
the proxy protocol header be sent encrypted within the SSL packet?
Good question. In my opinion send_proxy should
Hi Bob,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:58:12PM -0400, Bob S wrote:
Basic question on send-proxy:
If the HAProxy server configuration has both SSL and send-proxy, should the
proxy protocol header be sent encrypted within the SSL packet? On
1.5-dev22, I see it being sent outside of the encrypted
Hi Bertrand,
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 04:18:44PM +0100, Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
Hi,
I did this patch for dev19 some time ago but I am still not sure whether
it is the best way to do it or not, and did not have the time to discuss
it since. As the latest changes broke it and forced me to
Basic question on send-proxy:
If the HAProxy server configuration has both SSL and send-proxy, should the
proxy protocol header be sent encrypted within the SSL packet? On
1.5-dev22, I see it being sent outside of the encrypted envelope. This
causes a handshake failure, even when connecting
].
Regards,
Lukas
[1] http://hg.nginx.org/nginx/rev/3a72b1805c52
[2] http://nginx.org/en/CHANGES
[3] http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_core_module.html#listen
[4] http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_core_module.html#variables
[5] https://chrislea.com/2014/03/20/using-proxy-protocol-nginx/
2001
From: Bertrand Jacquin bjacq...@exosec.fr
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:43:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] MEDIUM: proxy: support use_backend with dynamic names
We have a use case where we look up a customer ID in an HTTP header
and direct it to the corresponding server. This can easily be done
using
Hi Jim,
Please try it and report any issue / bug / success story.
(the wiki hosting the page above uses the patch, of course)
This is great, and mostly working for me on 1.4.5! Solves a big problem
of mine.However, is it not possible to use SNI at the same time?
When I configure nginx
Baptiste bedis9@... writes:
Please try it and report any issue / bug / success story.
(the wiki hosting the page above uses the patch, of course)
This is great, and mostly working for me on 1.4.5! Solves a big problem
of mine.However, is it not possible to use SNI at the same time?
When I
Hi Jim,
Thanks a lot for the feedback.
I know nginx devs are now working on an official patch:
https://twitter.com/mdounin/status/441705983581372417
Baptiste
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Jim Howell jimboco...@gmail.com wrote:
Baptiste bedis9@... writes:
Please try it and report any
laptop to
split traffic, for example, there's a ACL to let some special domains
go via remote proxy, and the default goes local proxy, I wonder is it
possible to replace local proxy with haproxy, so I could have:
server default local:1080 directly without creating a proxy by
another tool
I am running HAProxy version 1.5-dev16 to load balance traffic to a pair of web
servers. That part of the service is running great. I attempted to add a proxy
to serve the HTTP statistics page and am receiving 503 Service Unavailable
messages. (I also run a separate instance of HAProxy version
to reverse
proxy HTTP requests (/maps context) to the HTTPS Google maps API.
Network traces show empty data packets coming back from Google which
appear to be interpreted as 503/bad gateway by haproxy. I've modified
the haproxy config through various attempts to get this working
(commented out
Hi,
Le 20/02/2014 21:56, Steve Phillips a écrit :
That's corrrect, I want to talk https to the maps API. Thanks for the
response. Added ssl keyword and tried adding verify none as well but
now get a 404 back from google. The URL is valid as I'm testing with
curl on my haproxy host:
curl -I
That worked! Thank you so much for your help I've been working on
this off and on for a couple weeks.
Steve
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Cyril Bonté cyril.bo...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
Le 20/02/2014 21:56, Steve Phillips a écrit :
That's corrrect, I want to talk https to the maps
is running great. I attempted to add a
proxy to serve the HTTP statistics page and am receiving 503 Service
Unavailable messages. (I also run a separate instance of HAProxy version
1.4.8 on which the statistics page is working fine.) I have tried several
different configurations. Here is what gets
So you now owe Cyril a beer
(at least)
Baptiste
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Steve Phillips stw...@gmail.com wrote:
That worked! Thank you so much for your help I've been working on this
off and on for a couple weeks.
