HAproxy Error

Hi Team, We are in the process of using newer HAproxy version. Below is the scenario explained where we are stuck. * In RHEL 8.1 version, installed the latest version of the application. haproxy-1.8.15-6.el8_1.1.x86_64 # yum info haproxy Red Hat Update

RE: HAproxy Error

++Adding attachement Thank you in advance. Thanks, Bindushree D B From: D B, Bindushree (Cognizant) Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 5:08 PM To: haproxy@formilux.org Subject: HAproxy Error Importance: High Hi Team, We are in the process of using newer HAproxy version. Below is the scenario

Re: HAproxy Error

ср, 15 апр. 2020 г. в 16:41, : > Hi Team, > > > > We are in the process of using newer HAproxy version. > > Below is the scenario explained where we are stuck. > > > > · In RHEL 8.1 version, installed the latest version of the > application. > >

RE: HAproxy Error

Hi Team Let us know your availability to work on this. Thanks, Bindushree D B -Original Message- From: Aleksandar Lazic Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 6:06 PM To: D B, Bindushree (Cognizant) ; haproxy@formilux.org Subject: Re: HAproxy Error [External] Hi. On 15.04.20 13:39,

RE: [RFC] BUG/MEDIUM: Checks: support for HTTP health checks with POST and data corrupted by extra connection close

Hi Christopher, Thank you or updating the patch. I have seen the "http-check send" directive you have added in the patch and agree with your point that the syntax must be compatible with the rework in HTTP checks for H1/H2. As for the reg-test, sorry for my misinterpretation, I thought you

Sometimes worker process stops working.

Hi all, I'm using latest v2.1.4, with a multiple processes config(nbproc 4), everything works fine at the beginning.Meaning I can see 4 worker processes are using CPU at 70~80% by top command. The next day I noticed a drop of CPU usage on our monitoring system dashboard, then I logged in and

Re: Sometimes worker process stops working.

Hi, I dug a little more: start haproxy, got 5 processes: say 1000(master), 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004 When this happens, 1001/1002/1003 are using 70% CPU, and 1004 is ~1%. So I kiiled 1001/1002/1003, and try send requests to haproxy, surprisingly 1004 process is working! And if I use ab to send lots

RE: Question regarding increasing requests more than 32kb

Hi Alek, Since the mail looked jumbled I did not notice this, Please can you share the haproxy version and your config. (PFA of the Config File) haproxy -vv version : root@balqhaproxy01:/home/aravindv# haproxy -vv HA-Proxy version 1.6.3 2015/12/25 Copyright 2000-2015 Willy Tarreau Build

Re: HAproxy Error

Aleks, Ilya, Am 15.04.20 um 14:35 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic: > Useless disclaimer for a public mailing list! > Am 15.04.20 um 14:25 schrieb Илья Шипицин:> hello. > should we destroy this message ? Can we please stop complaining about these disclaimers? It adds more noise to the list than the

Re: Disclaimer in emails (was: Re: HAproxy Error)

Hello Tim, Aleks, I fully agree with everything Tim just said. Let's keep the list about haproxy. Lukas

Re: HAproxy Error

Hi. On 15.04.20 13:39, bindushree...@cognizant.com wrote: ++Adding attachement Thank you in advance. Thanks, Bindushree D B *From:* D B, Bindushree (Cognizant) *Sent:* Wednesday, April 15, 2020 5:08 PM *To:* haproxy@formilux.org *Subject:* HAproxy Error *Importance:* High Hi Team, We are

Disclaimer in emails (was: Re: HAproxy Error)

Aleks, Am 15.04.20 um 15:35 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic: >> Can we please stop complaining about these disclaimers? It adds more >> noise to the list than the disclaimers itself which are neatly tucked >> away at the end of the email. > > Nope, because I only add my complaining when I answer a

Re: HAproxy Error

On 15.04.20 14:57, Tim Düsterhus wrote: Aleks, Ilya, Am 15.04.20 um 14:35 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic: Useless disclaimer for a public mailing list! Am 15.04.20 um 14:25 schrieb Илья Шипицин:> hello. should we destroy this message ? Can we please stop complaining about these disclaimers? It

Re: Disclaimer in emails

On 15.04.20 16:28, Lukas Tribus wrote: Hello Tim, Aleks, I fully agree with everything Tim just said. Let's keep the list about haproxy. I agree with this line only. Lukas

Re: Disclaimer in emails

Ah, a hot subject :-) On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 05:37:39PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > On 15.04.20 16:28, Lukas Tribus wrote: > > Hello Tim, Aleks, > > > > I fully agree with everything Tim just said. > > > > Let's keep the list about haproxy. > > I agree with this line only. Well, I've

Re: interpreting haproxy 2.1 EOL statement

Hi guys, On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 02:11:34AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > On 03.03.20 15:28, Andrew McDermott wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > From the following: > > > >$ ~/git.haproxy.org/haproxy-2.1/haproxy -v > >HA-Proxy version 2.1.3-ce757f-13 2020/02/21 - https://haproxy.org/ > >