Steve
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Cyril Bonté
If you're ever in San Francisco, beer is on me:)
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
So you now owe Cyril a beer
(at least)
Baptiste
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Steve Phillips stw...@gmail.com wrote:
That worked! Thank you so much for your
- Original Message -
Hi Patrick,
I think your listen adminstats would be glad to have a 'stats enable'
statement!
Baptiste
Thanks but that does not fix it. I had that included at one point. I have been
through so many configurations
listen adminstats 0.0.0.0:8080
mode
Hi Patrick,
Le 21/02/2014 00:06, Patrick Landry a écrit :
Thanks but that does not fix it. I had that included at one point. I
have been through so many configurations
The solution is to upgrade to haproxy-1.5-dev22 or the current snapshot ;-)
There were regressions on the stats page in
- Original Message -
From: Cyril Bonté cyril.bo...@free.fr
To: Patrick Landry p...@louisiana.edu, Baptiste
bed...@gmail.com
Cc: HAProxy haproxy@formilux.org
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 5:32:25 PM
Subject: Re: 503 errors from HTTP statistics proxy
Hi Patrick,
Le 21/02/2014 00
Hi Russ,
Your last chance is the proxy-protocol:
http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.5/doc/proxy-protocol.txt
http://blog.exceliance.fr/haproxy/proxy-protocol/
That said, your proxy server might be compatible!
Baptiste
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Russ Daigle rdaigle...@yahoo.com wrote
Hi David,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:53:22PM -0500, David S wrote:
I want to use HAProxy to terminate my incoming SSL connections and forward
the messages to my server application. My challenge is that my
application needs information from the client certificates.
The Proxy Protocol
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 07:32:37PM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
On 29 January 2014 17:59, Ricardo ri...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is a bit mess situation but I can't configure Haproxy as a simple proxy.
The behaviour I'm looking for is an Haproxy listen in port 80, receiving
information from the client certificates.
The Proxy Protocol is one way that connection information can be
forwarded
from HAProxy to the receiver. I'm interested in extending the Proxy
Protocol to include client certificate information.
The Proxy Protocol documentation mentions that this has
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:19:34AM +, Neil wrote:
Another http proxy 'pound' passes on this information by added http headers
similar to x-forwarded-for.
It would,imho, be great to be able to take arbitary headers from client and
mangle and pass them on to backend servers or use in acls
:22PM -0500, David S wrote:
I want to use HAProxy to terminate my incoming SSL connections and
forward
the messages to my server application. My challenge is that my
application needs information from the client certificates.
The Proxy Protocol is one way that connection information can
Hi,
OK we discussed this with Emeric in the last few days and came up with a
solution closer from yours than from mine. What made me accept to change
my mind is to realize that many users don't see warnings at all. Probably
that the new shitty service managers which replace init are
Hi Lukas,
coming back to this old thread.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:48:12AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:52:32AM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hi Willy,
I sense we are not going to agree on this, but I'm posting my two cents
here anyway.
you're welcome :-)
Hello,
Is a bit mess situation but I can't configure Haproxy as a simple proxy.
The behaviour I'm looking for is an Haproxy listen in port 80, receiving
request to any url and forward each request to the appropiate domain trought
his own gateway.
Client 192.168.1.5 -- Haproxy 192.168.1.254
On 29 January 2014 17:59, Ricardo ri...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is a bit mess situation but I can't configure Haproxy as a simple proxy.
The behaviour I'm looking for is an Haproxy listen in port 80, receiving
request to any url and forward each request to the appropiate domain trought
I want to use HAProxy to terminate my incoming SSL connections and forward
the messages to my server application. My challenge is that my
application needs information from the client certificates.
The Proxy Protocol is one way that connection information can be forwarded
from HAProxy
Hello
Our HAProxy 1.5~dev21 setup looks like this:
client browser - haproxy1 - haproxy2 - web servers
- client browser sends as https.
- haproxy1 receives with mode tcp frontend, and sends using mode tcp backend
with send-proxy.
- haproxy2 receives with mode http frontend with ssl accept-proxy
- haproxy2 - web servers
- client browser sends as https.
- haproxy1 receives with mode tcp frontend, and sends using mode tcp backend
with send-proxy.
- haproxy2 receives with mode http frontend with ssl accept-proxy, and sends
using mode http backend to web servers.
The problem: when
, January 23, 2014 12:27
To: Oskar Liljeblad
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: tune.bufsize issue with send-proxy / accept-proxy SSL setup
Hi Oskar,
Are you using the latest git version?
If no, please give it a try, there may be a fix which apply to this case.
Baptiste
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12
To: Lauri-Alo Adamson; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: RE: HA-Proxy version 1.5-dev21-51437d2 2013/12/29 sticky ssl sessons
are not working in my environment
Hi,
My web servers contain text file wich contain name of that server.
Then put following line to web browser https://X.X.X.X/index.txt
Hi,
And this program generated a file rfc5077-output-1389174665--p-4431-
192.168.35.254.csv with following contet:
This output is extremely useful. What it says is that session id caching
works perfectly fine; as long as TLS ticket remains disabled on the client
side.
But when the client
Hi,
I have run into an issue that http download stop with busy low speed link
if haproxy doing reverse proxy for a file about 5MB.
The topo is like:
browser1-traffic shape box allow 128Kb
--haproxy--1Gb link---web server
|
browser2
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 06:07:21PM +0800, Delta Yeh wrote:
Hi,
I have run into an issue that http download stop with busy low speed link
if haproxy doing reverse proxy for a file about 5MB.
The topo is like:
browser1-traffic shape box allow 128Kb
--haproxy
@formilux.org
Subject: RE: HA-Proxy version 1.5-dev21-51437d2 2013/12/29 sticky ssl sessons
are not working in my environment
Hi,
My web servers contain text file wich contain name of that server.
Then put following line to web browser https://X.X.X.X/index.txt and
browse this page it displays
Hi,
My web servers contain text file wich contain name of that server.
Then put following line to web browser https://X.X.X.X/index.txt
and browse this page it displays server name One server file index.txt
contains server name etee-live1 and other server the file contains this
server name
Hi,
Have been wondering about if/how i could persist ssl sessions between
servers myself if i ever need it.
And found the concept of a SSL-session-id rather promising, then after
looking into how to use it and its reliability i found some articles
saying it might not be wise..
and try experiment ssl sessioon
affinity again.
Lauri-Alo Adamson
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Tribus [mailto:luky...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 11:41 PM
To: Lauri-Alo Adamson; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: RE: HA-Proxy version 1.5-dev21-51437d2 2013/12/29 sticky ssl
Hi,
Le 04/01/2014 20:09, Lauri-Alo Adamson a écrit :
Are you tcpdumping the frontent traffic?
If undestood correctly tcpdump displays encrypted traffic without necessary
information about affinity
Yes it does. This will allow to check the SSL session id in each
ClientHello/ServerHello
Subject: Re: HA-Proxy version 1.5-dev21-51437d2 2013/12/29 sticky ssl sessons
are not working in my environment
Hi,
Le 04/01/2014 20:09, Lauri-Alo Adamson a écrit :
Are you tcpdumping the frontent traffic?
If undestood correctly tcpdump displays encrypted traffic without
necessary information
Hi,
Hi, this question is silly, but I use haproxy even on my laptop to
split traffic, for example, there's a ACL to let some special domains
go via remote proxy, and the default goes local proxy, I wonder is it
possible to replace local proxy with haproxy, so I could have:
server default
Hi,
Hello ,
Many thanks for your replay. This thing is more stranger i downloaded and
compiled serverl versions of HAproxy 1.5.x.x and the result was alwase the
same
I experimented with following versions
At first i testing with
Hi,
Have been wondering about if/how i could persist ssl sessions between
servers myself if i ever need it.
And found the concept of a SSL-session-id rather promising, then after
looking into how to use it and its reliability i found some articles
saying it might not be wise..
Hello !
Problem description - then i access my two web servers through HA-Proxy version
1.5-dev21-51437d2 2013/12/29
it acts as round robin load balancing with out any ssl sticky sessions effect.
I would be very pleased if some could help to make sticky ssl sessions work
with out ssl offload
Hi,
Problem description – then i access my two web servers through HA-Proxy
version 1.5-dev21-51437d2 2013/12/29
it acts as round robin load balancing with out any ssl sticky sessions
effect. I would be very pleased if some could help to make sticky ssl
sessions work with out ssl offload
Hi,
Dumb question: what is the advantage of the proxy protocol for http (as
would be the case with varnish)? I assumed the proxy protocol was used
to enable load balancing of non-http protocols.
It can be useful even when you are load-balancing http. Perhaps you don't
want to touch the HTTP
Hi, this question is silly, but I use haproxy even on my laptop to
split traffic, for example, there's a ACL to let some special domains
go via remote proxy, and the default goes local proxy, I wonder is it
possible to replace local proxy with haproxy, so I could have:
server default local:1080
://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.5/src/snapshot/
All the time the result was same
Lauri-Alo Adamson
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Tribus [mailto:luky...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 5:35 PM
To: Lauri-Alo Adamson; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: RE: HA-Proxy version 1.5-dev21
On 12/30/2013 10:00 AM, Baptiste wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Emmanuel Hocdet m...@gandi.net wrote:
Hi,
I have made a patch to add proxy protocol to V arnish 3.0
you can find it at http://varnish.hocdet.net
Emmanuel
Brilliant!!!
I'm going to play with it soon :)
Dumb
Hi,
I have made a patch to add proxy protocol to Varnish 3.0
you can find it at http://varnish.hocdet.net
Emmanuel
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Emmanuel Hocdet m...@gandi.net wrote:
Hi,
I have made a patch to add proxy protocol to V arnish 3.0
you can find it at http://varnish.hocdet.net
Emmanuel
Brilliant!!!
I'm going to play with it soon :)
Baptiste
Hi,
I have made a patch to add proxy protocol to Varnish 3.0
you can find it at http://varnish.hocdet.net
Nice!
Btw, is there any patch available for apache? Google search
with the apache, haproxy, proxy keywords isn't very helpful,
as you can immagine ...
We need more exotic names
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 30.12.2013 19:00, Baptiste wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Emmanuel Hocdet m...@gandi.net wrote:
Hi,
I have made a patch to add proxy protocol to V arnish 3.0
you can find it at http://varnish.hocdet.net
Emmanuel
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 03:23:59AM +0100, Thomas Heil wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 30.12.2013 19:00, Baptiste wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Emmanuel Hocdet m...@gandi.net wrote:
Hi,
I have made a patch to add proxy protocol to V arnish
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:34:43AM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hi,
I have made a patch to add proxy protocol to Varnish 3.0
you can find it at http://varnish.hocdet.net
Nice!
Btw, is there any patch available for apache? Google search
with the apache, haproxy, proxy keywords isn't
HAProxy
and the server to know the issue.
Maybe your HTTP check URL is wrong or you need a Host header.
Baptiste
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 4:48 AM, jinge altman87...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I want use the haproxy PROXY protocol for our use case. To send our
clients
ip address
On 29 October 2013 08:30, Ge Jin altman87...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Baptiste!
Thanks for your reply, I found there is an incorrect configure in my
... email client? ;-)
Hi Charles-Antoine,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 06:14:17PM +0200, Charles-antoine Guillat-Guignard
wrote:
Hello,
After testing the proxy protocol feature to balance SMTP connections to
a Postfix
2.10 farm, I have to say it is doing nicely, using HAProxy 1.5-dev19.
Thank you for this very
altman87...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I want use the haproxy PROXY protocol for our use case. To send our clients
ip address to the peer haproxy. But after I config the send-proxy and
accept-proxy in the configuration. The web nevent be successful responsed.
The 503 error always
Hello,
After testing the proxy protocol feature to balance SMTP connections to
a Postfix
2.10 farm, I have to say it is doing nicely, using HAProxy 1.5-dev19.
Thank you for this very welcome feature.
But I was wondering, is the proxy protocol patch for the current stable
version
(1.4.24
Hi all!
I want use the haproxy PROXY protocol for our use case. To send our clients ip
address to the peer haproxy. But after I config the send-proxy and accept-proxy
in the configuration. The web nevent be successful responsed. The 503 error
always there.
the configure there
ha-L0.conf
801 - 900 of 1160 matches
Mail list logo
